Disclosure GuidesThe questions that hold a report up, settled

London Reporting Academy·Disclosure guides

Understand the questions behind the standards.

Expert-written answers to the questions that slow reporting teams down. Each one opens with the conclusion, shows the requirement it rests on, explains the conditions and the judgement involved, and links to the disclosure cards the decision affects.

  • 478 guides published
  • Practitioner-written, technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Free to read

✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop

Not sure how to phrase the question? Describe the situation.

The assistant answers from reviewed LRA content, names the missing fact instead of inventing one, and points you to the guide or disclosure card the decision lands on. Your first two answers are free without signing in.

Try
2 free answers Automated · the LRA team is one click away

Answers from the published guides · 275 disclosure cards · 1,211 indexed reports

Disclosure guides

Filtered guides

Clear the filters and show every guide →

GRI·Explainer·Data and evidence

Stakeholder engagement for GRI materiality: methods, evidence and common mistakes

Stakeholder engagement is an evidence input to GRI materiality, not a vote that determines material topics. Existing HR, customer, supplier, community and grievance processes can be reused when they reach the relevant affected stakeholders, are meaningful and safe, generate traceable evidence, and are suitable for the impact being assessed.

Helps you decideWhich stakeholder evidence can be reused, where targeted engagement is necessary, and how the input affects the impact assessment.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Materiality and scope

GRI Impact Inventory: How to Build a Complete Long List of Impacts

Build the impact inventory before scoring. Start with the organisation’s activities, products, sites, workers, affected communities and business relationships; harvest evidence from due diligence, incidents, grievances, audits, stakeholder input, Sector Standards and external sources; then write one concrete impact statement per affected object and causal pathway.

Helps you decideGRI Impact Inventory: How to Build a Complete Long List of Impacts

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 27 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Data and evidence

GRI Content Index Review Checklist: 25 Checks before Publication

A final GRI content index review should test more than whether rows and page numbers exist. The reviewer should verify the statement of use, reporting period, GRI 1 edition, applicable Sector Standards, material-topic logic, disclosure and requirement-level completeness, exact locations, reasons for omission, assurance wording, cross-document consistency, accessibility and version control.

Helps you decideGRI Content Index Review Checklist: 25 Checks before Publication

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 22 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Metrics and methodologies

GRI 102 Scope 3 Reporting: Categories, Data Hierarchy and Supplier Estimates

GRI 102: Climate Change 2025 requires gross Scope 3 emissions to be reported by each of the 15 GHG Protocol categories, together with the consolidation approach, methods, assumptions, emission-factor sources and relevant base-year information. A first-year reporter should therefore screen every category, calculate material or high-priority categories with the best available data, use transparent estimates for the rest, and record a time-bound improvement plan.

Helps you decideGRI 102 Scope 3 Reporting: Categories, Data Hierarchy and Supplier Estimates

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 23 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Assurance and controls

How to Prepare a GRI Report for External Assurance

Prepare for external assurance as a controlled reporting project, not as a late review of the finished PDF. First define the subject matter, reporting boundary, criteria, assurance level and exclusions; then procure an independent, competent provider, map every assured disclosure to evidence, test data and narrative controls, run walkthroughs and a dry review, remediate findings, obtain appropriate management representations and align the final publication wording with the practitioner’s report.

Helps you decideHow to Prepare a GRI Report for External Assurance

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 21 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Omissions and claims

GRI Content Index: reporting routes, disclosure locations, material topics, Sector Standards, permitted omissions and a free template

A GRI content index is required for both reporting in accordance with and reporting with reference to the GRI Standards. It identifies the reporting route, the GRI Standards and disclosures used, and the exact locations of reported information.

Helps you decideWhat must appear in the index, how each row should point to evidence, and how omissions should be recorded.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 9 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Assurance and controls

Internal Controls for GRI Reporting: Data Owners, Reviewers and Approval Workflow

GRI does not prescribe one internal-control framework, but its reporting principles require information to be accurate, complete, comparable, timely and verifiable. Assign an owner, preparer, independent reviewer and accountable approver to each disclosure; retain source evidence, calculation logic, estimates, judgements and change records; and reconcile the report, Content Index and supporting pack.

Helps you decideInternal Controls for GRI Reporting: Data Owners, Reviewers and Approval Workflow

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Omissions and claims

Do You Need to Disclose Every Indicator in a GRI Topic Standard?

No. GRI does not require every disclosure in a Topic Standard or a minimum number of Topic Standard disclosures. For each material topic, report only the disclosures relevant to the organisation’s impacts and always report GRI 3-3.

Helps you decideDo You Need to Disclose Every Indicator in a GRI Topic Standard?

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Materiality and scope

GRI 3-3 Explained: How to Report the Management of Each Material Topic

For each material topic, GRI 3-3 requires a topic-specific explanation of the organisation’s impacts, its involvement in negative impacts, policies or commitments, actions, how effectiveness is tracked, results and lessons, and how stakeholder engagement informed the response. Generic ESG policy language is not enough.

Helps you decideGRI 3-3 Explained: How to Report the Management of Each Material Topic

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Materiality and scope

GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 — How Disclosures 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 Work Together

Disclosures 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 are not three independent narratives. Disclosure 3-1 explains how impacts were identified and prioritised; Disclosure 3-2 reports the resulting material-topic list and changes from the prior period; Disclosure 3-3 explains, for every listed topic, the impacts and how they are managed.

Helps you decideGRI 3: Material Topics 2021 — How Disclosures 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 Work Together

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 9 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Omissions and claims

GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021 — Complete Guide and Common Reporting Errors

To report in accordance with the GRI Standards, an organisation reports all 30 disclosures in GRI 2. Reasons for omission are not permitted for Disclosures 2-1 to 2-5; they may be used for later disclosures only when the GRI 1 conditions are met and the exact missing disclosure or requirement is identified in the Content Index.

Helps you decideGRI 2: General Disclosures 2021 — Complete Guide and Common Reporting Errors

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

GRI·Comparison·Materiality and scope

Impact Materiality vs Double Materiality

Impact materiality asks whether an organisation has significant actual or potential impacts on people or the environment. Double materiality adds a separate financial lens: a sustainability matter is material under ESRS when it is material from the impact perspective, the financial perspective, or both.

Helps you decideImpact Materiality vs Double Materiality

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 8 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Data and evidence

How to Prepare a GRI Report

To prepare a GRI report, define the reporting objective and governance, understand the organisation’s context, identify and assess impacts, determine material topics, apply relevant Sector and Topic Standards, collect controlled evidence, draft management approach and topic disclosures, complete the GRI content index, resolve omissions, perform technical QA, obtain approval, publish and notify GRI. The materiality process must drive disclosure selection; the content index should be built throughout the project, not at the end.

Helps you decideHow to Prepare a GRI Report

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 9 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Omissions and claims

What Are the GRI Standards?

The GRI Standards are a modular system for reporting an organisation’s impacts on the economy, environment and people, including human rights. Every organisation starts with the Universal Standards, uses any applicable Sector Standard to understand likely significant impacts, and selects relevant Topic Standard disclosures for its material topics.

Helps you decideWhat Are the GRI Standards?

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 8 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Materiality and scope

GRI Materiality Assessment

A GRI materiality assessment identifies an organisation’s actual and potential, positive and negative impacts on the economy, environment and people, assesses the significance of those impacts and prioritises the most significant impacts for reporting. The output is a defensible list of material topics — not a list of issues that stakeholders simply voted as important and not a financial-risk matrix.

Helps you decideGRI Materiality Assessment

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 9 min Read the guide →

GRI·Comparison·Framework interoperability

GRI vs ESRS vs IFRS S1 and S2

GRI, ESRS and IFRS S1/S2 are not interchangeable. GRI starts with an organisation’s most significant impacts on the economy, environment and people.

Helps you decideGRI vs ESRS vs IFRS S1 and S2

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 9 min Read the guide →

GRI·Comparison·Framework interoperability

GRI In Accordance vs With Reference: requirements, content indexes, statements of use, permitted omissions, GRI notification and reporting claims

“In accordance” is the comprehensive GRI reporting route and requires compliance with all nine requirements in GRI 1. “With reference” is a selective route for reporting specific GRI information and requires a content index, the prescribed with-reference statement and notification to GRI.

Helps you decideWhich reporting route supports the intended claim and what minimum process is required.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 8 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Omissions and claims

Can You Say 'GRI Compliant' or 'Aligned with GRI'? Claims to Use and Avoid

For a report, the safest and most accurate wording is the reporting status defined by GRI 1: either the organisation has reported in accordance with the GRI Standards, or it has reported selected information with reference to the GRI Standards. 'GRI compliant' is not the prescribed reporting status and can imply a broader conclusion than the evidence supports.

Helps you decideWhat exactly is being claimed: a reporting status, a limited method alignment, a service completion or an authorised partner/certification status?

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Omissions and claims

GRI Statement of Use Correct Wording Placement and Approval

The GRI statement of use must match the reporting option the organisation has actually earned, identify the reporting organisation, include the start and end dates of the reporting period, and appear in the GRI content index. For reporting in accordance, the statement is available only after all nine GRI 1 requirements have passed.

Helps you decideWhich reporting option is supportable, what organisation and period the statement covers, and whether the exact claim is publication-ready.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Omissions and claims

GRI 1 Foundation 2021 Complete Requirements Checklist for Reporting in Accordance

An organisation can state that it has reported in accordance with the GRI Standards only when all nine requirements in GRI 1 have been satisfied. The checklist is cumulative: applying the reporting principles, reporting GRI 2, determining material topics, reporting GRI 3, reporting relevant Topic Standard disclosures, using only permitted reasons for omission, publishing a complete GRI content index, inserting the prescribed statement of use and notifying GRI.

Helps you decideWhether every requirement has passed and the in-accordance statement can be released.

Affects GRI 3-1GRI 3-3

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Materiality and scope

What to Do When No GRI Topic Standard Covers a Material Topic

For an in-accordance report, the organisation must still report Disclosure 3-3 for every material topic, even where no GRI Topic Standard covers that topic. GRI 1 then recommends reporting additional information drawn from relevant Sector Standard recommendations, recognised external sources or disclosures developed by the organisation.

Helps you decideWhat to Do When No GRI Topic Standard Covers a Material Topic

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Materiality and scope

How to Select GRI Topic Standards and Relevant Disclosures

Select GRI Topic Standards by starting with the organisation's actual or potential impacts, not with a checklist of standard titles. For each material topic, identify one or more Topic Standards that contain disclosures capable of explaining those impacts, then test every candidate disclosure for relevance.

Helps you decideWhich Topic Standard disclosures are relevant to the organisation's impacts for each material topic.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Materiality and scope

How to Exclude a Likely Material Topic from a GRI Sector Standard

A likely material topic in a GRI Sector Standard is not automatically a material topic for every organisation. The organisation must review every topic in each applicable Sector Standard and apply its own impact assessment.

Helps you decideHow to Exclude a Likely Material Topic from a GRI Sector Standard

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Materiality and scope

GRI Sector Standards for Diversified Groups: When More Than One Standard Applies

A diversified group should not select one GRI Sector Standard solely because it matches the parent company’s headline industry, largest revenue stream or stock-exchange classification. GRI requires an organisation reporting in accordance to use the Sector Standards applicable to its sectors, and official GRI guidance confirms that all applicable Sector Standards should be used where the organisation has substantial activities in more than one covered sector.

Helps you decideGRI Sector Standards for Diversified Groups: When More Than One Standard Applies

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 11 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Materiality and scope

GRI Sector Standards: Applicability, Requirements and Common Mistakes

A GRI Sector Standard applies when the organisation's reporting boundary includes activities within that standard's defined sector scope. If an applicable Sector Standard is available, the organisation must use it when determining material topics and what to report for each material topic.

Helps you decideWhich Sector Standard or Standards apply and how their topic and disclosure lists affect the materiality process and Content Index.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 11 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Materiality and scope

GRI Materiality Assessment without Reliable Data: Expert Judgement, Assumptions and Uncertainty

A GRI materiality assessment does not have to stop because quantitative data are incomplete. GRI 3 allows significance to be assessed through quantitative and qualitative analysis and recognises that subjective judgement may be necessary.

Helps you decideGRI Materiality Assessment without Reliable Data: Expert Judgement, Assumptions and Uncertainty

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 18 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Materiality and scope

How Often Should a GRI Materiality Assessment Be Updated?

GRI does not prescribe a fixed rule that every organisation must repeat a full materiality assessment every year or every three years. It expects the organisation to identify and assess impacts on an ongoing basis and, in each reporting period, review the material topics from the previous period to account for changes in impacts and context.

Helps you decideHow Often Should a GRI Materiality Assessment Be Updated?

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 17 min Read the guide →

GRI·Comparison·Materiality and scope

Actual vs Potential Impacts under GRI: Definitions, Examples and Assessment Logic

An actual impact is an effect that the organisation has already had on the economy, environment or people, including human rights. A potential impact is an effect that could occur but has not yet occurred.

Helps you decideWhether harm has already occurred or could occur, and how incidents, near misses, controls and exposure evidence affect the assessment.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 11 min Read the guide →

Showing 30 of 66 published guides — filter by framework or problem above. Show every guide (66) →

How an LRA guide is built

Every answer follows the same discipline.

You should be able to stop reading after the first paragraph and still have what you came for. Everything below it exists so you can defend the answer to a reviewer.

  1. 01
    Answer

    The question is stated as a reporting team would ask it, and settled in the opening lines.

  2. 02
    Basis

    The official source and edition are named, and kept clearly apart from our reading of them.

  3. 03
    Judgement

    The points the standard leaves open are marked, with what a defensible position looks like.

  4. 04
    Action

    The answer links to the disclosures and evidence it affects, so a decision turns into fields to fill.

  • Practitioner-written, then technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Requirements kept separate from practice and interpretation
  • Stated update triggers for re-reading each answer

Coverage

Which frameworks have answers yet.

The guides tier is written framework by framework rather than thinly across all of them, so this says where the writing has actually reached. Disclosure cards, which cover the requirements themselves, run ahead of it.

Found the answer?

Turn the decision into a disclosure.

An answer settles what to do. The disclosure card is where it becomes data to collect, owners to name, evidence to retain and wording to draft — and when the whole reporting cycle is the problem, the programme walks it with a mentor on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

/en/knowledge-hub/disclosure-guides/ Wave 1 — English only