Disclosure GuidesThe questions that hold a report up, settled

London Reporting Academy·Disclosure guides

Understand the questions behind the standards.

Expert-written answers to the questions that slow reporting teams down. Each one opens with the conclusion, shows the requirement it rests on, explains the conditions and the judgement involved, and links to the disclosure cards the decision affects.

  • 478 guides published
  • Practitioner-written, technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Free to read

✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop

Not sure how to phrase the question? Describe the situation.

The assistant answers from reviewed LRA content, names the missing fact instead of inventing one, and points you to the guide or disclosure card the decision lands on. Your first two answers are free without signing in.

Try
2 free answers Automated · the LRA team is one click away

Answers from the published guides · 275 disclosure cards · 1,211 indexed reports

Disclosure guides

Data and evidence

Clear the filters and show every guide →

GRI·Explainer·Data and evidence

Stakeholder engagement for GRI materiality: methods, evidence and common mistakes

Stakeholder engagement is an evidence input to GRI materiality, not a vote that determines material topics. Existing HR, customer, supplier, community and grievance processes can be reused when they reach the relevant affected stakeholders, are meaningful and safe, generate traceable evidence, and are suitable for the impact being assessed.

Helps you decideWhich stakeholder evidence can be reused, where targeted engagement is necessary, and how the input affects the impact assessment.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Data and evidence

GRI Content Index Review Checklist: 25 Checks before Publication

A final GRI content index review should test more than whether rows and page numbers exist. The reviewer should verify the statement of use, reporting period, GRI 1 edition, applicable Sector Standards, material-topic logic, disclosure and requirement-level completeness, exact locations, reasons for omission, assurance wording, cross-document consistency, accessibility and version control.

Helps you decideGRI Content Index Review Checklist: 25 Checks before Publication

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 22 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Data and evidence

How to Prepare a GRI Report

To prepare a GRI report, define the reporting objective and governance, understand the organisation’s context, identify and assess impacts, determine material topics, apply relevant Sector and Topic Standards, collect controlled evidence, draft management approach and topic disclosures, complete the GRI content index, resolve omissions, perform technical QA, obtain approval, publish and notify GRI. The materiality process must drive disclosure selection; the content index should be built throughout the project, not at the end.

Helps you decideHow to Prepare a GRI Report

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 9 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Data and evidence

How to Prepare a GRI Report without a Dedicated ESG Team

An organisation does not need a dedicated ESG department to prepare a credible GRI report. It does need clear accountability, cross-functional data ownership, access to technical judgement, independent review and governance approval.

Helps you decideHow to Prepare a GRI Report without a Dedicated ESG Team

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 17 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Data and evidence

First GRI Report in 90 Days: What Is Realistic and What Must Wait

A credible first GRI output can be prepared in 90 days when scope is stable, source evidence is accessible, data owners respond and governance decisions are scheduled. The project can establish an impact inventory, approve material topics, prepare disclosures and a Content Index, and document gaps.

Helps you decideFirst GRI Report in 90 Days: What Is Realistic and What Must Wait

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 13 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Data and evidence

Using AI for GRI Reporting: What Can Be Automated and What Requires Human Judgement

AI can accelerate repeatable and reviewable tasks in GRI reporting: extracting candidate requirements from an approved source pack, proposing mappings, drafting data requests, comparing periods, checking consistency and assembling a first-pass Content Index. It should not make final decisions on impact identification, significance, material topics, stakeholder interpretation, reporting boundaries, legal prohibitions, confidentiality, evidence validity, assurance conclusions or the organisation's statement of use.

Helps you decidewhich GRI reporting tasks AI may draft or check, which stay with a named human, and what audit trail an AI-assisted step has to leave

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Data and evidence

Board Responsibilities for GRI Reporting: Material Topics, Oversight and Final Approval

Under GRI 2, the organisation reports the highest governance body's role in overseeing the management of impacts, how responsibilities are delegated and whether that body reviews and approves the reported information, including material topics. GRI 3 guidance says the highest governance body should review and approve the list of material topics; where no such body exists, senior executives should do so.

Helps you decidewhat the highest governance body has to approve itself, what it can delegate, and what evidences the release decision afterwards

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 8 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Data and evidence

GRI Evidence Pack: source documents, calculations, methodologies, data-owner confirmations, review controls, approvals, access and retention

A GRI evidence pack should allow an informed reviewer to trace every material public claim from the published wording or metric back to its original source, methodology, calculation, data-owner confirmation, review control and approval. GRI does not prescribe one software platform, folder structure or universal retention period.

Helps you decideWhat evidence must be retained, how it is classified and linked, who reviews it, and when it can be deleted or archived.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 14 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Data and evidence

GRI Source Register and Data Request

A practical GRI source register is a controlled row-level link between a disclosure requirement and the evidence used to report it. Each row should identify the exact requirement, owner, reporting boundary, source system, period, unit, methodology, evidence, reviewer, issue status and final publication location.

Helps you decideHow to structure one register that supports data collection, drafting, review, Content Index assembly, assurance and repeat reporting.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 17 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Data and evidence

Estimates in GRI Reporting

Estimates are acceptable in GRI reporting when they are the best usable information available, are sufficiently accurate for the disclosure's purpose, and do not create false precision or conceal a material gap. The organisation should identify estimated data, explain the method, assumptions and limitations, retain evidence and review controls, and restate comparatives where a changed method materially affects previously reported information.

Helps you decideWhether to use a defensible estimate, improve the method before publication, or apply an allowed reason for omission.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 18 min Read the guide →

GRI·Decision guide·Data and evidence

GRI Reporting Principles Explained: Accuracy, Balance, Completeness and Verifiability

GRI requires organisations reporting in accordance with the Standards to apply eight reporting principles: Accuracy, Balance, Clarity, Comparability, Completeness, Sustainability context, Timeliness and Verifiability. The principles should operate as a control framework across data collection, drafting, review and approval.

Helps you decideHow to turn the eight GRI reporting principles into drafting rules, evidence expectations and review controls.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 13 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Data and evidence

GRI 103 Energy Consumption and Reporting Boundaries: A Practical Data Guide

Build GRI 103 reporting from a controlled energy ledger, not an emissions spreadsheet. Record fuel, purchased energy, self-generation, energy sold and significant value-chain energy by site, source, activity, period and unit.

Helps you decideGRI 103 Energy Consumption and Reporting Boundaries: A Practical Data Guide

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 14 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Data and evidence

GRI 102: Climate Change 2025 - What Changes and How to Prepare for 2027

GRI 102: Climate Change 2025 is effective for reports or other materials published on or after 1 January 2027, with earlier adoption encouraged. It withdraws GRI 201-2 and GRI 305-1 to 305-5 for climate reporting and introduces ten disclosures covering mitigation and adaptation plans, just transition, targets and progress, gross Scope 1-3 emissions, intensity, removals and carbon credits.

Helps you decideWhich legacy climate disclosures change, what data and governance are newly needed, and how to prepare the 2026-2027 transition.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 9 min Read the guide →

GRI·Explainer·Data and evidence

GRI 101 Biodiversity Site and Supply-Chain Data: How to Prepare Location-Specific Evidence

Build a complete inventory of sites, material products and sourcing relationships, then identify the locations linked to the most significant biodiversity impacts. Use site-level data for own operations and the best available geographic precision for the supply chain.

Helps you decideGRI 101 Biodiversity Site and Supply-Chain Data: How to Prepare Location-Specific Evidence

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 16 min Read the guide →

GRI·Comparison·Data and evidence

Positive vs Negative Impacts in GRI Reporting: What Counts and How to Evidence It

Under GRI, an impact is an effect the organisation has or could have on the economy, environment or people through its activities or business relationships. A genuine positive impact therefore requires evidence of a beneficial effect or credible contribution to sustainable development - not merely expenditure, participation, a policy, a product launch or an output count.

Helps you decideIs the statement about an activity, output, outcome or effect on the economy, environment or people?

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

How an LRA guide is built

Every answer follows the same discipline.

You should be able to stop reading after the first paragraph and still have what you came for. Everything below it exists so you can defend the answer to a reviewer.

  1. 01
    Answer

    The question is stated as a reporting team would ask it, and settled in the opening lines.

  2. 02
    Basis

    The official source and edition are named, and kept clearly apart from our reading of them.

  3. 03
    Judgement

    The points the standard leaves open are marked, with what a defensible position looks like.

  4. 04
    Action

    The answer links to the disclosures and evidence it affects, so a decision turns into fields to fill.

  • Practitioner-written, then technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Requirements kept separate from practice and interpretation
  • Stated update triggers for re-reading each answer

Coverage

Which frameworks have answers yet.

The guides tier is written framework by framework rather than thinly across all of them, so this says where the writing has actually reached. Disclosure cards, which cover the requirements themselves, run ahead of it.

Found the answer?

Turn the decision into a disclosure.

An answer settles what to do. The disclosure card is where it becomes data to collect, owners to name, evidence to retain and wording to draft — and when the whole reporting cycle is the problem, the programme walks it with a mentor on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

/en/knowledge-hub/disclosure-guides/ Wave 1 — English only