GRI 2: General Disclosures·Disclosure GRI 2-12
Role of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of impacts
Practical guidance for preparing this disclosure. Use this card to identify the information to prepare, verify claims and organise supporting evidence. For exact requirements, always refer to the official GRI source.
Published passport
Last reviewed 2026-07-22
Reviewed by
Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn
Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert
GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert
15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures
Canary Wharf, London
LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by GRI
Standard
GRI 2: General Disclosures
Disclosure GRI 2-12
Last reviewed
2026-07-22
LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by GRI
Disclosure focus
Disclosure 2-12 requires an organization to describe the respective roles of its highest governance body and senior executives in developing, approving and updating the organization’s purpose, value or mission statements, strategies, policies and goals related to sustainable development.
The organization must also describe the role of the highest governance body in overseeing due diligence and other processes used to identify and manage the organization’s impacts on the economy, environment, and people. Due diligence is the process used to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how the organization addresses its actual and potential negative impacts.
The disclosure must explain whether and how the highest governance body engages with stakeholders to support these processes. Where stakeholder engagement is delegated, the organization can explain to whom it is delegated and how the resulting stakeholder feedback is provided to the highest governance body. Direct engagement by the highest governance body is not mandatory, but the organization must report the actual arrangement accurately.
The organization must describe how the highest governance body considers the outcomes of its due diligence and other impact-identification and management processes. This can include how outcomes are reviewed, discussed, challenged, approved, escalated or used to determine priorities and follow-up actions.
The organization must also describe the role of the highest governance body in reviewing the effectiveness of these due diligence and impact-management processes and report the frequency of this effectiveness review. The required frequency is not the general frequency of Board or committee meetings, but the frequency with which the effectiveness of the relevant processes is reviewed.
Senior executives are explicitly included in Disclosure 2-12-a. Disclosures 2-12-b and 2-12-c focus on the role of the highest governance body. Where committees or management bodies perform work on its behalf, the organization should explain the delegation, division of responsibilities and reporting route to the highest governance body.
The disclosure should not be limited only to impacts already classified as significant or material. It should describe governance oversight of the organization’s processes for identifying and managing impacts on the economy, environment, and people.
Reasons for omission are permitted for Disclosure 2-12. If a specified process or practice does not exist, the organization should report this explicitly. Where required information exists but cannot be reported, the organization must identify the affected requirement and provide an applicable reason for omission and the required explanation in its GRI content index.
This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official GRI source.
Before you start
Before you start
A quick mental checklist before you prepare this disclosure — tick each as you settle it.
Preparation
Key information to prepare
| Preparation field | What to capture | Evidence hint | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governance and executive roles | Describe the respective roles in developing, approving and updating purpose, value or mission statements, strategies, policies and goals related to sustainable development. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting governance and executive roles. | Company Secretariat / Governance |
| Oversight of due diligence | Describe how the highest governance body oversees due diligence and other impact-management processes. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting oversight of due diligence. | Company Secretariat / Governance |
| Stakeholder engagement | State whether and how the highest governance body engages with stakeholders, directly or through delegated arrangements. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting stakeholder engagement. | Company Secretariat / Governance |
| Consideration of outcomes | Explain how the highest governance body considers outcomes from the processes. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting consideration of outcomes. | Company Secretariat / Governance |
| Effectiveness review | Describe the highest governance body's role in reviewing process effectiveness. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting effectiveness review. | Company Secretariat / Governance |
| Frequency of effectiveness review | State how often that effectiveness review occurs. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting frequency of effectiveness review. | Company Secretariat / Governance |
How to prepare it
Request the data
Request the disclosure evidence
Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.
Provide the roles, process records and review evidence covering development and approval, due-diligence oversight, stakeholder engagement, consideration of outcomes, effectiveness review and its frequency.
Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined GRI terms and the scope described above.
Better request
Provide the roles, process records and review evidence covering development and approval, due-diligence oversight, stakeholder engagement, consideration of outcomes, effectiveness review and its frequency.
Draft your disclosure
Notes that turn data into a disclosure
LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.
Method note
Distinguish governance oversight from operational management and preserve the defined term due diligence.
Context note
Explain delegated committee or stakeholder-engagement arrangements and the reporting route to the highest governance body.
Download Centre
Preparation tools & forms
Professional preparation tools for GRI 2-12 — free with an LRA Community membership. Register once (it's free) and every download unlocks, together with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI Assistant.
Assurance readiness
For each claim, check the evidence
| Claim | Risk | Evidence to check |
|---|---|---|
| Governance and executive roles is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates governance and executive roles. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting governance and executive roles. |
| Oversight of due diligence is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates oversight of due diligence. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting oversight of due diligence. |
| Stakeholder engagement is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates stakeholder engagement. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting stakeholder engagement. |
| Consideration of outcomes is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates consideration of outcomes. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting consideration of outcomes. |
| Effectiveness review is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates effectiveness review. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting effectiveness review. |
| Frequency of effectiveness review is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates frequency of effectiveness review. | Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting frequency of effectiveness review. |
Evidence pack to prepare
Common reporting gaps
Ask the Study Studio AI Assistant about this disclosure
Get practical answers for your reporting context. Your first two answers are free — join LRA Community for free to continue without a limit.
Framework references
Relevant GRI requirements and related disclosures
Available framework references and nearby disclosures relevant to preparing this requirement.
GRI
GRI 2-12
within GRI 2: General Disclosures
Related & explore
More in GRI 2 → Browse full catalogue → Disclosure Library home → Search all disclosures →
Go deeper · GRI 2-12
Learn to prepare this disclosure end-to-end
This guide covers one disclosure. The GRI Standards Certified Training — taken as a bundle with an ESRS course — walks the full workflow: datapoints, evidence, drafting and assurance, with exercises on your own data.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.
Get your GRI 2-12 tools — free
Your preparation tools are free for LRA Community members and students. Register once (it's free) and your download starts right away — plus the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI Assistant.
You're in — your download is starting
Your file is downloading now. Your Community Cabinet — with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI Assistant — is ready too.
Open your Cabinet →