TNFD·Explainer·Data and evidence
A practical TNFD reporting pack should convert LEAP assessment work into controlled, disclosure-ready evidence. The minimum pack should include a scoping sheet, location register, dependency and impact register, risk and opportunity register, metrics matrix, evidence register and TNFD disclosure checklist.
Helps you decideWhich registers and checklists should be completed before drafting a first TNFD-aligned disclosure.
Reviewed 11 Aug 2026
6 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Toolkit·Data and evidence
A package-level toolkit containing 01_Sensitive_Location_Assessment_Register.csv; 02_Geospatial_Data_and_Map_QA_Register.csv; 03_Value_Chain_Prioritisation_and_Traceability_Register.csv; 04_Nature_Dependency_Register.csv; 05_Nature_Impact_and_State_of_Nature_Register.csv; 06_Evidence_and_Control_Register.csv; 07_Update_Trigger_Register.csv, with 5 related Knowledge Hub guides.
Helps you decideWhich package files and related guides belong to this toolkit?
Reviewed 11 Aug 2026
3 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
A TNFD supplier questionnaire should not ask every supplier for a full biodiversity assessment. Start with a small set of fields that identify the supplier, product or commodity, activity, origin and location confidence, material water or biodiversity interfaces, controls, incidents, evidence and data gaps.
Helps you decideWhich suppliers need which questions and evidence, at what granularity, for which decision and by when?
Reviewed 10 Aug 2026
13 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
The Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) provides a voluntary, market-led framework for reporting nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks and opportunities - DIROs. Its 14 recommended disclosures sit under four familiar pillars: governance, strategy, risk and impact management, and metrics and targets.
Helps you decideHow to structure the first assessment and report without mistaking the framework for a checklist or claiming more alignment than the evidence supports.
Reviewed 11 Aug 2026
9 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
A TNFD value-chain assessment can begin before every origin is fully traceable. Define relevant sectors, activities, products, commodities and upstream/downstream stages; then prioritise where dependency or impact pathways may be greatest using business volume or spend together with geography, ecological sensitivity, operational criticality, leverage and uncertainty.
Helps you decideWhich sectors, commodities, suppliers, geographies and downstream pathways require deeper assessment?
Reviewed 10 Aug 2026
10 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
ENCORE, IBAT and Aqueduct answer different screening questions. ENCORE indicates potential dependencies and pressures associated with sectors and economic activities.
Helps you decideWhich screening lens is suitable and what validation is needed?
Reviewed 10 Aug 2026
7 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
A TNFD nature-related opportunity should not be recorded merely because an activity sounds green. It should connect a material dependency, impact, risk or strategic need to an activity that can create positive outcomes for the organisation and nature.
Helps you decideIs the proposed activity a credible nature-related opportunity, what investment and safeguards are required, and what can be claimed publicly?
Reviewed 10 Aug 2026
13 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
LEAP is TNFD’s optional internal due-diligence approach for identifying and assessing nature-related issues. It begins with scoping, then uses four phases - Locate, Evaluate, Assess and Prepare - containing 16 components from L1 to P4.
Helps you decideHow to translate LEAP into project scope, data requests, phase deliverables, approval gates and disclosures.
Reviewed 11 Aug 2026
10 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
Companies should continue using TNFD in 2026, while treating the ISSB nature project as active but unfinished standard-setting. IFRS S1 already requires material information about nature-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect an entity's prospects.
Helps you decideTNFD and the ISSB Nature Project: What Companies Should Prepare for in 2026
Reviewed 11 Aug 2026
10 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Explainer·Data and evidence
A phased TNFD adoption is acceptable when it is transparent. A first-year report does not need to cover every activity, value-chain tier or all 14 recommended disclosures, but it should make clear what is in scope, which nature-related issues have been prioritised, how locations were considered, what evidence supports the disclosed dependencies, impacts, risks and opportunities, and how the organisation plans to expand the depth and breadth of reporting.
Helps you decideWhich nature-related issues, locations, disclosures and metrics are credible for year one, and what must be placed on the expansion roadmap.
Reviewed 11 Aug 2026
7 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
A credible TNFD-aligned report is built by first defining the reporting objective, materiality approach and assessment scope; then identifying priority interfaces with nature, evaluating dependencies and impacts, assessing risks and opportunities, and translating those findings into the 14 recommended disclosures. LEAP is a useful assessment approach but is not itself a mandatory alignment test.
Helps you decideHow to Prepare a TNFD-Aligned Report: Complete Step-by-Step Guide
Reviewed 11 Aug 2026
13 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
TNFD Governance A-C disclosure should show how nature-related issues enter real governance and decision-making. Governance A explains how the board or its committees are informed, which strategic, risk, budget, target, capital and reporting decisions they oversee, and how competence and remuneration are addressed.
Helps you decideWho is accountable, what information reaches each governance level, which decisions are affected, how rights-holder and stakeholder engagement informs the process, and what evidence supports the discl
Reviewed 10 Aug 2026
14 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
A bank can begin TNFD with a clearly stated subset of lending portfolios rather than waiting for exact locations for every borrower. The first-year process should combine financial exposure with sector and geography screening, then deepen analysis for priority borrowers, projects and collateral.
Helps you decideWhich exposures need deeper borrower/location analysis and credit action?
Reviewed 10 Aug 2026
6 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
A defensible TNFD map begins with controlled geospatial data lineage, not the final image. Each location should have a stable ID, link to the business activity or value-chain stage, geometry type, coordinate reference system, source, date, precision and confidence grade.
Helps you decideCan a reviewer reproduce where the location came from, how it was joined to nature data and why the public map uses its chosen granularity?
Reviewed 10 Aug 2026
10 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
TNFD work can start before every datapoint is primary or perfect, but the organisation should not disguise proxy or modelled information as measured fact. Primary evidence comes directly from operations, counterparties, sites or affected stakeholders.
Helps you decideIs the information fit for this decision and how should uncertainty be disclosed?
Reviewed 10 Aug 2026
7 min
Read the guide →
TNFD·Decision guide·Data and evidence
A TNFD Adopter is an organisation that publicly commits to make disclosures aligned with the final TNFD recommendations in its corporate reporting for a stated financial year. It is a commitment to report, not a TNFD certification, assurance conclusion, quality rating or proof that the organisation has disclosed all 14 recommended disclosures.
Helps you decideWhether the organisation is ready to publicly commit to a reporting year, and how to word the claim without overstatement.
Reviewed 11 Aug 2026
6 min
Read the guide →