Disclosure GuidesThe questions that hold a report up, settled

London Reporting Academy·Disclosure guides

Understand the questions behind the standards.

Expert-written answers to the questions that slow reporting teams down. Each one opens with the conclusion, shows the requirement it rests on, explains the conditions and the judgement involved, and links to the disclosure cards the decision affects.

  • 478 guides published
  • Practitioner-written, technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Free to read

✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop

Not sure how to phrase the question? Describe the situation.

The assistant answers from reviewed LRA content, names the missing fact instead of inventing one, and points you to the guide or disclosure card the decision lands on. Your first two answers are free without signing in.

Try
2 free answers Automated · the LRA team is one click away

Answers from the published guides · 275 disclosure cards · 1,211 indexed reports

Disclosure guides

Framework interoperability

Clear the filters and show every guide →

ESRS·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

ESRS and the EU Taxonomy: How to Connect Eligibility, Alignment and Sustainability Disclosures

ESRS and EU Taxonomy disclosures should use a connected activity, financial and evidence model, but they are not substitutes. The Taxonomy classifies economic activities and measures the proportion of turnover, CapEx and OpEx - or the relevant financial-undertaking KPIs - associated with Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned activities.

Helps you decideHow to share activity and financial data while maintaining separate Taxonomy eligibility/alignment tests and ESRS materiality/disclosure requirements.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 15 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

ESRS Omissions and Confidential Information: Commercial Prejudice, Trade Secrets and Privacy

ESRS permits omission only for defined categories and conditions: exceptional serious commercial prejudice; qualifying trade secrets; classified information; or information protected by Union or national law or needed to safeguard the privacy or security of a person or legal entity. Before omitting, test whether aggregation, anonymisation or limited redaction can meet the disclosure objective.

Helps you decideESRS Omissions and Confidential Information: Commercial Prejudice, Trade Secrets and Privacy

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 13 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Comparison·Framework interoperability

ESRS vs IFRS S1 and IFRS S2: Key Differences in Materiality, Scope and Reporting

ESRS and IFRS S1/S2 can be implemented through one coordinated reporting programme, but they answer different primary questions. ESRS applies double materiality: material impacts on people and the environment, and material sustainability-related risks and opportunities for the undertaking.

Helps you decideHow to share process and data while preserving separate materiality, boundary, presentation, compliance and assurance conclusions.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 15 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Comparison·Framework interoperability

ESRS vs GRI: Double Materiality, Impact Reporting and Practical Interoperability

ESRS and GRI can share substantial evidence, data and process infrastructure, but they are not interchangeable. ESRS is an EU legal reporting standard built around double materiality: impact materiality and financial materiality.

Helps you decideWhich evidence can be reused, which tests and outputs remain framework-specific, and what combined-report architecture is defensible.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 14 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Comparison·Framework interoperability

ESRS and CSDDD: Reporting, Due Diligence and Value Chain Responsibilities Compared

ESRS and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) are connected, but they are not interchangeable. ESRS determines what material sustainability information an undertaking must disclose.

Helps you decideWhich evidence and processes can be shared, and which conclusions, approvals and public claims must remain instrument-specific?

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 14 min Read the guide →

How an LRA guide is built

Every answer follows the same discipline.

You should be able to stop reading after the first paragraph and still have what you came for. Everything below it exists so you can defend the answer to a reviewer.

  1. 01
    Answer

    The question is stated as a reporting team would ask it, and settled in the opening lines.

  2. 02
    Basis

    The official source and edition are named, and kept clearly apart from our reading of them.

  3. 03
    Judgement

    The points the standard leaves open are marked, with what a defensible position looks like.

  4. 04
    Action

    The answer links to the disclosures and evidence it affects, so a decision turns into fields to fill.

  • Practitioner-written, then technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Requirements kept separate from practice and interpretation
  • Stated update triggers for re-reading each answer

Coverage

Which frameworks have answers yet.

The guides tier is written framework by framework rather than thinly across all of them, so this says where the writing has actually reached. Disclosure cards, which cover the requirements themselves, run ahead of it.

Found the answer?

Turn the decision into a disclosure.

An answer settles what to do. The disclosure card is where it becomes data to collect, owners to name, evidence to retain and wording to draft — and when the whole reporting cycle is the problem, the programme walks it with a mentor on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

/en/knowledge-hub/disclosure-guides/ Wave 1 — English only