Disclosure guides

Understand the questions behind the standards.

How Disclosure Guides work

London Reporting Academy·Disclosure guides

Understand the questions behind the standards.

Expert-written answers to the questions that slow reporting teams down. Each one opens with the conclusion, shows the requirement it rests on, explains the conditions and the judgement involved, and links to the disclosure cards the decision affects.

  • 478 guides published
  • Practitioner-written, technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Free to read

Watch the walkthrough

How an LRA Disclosure Guide helps: use the GRI omissions example to check the rule, understand the required explanation and prepare the disclosure using the relevant card. GRI 2-1 does not permit omissions.
Find your question

✓ Knowledge Hub AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop

Not sure how to phrase the question? Describe the situation.

It answers from this page, and reaches into the linked disclosure cards when your question is about the standard itself.

Try
Automated · the LRA team is one click away

Answers from the published guides · 275 disclosure cards · 1,211 indexed reports

Disclosure guides

Framework interoperability

Clear the filters and show every guide →

UK S2·Comparison·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S2 and Transition Plan Policy Standard Disclosures vs a Mandatory Plan Requirement

UK SRS S2 does not itself require every entity to develop, implement or publish a climate transition plan. It requires specified disclosures about the entity’s response to material climate-related risks and opportunities and about any transition plan it has, including relevant assumptions, dependencies, resources and progress.

Helps you decideWhich statements are UK SRS S2 requirements, which are guidance and which depend on future policy.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 7 min Read the guide →

ISSB·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S2 and GRI Climate Reporting: What Data Can Be Reused?

A large part of the underlying climate dataset can be reused, especially the controlled GHG inventory, Scope 3 category assessment, base year, targets, transition actions, carbon-credit records, scenario inputs and evidence trail. The reporting narratives must remain distinct.

Helps you decideWhich data, methods and evidence can be common, and where separate materiality, narrative and claim controls are required.

Affects s1-27-as1-27-bs1-29s1-30-a +10 more

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

UK S1·Comparison·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S1 vs ESRS: Investor Materiality, Double Materiality and UK-EU Reporting

UK SRS S1 and ESRS both require structured sustainability disclosure, but they are built on different reporting lenses. UK SRS S1 is centred on investor-focused materiality: information about sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect the entity’s prospects.

Helps you decideWhich reporting work can be shared between UK SRS S1 and ESRS, and which materiality, disclosure and assurance decisions must remain separate.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 6 min Read the guide →

UK S2·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

From UK TCFD Reporting to UK SRS S2: What Listed Companies Need to Add

A listed company with mature UK TCFD reporting has a strong starting point for UK SRS S2, but it does not have a complete S2 report merely because it covers the four pillars and 11 TCFD recommended disclosures. The company must add the UK SRS S1 foundations, including investor-focused materiality, reporting entity, connected information, same-time reporting, comparatives, significant judgements, uncertainty and compliance controls.

Helps you decideFrom UK TCFD Reporting to UK SRS S2: What Listed Companies Need to Add

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

UK S2·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S2 and SECR: Why Emissions Reporting May Still Be Duplicated

UK SRS S2 does not currently replace Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR). The two regimes overlap in activity data, emissions calculations, methodology and annual-report governance, but they have different legal status, entity scope, reporting boundaries, minimum content and claim mechanics.

Helps you decideUK SRS S2 and SECR: Why Emissions Reporting May Still Be Duplicated

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

UK S2·Mistakes and myths·Framework interoperability

Common UK SRS S2 Mistakes: Copying IFRS Reliefs, Misstating Scope 3 and Ignoring UK Overlap

The most serious UK SRS S2 mistakes usually come from using the wrong source or classification rather than from weak prose. Teams copy IFRS S2 relief durations into the final UK standard, prepare S2 without UK SRS S1 foundations, call Scope 3 optional, omit the paragraph B59A explanation for prior-period financed emissions, reject all industry metrics because SASB guidance is optional, describe TCFD as equivalent to UK SRS S2, merge NFSIS and SECR with UK SRS, or present FCA and Companies Act proposals as enacted law.

Helps you decideIs the issue a wrong source, wrong applicability conclusion, missing evidence, incomplete provision disclosure or unsupported public claim?

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 14 min Read the guide →

UK S2·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S2 and NFSIS Climate Disclosures: When Duplication Can Be Avoided

A company does not necessarily need to write one climate section for UK SRS S2 and a second, repetitive section for the climate-related financial disclosures in its Non-Financial and Sustainability Information Statement (NFSIS). The UK Government has confirmed that UK SRS S2 is a national reporting framework for Companies Act 2006 section 414CB(6).

Helps you decideUK SRS S2 and NFSIS Climate Disclosures: When Duplication Can Be Avoided

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

UK S2·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S2 Industry-Based Metrics: Optional SASB Guidance but Mandatory Industry Judgement

Yes. UK SRS S2 still requires an entity to disclose industry-based metrics associated with business models, activities or other common features that characterise participation in an industry. What is optional is the specific reference to, and consideration of, the IFRS S2 Industry-based Guidance.

Helps you decideWhich industry-based metrics are relevant to the entity’s material climate matters, and which source or entity-developed measure best meets the information need.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

UK S2·Comparison·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S2 vs IFRS S2: UK Amendments, Reliefs and Financed Emissions Compared

UK SRS S2 is closely based on IFRS S2, but the standards are not identical. The main UK differences are optional specific reference to the IFRS S2 Industry-based Guidance, a UK-only financed-emissions paragraph B59A, removal of the standard-set effective date and an open-ended Scope 3 transition relief for voluntary users that local UK rules may restrict.

Helps you decideUK SRS S2 vs IFRS S2: UK Amendments, Reliefs and Financed Emissions Compared

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 9 min Read the guide →

UK S1·Comparison·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S1 vs UK SRS S2: How General and Climate Requirements Work Together

UK SRS S1 and UK SRS S2 are designed to operate together, not as alternative standards. S1 supplies the general architecture for sustainability-related financial disclosures: objective, investor-focused materiality, reporting entity, connected information, four-pillar structure, location, timing, comparatives, judgements, uncertainties and compliance.

Helps you decideUK SRS S1 vs UK SRS S2: How General and Climate Requirements Work Together

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

UK S1·Comparison·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S1 vs IFRS S1: The UK Amendments That Change Implementation

UK SRS S1 is closely based on IFRS S1, but it is not identical. The UK amendments change implementation in six important areas: reference to SASB Standards is optional rather than mandatory; the IFRS effective date is removed; the first-year relief allowing delayed publication after the financial statements is removed; the climate-only provision is no longer limited by the standard to the first reporting year; use of that provision prevents a UK SRS S1 compliance claim; and UK law or regulation can override the availability or operation of transition and compliance provisions.

Helps you decideUK SRS S1 vs IFRS S1: The UK Amendments That Change Implementation

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 11 min Read the guide →

UK S1·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S1 Risk Management Disclosures: How to Integrate Sustainability into ERM

UK SRS S1 does not require a separate sustainability risk system. It requires disclosure of the processes used to identify, assess, prioritise and monitor sustainability-related risks and opportunities, including inputs, scenario analysis, nature, likelihood and magnitude, priority relative to other risks, monitoring, changes and the extent of integration into overall risk management.

Helps you decideWhether the disclosure explains inputs, assessment, prioritisation, monitoring, opportunities, changes and genuine ERM integration.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 13 min Read the guide →

UK S1·Explainer·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S1 and the NFSIS: What Can Be Combined and What Remains Separate?

One controlled reporting system can support both the NFSIS and UK SRS: the organisation can reuse business-model descriptions, policy and due-diligence records, risk evidence, climate data, KPIs, governance records and source calculations. It must still perform separate scope, materiality and disclosure tests.

Helps you decidewhich NFSIS and UK SRS content can share one evidence base, and which scope, materiality and public-claim decisions must stay separate

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

UK S1·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

Can One Dataset Support UK SRS S1, IFRS S1, ESRS and GRI?

Yes. One controlled data and evidence model can support UK SRS S1, IFRS S1, ESRS and GRI, but it should not attempt to produce one universal report automatically. The shared layer should hold stable source data, definitions, boundaries, evidence, methods, owners and controls.

Helps you decideWhich information is common source data and which element is framework-specific.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 11 min Read the guide →

GRI·Comparison·Framework interoperability

GRI In Accordance vs With Reference: requirements, content indexes, statements of use, permitted omissions, GRI notification and reporting claims

“In accordance” is the comprehensive GRI reporting route and requires compliance with all nine requirements in GRI 1. “With reference” is a selective route for reporting specific GRI information and requires a content index, the prescribed with-reference statement and notification to GRI.

Helps you decideWhich reporting route supports the intended claim and what minimum process is required.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 8 min Read the guide →

EU VS·Comparison·Framework interoperability

EU Voluntary Standard vs GRI: Which Framework Fits an SME?

The best fit depends on the reporting objective. The EU Voluntary Standard is designed as a proportionate, modular information set for undertakings outside mandatory CSRD reporting, with a Basic Module and a Comprehensive Module that can support lender, customer, investor and value-chain requests.

Helps you decideWhether the immediate need is a proportionate counterparty dataset, a public impact report, future ESRS readiness, or a controlled combination.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 13 min Read the guide →

EU VS·Comparison·Framework interoperability

EU Voluntary Standard vs ESRS: Key Differences for Companies Outside CSRD Scope

The EU Voluntary Standard and ESRS are not two sizes of the same compliance checklist. The Voluntary Standard is a proportionate, modular framework for undertakings outside mandatory sustainability reporting, designed to support lender, investor and value-chain information needs and internal management.

Helps you decideWhich framework supports the current reporting objective and what additional work is needed for ESRS migration.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

EU VS·Comparison·Framework interoperability

EU Voluntary Standard vs IFRS S1 and IFRS S2: SME Reporting and Investor Information Compared

The EU Voluntary Standard and IFRS S1/S2 can use some of the same underlying data, but they are not interchangeable reporting bases. The EU Voluntary Standard is a proportionate, modular framework intended mainly to answer the needs of business counterparties, banks and investors and to help an undertaking manage sustainability issues.

Helps you decidewhether a lender- or investor-facing SME should report under the voluntary standard, under IFRS S1 and S2, or under both

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

ESRS and the EU Taxonomy: How to Connect Eligibility, Alignment and Sustainability Disclosures

ESRS and EU Taxonomy disclosures should use a connected activity, financial and evidence model, but they are not substitutes. The Taxonomy classifies economic activities and measures the proportion of turnover, CapEx and OpEx - or the relevant financial-undertaking KPIs - associated with Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned activities.

Helps you decideHow to share activity and financial data while maintaining separate Taxonomy eligibility/alignment tests and ESRS materiality/disclosure requirements.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 15 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

ESRS Omissions and Confidential Information: Commercial Prejudice, Trade Secrets and Privacy

ESRS permits omission only for defined categories and conditions: exceptional serious commercial prejudice; qualifying trade secrets; classified information; or information protected by Union or national law or needed to safeguard the privacy or security of a person or legal entity. Before omitting, test whether aggregation, anonymisation or limited redaction can meet the disclosure objective.

Helps you decideESRS Omissions and Confidential Information: Commercial Prejudice, Trade Secrets and Privacy

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 13 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Comparison·Framework interoperability

ESRS vs IFRS S1 and IFRS S2: Key Differences in Materiality, Scope and Reporting

ESRS and IFRS S1/S2 can be implemented through one coordinated reporting programme, but they answer different primary questions. ESRS applies double materiality: material impacts on people and the environment, and material sustainability-related risks and opportunities for the undertaking.

Helps you decideHow to share process and data while preserving separate materiality, boundary, presentation, compliance and assurance conclusions.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 15 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Comparison·Framework interoperability

ESRS vs GRI: Double Materiality, Impact Reporting and Practical Interoperability

ESRS and GRI can share substantial evidence, data and process infrastructure, but they are not interchangeable. ESRS is an EU legal reporting standard built around double materiality: impact materiality and financial materiality.

Helps you decideWhich evidence can be reused, which tests and outputs remain framework-specific, and what combined-report architecture is defensible.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 14 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Comparison·Framework interoperability

ESRS and CSDDD: Reporting, Due Diligence and Value Chain Responsibilities Compared

ESRS and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) are connected, but they are not interchangeable. ESRS determines what material sustainability information an undertaking must disclose.

Helps you decideWhich evidence and processes can be shared, and which conclusions, approvals and public claims must remain instrument-specific?

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 14 min Read the guide →

TNFD·Comparison·Framework interoperability

TNFD vs ESRS E4: Nature-Related Financial Disclosure and Double Materiality Compared

TNFD and ESRS have strong correspondence, but they serve different reporting decisions. TNFD is a voluntary framework with an ISSB-style financial-materiality baseline and an optional additional impact lens.

Helps you decideWhat can be reused, what must be adjusted, and how to avoid an unsupported equivalence or compliance claim.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 11 min Read the guide →

TNFD·Comparison·Framework interoperability

TNFD vs TCFD: Nature-Related and Climate-Related Financial Disclosures Compared

TNFD deliberately uses the TCFD’s four-pillar architecture and carries all 11 TCFD recommended disclosures into nature reporting, with three additions for nature: Governance C on human rights and stakeholder engagement, Strategy D on priority locations, and a separate Risk and Impact Management A(ii) disclosure for upstream and downstream value-chain assessment. Climate governance, ERM, scenario governance, annual-report controls and financial-planning connections can be reused.

Helps you decideWhich governance, risk and reporting infrastructure can be reused and which nature-specific evidence and processes must be added.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 9 min Read the guide →

ISSB·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

Can One Climate Dataset Support UK SRS S2, IFRS S2, ESRS E1, TCFD and CDP?

Yes - one governed climate dataset and evidence model can support UK SRS S2, IFRS S2, ESRS E1, TCFD and CDP. It should not produce one undifferentiated disclosure.

Helps you decideHow to define the common source of truth and the framework-specific adjustment layer for every published output.

Affects s1-27-as1-27-bs1-29s1-30-a +35 more

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 13 min Read the guide →

ISSB·Decision guide·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S2 and CDP: How to Reuse Climate Data Without Assuming Compliance

No. CDP can provide a valuable structured source of climate data and evidence, but completing the questionnaire or receiving a CDP score does not demonstrate compliance with UK SRS S2. CDP’s own IFRS S2 mapping states that the questionnaire, although aligned, should not be interpreted as strictly fulfilling IFRS S2.

Helps you decideHow to reuse CDP-aligned data while completing a separate UK SRS S1/S2 assessment and annual-report approval process.

Affects s1-27-as1-27-bs1-29s1-30-a +10 more

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

ISSB·Comparison·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S2 vs ESRS E1: Climate Materiality, GHG and Transition Plan Differences

No. UK SRS S2 and ESRS E1 can share a substantial climate data and evidence base, but they are not interchangeable reporting requirements. UK SRS S2 applies the UK SRS S1 investor-focused materiality lens to climate-related risks and opportunities that could affect an entity’s prospects.

Helps you decideWhich data and evidence can be reused, and which framework-specific tests, disclosures and claims must remain separate.

Affects s1-27-as1-27-bs1-29s1-30-a +10 more

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 15 min Read the guide →

UK S1·Explainer·Framework interoperability

UK SRS S1 and the Strategic Report: How to Integrate Sustainability and Financial Narrative

A company can integrate UK SRS S1 information with its Strategic Report by building one connected narrative around the business model, strategy, principal risks, section 172 considerations, sustainability-related risks and opportunities, financial effects and performance metrics. The two frameworks overlap but are not interchangeable.

Helps you decidewhich UK SRS content the Strategic Report can carry, and where an exact cross-reference is safer than restating the same narrative in two places

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

Showing 30 of 46 published guides — filter by framework or problem above. Show every guide (46) →

How an LRA guide is built

Every answer follows the same discipline.

You should be able to stop reading after the first paragraph and still have what you came for. Everything below it exists so you can defend the answer to a reviewer.

  1. 01
    Answer

    The question is stated as a reporting team would ask it, and settled in the opening lines.

  2. 02
    Basis

    The official source and edition are named, and kept clearly apart from our reading of them.

  3. 03
    Judgement

    The points the standard leaves open are marked, with what a defensible position looks like.

  4. 04
    Action

    The answer links to the disclosures and evidence it affects, so a decision turns into fields to fill.

  • Practitioner-written, then technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Requirements kept separate from practice and interpretation
  • Stated update triggers for re-reading each answer
RK From the answer to the report Dr Ross Kurinko Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS
GRI and ISSB-IFRS S1 & S2 Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert 15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures Canary Wharf, London LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by the standard setters LinkedIn

Coverage

Which frameworks have answers yet.

The guides tier is written framework by framework rather than thinly across all of them, so this says where the writing has actually reached. Disclosure cards, which cover the requirements themselves, run ahead of it.

Found the answer?

Turn the decision into a disclosure.

An answer settles what to do. The disclosure card is where it becomes data to collect, owners to name, evidence to retain and wording to draft — and when the whole reporting cycle is the problem, the programme walks it with a mentor on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

/en/knowledge-hub/disclosure-guides/ Wave 1 — English only