Skip to the disclosure focus

Disclosure LibraryPractitioner guidance for every reporting disclosure

GRI 101: Biodiversity·Disclosure GRI 101-7

Changes to the state of biodiversity

Practical guidance for preparing this disclosure. Use this card to identify the information to prepare, verify claims and organise supporting evidence. For exact requirements, always refer to the official Global Reporting Initiative source.

Legal status

GRI 101: Biodiversity 2024 is effective for reports or other materials published on or after 1 January 2026 and replaces GRI 304: Biodiversity 2016.

Published passport

Last reviewed 2026-07-28
RK Reviewed by Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert 15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures Canary Wharf, London LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by Global Reporting Initiative

Standard

GRI 101: Biodiversity

Disclosure GRI 101-7 · 2024

Effective

2026-01-01

Official source: Open ↗

Last reviewed

2026-07-28

LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by Global Reporting Initiative

Disclosure focus

Disclosure 101-7 requires an organization to report changes in the condition of ecosystems affected or potentially affected by the sites reported under Disclosure 101-5-a. The organization should use the same approved site list and should not conduct a separate site-prioritization exercise for this disclosure.

For each site, the organization must consider every ecosystem type within the area affected or potentially affected by its activities, including affected areas beyond the site boundary where relevant. It is not required to report on the condition of the entire wider ecosystem or region.

For each affected or potentially affected ecosystem type, the organization must report the ecosystem type for the base year, the ecosystem extent in hectares for the base year, and the ecosystem condition for both the base year and the current reporting period. Ecosystem extent is the fixed area over which condition is measured over time and should not automatically be equated with the total site area, land parcel or operational footprint.

The organization should report the base year and explain how it was determined. A base year can correspond to the start of activities, the date from which the organization owned, leased or managed the site, or the date of a commitment to halt and reverse biodiversity loss. Base year, baseline condition and reference condition should be clearly distinguished.

The organization should report the ecosystem classification used. Ecosystem condition should be assessed against a defined reference condition and should reflect relevant living and non-living characteristics, including ecosystem composition, function and structure, landscape connectivity, and physical and chemical state.

Where ecosystem monitoring is conducted less frequently than sustainability reporting, the organization should report the most recent available condition information and state the measurement date. It does not need to conduct an additional measurement solely to meet Disclosure 101-7.

Changes in ecosystem condition can reflect the cumulative activities of the organization and other actors. The organization should therefore avoid attributing changes solely to its own actions unless this is supported by evidence.

The organization must report the standards, methodologies and assumptions used to compile the information. It should distinguish between primary, secondary and modeled data, identify the datasets used, explain methodological and data limitations, and describe any plans to improve data accuracy.

The organization should additionally report changes in the state of biodiversity for products and services in its supply chain identified under Disclosure 101-5-d, with a breakdown by country or jurisdiction, and for its downstream value chain where information is available. It can also report information on affected species, including extinction risk and population size in the baseline and current periods.

Where required information is unavailable, incomplete, prohibited by law or subject to confidentiality constraints, the organization should apply the relevant reason for omission in accordance with GRI 1 rather than silently excluding or aggregating the information.

This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official Global Reporting Initiative source.

Before you start

Before you start

A quick mental checklist before you prepare this disclosure — tick each as you settle it.

Preparation

Key information to prepare

Preparation field What to capture Evidence hint Owner
Affected ecosystem types For each site, identify every ecosystem type within the area affected or potentially affected by its activities. Approved GRI 101-5 site list, impact area, ecosystem map and classification. Sustainability reporting / Biodiversity
Base-year ecosystem type Report the ecosystem type for the base year. Base-year ecosystem map, classification crosswalk and source evidence. Sustainability reporting / Biodiversity
Base-year ecosystem extent Report the fixed ecosystem extent in hectares over which condition is measured. Assessment-area polygon, GIS calculation and extent methodology. Sustainability reporting / Biodiversity
Base-year ecosystem condition Report ecosystem condition for the base year against a defined reference condition. Baseline survey, reference-condition definition, indicators and calculation. Sustainability reporting / Biodiversity
Current ecosystem condition Report ecosystem condition for the current reporting period over the same extent. Current survey or latest available measurement, indicators and calculation. Sustainability reporting / Biodiversity
Base year and reference condition Report the base year and explain how it was selected; distinguish base year, baseline condition and reference condition. Base-year rationale, commitment or activity timeline and reference-condition methodology. Sustainability reporting / Biodiversity
Classification and condition characteristics Report the ecosystem classification and assess relevant composition, function, structure, connectivity and physical and chemical characteristics. Classification source, indicator framework, field and remote-sensing data and expert assessment. Sustainability reporting / Biodiversity
Measurement date Where monitoring is less frequent than reporting, report the most recent condition information and its measurement date. Monitoring schedule, latest survey and date-controlled dataset. Sustainability reporting / Biodiversity
Standards, methodologies and assumptions Report the standards, methodologies and assumptions used to compile the information. Methodology, standards mapping, assumptions register and approval evidence. Sustainability reporting / Biodiversity
Data types, limitations and improvement Distinguish primary, secondary and modeled data, identify datasets, explain limitations and describe improvement plans. Data inventory, model documentation, quality review, limitation log and improvement plan. Sustainability reporting / Biodiversity
+ Show GRI 101-7 sub-elements (LRA working checklist)

How to prepare it

Use every site reported under GRI 101-5-a and include affected areas beyond the site boundary where relevant; do not re-prioritise sites or report the condition of an entire wider region.
Collect and reconcile the records for: Affected ecosystem types; Base-year ecosystem type; Base-year ecosystem extent; Base-year ecosystem condition; Current ecosystem condition; Base year and reference condition; Classification and condition characteristics; Measurement date; Standards, methodologies and assumptions; Data types, limitations and improvement.
Do not attribute ecosystem-condition changes solely to the organisation unless causation is supported by evidence. Apply GRI 1 reasons for omission where required information cannot be reported.
Draft the response using the defined terms shown in the disclosure focus; do not substitute broader internal labels.
Review the final wording against every requirement and the supporting governance or data records before sign-off.

Request the data

Request the disclosure evidence

Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.

Provide the approved site list, affected-area and ecosystem maps, base-year and current extent and condition data, reference-condition and classification methods, measurement dates, standards, assumptions, datasets, limitations and improvement plan.

Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined GRI terms and the scope described above.

Better request

Provide the approved site list, affected-area and ecosystem maps, base-year and current extent and condition data, reference-condition and classification methods, measurement dates, standards, assumptions, datasets, limitations and improvement plan.

Draft your disclosure

Notes that turn data into a disclosure

LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.

Method note

Use a fixed ecosystem extent to compare condition over time and keep it distinct from total site area, land parcel and operational footprint.

Context note

Supply-chain ecosystem condition and affected-species information are additional Guidance items and should be distinguished from mandatory site-level requirements.

Download Centre

Preparation tools & forms

Professional preparation tools for GRI 101-7 — free with an LRA Community membership. Register once (it's free) and every download unlocks, together with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI Assistant.

Free · Community members

Assurance readiness

For each claim, check the evidence

Claim Risk Evidence to check
Affected ecosystem types is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates affected ecosystem types.Approved GRI 101-5 site list, impact area, ecosystem map and classification.
Base-year ecosystem type is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates base-year ecosystem type.Base-year ecosystem map, classification crosswalk and source evidence.
Base-year ecosystem extent is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates base-year ecosystem extent.Assessment-area polygon, GIS calculation and extent methodology.
Base-year ecosystem condition is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates base-year ecosystem condition.Baseline survey, reference-condition definition, indicators and calculation.
Current ecosystem condition is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates current ecosystem condition.Current survey or latest available measurement, indicators and calculation.
Base year and reference condition is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates base year and reference condition.Base-year rationale, commitment or activity timeline and reference-condition methodology.
Classification and condition characteristics is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates classification and condition characteristics.Classification source, indicator framework, field and remote-sensing data and expert assessment.
Measurement date is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates measurement date.Monitoring schedule, latest survey and date-controlled dataset.
Standards, methodologies and assumptions is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates standards, methodologies and assumptions.Methodology, standards mapping, assumptions register and approval evidence.
Data types, limitations and improvement is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates data types, limitations and improvement.Data inventory, model documentation, quality review, limitation log and improvement plan.

Evidence pack to prepare

Common reporting gaps

Applying a new materiality threshold to the GRI 101-5-a sites.
Equating ecosystem extent with total site area.
Confusing base year, baseline condition and reference condition.
Changing the assessment extent between periods without explanation.
Attributing cumulative ecosystem change solely to the organisation without evidence.
Omitting the measurement date when current-year monitoring was not performed.
✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop
Dr Ross Kurinko

Ask the Study Studio AI Assistant about this disclosure

Get practical answers for your reporting context. Your first two answers are free — join LRA Community for free to continue without a limit.

Try How do I prepare GRI 101-7? What data do I need to collect? What mistakes should I avoid?
2 free answers

Framework references

Relevant GRI requirements and related disclosures

Available framework references and nearby disclosures relevant to preparing this requirement.

GRI

GRI 101-7

within GRI 101: Biodiversity

Open official source →

Related & explore

More in GRI 101 → Browse full catalogue → Disclosure Library home → Search all disclosures →

Go deeper · GRI 101-7

Learn to prepare this disclosure end-to-end

This guide covers one disclosure. The GRI Standards Certified Training — taken as a bundle with an ESRS course — walks the full workflow: datapoints, evidence, drafting and assurance, with exercises on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

Explore GRI training (ESRS bundle) →
How this library is built 312 published reports indexed 63,171 pages with page-level citations 272 practitioner-built Disclosure Cards
/en/knowledge-hub/disclosure-cards/gri-101-7/