Vai al focus dell’informativa
Gratis · Membri della Community
＋ Mostra 6 in più− Mostra meno
＋ Mostra 7 in più− Mostra meno
Report reali pubblicati
Apri il report →
Apri il report →
Apri il report →
✓ Assistente IA di LRA · Con supervisione umana
Apri la fonte ufficiale →
Explore the ESRS / CSRD course →
ESRS S1: Own Workforce·Disclosure Requirement S1-3
Actions & Resources
Guida pratica per preparare questa informativa. Usa questa scheda per individuare le informazioni da predisporre, verificare le affermazioni e organizzare le evidenze a supporto. Per i requisiti esatti, fai sempre riferimento alla fonte ufficiale European Commission.
Passaporto pubblicato
Revisione in attesa
···
In revisione
Revisione editoriale in corso
Predisposto a partire da fonti ufficiali e da evidenze di report pubblicati. Non è ancora registrato un approvatore, quindi la pagina non riporta una firma.
Usala insieme alla fonte ufficiale European Commission finché la revisione è in corso.
Standard
ESRS S1: Own Workforce
Disclosure Requirement S1-3 · 2026-5010-final
Ultima revisione
—
Materiale didattico LRA · Non emesso né approvato da European Commission
Per preparare questa informativa
Focus dell’informativa
This disclosure asks an organisation to explain the main actions it is taking, or plans to take, on its own workforce-related impacts, risks and opportunities, and to show what resources it is putting behind those actions. In practice, that means describing the measures in a way that lets a reader understand what is being done, why it matters, and whether the organisation has committed people, time, money or other support to make it happen.
The practical focus is on whether the response is real and organisation-wide, not just limited to a few visible initiatives. A useful report should make clear where the actions apply across the business, which parts of the workforce they cover, and how resources are allocated between different measures, rather than only highlighting flagship sites, pilot projects or one-off programmes.
Questo materiale didattico LRA supporta la preparazione dell’informativa. Per i requisiti esatti, fai sempre riferimento alla fonte ufficiale European Commission.
Prima di iniziare
Prima di iniziare
Una breve checklist prima di preparare questa informativa: spunta ogni voce man mano che la definisci.
Preparazione
Informazioni chiave da preparare
| Campo da preparare | Cosa rilevare | Suggerimento sull’evidenza | Responsabile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implemented actions | A plain summary of the steps already put in place to address the issue, including what was done and at what level of progress. | Action tracker, project updates, management papers, implementation logs. | Sustainability / operations |
| Prevention steps | The measures set up to stop the issue arising again, covering the controls or changes introduced to reduce future occurrence. | Control design documents, policy updates, risk treatment plans, process change records. | Risk / operations |
| Reduction measures | The steps taken to lessen the size, frequency, or seriousness of the issue where it cannot be avoided entirely. | Mitigation plan, incident response records, operational change logs, issue tracker. | Operations / sustainability |
| Repair actions | The actions taken to put right harm already caused, including any restoration, compensation, or follow-up work already underway. | Remediation plan, claims or compensation records, restoration work orders, case management files. | Legal / operations |
| Impact category | The kind of effect being described, stated in business terms and aligned to the specific issue being reported. | Impact assessment, issue register, stakeholder analysis, incident classification notes. | Sustainability / risk |
| Response actions | The concrete steps taken in response to the impact, including what was done and by whom. | Response plan, action log, incident records, management reporting. | Operations / sustainability |
| Trade-off assessment | A short explanation of the business choices made, showing the balance between the impact response and other commercial considerations. | Decision paper, board pack, approval memo, risk-benefit analysis. | Finance / strategy |
| Performance indicators | The measures used to track progress or performance for the matter being reported, with the exact metric names and values used internally. | KPI dashboard, management report, scorecard, data dictionary. | Finance / sustainability |
| Tracking systems | The systems, tools, or processes used to monitor the matter over time, including where the data comes from and how it is checked. | System descriptions, control documentation, monitoring workflow, IT or data governance records. | IT / data governance |
| Review findings | The results of the evaluation, including what the review found and whether the measures are working as intended. | Evaluation report, audit findings, review minutes, performance analysis. | Sustainability / internal audit |
＋ Mostra i sotto-elementi di S1-3 (checklist di lavoro LRA)
Put in place the actions already carried out.
Set out the steps used to reduce the issue.
Set out the steps used to stop the issue arising.
Set out the steps used to put things right after harm.
Describe the actions the business has already taken.
Explain the business choices or compromises involved.
State what kind of impact is being considered.
Report the results of the assessment or review.
List the key measures used to track performance.
Describe the systems used to keep watch over progress.
Come prepararla
Set the reporting boundary first. Decide which parts of the business, which activities, and which people-related impacts you are covering, so the disclosure is anchored to the right scope before you draft anything else.
Agree the categories you will use. Separate the information into the practical buckets needed here: what has been done, what was put in place to stop issues arising, what was done to reduce them, and what was done to put things right.
Gather the underlying support. Pull together the records, internal reports, tracking outputs, and other source material that show the actions taken, the impact type, the measures used, and the monitoring or review results.
Prepare the actual disclosure content. For each required item, write the narrative or figures that explain the action, the relevant impact, the trade-offs for the business, the indicators used, the monitoring approach, and what the evaluation showed.
Record any limits or changes in approach. Note where information has been left out, where methods have changed, or where the basis of reporting differs from prior periods, so users can understand the context of the data.
Check the draft against the source requirements. Compare each line with the official ESRS material to confirm you have covered every required point, used the right scope, and not added or omitted anything material.
Richiedi i dati
Request the people actions and tracking evidence
Traduci l’informativa in una domanda di business interna, poi adattala al linguaggio della tua organizzazione.
What people-related actions have been put in place, what was done to prevent, reduce, or put right the issue, and how are we tracking whether it is working?
Use your organisation’s own terms first (for example, people plan, case handling, wellbeing action, conduct issue, manager follow-up, or employee relations log), then map those terms to the disclosure wording before sign-off. This is a possible LRA training template only; adapt it to your organisation and check the official source before sign-off.
Richiesta debole
Please send the ESRS S1-3 actions, prevention, mitigation, remediation, impact type, trade-offs, KPIs, monitoring systems, and evaluation results for the reporting period.
Perché non funziona: It uses framework labels that many teams do not use day to day, so the owner may not know which records to pull. It also does not say which system, boundary, period, or internal category names to use, so the response is likely to be incomplete or hard to map.
Richiesta migliore
Please send the people action tracker or case summary for [period] covering [boundary]. Include the actions taken, the steps used to prevent, reduce, or put right the issue, the issue type as your team records it, any trade-offs considered, the measures used to track progress, and the latest results. Use your own team labels first, then we will map them to the reporting pack.
Modello di e-mail formale
Subject: Request for people action and tracking evidence for [reporting period] Hello [name], We are preparing the sustainability reporting pack and need your help with the people-related actions and tracking information for [reporting period] across [boundary]. Please send a short extract or summary covering: - the main actions put in place - the steps taken to prevent, reduce, or put right the issue - the type of people issue or impact each action relates to - any trade-offs or side effects the team considered - the measures used to track progress - the latest results from those measures - the source system or file used Please use your team’s own wording first, then we will map it to the reporting labels. If helpful, you can return it in the table format below. This is a possible LRA training template only; please adapt it to your organisation and check the official source before sign-off. Many thanks, [preparer name] [role] [contact details]
Versione breve per Teams / Slack
Hi [name] — could you share the people actions and tracking evidence for [period] across [boundary]? Please include the action taken, the prevention / reduction / fix steps, the issue type, any trade-offs, the measures used, and the latest results. Use your team’s own terms first; we’ll map them later. Thanks, [name]
Esempi di settore
Manufacturing
Contesto. A plant HR team tracks absence, safety-related people issues, and supervisor follow-up actions in a local workbook and case system.
Richiesta adattata. Please share the site people action log for [period] at [site]. Include the action taken, the prevention or fix steps, the issue type as recorded locally, any trade-offs, the tracking measures, and the latest results. Use the site’s own labels first.
Esempio di risposta. The site returns a table with action ID, issue type, action description, follow-up step, trade-off note, KPI, latest result, and evidence link to the workbook and meeting minutes.
Retail
Contesto. A regional people team manages store-level engagement actions, manager coaching, and employee relations follow-up in a shared dashboard.
Richiesta adattata. Please send the regional people improvement dashboard for [period] across [region]. Include the actions taken, the steps to prevent or reduce the issue, the store issue type, any business trade-offs, the measures used, and the latest dashboard results. Use your own store and region terms first.
Esempio di risposta. The team provides a dashboard extract showing action name, store cluster, issue category, coaching or policy step, trade-off note, measure, latest score, and link to the dashboard snapshot.
Redigi la tua informativa
Note che trasformano i dati in un’informativa
Modelli formativi LRA: adattali alla tua organizzazione e verifica la fonte ufficiale prima dell’approvazione.
Nota metodologica
For this disclosure, we describe the impact type, the actions already put in place, the main indicators used to track progress, the monitoring approach, and the latest evaluation outcome, using the same basis consistently across the reporting period.
Nota di contesto
These figures show how the organisation has responded to the identified impacts, what it is watching to judge progress, and where any trade-offs have been accepted in order to carry out the response.
Dichiarazione sulle variazioni
If the numbers move materially, explain whether that reflects a change in the underlying impact, a shift in the response measures, a different monitoring result, or a revised assessment of effectiveness.
Voce dell’indice dei contenuti
S1-3 Actions & Resources — [location / page] / [notes]Centro download
Strumenti e moduli per la preparazione
Strumenti professionali di preparazione per S1-3 — gratuiti con l’iscrizione a LRA Community. Registrati una volta (è gratis) e sblocchi tutti i download, insieme alla Biblioteca delle informative, ai modelli e all’assistente IA di LRA.
01XLSCartella di lavoro per preparazione e assurancePunti dato, rischi, evidenze da verificare, responsabile e pacchetto di evidenze.Ottienilo gratis ↧
02XLSPacchetto per la richiesta datiE-mail di richiesta, modello di messaggio, campi di risposta e struttura di approvazione.Ottienilo gratis ↧
03PDFScheda della bibliotecaSintesi stampabile di una pagina di questa scheda informativa.Ottienilo gratis ↧
Preparazione all’assurance
Per ogni affermazione, verifica le evidenze
| Affermazione | Rischio | Evidenze da verificare |
|---|---|---|
| We say the coverage figure was built from the full set of in-scope people we chose for the period, and we can show how we defined that population, any exclusions, and why those choices were made. | An assurer will test whether the population behind the figure is complete, consistently defined, and not narrowed or widened without a clear basis. | ['Population definition note or methodology paper', 'Inclusion and exclusion rules used for the period', 'Source extracts or system reports showing the in-scope population', 'Approval trail for any scope judgement or change'] |
| We explain the way we tracked whether the actions were working, including what we measured, how often we reviewed it, and how we decided if progress was real. | An assurer will probe whether the monitoring approach is capable of showing progress rather than just activity, and whether the review method was applied consistently. | ['Tracking framework or KPI dashboard', 'Review cadence and assessment criteria', 'Meeting packs or management updates showing progress checks', 'Records of any changes to the tracking method'] |
| We have set out the main measures and the resources we used to deal with the identified workforce issues, and we can evidence that these were the actions actually planned or under way. | An assurer will check whether the disclosed actions are genuinely the main responses, whether resources are identifiable, and whether the description matches what was implemented. | ['Action plan or programme register', 'Budget, headcount or other resource allocation records', 'Project status reports', 'Internal sign-off confirming the disclosed actions'] |
| Where there was harm that had already happened, we describe the steps we took to put things right or to help others do so, and we can show who was responsible for each step. | An assurer will look for evidence that remedial steps were not just aspirational, but were actually arranged, supported or carried out for the affected people. | ['Case logs, grievance records or remediation files', 'Responsibility matrix or ownership records', 'Correspondence with affected parties or representatives', 'Completion evidence for remedial actions'] |
| We have explained how we balanced workforce-related actions against other commercial pressures, and we can show the internal discussion where those trade-offs were considered. | An assurer will test whether the tension between people-related action and business constraints was genuinely assessed, rather than omitted or simplified. | ['Decision papers or trade-off analyses', 'Executive or committee minutes', 'Risk registers showing competing pressures', 'Internal approvals or escalation records'] |
| For the negative workforce issues we identified, we grouped them by type and described the steps already taken, the steps planned, and the steps still in progress to stop, reduce or fix them. | An assurer will check whether the issue types are clearly distinguished and whether the response actions are complete, current, and matched to each issue. | ['Issue log or impact assessment', 'Action tracker with status and owners', 'Evidence of completed, ongoing and planned measures', 'Management review showing linkage between issue type and response'] |
Pacchetto di evidenze da preparare
Lacune ricorrenti nella rendicontazione
The information is presented without a date or as-at point.
The scope or boundary of the statement is left undefined.
Key terms are used inconsistently across the report.
Material changes since the previous period are not disclosed.
Assertions are made without supporting detail or a source record.
Boilerplate is used that does not actually answer what is asked.
Lacune ricorrenti
Errori da evitare nella raccolta dei dati
Wrong ownerThe request goes to the wrong team, so the people who actually run the action, prevention, mitigation or remedy never confirm what happened.
Framework language onlyThe data call uses reporting jargon instead of the organisation’s own terms, and staff cannot map it cleanly to the work they manage.
Scope left vagueNo one states which business units, sites, worker groups or activities are in scope, so different teams collect different slices of the same topic.
Boundary not fixedThe collector does not define whether the figures cover the whole group, a subsidiary, or only a local operation, which makes the dataset inconsistent.
Wrong period basisSome teams pull current-year activity while others use the period when the work was approved or completed, so the timeline does not line up.
Mixed counting methodHeadcounts, cases, actions and spend are blended without a single counting rule, so the totals cannot be compared or checked.
Source labels lostOriginal file names, system codes or local category names are stripped out, so the evidence can no longer be traced back to the source record.
Populations mergedSeparate groups that should stay distinct, such as different worker categories or action types, are rolled into one bucket and the detail is lost.
Evidence trail missingThe pack has the numbers but not the supporting metadata, version history or sign-off record, so nobody can show where the data came from or who approved it.
Dove serve spesso un giudizio professionale
What counts as in-scope people after a buy-in or sale-outUse the same organisational perimeter you applied for the rest of the people data, and explain when a purchase or disposal changes which workers, contractors or other covered groups are included.
How to handle different local job labels for the same worker groupMap country-specific titles and employment labels into one internal grouping rule, then state the rule you used so readers can see how like-for-like groups were combined.
Where to draw the line for workers near the perimeterSet out whether you included people who are partly managed by the organisation, on temporary assignment, or otherwise close to the boundary, and explain the practical rule used to decide.
Whether to report by event date or by reporting-period averageChoose one timing basis for counting actions, resources and affected people, apply it consistently, and say if any late changes or backdated items were brought into the period.
When to use estimates instead of direct countsIf complete headcounts or action records are not available, use a documented estimate method, label it clearly, and explain where the figure is based on system data versus judgement.
How to round small numbers without distorting the pictureState the rounding rule used, keep totals and component figures internally consistent, and note any cases where rounding changes the visible split between categories.
How far to aggregate people data for privacy reasonsCombine small groups where needed to avoid identifying individuals, but explain the aggregation rule and any minimum group size so users understand the loss of detail.
How to separate prevention, mitigation and remedy in one programmeIf one initiative serves more than one purpose, describe the main purpose you assigned to it and explain any split or overlap so the same action is not counted twice.
How to treat actions that are still underway at period endShow whether you reported only completed work or also live programmes, and make clear the cut-off used for items that started before period end but were not finished.
How to align internal monitoring results with the narrative on actionsLink the measures you track to the actions you describe, explain any gaps between the two, and disclose the basis used when a KPI is a proxy rather than a direct measure.
Esempi
Esempi illustrativi
Sintetici, scritti da LRA: non provengono dal report di un’azienda né dal testo di uno standard.
Illustrative (synthetic) example — food processing
We describe one issue affecting our own workforce: repetitive strain linked to manual packing, which we addressed through line redesign, extra lifting aids and refreshed supervisor training. We also set out the practical steps we used to reduce the risk, the support we gave to affected workers, and the business choices we made where faster throughput had to be balanced against safer working methods.
- Actions already in place: 14 prevention steps and 6 follow-up measures were rolled out across 3 sites; 2 worker cases received direct support and 1 case required a formal remedy plan.
- For the impact itself, we recorded a physical health issue affecting 18 workers; we responded with job rotation, adjusted shift patterns and targeted training, while accepting a 3% reduction in hourly output at the busiest site.
- To track progress, we used three indicators: 92% of supervisors completed the new training, 87% of high-risk tasks were covered by the monitoring checks, and the review found a 28% fall in reported strain incidents versus the prior quarter.
This is a synthetic, internally consistent example showing how to narrate the actions taken, the nature of the workforce harm, the trade-off with output, and the measures used to monitor and assess progress.
Illustrative (synthetic) example — logistics and warehousing
We report a case involving fatigue and stress among night-shift staff after a period of sustained peak demand, and we explain the steps we took to prevent recurrence, lessen the harm and support recovery. Our response included roster changes, extra rest breaks, a confidential support route and a review of overtime limits, even though this meant slower parcel turnaround for a short period.
- We put in place 11 preventive controls, 5 harm-reduction actions and 4 recovery measures; 3 employees received direct follow-up and 1 team was offered a formal repair process.
- The issue we identified was mental well-being strain affecting 26 workers; we acted with revised shift planning, workload caps and manager coaching, while accepting a 5% drop in same-day dispatch performance during the adjustment period.
- We monitored the situation with four measures: 95% of night supervisors completed the new briefing, 90% of high-load shifts were checked weekly, 8% of staff used the support route, and the latest review showed a 31% decline in fatigue-related complaints.
This is a synthetic, internally consistent example showing how to describe the impact type, the response taken, the operational trade-off, and the indicators, monitoring and review results used to judge whether the response is working.
Report aziendali
Come le aziende rendicontano S1-3 nella pratica
Esempi di prassi di rendicontazione completa e parziale. Sono analisi basate sulle evidenze, non modelli da copiare.
Continental AG
Tires · Germany · 2025
Continental AG’s 2025 Annual Report includes some related context on capital and operational expenditures for key actions, mentioning total amounts of current and planned CapEx and OpEx for target achievement (p.143, p.133). The report also addresses material impacts and management approaches related to environmental and workforce issues (p.115, p.163, p.213). However, there is no clear or direct disclosure of the specific datapoint sought, and several narrative items are not found or remain unclear in the report.
SNCF Group
Ground Transportation — Railroads · France · 2025
SNCF Group’s 2025 Full-Year Financial Report includes a description of a network of 600 local prevention specialists and measures to combat bullying and discrimination in the workplace, as well as a whistleblowing system (p.255). The report provides partial context on impact assessment methodologies and compliance checks (p.227), and mentions actions taken to respond to effects by adapting corporate strategy, organisation, and governance (p.72). However, no headline values or detailed narrative items directly addressing the disclosure were found elsewhere in the report.
Telecom Italia S.p.A.
Telecommunication Services · Italy · 2025
Telecom Italia S.p.A.’s 2025 Annual Report includes references to actions and resources related to sustainability issues affecting its own workforce and consumers, as noted on pages 152 and 153. The report also mentions climate change policies and mitigation efforts, with specific operational expenditure of 23.8 thousand euros dedicated to these actions (p.181, p.185). However, no direct or quotable narrative evidence explicitly detailing the company’s sustainability disclosure was found in the report.
Chiedi all’assistente IA di Study Studio di questa informativa
Ottieni risposte pratiche per il tuo contesto di rendicontazione. Le prime due risposte sono gratuite: iscriviti gratis a LRA Community per continuare senza limiti.
Prova
Come preparo S1-3?
Quali dati devo raccogliere?
Dove posso vedere un esempio da un report reale?
Quali errori devo evitare?
2 risposte gratuite
Verifica la tua comprensione
Scenari da affrontare
A group has rolled out a new grievance channel for its own workforce, but the first reporting draft only describes the channel and leaves out the training sessions, policy updates and staffing added to make it work. The team also has a separate note on a pay review that was used to address a known concern.
DShould the disclosure bring together the concrete steps already put in place, including prevention, reduction and remedy measures, rather than listing only the new channel?
Mostra la risposta modello →Nascondi la risposta ↑
Yes. The write-up should cover the actual steps the organisation has already put in place to deal with the issue, and it should distinguish between measures aimed at stopping problems before they happen, reducing harm where it is already arising, and putting things right after harm has occurred. If a pay review was part of the response, it belongs in the account of actions taken, alongside the other measures, so the reader can see the full response rather than just one visible initiative.
Perché è importante · Describe the full response package, not just the most visible action.
A preparer is drafting a section on a workplace safety issue and has a long list of controls, but the draft does not say which part of the workforce was affected, what the organisation actually did, or what trade-off was accepted when production targets were adjusted to allow extra training time.
DHow should the preparer decide what to include so the account shows the nature of the impact, the response, and any business trade-off that came with it?
Mostra la risposta modello →Nascondi la risposta ↑
The disclosure should explain what kind of impact the organisation was dealing with, then set out the steps taken in response, and also make clear any business trade-off that was accepted as part of that response. In practice, that means linking the issue to the affected people and describing the operational choice made, such as slowing output to create time for training, rather than leaving the reader to infer the connection.
Perché è importante · Show the impact, the response, and the practical cost of acting.
The sustainability team has introduced a supplier audit programme and a new whistleblowing hotline, and it wants to report both as part of its people-related actions. However, the draft does not say how the team will track whether those measures are working, or what indicators will be used to judge progress over time.
DWhat should the preparer add so the disclosure shows how the organisation will follow up on the measures and assess whether they are effective?
Mostra la risposta modello →Nascondi la risposta ↑
The preparer should add the measures used to monitor progress, the indicators chosen to track them, and the outcome of the review so far. That means explaining what is being watched, how it is being watched, and what the early or latest assessment shows, rather than stopping at a list of initiatives. If the organisation has a dashboard, audit cycle or other tracking method, that belongs in the narrative because it shows how the response is being checked in practice.
Perché è importante · Pair each action with a way to track whether it is working.
A company has completed a remediation process after a complaint about working conditions, but the draft report only says the complaint was closed. It does not explain what was done to address the harm, whether the fix was aimed at the people affected, or whether the result was reviewed afterwards.
DHow should the preparer decide whether the remediation story is complete enough for the disclosure?
Mostra la risposta modello →Nascondi la risposta ↑
The account should make clear what was done to put matters right for the people affected, not just that the case was closed. It should describe the remedy itself, show that it was linked to the harm that had occurred, and include the result of the follow-up review if one was carried out. A bare closure note is not enough because it does not let the reader see the action taken or whether it achieved the intended outcome.
Perché è importante · For remedy, explain the fix and the result, not only the case status.
Riferimenti al framework
Requisiti ESRS pertinenti e informative correlate
Riferimenti disponibili al framework e informative vicine utili alla preparazione di questo requisito.
ESRS
S1-3
all’interno di ESRS S1: Own Workforce
Correlati ed esplora
Policies (Own Workforce) → SchedaSocial Protection → SchedaDisabilities → SchedaTraining → SchedaHealth & Safety → Scheda
Sfoglia tutte le informative →
Altro in ESRS S1 → Sfoglia il catalogo completo → Home della Biblioteca delle informative → Cerca in tutte le informative →
FAQ
Domande a cui risponde questa pagina
How do I use the S1-3 ESRS S1 Own Workforce page to draft the disclosure from scratch?+−
Start with the plain-language explainer, then work through the step-by-step preparation section and the datapoints to prepare. The page is designed to help you turn source data into a draft narrative, supported by the example disclosures and draft-output section.
What data do I need to collect for S1-3 Own Workforce before I start writing the disclosure?+−
The page says to prepare data on implemented actions, prevention steps, reduction measures, repair actions, impact category, response actions, trade-off assessment, performance indicators, tracking systems, and review findings. Use that list as your collection checklist so you can see what is available, what is missing, and what needs owner sign-off.
How should I set the scope and methodology for the S1-3 Own Workforce disclosure?+−
Use the page’s step-by-step preparation guidance to decide what sits in scope and how each datapoint will be treated consistently. The page is meant to help you define the working method for the disclosure, rather than giving a fixed reporting template.
Who should own the S1-3 Own Workforce data and narrative in practice?+−
The page is aimed at sustainability and ESG managers, HR teams, data owners, and assurance reviewers, so ownership should sit with the people who can evidence the actions, indicators, and review findings. A practical approach is to assign one lead for the draft and named owners for each datapoint and evidence item.
What should I put in the evidence pack for S1-3 Own Workforce assurance readiness?+−
The page includes an evidence pack with five items to support assurance readiness, alongside six assurance claims to verify. Use those sections to build a file that links each claim to the relevant risk and evidence before the draft is finalised.
What are the six assurance claims I need to check for S1-3 Own Workforce?+−
The page says there are six assurance claims to verify, each framed around claim, risk, and evidence. It does not list them in the source text here, so you need to use the page itself and the evidence pack to work through them.
What are the common reporting mistakes on the S1-3 Own Workforce page and how do I avoid them?+−
The page lists common reporting gaps and mistakes so you can spot weak drafting before sign-off. A practical use is to compare your draft against those gaps, then check whether each datapoint is supported by evidence and whether the narrative matches the underlying data.
How do I use the synthetic example disclosures on the S1-3 Own Workforce page?+−
Use the synthetic examples as a model for structure, level of detail, and how quantitative information can be presented in a table. They are illustrative only, so they should help you draft your own wording without treating the example as a reporting requirement.
What should the draft output for S1-3 Own Workforce look like on this page?+−
The page gives draft-output ideas including visualisation options, narrative starters, and a content-index line. Use those to turn your prepared data into a readable draft that is easier for reviewers and assurance teams to follow.
How do I use the Prep & Assurance workbook and printable Library Card for S1-3 Own Workforce?+−
The Download Centre includes a Prep & Assurance workbook in .xlsx format and a printable Library Card in .pdf format. Use the workbook to organise preparation and assurance checks, and the Library Card as a quick reference while drafting or reviewing.
Altre domande in cui questa pagina può aiutare
S1-3 ESRS S1 Own Workforce checklist for ESG managers: what should I gather before drafting?How do I build an evidence pack for S1-3 Own Workforce using the page’s assurance claims?What is the best way to turn S1-3 Own Workforce data into a first draft narrative?Which S1-3 Own Workforce datapoints should HR own versus sustainability own?How can I use the S1-3 Own Workforce example table to format my own quantitative disclosure?What are the most common S1-3 Own Workforce reporting gaps to check before sign-off?How do I use the S1-3 Own Workforce workbook to track preparation and assurance actions?What should an assurance reviewer look for in an S1-3 Own Workforce draft?How do I write the content-index line for S1-3 Own Workforce?Where can I find real company report examples for S1-3 Own Workforce on the page?How do I use the review findings datapoint in S1-3 Own Workforce reporting?What visualisation ideas does the S1-3 Own Workforce page suggest for the draft output?
Approfondisci · S1-3
Impara a preparare questa informativa dall’inizio alla fine
This guide covers one Disclosure Requirement. The ESRS / CSRD Reporting course walks the full European workflow — double materiality, datapoints, evidence and assurance — with exercises on your own data.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.
Come è costruita questa biblioteca
312 report pubblicati indicizzati
63.171 pagine con citazioni a livello di pagina
272 schede disclosure realizzate da professionisti
/it/knowledge-hub/disclosure-cards/esrs-s1-3/
Gratis · LRA Community
Ottieni i tuoi strumenti per S1-3 — gratis
I tuoi strumenti di preparazione sono gratuiti per i membri di LRA Community e per gli studenti. Registrati una volta (è gratis) e il tuo download parte subito — insieme alla Biblioteca delle informative, ai modelli e all’assistente IA di LRA.
✓
Ci sei — il download sta per iniziare
Il file è in download. Anche il tuo Cabinet Community — con la Biblioteca delle informative, i modelli e l’assistente IA di LRA — è pronto.
Apri il tuo Cabinet →