Disclosure focus
An operation can qualify through a human rights review or a human rights impact assessment; both are not required. A generic operational, financial, environmental, compliance or supplier audit qualifies only if it substantively reviews the operation's human rights impacts.
Calculate the percentage using operations subject to a qualifying review or impact assessment as the numerator and total operations in the relevant country population as the denominator. Document what counts as an operation and apply the reporting-period basis consistently.
Findings, responses, review type and supplier coverage can be useful context but do not replace the required country-level number and percentage.
This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official Global Reporting Initiative source.
Prepare
What to collect before drafting
Tick each field as the evidence lands. Owners are the teams that usually hold the source files.
-
Country and total operations
People / Human Rights / Sustainability ReportingPrepare and reconcile this field using the definitions, population and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus.
Evidence Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting country and total operations.
Watch for The published response for country and total operations is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Operations subject to a qualifying human rights review or impact assessment
People / Human Rights / Sustainability ReportingPrepare and reconcile this field using the definitions, population and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus.
Evidence Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting operations subject to a qualifying human rights review or impact assessment.
Watch for The published response for operations subject to a qualifying human rights review or impact assessment is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Review type, scope, date and validity
People / Human Rights / Sustainability ReportingPrepare and reconcile this field using the definitions, population and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus.
Evidence Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting review type, scope, date and validity.
Watch for The published response for review type, scope, date and validity is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Country-level numerator and denominator
People / Human Rights / Sustainability ReportingPrepare and reconcile this field using the definitions, population and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus.
Evidence Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting country-level numerator and denominator.
Watch for The published response for country-level numerator and denominator is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Country-level number and percentage
People / Human Rights / Sustainability ReportingPrepare and reconcile this field using the definitions, population and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus.
Evidence Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting country-level number and percentage.
Watch for The published response for country-level number and percentage is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Methodology, source and approval
People / Human Rights / Sustainability ReportingPrepare and reconcile this field using the definitions, population and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus.
Evidence Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting methodology, source and approval.
Watch for The published response for methodology, source and approval is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
Before you start
- Have you defined and reconciled the complete population for country and total operations?
- Have you separated mandatory GRI requirements from recommendations and optional supporting context?
- Can every reported number, category, definition, exclusion and conclusion be traced to current source evidence?
- Have privacy, confidentiality, missing information and any applicable GRI 1 reason for omission been documented?
How to prepare it
Request the data
Request the disclosure evidence
Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.
Provide the reporting-period records and reconciliations for Disclosure 412-1: Country and total operations; Operations subject to a qualifying human rights review or impact assessment; Review type, scope, date and validity; Country-level numerator and denominator; Country-level number and percentage; Methodology, source and approval. Include definitions, population, period, methods, exclusions, owners and approvals.
Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined GRI terms and the scope described above.
Better request
Provide the reporting-period records and reconciliations for Disclosure 412-1: Country and total operations; Operations subject to a qualifying human rights review or impact assessment; Review type, scope, date and validity; Country-level numerator and denominator; Country-level number and percentage; Methodology, source and approval. Include definitions, population, period, methods, exclusions, owners and approvals.
Draft your disclosure
Notes that turn data into a disclosure
LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.
Method note
Findings, responses, review type and supplier coverage can be useful context but do not replace the required country-level number and percentage.
Context note
Keep mandatory GRI Requirements, GRI recommendations and additional LRA preparation controls clearly distinguished. Apply a GRI 1 reason for omission where required information cannot be reported.
Check
For each claim, check the evidence
Country and total operations is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates country and total operations.
Evidence to check Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting country and total operations.
Operations subject to a qualifying human rights review or impact assessment is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates operations subject to a qualifying human rights review or impact assessment.
Evidence to check Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting operations subject to a qualifying human rights review or impact assessment.
Review type, scope, date and validity is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates review type, scope, date and validity.
Evidence to check Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting review type, scope, date and validity.
Country-level numerator and denominator is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates country-level numerator and denominator.
Evidence to check Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting country-level numerator and denominator.
Country-level number and percentage is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates country-level number and percentage.
Evidence to check Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting country-level number and percentage.
Methodology, source and approval is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates methodology, source and approval.
Evidence to check Approved source records, calculations and review evidence supporting methodology, source and approval.
Evidence pack to prepare
Common reporting gaps
- Reporting percentage without number, number without percentage or no country split.
- Counting generic audits that do not substantively assess human rights impacts.
- Using employees, legal entities, projects or sites interchangeably with operations.
- Using cumulative lifetime reviews without explaining the current-period basis.
- Treating optional context, an LRA preparation control or a neighbouring disclosure as a mandatory element of this disclosure.
- Publishing an estimate, exclusion, partial population or unsupported conclusion without its method and evidence.
Ask the Knowledge Hub AI Assistant about this disclosure
Get practical answers for your reporting context.
Check your text
Paste one or two paragraphs. The fragment is used for this check only and is not stored in your conversation.
Peer comparison uses examples on this card, not prevalence in the report corpus.
Advice, not assurance
Framework references
Relevant GRI requirements and related disclosures
GRI
GRI 412-1
within GRI 412: Human Rights Assessment
Related & explore
More in GRI 412 →Browse full catalogue →Search all disclosures →