Disclosure focus
Where the undertaking has sites in areas with water stress that are not covered by water-related policies, it discloses that fact. Screening methods, thresholds and basin reviews may support this conclusion but are not separate E3-1 requirements.
If no water-related policy exists for a material water matter, the undertaking records that fact through the applicable ESRS 2 disclosure route rather than inventing a policy title.
This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official European Commission source.
Prepare
What to collect before drafting
Tick each field as the evidence lands. Owners are the teams that usually hold the source files.
-
Material impacts, risks and opportunities
Sustainability reportingIdentify the material impacts, risks or opportunities that each policy addresses.
Evidence Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting material impacts, risks and opportunities.
Watch for The published response for material impacts, risks and opportunities is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Policy contents and objectives
Sustainability reportingDescribe the policy's key contents and general objectives.
Evidence Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting policy contents and objectives.
Watch for The published response for policy contents and objectives is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Policy scope and exclusions
Sustainability reportingDescribe scope or exclusions across own operations, upstream and downstream value chain, geographies and affected stakeholder groups where defined.
Evidence Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting policy scope and exclusions.
Watch for The published response for policy scope and exclusions is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Accountability
Sustainability reportingIdentify the most senior level in the undertaking accountable for implementation.
Evidence Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting accountability.
Watch for The published response for accountability is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Third-party commitments
Sustainability reportingIdentify third-party standards or initiatives only where the policy commits the undertaking to respect them through implementation.
Evidence Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting third-party commitments.
Watch for The published response for third-party commitments is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Stakeholder interests and availability
Sustainability reportingExplain how key stakeholder interests were considered and how the policy is made available to affected stakeholders where relevant.
Evidence Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting stakeholder interests and availability.
Watch for The published response for stakeholder interests and availability is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Policy changes
Sustainability reportingDescribe material policy changes during the reporting period, where applicable.
Evidence Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting policy changes.
Watch for The published response for policy changes is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
-
Uncovered sites in areas with water stress
Environment / Sustainability reportingState whether any own-operation sites in areas with water stress are not covered by water-related policies.
Evidence Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting uncovered sites in areas with water stress.
Watch for The published response for uncovered sites in areas with water stress is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
Before you start
- Use the GDR-P scope structure and revised ESRS E3 Water; do not include marine resources as though they remained part of E3.
- The uncovered-site statement applies when sites in areas with water stress exist; internal screening evidence supports but does not replace the disclosure.
- Have the supporting records and the final response been reconciled?
How to prepare it
Request the data
Request the disclosure evidence
Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.
Provide the water-policy inventory, material-IRO mapping, scope and accountability evidence, policy changes, third-party commitments and the list of own-operation sites in areas with water stress not covered by policy.
Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined ESRS terms and the scope described above.
Better request
Provide the water-policy inventory, material-IRO mapping, scope and accountability evidence, policy changes, third-party commitments and the list of own-operation sites in areas with water stress not covered by policy.
Draft your disclosure
Notes that turn data into a disclosure
LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.
Method note
Use the official term areas with water stress and distinguish policy content from supporting water-stress screening controls.
Context note
Do not calculate policy coverage percentages unless they are useful entity-specific information and clearly labelled as such.
Download Centre
Preparation tools & forms
Download preparation tools for E3-1 with free verified email access for 24 hours. Source-report links remain public.
Check
For each claim, check the evidence
Material impacts, risks and opportunities is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates material impacts, risks and opportunities.
Evidence to check Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting material impacts, risks and opportunities.
Policy contents and objectives is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates policy contents and objectives.
Evidence to check Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting policy contents and objectives.
Policy scope and exclusions is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates policy scope and exclusions.
Evidence to check Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting policy scope and exclusions.
Accountability is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates accountability.
Evidence to check Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting accountability.
Third-party commitments is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates third-party commitments.
Evidence to check Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting third-party commitments.
Stakeholder interests and availability is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates stakeholder interests and availability.
Evidence to check Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting stakeholder interests and availability.
Policy changes is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates policy changes.
Evidence to check Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting policy changes.
Uncovered sites in areas with water stress is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates uncovered sites in areas with water stress.
Evidence to check Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting uncovered sites in areas with water stress.
Evidence pack to prepare
Common reporting gaps
- Using the old Water and Marine Resources title.
- Omitting GDR-P elements.
- Treating screening methodology as the disclosure itself.
- Requiring a policy coverage percentage.
- Failing to provide an absence-of-policy route.
Ask the Knowledge Hub AI Assistant about this disclosure
Get practical answers for your reporting context.
Check your text
Paste one or two paragraphs. The fragment is used for this check only and is not stored in your conversation.
Peer comparison uses examples on this card, not prevalence in the report corpus.
Advice, not assurance
Framework references
Relevant ESRS requirements and related disclosures
ESRS
E3-1
within ESRS E3: Water
Guides that settle this question
Related & explore
More in ESRS E3 →Browse full catalogue →Search all disclosures →