GRI 102: Climate Change·Disclosure GRI 102-2
Climate change adaptation plan
Guide pratique pour préparer cette information. Utilisez cette fiche pour identifier les données à préparer, vérifier les affirmations et organiser les preuves. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle Global Reporting Initiative.
Statut juridique
GRI 102: Climate Change 2025 is effective for reports or other materials published on or after 1 January 2027, with earlier adoption encouraged.
Passeport publié
Dernière révision le 2026-07-30
Révisé par
Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn
Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert
GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert
15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures
Canary Wharf, London
Support pédagogique LRA · Non publié ni approuvé par Global Reporting Initiative
Norme
GRI 102: Climate Change
Disclosure GRI 102-2 · 2025
Dernière révision
2026-07-30
Support pédagogique LRA · Non publié ni approuvé par Global Reporting Initiative
Objet de l’information
Disclosure 102-2 requires an organization to describe its plan to adapt to the actual and potential effects of climate change across its activities and its upstream and downstream value chain. The disclosure distinguishes between impacts associated with climate change-related risks and opportunities, which inform the development of the adaptation plan, and impacts that arise from implementing the plan.
The organization must describe the impacts on people and the environment associated with its physical risks, transition risks relevant to adaptation, and climate change-related opportunities, and explain how these impacts were considered in developing the adaptation plan. Physical risks can be acute, such as storms and floods, or chronic, such as rising temperatures, heatwaves, drought and water scarcity.
The adaptation plan must include the organization’s policies and actions to adapt to climate change. Actions can include nature-based adaptation, engineering solutions, technological solutions, climate-proofing facilities, working with suppliers, supporting community disaster preparedness, and improving access to water and other essential services.
The organization must identify the climate change-related scenarios used, the temperature projections included in them, and the methodologies and assumptions applied. It should use a range of scenarios, including at least one high-emissions scenario with warming well above 2°C and one scenario compatible with the Paris Agreement. Where non-IPCC scenarios are used, the organization should explain the reason for their selection and how they align with the latest science.
The organization must report the expenditure incurred in implementing the adaptation plan both as a monetary value and as a percentage of its total expenditure for the reporting period. The percentage must be calculated using total organizational expenditure as the denominator, not the budget or total planned cost of the adaptation programme. The organization should reconcile the amounts with financial information and report the CapEx and OpEx breakdown.
The organization must identify the governance bodies or individual roles responsible for overseeing and implementing the adaptation plan and describe their responsibilities. It should distinguish the oversight responsibilities of the highest governance body from the implementation responsibilities of senior executives.
The organization must report the targets used to achieve the adaptation plan and its progress toward them. Targets can relate to physical-risk assessments, implementation of site adaptation plans, employee training, resilience testing, heat-related illness, damage costs and adaptive capacity.
The organization must explain how the adaptation plan aligns with just transition principles and how engagement with affected stakeholders informs its development and implementation. It should identify affected and potentially affected workers, trade unions, local communities, Indigenous Peoples, suppliers, governments and at-risk or vulnerable groups, and explain how their concerns influenced the plan.
The organization must describe the positive and negative impacts on people and the environment that result from implementing the adaptation plan and the actions taken to manage them. It must consider workers, local communities, Indigenous Peoples and biodiversity separately. It should also describe impacts that could arise if the adaptation plan is not implemented.
If the organization does not have an adaptation plan, it must explain why the plan does not exist, describe the steps being taken to develop it and report the expected time frame.
The organization should report how frequently the adaptation plan is reviewed, changes made since the previous reporting period and any alignment with applicable national, regional or sectoral adaptation plans. Information already reported under Disclosures 102-1, 2-12, 2-13, 2-23, 2-29, 3-3 or 101-2 can be incorporated through clear cross-references where it fully addresses the relevant requirement.
Disclosure 102-2 applies when climate change has been determined to be a material topic and the disclosure is relevant to the organization’s climate change-related impacts. It supplements and does not replace Disclosure 3-3. Reasons for omission are permitted in accordance with GRI 1.
Ce support pédagogique LRA aide à préparer l’information. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle Global Reporting Initiative.
Avant de commencer
Avant de commencer
Une courte liste de contrôle avant de préparer cette information — cochez chaque point une fois réglé.
Préparation
Informations clés à préparer
| Champ à préparer | Ce qu’il faut recueillir | Indice de preuve | Responsable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptation-plan scope and distinction between risk impacts and plan impacts | Disclosure 102-2 requires an organization to describe its plan to adapt to the actual and potential effects of climate change across its activities and its upstream and downstream value chain. The disclosure distinguishes between impacts associated with climate change-related risks and opportunities, which inform the development of the adaptation plan, and impacts that arise from implementing the plan. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting adaptation-plan scope and distinction between risk impacts and plan impacts. | Climate / Sustainability reporting |
| Physical-risk, transition-risk and opportunity impacts | The organization must describe the impacts on people and the environment associated with its physical risks, transition risks relevant to adaptation, and climate change-related opportunities, and explain how these impacts were considered in developing the adaptation plan. Physical risks can be acute, such as storms and floods, or chronic, such as rising temperatures, heatwaves, drought and water scarcity. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting physical-risk, transition-risk and opportunity impacts. | Climate / Sustainability reporting |
| Adaptation policies and actions | The adaptation plan must include the organization’s policies and actions to adapt to climate change. Actions can include nature-based adaptation, engineering solutions, technological solutions, climate-proofing facilities, working with suppliers, supporting community disaster preparedness, and improving access to water and other essential services. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting adaptation policies and actions. | Operations / Sustainability reporting |
| Climate scenarios, projections and assumptions | The organization must identify the climate change-related scenarios used, the temperature projections included in them, and the methodologies and assumptions applied. It should use a range of scenarios, including at least one high-emissions scenario with warming well above 2°C and one scenario compatible with the Paris Agreement. Where non-IPCC scenarios are used, the organization should explain the reason for their selection and how they align with the latest science. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting climate scenarios, projections and assumptions. | Climate / Sustainability reporting |
| Adaptation expenditure, denominator and reconciliation | The organization must report the expenditure incurred in implementing the adaptation plan both as a monetary value and as a percentage of its total expenditure for the reporting period. The percentage must be calculated using total organizational expenditure as the denominator, not the budget or total planned cost of the adaptation programme. The organization should reconcile the amounts with financial information and report the CapEx and OpEx breakdown. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting adaptation expenditure, denominator and reconciliation. | Finance / Sustainability reporting |
| Governance oversight and implementation responsibilities | The organization must identify the governance bodies or individual roles responsible for overseeing and implementing the adaptation plan and describe their responsibilities. It should distinguish the oversight responsibilities of the highest governance body from the implementation responsibilities of senior executives. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance oversight and implementation responsibilities. | Board Secretariat / Governance / Sustainability reporting |
| Adaptation targets and progress | The organization must report the targets used to achieve the adaptation plan and its progress toward them. Targets can relate to physical-risk assessments, implementation of site adaptation plans, employee training, resilience testing, heat-related illness, damage costs and adaptive capacity. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting adaptation targets and progress. | Climate / Sustainability reporting |
| Just transition and affected-stakeholder engagement | The organization must explain how the adaptation plan aligns with just transition principles and how engagement with affected stakeholders informs its development and implementation. It should identify affected and potentially affected workers, trade unions, local communities, Indigenous Peoples, suppliers, governments and at-risk or vulnerable groups, and explain how their concerns influenced the plan. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting just transition and affected-stakeholder engagement. | Stakeholder Engagement / Human Rights / Sustainability reporting |
| Positive and negative implementation impacts and management actions | The organization must describe the positive and negative impacts on people and the environment that result from implementing the adaptation plan and the actions taken to manage them. It must consider workers, local communities, Indigenous Peoples and biodiversity separately. It should also describe impacts that could arise if the adaptation plan is not implemented. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting positive and negative implementation impacts and management actions. | Operations / Sustainability reporting |
| Reason, development steps and time frame when no plan exists | If the organization does not have an adaptation plan, it must explain why the plan does not exist, describe the steps being taken to develop it and report the expected time frame. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting reason, development steps and time frame when no plan exists. | Climate / Sustainability reporting |
| Review frequency, changes, external alignment and cross-references | The organization should report how frequently the adaptation plan is reviewed, changes made since the previous reporting period and any alignment with applicable national, regional or sectoral adaptation plans. Information already reported under Disclosures 102-1, 2-12, 2-13, 2-23, 2-29, 3-3 or 101-2 can be incorporated through clear cross-references where it fully addresses the relevant requirement. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting review frequency, changes, external alignment and cross-references. | Climate / Sustainability reporting |
Comment le préparer
Demander les données
Request the disclosure evidence
Traduisez l’information en une question métier interne, puis adaptez-la au vocabulaire de votre organisation.
Provide the adaptation plan and scope; risk, opportunity and impact assessments; policies and actions; scenario sources, projections and assumptions; expenditure and total-expenditure denominator; governance; targets and progress; stakeholder and just-transition records; implementation-impact management; review history and external-plan alignment.
Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined GRI terms and the scope described above.
Meilleure demande
Provide the adaptation plan and scope; risk, opportunity and impact assessments; policies and actions; scenario sources, projections and assumptions; expenditure and total-expenditure denominator; governance; targets and progress; stakeholder and just-transition records; implementation-impact management; review history and external-plan alignment.
Rédigez votre information
Des notes qui transforment les données en information publiée
Modèles pédagogiques LRA — adaptez-les à votre organisation et vérifiez la source officielle avant validation.
Note méthodologique
Classify acute and chronic physical risks, identify transition risks relevant to adaptation and use a range of scenarios including a high-emissions case and a Paris-compatible case. Calculate adaptation expenditure as a percentage of total organisational expenditure.
Note de contexte
GRI 102-2 supplements rather than replaces GRI 3-3. Information from GRI 102-1, GRI 2 or GRI 101-2 can be cross-referenced only where it fully addresses the adaptation-specific requirement.
Centre de téléchargement
Outils et formulaires de préparation
Outils de préparation professionnels pour GRI 102-2 — gratuits avec l’adhésion à LRA Community. Inscrivez-vous une fois (c’est gratuit) et tous les téléchargements se débloquent, avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA.
Préparation à l’assurance
Pour chaque affirmation, vérifiez les preuves
| Affirmation | Risque | Preuves à vérifier |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptation-plan scope and distinction between risk impacts and plan impacts is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates adaptation-plan scope and distinction between risk impacts and plan impacts. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting adaptation-plan scope and distinction between risk impacts and plan impacts. |
| Physical-risk, transition-risk and opportunity impacts is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates physical-risk, transition-risk and opportunity impacts. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting physical-risk, transition-risk and opportunity impacts. |
| Adaptation policies and actions is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates adaptation policies and actions. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting adaptation policies and actions. |
| Climate scenarios, projections and assumptions is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates climate scenarios, projections and assumptions. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting climate scenarios, projections and assumptions. |
| Adaptation expenditure, denominator and reconciliation is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates adaptation expenditure, denominator and reconciliation. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting adaptation expenditure, denominator and reconciliation. |
| Governance oversight and implementation responsibilities is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates governance oversight and implementation responsibilities. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance oversight and implementation responsibilities. |
| Adaptation targets and progress is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates adaptation targets and progress. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting adaptation targets and progress. |
| Just transition and affected-stakeholder engagement is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates just transition and affected-stakeholder engagement. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting just transition and affected-stakeholder engagement. |
| Positive and negative implementation impacts and management actions is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates positive and negative implementation impacts and management actions. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting positive and negative implementation impacts and management actions. |
| Reason, development steps and time frame when no plan exists is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates reason, development steps and time frame when no plan exists. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting reason, development steps and time frame when no plan exists. |
| Review frequency, changes, external alignment and cross-references is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates review frequency, changes, external alignment and cross-references. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting review frequency, changes, external alignment and cross-references. |
Dossier de preuves à préparer
Lacunes fréquentes dans les rapports
Interrogez l’assistant IA de Study Studio sur cette information
Obtenez des réponses concrètes pour votre contexte de reporting. Les deux premières réponses sont gratuites — rejoignez gratuitement LRA Community pour continuer sans limite.
Références au référentiel
Exigences GRI applicables et informations connexes
Références disponibles du référentiel et informations voisines utiles à la préparation de cette exigence.
GRI
GRI 102-2
au sein de GRI 102 : Climate Change
Connexes et exploration
Plus dans GRI 102 → Parcourir le catalogue complet → Accueil de la Bibliothèque des informations → Rechercher dans toutes les informations →
Aller plus loin · GRI 102-2
Apprenez à préparer cette information de bout en bout
This guide covers one disclosure. The GRI Standards Certified Training — taken as a bundle with an ESRS course — walks the full workflow: datapoints, evidence, drafting and assurance, with exercises on your own data.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.
Obtenez vos outils GRI 102-2 — gratuitement
Vos outils de préparation sont gratuits pour les membres de LRA Community et les étudiants. Inscrivez-vous une fois (c’est gratuit) et votre téléchargement démarre aussitôt — avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA.
C’est fait — votre téléchargement démarre
Votre fichier est en cours de téléchargement. Votre Cabinet Community — avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA — est prêt lui aussi.
Ouvrir votre Cabinet →