Bibliothèque des disclosuresGuide pratique pour chaque information à publier

ESRS S1: Own Workforce·Disclosure Requirement S1-10

Social Protection

Q: How do I prepare disclosure S1-10 (ESRS S1 Own Workforce) using this page in practice?

Start with the plain-language explainer, then work through the step-by-step preparation section and the three datapoints to prepare: coverage status, covered event types and uncovered countries. The page is designed to help you turn those inputs into a draft disclosure and an assurance-ready evidence pack.

Q: What data do I need to collect for S1-10 before I draft the disclosure?

The page says to prepare three core datapoints: coverage status, covered event types and uncovered countries. Use those as the minimum data set before you move into the draft-output section.

Q: How should I decide the scope for S1-10 coverage status and covered event types?

Use the page’s preparation section to define what is in scope, then record the coverage status and the event types that are covered. The page also flags uncovered countries, so scope should be clear enough to show where the disclosure does and does not apply.

Q: Who should own the S1-10 data and evidence pack in practice?

The page is aimed at sustainability and ESG managers, HR teams, data owners and assurance reviewers, so ownership should sit with the people who can confirm the data and evidence. Use the workbook to assign tasks and keep the evidence pack aligned to the disclosure.

Q: What evidence do I need to make S1-10 assurance-ready?

The page includes an evidence pack with five items and four assurance claims to verify. Use those together so each claim has a clear risk and supporting evidence before review.

Q: What are the common mistakes to avoid when reporting S1-10?

The page lists common reporting gaps and mistakes to help you spot weak points before sign-off. A practical use is to compare your draft against those gaps and check that the coverage status, event types and uncovered countries are all complete.

Q: How do I use the Prep & Assurance workbook for S1-10?

The Download Centre includes a Prep & Assurance workbook in .xlsx format. Use it to organise the preparation steps, track the evidence pack and support assurance readiness.

Q: What is the printable Library Card for S1-10 used for?

The Download Centre also includes a printable Library Card in .pdf format. It is there as a practical reference alongside the workbook when you are preparing the disclosure and checking your draft.

Q: Can I use the synthetic example disclosure on the S1-10 page as a template?

Yes, as a worked illustration only. The page says the example disclosures are synthetic, and the quantitative table is internally consistent, so you can use it to see how the data might be presented without treating it as a real company example.

Q: How do I turn S1-10 data into a draft narrative and content index line?

The draft-output section gives visualisation ideas, narrative starters and a content-index line. Use those to convert your prepared data into a readable draft once the scope and evidence are in place.

Guide pratique pour préparer cette information. Utilisez cette fiche pour identifier les données à préparer, vérifier les affirmations et organiser les preuves. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle European Commission.

Ouvrir la source officielle European Commission Comparer des rapports réels → ↗ Partager

Passeport publié

Révision en attente

··· En cours de révision Révision éditoriale en cours Élaboré à partir des sources officielles et de preuves issues de rapports publiés. Aucun approbateur n’est encore enregistré : cette page ne porte donc pas de signature. Utilisez-la avec la source officielle European Commission tant que cette révision est en cours.

Norme

ESRS S1: Own Workforce

Disclosure Requirement S1-10 · 2026-5010-final

En vigueur

2027-01-01

Source officielle : Ouvrir ↗

Dernière révision

—

Support pédagogique LRA · Non publié ni approuvé par European Commission

Pour préparer cette information

3champs à préparer 4affirmations à vérifier 5domaines de preuve 3exemples de rapports

Objet de l’information

This disclosure asks an organisation to explain how it covers its own workforce with social protection arrangements. In practice, that means describing whether employees and other workers in the workforce have access to protections such as social security or equivalent benefits, and whether that coverage is provided consistently across the organisation’s operations and locations.

The practical focus is not just on whether a policy exists, but on how far it reaches in reality. Report whether coverage applies to the whole workforce or only certain groups, countries, sites, or contract types, and make clear any gaps, exclusions, or differences in treatment that affect who is protected and where.

Ce support pédagogique LRA aide à préparer l’information. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle European Commission.

Avant de commencer

Une courte liste de contrôle avant de préparer cette information — cochez chaque point une fois réglé.

Have you decided whether you are counting only people covered by a social safety arrangement, or also those covered through another arrangement you provide or fund? Have you fixed which life events you will treat as in scope for this check — for example illness, job loss, work injury, or maternity-related leave? Have you agreed the country list you will use to spot where people are not covered, and whether that list is based on the reporting period or a different cut-off date? Can you trace each yes/no and country entry back to a source you can show later, such as policy records, payroll data, or insurer information? Have you settled the definition you will use for “covered” so the same rule is applied across all locations and employee groups?

Préparation

Informations clés à préparer

Champ à préparer	Ce qu’il faut recueillir	Indice de preuve	Responsable
Coverage status	Record whether the workforce is covered by the relevant protection arrangement, using a simple yes/no answer for the reporting period.	Policy schedule, benefits register, insurer or scheme confirmation, and HR/benefits records showing who is enrolled.	HR / Benefits
Covered event types	List the kinds of events the arrangement protects against, limited to the events actually provided for in the source record for the period.	Plan terms, policy wording, insurer certificate, or scheme summary showing the event categories included.	HR / Benefits
Uncovered countries	Identify the countries where the arrangement does not apply, based on the current coverage map for the reporting period.	Territory schedule, insurer exclusions, local plan matrix, or country-by-country benefits register.	HR / Benefits

＋ Afficher les sous-éléments de S1-10 (liste de travail LRA)

Comment le préparer

Set the reporting boundary first: decide which workforce locations and arrangements are in scope for this check, so you can answer the coverage question consistently across the group.

Define the benefit events you will treat as covered for this disclosure, using the same practical categories each time and keeping the list aligned to the events named in the source data point.

Gather the underlying proof from the relevant HR, payroll, benefits, or local policy records, so you can support both the yes/no coverage answer and any country-level exceptions.

Prepare the reported output in two parts: the coverage flag, and a clear note on which event types are included, plus the countries where that protection is not available.

Record any exclusions, gaps, or changes in approach, including where coverage differs by country, so the final disclosure explains the limits of the information rather than implying full uniformity.

Check the draft against the official source data points before sign-off, confirming that the boundary, event list, and country exceptions match the underlying records and that nothing material has been omitted or added.

Demander les données

Request the social protection coverage data from People Operations

Traduisez l’information en une question métier interne, puis adaptez-la au vocabulaire de votre organisation.

Which parts of our workforce are covered by social protection arrangements, what types of life events or risks are included, and where do we still have no coverage in place?

Use your organisation’s own terms first, then map them to the disclosure. For example, if you talk about benefits, welfare cover, statutory schemes, or local insurance arrangements internally, use those labels in the request and only translate them afterwards for reporting. This is a possible LRA training template; adapt it to your organisation and check the official source before sign-off.

Demande faible

Can you fill in the ESRS S1 social protection disclosure for us, including coverage, events covered, and countries without coverage?

Pourquoi elle échoue : It uses framework language that many operational teams will not recognise, and it does not say which people, countries, systems, or internal labels to use. That makes it harder to pull the right records and increases the risk of inconsistent answers.

Meilleure demande

Please send the workforce protection summary for [reporting period] for [population boundary]. For each country or worker group, tell us whether cover exists, what it includes in your own team’s terms, and where there is no cover. If the data comes from more than one system, include the source for each line and flag any gaps or assumptions.

Modèle d’e-mail formel

Subject: Data request for social protection coverage review

Hi [Name],

I’m preparing our year-end sustainability reporting pack and need your help with the workforce protection data for [reporting period].

Please share the information for [population boundary] across [countries/sites], using the terms your team normally uses internally. I’m looking for:
- whether each location or worker group has cover in place;
- which types of events or risks are included, such as sickness, unemployment, injury, or maternity-related support;
- where there is no cover in place, by country.

If the information sits across more than one system, please include the source for each line and note any assumptions or gaps.

A possible format is attached below. Please adapt this to your organisation’s own language, and please check the official source before sign-off.

Many thanks,
[Your name]

Version courte pour Teams / Slack

Hi [Name] — could you send over the workforce protection data for [reporting period] for [population boundary]? Please use your usual internal terms, and include: whether cover exists, what events/risks are included, and which countries have no cover. If it’s split across systems, just note the source for each line. Thanks — [Your name]

Exemples sectoriels

Manufacturing

Contexte. A group with plants in several countries and a mix of direct employees and local site workers.

Demande adaptée. Please share the site-level workforce protection summary for [reporting period] across [plant locations]. Use the labels your benefits or payroll teams already use. For each site, confirm whether cover is in place, what events it includes, and which countries have no cover for any worker group.

Exemple de réponse. Country / site: Poland plant | Worker group: direct employees | Coverage in place: Y | Included event or risk: sickness, injury, maternity support | Coverage basis: company scheme plus statutory arrangements | No-cover reason / gap note: none | Source reference: benefits register v3

Professional services

Contexte. A firm with office-based staff in multiple jurisdictions and locally managed benefits packages.

Demande adaptée. Please send the benefits coverage summary for [reporting period] across [countries]. Use your normal benefits names, and show whether each office population has cover, what it includes, and where any country has no arrangement in place.

Rédigez votre information

Des notes qui transforment les données en information publiée

Modèles pédagogiques LRA — adaptez-les à votre organisation et vérifiez la source officielle avant validation.

Note méthodologique

State how you defined the protection package, which employee groups were included in the count, and how you identified the listed protection types and any countries without that cover.

Note de contexte

Explain what the figures say about the organisation’s employee protection arrangements, including whether cover is available at all, which risks are included, and where gaps remain by country.

Déclaration sur les variations

If the position changed from the prior period, point to changes in the number of countries without cover, shifts in the protection types offered, or a move from partial to broader coverage.

Entrée de l’index de contenu

S1-10 Social Protection — [location / page] / [notes]

Centre de téléchargement

Outils et formulaires de préparation

Outils de préparation professionnels pour S1-10 — gratuits avec l’adhésion à LRA Community. Inscrivez-vous une fois (c’est gratuit) et tous les téléchargements se débloquent, avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA.

Gratuit · Membres de la Community

01XLSClasseur préparation et assurancePoints de données, risques, preuves à vérifier, responsable et dossier de preuves.Obtenir gratuitement ↧ 02XLSPack de demande de donnéesE-mail de demande, modèle de message, champs de réponse et structure de validation.Obtenir gratuitement ↧ 03PDFFiche de bibliothèqueRésumé imprimable d’une page de cette fiche d’information.Obtenir gratuitement ↧

Préparation à l’assurance

Pour chaque affirmation, vérifiez les preuves

Affirmation	Risque	Preuves à vérifier
We built the coverage figure from our own employee records and payroll files, then checked which people were in scope at the reporting date and which locations were included. For the countries we operate in, we mapped where social protection arrangements were in place and where they were not, using a documented country-by-country review.	An assurer will probe whether the scope was set consistently, whether all relevant countries and worker groups were included, and whether the coverage figure could be overstated or understated because of missing entities, duplicate records, or inconsistent cut-off dates.	Population extracts used for the calculation; payroll and HR source files; the scope memo showing which entities, countries and worker categories were included or excluded; the country-by-country mapping of social protection arrangements; version control or sign-off showing the final cut-off date and any adjustments.
We separated the disclosed figure from any estimates by tracing it back to underlying records and by documenting where local data had to be normalised before consolidation. Where a country used a different scheme or classification, we recorded the basis for treating it as covered or not covered so the same rule was applied across the group.	An assurer will test whether the data was comparable across countries, whether local classifications were translated consistently, and whether management judgement was applied in a way that could bias the result.	Data transformation notes; mapping tables between local categories and group reporting categories; reconciliation between local submissions and the consolidated figure; documented judgement papers for any ambiguous cases; review evidence showing the same rule was applied across locations.
Before publication, we checked the figure against headcount totals, reviewed exceptions, and investigated any unusual movements from the prior period. We also had the underlying working papers reviewed by a second person so that the final disclosure matched the supporting files.	An assurer will look for evidence that the final number was independently checked, that anomalies were investigated, and that the published disclosure agrees to the source workings without unexplained differences.	Reconciliation to headcount and other control totals; exception logs and follow-up notes; prior-period comparison analysis; reviewer sign-off or evidence of independent review; final working paper pack and the published disclosure showing consistency with the support.
For the part of the disclosure dealing with gaps in protection, we used a documented list of major life events and checked each country against that list using local policy documents and benefit summaries. Where a gap existed, we kept the supporting note showing why the event was treated as not covered.	An assurer will probe whether the list of events was complete and applied consistently, whether local documents actually support the coverage conclusion, and whether any gaps were omitted or described too narrowly.	The approved list of major life events used for the assessment; local policy documents, employee handbooks or benefit summaries; the country-by-country assessment matrix; notes explaining any gaps identified; evidence of management review of the final wording.

Dossier de preuves à préparer

The governing policy or written commitment behind this disclosureA methodology / definition note setting out how the disclosure was scoped and preparedSource-system exports the figures or facts were drawn fromThe internal approval / sign-off record for the disclosure before publicationMinutes or records evidencing the relevant engagement or consultation

Lacunes fréquentes dans les rapports

The information is presented without a date or as-at point.

The scope or boundary of the statement is left undefined.

Key terms are used inconsistently across the report.

Material changes since the previous period are not disclosed.

Assertions are made without supporting detail or a source record.

Boilerplate is used that does not actually answer what is asked.

Lacunes fréquentes

Erreurs à éviter lors de la collecte des données

Wrong ownerThe request goes to HR or payroll in framework language, so the team that actually tracks social cover in each country never confirms the figures.

Unclear population boundaryThe data pull mixes employees, contractors, and other groups because nobody first states which workforce population is in scope for the count.

No country splitRecords are gathered at group level only, so countries with no cover are not separated from countries where cover exists.

＋ Afficher 6 de plus

Là où un jugement professionnel est souvent nécessaire

Define the reporting perimeter after a deal closesIf a business is bought or sold during the period, state the cut-off you used for including people and explain whether the answer reflects the group at period end or a time-weighted view.

Choose one country rule where local schemes differWhere national systems describe protected events differently, map them to one internal list for sickness, job loss, injury and maternity, then explain the mapping so readers can see how the comparison was made.

Decide how to treat workers just outside the core populationSet out whether you included or excluded people such as agency staff, contractors or part-year joiners, and explain the practical rule used to place them inside or outside the count.

＋ Afficher 6 de plus

Exemples

Exemples illustratifs

Synthétiques, rédigés par LRA — ils ne proviennent ni d’un rapport d’entreprise ni du texte d’une norme.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — Food manufacturing

We say our workforce is covered by our employee protection arrangements, and those arrangements include support for illness, job loss, workplace harm and parental leave. In the countries where we operate, there are 2 where some staff are not covered by one or more of those protections.
- Coverage: yes
- Protections included: sickness, unemployment, injury and maternity
- Countries with gaps: 2

This example shows a simple narrative way to state whether the company’s own arrangements apply, which kinds of life events they address, and how many countries still have gaps.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — Retail logistics

Our group does not yet provide full protection across every location, so the answer on coverage is no. The package we do have covers illness, unemployment, injury and maternity, and there are 5 countries where at least one of those protections is missing.
- Coverage: no
- Protections included: sickness, unemployment, injury and maternity
- Countries with gaps: 5

This example shows how to report a partial position: state the overall yes/no outcome, list the life events addressed by the arrangements, and give the number of countries where coverage is incomplete.

Rapports d’entreprises

Comment les entreprises publient S1-10 en pratique

Exemples de pratiques de publication complètes et partielles. Ce sont des analyses fondées sur des preuves, non des modèles à recopier.

Rapports réels publiés

Hera S.p.A.

Water Utilities · Italy · 2024

Ouvrir le rapport →

Hera S.p.A.'s 2024 Consolidated Financial Statements include references to social protection, diversity, and training, with specific data points noted on pages 264 and 245, such as social protection (p.264), diversity metrics (p.264), and economic activities related to climate change mitigation and adaptation (p.245). The report also mentions employment relationships and remuneration alongside diversity metrics on page 264, and employee characteristics on page 263. However, no direct quotable narrative evidence was found in the report to provide detailed disclosure on these topics.

Aena S.M.E., S.A.

Air Transportation — Airport Services · Spain · 2025

Ouvrir le rapport →

Aena S.M.E., S.A.'s 2025 sustainability report provides detailed information on social protection coverage for salaried employees, stating that the group complements 100% of state sickness benefits and that 95.95% of employees were covered by social protection in 2025, with 99.85% covered by collective bargaining agreements (p.220, p.218). The report also references diversity metrics and adequate wages related to social protection (p.70). However, no specific data on other aspects of social protection or related narrative items were found in the report.

GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft

Electrical Equipment and Machinery · Germany · 2025

Ouvrir le rapport →

GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft’s 2025 Annual Report provides some data related to workforce metrics, including collective bargaining coverage and diversity (p.233), as well as injury frequency and severity rates under a strict zero-tolerance policy (p.233). The report also references incidents of discrimination and non-respect of UN Guiding Principles (p.228), and notes that 100% of employees are covered by a health and safety management system (p.178). However, no clear or quotable narrative evidence was found in the report to elaborate on these points or provide further context.

Comparer côte à côte →

✓ Assistant IA LRA · Supervision humaine

Interrogez l’assistant IA de Study Studio sur cette information

Obtenez des réponses concrètes pour votre contexte de reporting. Les deux premières réponses sont gratuites — rejoignez gratuitement LRA Community pour continuer sans limite.

Essayez Comment préparer S1-10 ? Quelles données dois-je collecter ? Où voir un exemple issu d’un rapport réel ? Quelles erreurs éviter ?

2 réponses gratuites

Vérifiez votre compréhension

Scénarios à travailler

A group of 120 employees is split across three countries. In two countries, the company pays into public or private schemes that cover illness, job loss, workplace injury and parental leave; in the third country, only 18 of 40 workers have any such cover through the employer.

QHow should the preparer decide whether to mark the coverage field as yes or no, and what should be captured about the third country?

Afficher la réponse type →

A preparer is drafting the note for a multinational group and finds that one subsidiary offers sickness and injury cover, while another only provides injury cover and no support for unemployment or maternity-related absence. The team is unsure whether to list every event separately or use a broad label.

QWhat level of detail should be given for the kinds of events covered?

Afficher la réponse type →

A company has operations in five countries. Four countries have employee social insurance arrangements, but in one country the local labour market is informal and the employer has no scheme in place for its 15 staff there. The draft note currently says only that the group has ‘broad coverage globally’.

QWhat should the preparer do about the country with no cover?

Afficher la réponse type →

A preparer has data showing that 78 of 90 workers in Country A are covered, 50 of 50 in Country B are covered, and 0 of 12 in Country C are covered. The team wants to report only the two countries with cover because the third one is sensitive.

QShould the country with no cover be left out, or included in the disclosure?

Afficher la réponse type →

Références au référentiel

Exigences ESRS applicables et informations connexes

Références disponibles du référentiel et informations voisines utiles à la préparation de cette exigence.

ESRS

S1-10

au sein de ESRS S1 : Own Workforce

Ouvrir la source officielle →

Connexes et exploration

Policies (Own Workforce) → Fiche Disabilities → Fiche Training → Fiche Health & Safety → Fiche Work-life Balance → Fiche Parcourir toutes les informations →

Plus dans ESRS S1 → Parcourir le catalogue complet → Accueil de la Bibliothèque des informations → Rechercher dans toutes les informations →

FAQ

Questions auxquelles cette page répond

How do I prepare disclosure S1-10 (ESRS S1 Own Workforce) using this page in practice?+

What data do I need to collect for S1-10 before I draft the disclosure?+

How should I decide the scope for S1-10 coverage status and covered event types?+

Who should own the S1-10 data and evidence pack in practice?+

What evidence do I need to make S1-10 assurance-ready?+

What are the common mistakes to avoid when reporting S1-10?+

How do I use the Prep & Assurance workbook for S1-10?+

What is the printable Library Card for S1-10 used for?+

Can I use the synthetic example disclosure on the S1-10 page as a template?+

How do I turn S1-10 data into a draft narrative and content index line?+

Autres questions auxquelles cette page peut aider

S1-10 ESRS S1 Own Workforce: what should I check before I start collecting data?S1-10 disclosure: how do I document coverage status and uncovered countries clearly?What does the S1-10 evidence pack need to contain for assurance review?How do I use the S1-10 step-by-step preparation section with HR data owners?What are the S1-10 reporting gaps and how do I avoid them?How do I use the S1-10 workbook to track claims, risks and evidence?Where can I find example company reports for S1-10 topics on the page?How do I write a draft S1-10 disclosure from the page’s narrative starters?What are the three datapoints to prepare for S1-10 own workforce disclosure?Is there a printable S1-10 reference sheet in the Download Centre?

Aller plus loin · S1-10

Apprenez à préparer cette information de bout en bout

This guide covers one Disclosure Requirement. The ESRS / CSRD Reporting course walks the full European workflow — double materiality, datapoints, evidence and assurance — with exercises on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

Explore the ESRS / CSRD course →

Comment cette bibliothèque est construite 312 rapports publiés indexés 63 171 pages avec citations au niveau de la page 272 fiches disclosure conçues par des praticiens

/fr/knowledge-hub/disclosure-cards/esrs-s1-10/

Gratuit · LRA Community

Obtenez vos outils S1-10 — gratuitement

Vos outils de préparation sont gratuits pour les membres de LRA Community et les étudiants. Inscrivez-vous une fois (c’est gratuit) et votre téléchargement démarre aussitôt — avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA.

	Rapport A	Rapport B	Rapport C
Point de donnée 1	✓ p.213	peu clair	✓ p.87
Point de donnée 2	✓ p.214	—	✓ p.90

Les membres voient la carte complète de couverture des points de données — ✓ avec références de page — sur trois rapports réels, dans les mots des entreprises elles-mêmes.

Social Protection

Passeport publié

Avant de commencer

Informations clés à préparer

Comment le préparer

Request the social protection coverage data from People Operations

Des notes qui transforment les données en information publiée

Outils et formulaires de préparation

Pour chaque affirmation, vérifiez les preuves

Erreurs à éviter lors de la collecte des données

Là où un jugement professionnel est souvent nécessaire

Exemples illustratifs

Comment les entreprises publient S1-10 en pratique

Interrogez l’assistant IA de Study Studio sur cette information

Scénarios à travailler

Exigences ESRS applicables et informations connexes

Questions auxquelles cette page répond

Apprenez à préparer cette information de bout en bout

Contactez-nous