Disclosure GuidesThe questions that hold a report up, settled

London Reporting Academy·Disclosure guides

Understand the questions behind the standards.

Expert-written answers to the questions that slow reporting teams down. Each one opens with the conclusion, shows the requirement it rests on, explains the conditions and the judgement involved, and links to the disclosure cards the decision affects.

  • 478 guides published
  • Practitioner-written, technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Free to read

✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop

Not sure how to phrase the question? Describe the situation.

The assistant answers from reviewed LRA content, names the missing fact instead of inventing one, and points you to the guide or disclosure card the decision lands on. Your first two answers are free without signing in.

Try
2 free answers Automated · the LRA team is one click away

Answers from the published guides · 275 disclosure cards · 1,211 indexed reports

Disclosure guides

Assurance and controls

Clear the filters and show every guide →

UK S2·Explainer·Assurance and controls

UK SRS S2 Climate Governance Disclosures: Board Oversight, Skills and Controls

UK SRS S2 governance disclosure must explain how climate oversight operates, not merely name the board or committee. The entity identifies the governance body or individual responsible, shows how responsibility appears in mandates and role descriptions, explains how suitable skills are available or developed, describes what information is received and how often, and shows how climate matters enter strategy, major transactions, risk management and trade-off decisions.

Helps you decideWhether the climate-governance narrative is supported by clear responsibility, capable oversight, decision evidence and operating controls.

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

UK S2·Decision guide·Assurance and controls

Internal Controls Over UK SRS S2 Climate Disclosures Data Models and Sign Off

UK SRS S2 requires governance disclosure about oversight of controls and procedures, but it does not prescribe one universal control framework. A defensible system begins with the risks of material misstatement or misleading disclosure: incomplete climate matters, wrong boundaries, model/version errors, unsupported estimates, disconnected financial effects, inaccurate targets, unbalanced narrative and uncontrolled publication changes.

Helps you decideWhich control prevents or detects the specific disclosure failure, who operates it and what evidence remains.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 7 min Read the guide →

UK S2·Decision guide·Assurance and controls

UK SRS S2 Assurance Readiness GHG Scenarios Financial Effects and Controls

UK SRS S2 does not contain a general requirement that every entity obtain independent assurance. Assurance can nevertheless arise under a future regulatory route, another jurisdiction, a contract or a voluntary decision.

Helps you decideWhat is being assured, against which criteria, over what boundary and at what level.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 7 min Read the guide →

UK S2·Decision guide·Assurance and controls

UK SRS S2 for CFOs: Connecting Climate Risk, GHG and the Annual Report

The CFO should own the connection between climate information and the organisation’s financial reporting system, even though specialist teams continue to own underlying risk, engineering, operational and GHG evidence. Finance should ensure that material climate-related risks and opportunities are reflected consistently in budgets, forecasts, asset and liability judgements, cash-flow and financing analysis, capital allocation, scenario assumptions and the annual report.

Helps you decideWhich climate information must enter finance systems, which specialist owners remain responsible, and which reconciliations and approvals are required before annual-report release.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 14 min Read the guide →

How an LRA guide is built

Every answer follows the same discipline.

You should be able to stop reading after the first paragraph and still have what you came for. Everything below it exists so you can defend the answer to a reviewer.

  1. 01
    Answer

    The question is stated as a reporting team would ask it, and settled in the opening lines.

  2. 02
    Basis

    The official source and edition are named, and kept clearly apart from our reading of them.

  3. 03
    Judgement

    The points the standard leaves open are marked, with what a defensible position looks like.

  4. 04
    Action

    The answer links to the disclosures and evidence it affects, so a decision turns into fields to fill.

  • Practitioner-written, then technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Requirements kept separate from practice and interpretation
  • Stated update triggers for re-reading each answer

Coverage

Which frameworks have answers yet.

The guides tier is written framework by framework rather than thinly across all of them, so this says where the writing has actually reached. Disclosure cards, which cover the requirements themselves, run ahead of it.

Found the answer?

Turn the decision into a disclosure.

An answer settles what to do. The disclosure card is where it becomes data to collect, owners to name, evidence to retain and wording to draft — and when the whole reporting cycle is the problem, the programme walks it with a mentor on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

/en/knowledge-hub/disclosure-guides/ Wave 1 — English only