Disclosure GuidesThe questions that hold a report up, settled

London Reporting Academy·Disclosure guides

Understand the questions behind the standards.

Expert-written answers to the questions that slow reporting teams down. Each one opens with the conclusion, shows the requirement it rests on, explains the conditions and the judgement involved, and links to the disclosure cards the decision affects.

  • 478 guides published
  • Practitioner-written, technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Free to read

✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop

Not sure how to phrase the question? Describe the situation.

The assistant answers from reviewed LRA content, names the missing fact instead of inventing one, and points you to the guide or disclosure card the decision lands on. Your first two answers are free without signing in.

Try
2 free answers Automated · the LRA team is one click away

Answers from the published guides · 275 disclosure cards · 1,211 indexed reports

Disclosure guides

Reporting boundaries

Clear the filters and show every guide →

ESRS·Decision guide·Reporting boundaries

ESRS Explained: What the Standards Require, Who Must Apply Them and How to Start

ESRS are the reporting standards used to prepare the sustainability statement required by the EU Accounting Directive, as amended by the CSRD and Omnibus I. They do not decide legal scope on their own.

Helps you decideDetermine the legal gateway, applicable ESRS edition, reporting boundary, material matters and first implementation sequence.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 13 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Decision guide·Reporting boundaries

Who Must Report Under CSRD After Omnibus I? The 2026 Scope Guide

For financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027, the main Omnibus I scope at EU Directive level covers an undertaking at individual level, or a group at consolidated level, only where it exceeds both EUR 450 million net turnover and an average of 1,000 employees during the financial year. There is no separate balance-sheet-total threshold.

Helps you decideDetermine whether individual, consolidated, issuer or third-country reporting applies for a specified financial year and jurisdiction.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Explainer·Reporting boundaries

ESRS for Non-EU Groups and ESRS-40a: Scope, Exemptions and Emerging Requirements

A non-EU group should not begin with ESRS-40a. It should first map every possible EU reporting route: direct reporting by an EU subsidiary or issuer under Articles 19a or 29a, a consolidated subsidiary exemption where all conditions are met, and the separate third-country reporting route under Articles 40a to 40d.

Helps you decideESRS for Non-EU Groups and ESRS-40a: Scope, Exemptions and Emerging Requirements

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 16 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Comparison·Reporting boundaries

CSRD vs ESRS: What Is the Difference?

CSRD and ESRS are connected but not interchangeable. CSRD is Directive (EU) 2022/2464, which amended the EU Accounting Directive to create sustainability-reporting, assurance and governance obligations.

Helps you decideSeparate the legal scope and transposition analysis from the reporting-standard implementation analysis.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

ESRS·Decision guide·Reporting boundaries

ESRS Reporting Boundaries: Financial Consolidation, Own Operations and the Value Chain

An ESRS boundary is not one perimeter. Start with the same reporting undertaking used for the financial statements, classify the activities and recognised shares that form own operations, extend the analysis to material impacts, risks and opportunities connected through the upstream and downstream value chain, and then apply any topic- or metric-specific boundary rule.

Helps you decideHow should each entity, activity, asset or relationship be classified for the materiality assessment, narrative disclosures and individual metrics?

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 17 min Read the guide →

How an LRA guide is built

Every answer follows the same discipline.

You should be able to stop reading after the first paragraph and still have what you came for. Everything below it exists so you can defend the answer to a reviewer.

  1. 01
    Answer

    The question is stated as a reporting team would ask it, and settled in the opening lines.

  2. 02
    Basis

    The official source and edition are named, and kept clearly apart from our reading of them.

  3. 03
    Judgement

    The points the standard leaves open are marked, with what a defensible position looks like.

  4. 04
    Action

    The answer links to the disclosures and evidence it affects, so a decision turns into fields to fill.

  • Practitioner-written, then technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Requirements kept separate from practice and interpretation
  • Stated update triggers for re-reading each answer

Coverage

Which frameworks have answers yet.

The guides tier is written framework by framework rather than thinly across all of them, so this says where the writing has actually reached. Disclosure cards, which cover the requirements themselves, run ahead of it.

Found the answer?

Turn the decision into a disclosure.

An answer settles what to do. The disclosure card is where it becomes data to collect, owners to name, evidence to retain and wording to draft — and when the whole reporting cycle is the problem, the programme walks it with a mentor on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

/en/knowledge-hub/disclosure-guides/ Wave 1 — English only