Level 2 · Comparison·ESRS · Disclosure guides
CSRD vs ESRS: What Is the Difference?
The legal directive and the reporting standards explained, including national transposition, scope, timetable, assurance and the practical route from EU law to a compliant sustainability statement.
Published passport
Current as at 10 August 2026
Reviewed by
Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn
Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert
GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert
15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures
Canary Wharf, London
LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by European Commission
Edition written against
—
Published
10 Aug 2026
Knowledge Hub guide
Last reviewed
10 Aug 2026
Short answer
The answer, before the reasoning
CSRD and ESRS are connected but not interchangeable. CSRD is Directive (EU) 2022/2464, which amended the EU Accounting Directive to create sustainability-reporting, assurance and governance obligations.
Omnibus I subsequently amended that legal framework. ESRS are Commission delegated regulations adopted under the Accounting Directive: they specify how an in-scope undertaking identifies material information and what it reports in the sustainability statement. In practice, national law answers “must this undertaking report, when and at what level?”; the ESRS version in force answers “how must the statement be prepared and presented?”
The distinction matters because a technically good ESRS disclosure cannot cure a wrong legal scope conclusion, and a correct conclusion that a company is in scope does not tell the reporting team which datapoints, boundaries, reliefs and presentation rules apply. Compliance requires both routes to be controlled and then connected.
Technical status
EDITORIAL STATUS
<p>Publication and legal-status control This is an educational comparison, not a legal opinion. As at 2 August 2026, Omnibus I is in force as an EU directive but requires national transposition by 19 March 2027. Revised ESRS were adopted on 3 July 2026 but are not yet in force. The current legally applicable ESRS remain Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 as amended by the 2025 Quick Fix.</p>
Quick orientation
Figure 1. How the Accounting Directive, CSRD, Omnibus I, national law and ESRS fit together. London Reporting Academy learning visual.
Quick orientation
- Applies to
- Undertakings and groups deciding whether, when and how they must prepare EU sustainability reporting.
- Primary decision
- Separate the legal scope and transposition analysis from the reporting-standard implementation analysis.
- Key source
- Accounting Directive as amended by CSRD and Omnibus I; ESRS delegated regulations adopted under Article 29b.
- Common confusion
- Calling ESRS “the CSRD law”, or assuming an EU directive automatically operates identically in every Member State without transposition analysis.
1. CSRD is a directive that amended the Accounting Directive
CSRD is shorthand for the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, Directive (EU) 2022/2464. It did not create a self-contained reporting code separate from existing company law. Instead, it amended Directive 2013/34/EU, commonly called the Accounting Directive, as well as related audit and transparency legislation. The legal duties to include sustainability information in the management report, obtain an assurance opinion and prepare information in an electronic format therefore sit within that wider legislative architecture.
Directive (EU) 2026/470, known as Omnibus I, amended the framework again. It narrowed the mandatory reporting population, removed the listed-SME route, introduced new value-chain protections and instructed the Commission to simplify the ESRS. It entered into force on 18 March 2026, but Articles 1 to 3 must be transposed by Member States by 19 March 2027. A directive binds Member States as to the result to be achieved; the company-facing obligation normally needs to be read in the domestic implementing law.
2. ESRS are delegated regulations that specify the reporting method and content
Article 29b of the Accounting Directive empowers the European Commission to adopt European Sustainability Reporting Standards. The first set was adopted as Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772. A targeted “Quick Fix” amendment, Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1416, extended selected phase-in reliefs for undertakings already reporting. Revised ESRS were adopted by the Commission on 3 July 2026 through act C(2026) 5010, but at the review date they had not yet entered into force because scrutiny and Official Journal publication were still outstanding.
Unlike a directive, an EU regulation is directly applicable once it is in force. Member States do not rewrite the ESRS into national standards. However, the regulation applies to undertakings that are required by the transposed Accounting Directive rules to report, and the national law may affect scope, exemptions, filing, enforcement, assurance-provider eligibility and other procedural matters.
In practice
3. Side-by-side comparison
| Question | CSRD / Accounting Directive route | ESRS delegated-regulation route |
|---|---|---|
| What is it? | EU legislative amendments to company-reporting, audit and transparency law. | Detailed sustainability reporting standards adopted by the Commission. |
| Primary job | Determine the legal duty, population, timing, reporting location, assurance and enforcement framework. | Determine preparation principles, materiality, boundaries, disclosures, presentation and reliefs. |
| How does it reach a company? | Through national transposition, plus directly relevant EU provisions and related laws. | Directly applicable EU regulation once in force, for undertakings subject to the legal duty. |
| Who decides scope? | The Accounting Directive as amended, the CSRD/Omnibus timetable, national law and entity facts. | ESRS do not create the legal population, although they contain applicability rules for disclosures. |
| What document is produced? | A sustainability statement in a dedicated section of the management report. | The content and structure of that sustainability statement. |
| Materiality | Requires reporting of impacts and financial effects through the statutory framework. | Explains double materiality and information materiality in operational detail. |
| Assurance | Creates the assurance obligation and legal opinion framework. | Shapes the information and evidence that must be assurance-ready, but does not itself appoint the assurer. |
| Change mechanism | Amending directive followed by national implementation. | Commission delegated regulation subject to scrutiny and publication. |
4. National transposition is not a footnote
For a specific company, the enforceable answer depends on the law of the relevant Member State or States. A parent may have to consider the jurisdiction of incorporation, the rules governing the management report, issuer home-Member-State requirements, subsidiary exemptions, filing law and auditor or independent assurance-provider rules. Omnibus I’s new thresholds and transition provisions must be brought into national law by the deadline, and Member States may use certain derogations - including a potential exemption for below-new-threshold wave-one entities for financial years beginning in 2025 and 2026.
Rule
Legal control point
<p>Do not state that an undertaking is automatically exempt for FY2025 or FY2026 merely because it falls below the future Omnibus I thresholds. The Directive permits Member States to exempt those undertakings; the actual answer depends on national implementation and the reporting period.</p>
5. Scope and timetable: the questions belong to the legal route
At EU Directive level, Omnibus I targets the main individual and consolidated reporting duty for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027 at undertakings or groups that exceed both EUR 450 million net turnover and an average of 1,000 employees during the financial year. It also adjusts issuer rules, removes listed SMEs from the regime, applies the reduced scope logic to qualifying credit institutions and insurance undertakings, and revises the third-country route.
The third-country route uses a different test. The non-EU parent must have generated more than EUR 450 million net turnover in the Union for each of the last two consecutive financial years, together with an EU subsidiary exceeding EUR 200 million net turnover in the preceding year, or - where there is no qualifying subsidiary - an EU branch exceeding EUR 200 million. These thresholds answer whether a report is required under Article 40a; they do not tell the group which standard version or transition option to use.
In practice
| Period / event | Legal significance | Practical action |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024-FY2026 | The first-wave route continues for the original population, subject to national derogations and existing law. | Check the Member State’s current legislation and any adopted exemption. |
| 18 March 2026 | Omnibus I entered into force as an EU directive. | Update group scope policy and monitor transposition. |
| 3 July 2026 | Commission adopted revised ESRS. | Prepare change analysis; do not treat the text as in force before publication. |
| FY2026 | The adopted revised act provides version choices once it is in force. | Select and document the applicable route; disclose the version used. |
| 19 March 2027 | Deadline to transpose Omnibus I Articles 1-3. | Reconfirm domestic scope, exemptions and filing rules. |
| FY beginning on/after 1 January 2027 | New scope and revised ESRS architecture are intended to apply, subject to legal completion. | Use the final in-force legal texts and national law. |
6. Practical compliance is a two-track process
Identify the relevant legal entities, parent, issuer and reporting jurisdictions.
Calculate individual and consolidated thresholds using documented definitions and periods.
Check national transposition, derogations, subsidiary exemptions and third-country provisions.
Determine the applicable ESRS delegated regulation and any transition choice.
Perform double materiality and map material information to the applicable ESRS requirements.
Prepare the statement in the management report and design assurance, governance and digital-format controls.
Reconfirm the legal and standards analysis immediately before board approval and filing.
In practice
| Track | Questions | Controlled output |
|---|---|---|
| A · Legal applicability | Which entity or group? Which Member State? Which thresholds? Which period? Which exemption? Issuer, bank, insurer or third-country rules? | Signed legal scope memorandum with citations, calculations and approval. |
| B · Reporting standards | Which ESRS version is in force? Is an FY2026 option available? Which material matters and information? Which reliefs and boundaries? | Version memorandum, materiality register, applicability matrix and reporting manual. |
| Connection | Does the ESRS statement use the legally required reporting entity, period, location, assurance scope and release process? | Integrated reporting plan and management-report disclosure index. |
Hypothetical scenario
Illustrative scenario - EU parent with multiple subsidiaries
<p>An EU parent has consolidated turnover of EUR 620 million and 1,350 employees. Two subsidiaries operate in different Member States, one is an issuer and one is regulated as an insurer. The group first documents whether consolidated reporting under Article 29a applies after the relevant national transpositions. It separately checks whether any subsidiary remains individually in scope or can use a group exemption, and whether issuer or insurance provisions alter the route. Only then does it select the ESRS version, perform group double materiality and design the consolidated statement. The team does not use “we are above the threshold, therefore all ESRS datapoints apply” as its conclusion.</p>
Illustrative only. It shows how the decision is made, not wording that can be copied or relied on.
Illustrative legal-basis wording
This wording separates the national legal obligation from the ESRS preparation basis. It must not be used without confirming the exact domestic citation, reporting level, standard version, exemption position and approval facts.
Hypothetical scenario
Illustrative wording - adapt to the entity and jurisdiction
<p>“The parent prepared this consolidated sustainability statement pursuant to [identify the national provision transposing Article 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, as applicable for the reporting period]. The statement has been prepared in accordance with [identify the ESRS delegated regulation and version in force or validly selected for the period]. The scope assessment, subsidiary exemptions and version decision were approved on [date] and are retained in the reporting control file.”</p>
Illustrative only. It shows how the decision is made, not wording that can be copied or relied on.
In practice
Common mistakes and corrections
| Mistake | Risk created | Correction |
|---|---|---|
| “CSRD is a set of 12 standards.” | Confuses the directive with ESRS and hides the national-law gateway. | Describe CSRD as the amending directive and ESRS as delegated reporting standards. |
| “The EU threshold is directly self-executing everywhere.” | May ignore transposition, domestic timing and derogations. | Issue a jurisdiction-specific scope memorandum. |
| “The revised ESRS were adopted, so they are already mandatory.” | Uses a text before entry into force and may select the wrong FY2026 route. | Track scrutiny, Official Journal publication and application provisions. |
| “Below the future thresholds means no FY2025/FY2026 report.” | Assumes a discretionary Member-State derogation has been used. | Check the relevant domestic exemption. |
| “A group report automatically exempts every subsidiary.” | Overlooks conditions and locally in-scope entities. | Test each exemption and subsidiary obligation separately. |
| “ESRS compliance is only a sustainability-team issue.” | Separates legal, financial, governance and assurance responsibilities. | Use a cross-functional RACI and board-level release gate. |
Readiness
Reviewer checklist
- The entity, parent, issuer and jurisdiction are correctly identified.
- Threshold calculations use the correct definitions, period and individual or consolidated basis.
- Both the turnover and employee conditions are tested for the main post-Omnibus scope.
- National transposition and any FY2025/FY2026 derogation are cited.
- Subsidiary, financial holding, credit institution, insurer and third-country rules are separately assessed.
- The ESRS version in force or validly selected is documented.
- The reporting entity and period in the statement match the legal conclusion.
- The assurance and digital-format requirements are included in the project plan.
- The conclusion is revalidated before board approval and publication.
In practice
Source register
| ID | Official source | Role in article — Status |
|---|---|---|
| S1 | Directive 2013/34/EU (Accounting Directive), consolidated as at 18 March 2026 | Company-reporting law containing Articles 19a, 29a, 29b, 29d, 34 and 40a — Current EU directive text |
| S2 | Directive (EU) 2022/2464 (CSRD) | Amending directive that introduced the reporting regime — Amended by Omnibus I |
| S3 | Directive (EU) 2026/470 (Omnibus I) | Revised scope, timetable, value-chain cap and transposition deadline — In force; transposition pending |
| S4 | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 | Current ESRS delegated regulation — In force |
| S5 | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1416 | Current Quick Fix amendment — In force |
| S6 | Commission Delegated Regulation C(2026) 5010 final and annexes | Adopted revised ESRS and FY2026 transition routes — Not yet in force at review date |
| S7 | Directive 2004/109/EC | Issuer route under transparency law — Current as amended |
Take it with you
The checklists as a working spreadsheet
Every checklist and table on this page, with empty status, owner and evidence columns for your team to fill in and keep.
✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop
Ask about this guide
It answers from this page, and reaches into the linked disclosure cards when your question is about the standard itself. Your first two answers are free without signing in.
Go deeper · ESRS
ESRS and CSRD training
Double materiality, datapoints and the sustainability statement, with a mentor on your own report.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.