Skip to the screening

Materiality Navigator·Electrical Equipment and Machinery

Which topics should you investigate first?

Choose a business model to see the candidate sustainability topics most likely to need investigation, and why. Then refine the shortlist, work through each topic and record a preliminary screening decision.

This is an industry-informed hypothesis. Your task is to test it against the organisation's impacts, dependencies, risks, opportunities and stakeholder evidence. Industry relevance does not make a topic material.

High-voltage transformers and insulators at an electrical substation.
Step 1 Choose the business model you are screening

Candidate topics — Electrical Equipment and Machinery

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Lifecycle responsibility for sold electrical and electronic equipment after first sale, including take-back, repair, refurbishment, depollution, component harvesting and authorised recycling.

How it shows up in this industry

The industry sells long-lived transformers, motors, switchgear, drives, power electronics, lighting, control panels, instrumentation and circuit boards containing copper, aluminium, steel, precious metals, plastics, oils, capacitors, flame retardants and sometimes batteries. Reverse logistics already cover warranty returns, failed circuit boards, refurbished spares, oil-filled equipment and authorised WEEE treatment routes.

Why it may be material

Expanding WEEE producer responsibility, recycling targets and customer procurement requirements make take-back, repairability and authorised recycling financially and environmentally material. Poor end-of-life controls can expose dismantlers and communities to hazardous materials, lose valuable metals and create reputational or compliance liabilities.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach supply-chain workers.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  5. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  6. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  7. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  8. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  9. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Business partners, Customers / end-users, Suppliers.
  10. The source places the pathway in Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  5. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on supply-chain workers?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Supplier workforce, audit, grievance and remediation records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Electronics assembly plants with surface-mount technology lines, selective soldering, reflow ovens and conformal coating booths
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for electronic components, copper, electrical steel, hazardous chemicals, spare parts and finished goods
  • Process-map item (assets): Enterprise resource planning, product lifecycle management, digital twin, traceability and quality management systems
  • Process-map item (customers): Electric utilities, transmission operators and distribution network operators buying transformers, switchgear, protection relays and grid automation equipment
  • Process-map item (customers): Rail, marine, defence and aerospace integrators using specialised electrical cabinets, connectors, sensors and power electronics

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Routine releases of local air pollutants from metalworking, surface preparation, coating, heat treatment and testing activities.

How it shows up in this industry

Foundries, forge shops, heat-treatment lines, welding bays, shot blasting, grinding cells, solvent painting, powder coating, plating and engine or dynamometer test cells can release welding fume, particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, paint overspray, combustion gases and test exhaust.

Why it may be material

Air emissions are directly tied to common fabrication, finishing, heat-treatment and testing processes, and can affect environmental permits, abatement capital expenditure and relationships with workers and nearby communities.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  2. Potential effects may reach workers.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  5. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Contractors, Employees.
  6. The source places the pathway in Own operations.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on the atmosphere?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): CNC machining centres, grinding cells, laser cutters, press brakes, welding bays and robotic fabrication cells
  • Process-map item (assets): Surface preparation and finishing facilities, including shot blasting, phosphating, powder coating, solvent painting and plating lines
  • Process-map item (assets): Industrial IoT platforms, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cybersecurity controls
  • Process-map item (customers): Engineering, procurement and construction contractors specifying packaged machinery for industrial projects
  • Process-map item (customers): Distributors, dealers and system integrators selling standard industrial components, spares and automation packages

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Contractors
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Generation, storage, treatment, recovery and disposal of hazardous wastes and contaminated residues from electrical and electronic equipment manufacturing processes.

How it shows up in this industry

Electronics assembly, soldering, cleaning, etching, metal fabrication, powder coating, coil impregnation, resin casting, oil filling, surface treatment and wastewater treatment can generate spent solvents, solder dross, etching residues, used oils, resin wastes, contaminated wipes, filter media, wastewater treatment sludge and spent plating baths.

Why it may be material

Hazardous waste management creates recurring storage, documentation, contractor, treatment and disposal costs. Misclassification, poor segregation, poor storage or unauthorised disposal can trigger penalties, clean-up liabilities, insurance issues and reputational damage with customers requiring responsible manufacturing controls.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  4. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  5. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  6. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Contractors, Employees, Suppliers.
  8. The source places the pathway in Own operations.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on contractors?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on water bodies?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for electronic components, copper, electrical steel, hazardous chemicals, spare parts and finished goods
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Tightening restrictions on PFAS, brominated flame retardants, lead, cadmium and other substances used in insulation, coatings, solders and electronic components
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Investor and lender focus on Scope 3 emissions from purchased metals, use-phase energy losses and end-of-life waste
  • Process-map item (external_impacts): Air emissions from soldering, solvent cleaning, resin curing, powder coating, plating and thermal processes, including particulates and volatile organic compounds
  • Process-map item (external_impacts): Wastewater containing metals, flux residues, acids, alkalis, oils and suspended solids from surface treatment, cooling and cleaning operations

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Contractors
  • Employees
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Management of hazardous and recoverable production residues from casting, machining, fabrication, blasting, coating, plating, assembly and maintenance.

How it shows up in this industry

Foundries, machining cells, grinding operations, shot blasting, coating, plating, assembly and maintenance activities generate scrap metal, swarf, grinding dust, spent abrasives, rejected castings, spent solvents, waste oils, metalworking fluid residues, contaminated filters, oily rags, paint sludge, plating sludge and packaging waste.

Why it may be material

Waste handling affects disposal cost, permit compliance, contractor dependency and liability, while better segregation can recover alloy value and reduce hazardous waste exposure.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  2. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  3. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  4. Potential effects may reach workers.
  5. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  6. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Business partners, Contractors, Employees, Suppliers.
  8. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on ecosystems?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on soil and groundwater?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): CNC machining centres, grinding cells, laser cutters, press brakes, welding bays and robotic fabrication cells
  • Process-map item (assets): Surface preparation and finishing facilities, including shot blasting, phosphating, powder coating, solvent painting and plating lines
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Industrial IoT platforms, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cybersecurity controls
  • Process-map item (customers): Engineering, procurement and construction contractors specifying packaged machinery for industrial projects

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Business partners
  • Contractors
  • Employees
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Decarbonisation of industrial machinery manufacturing and product portfolios, including production energy, lower-emission equipment designs and lifetime energy performance of sold machinery.

How it shows up in this industry

Industrial machinery manufacturers operate energy-intensive foundries, forge shops, heat-treatment lines, machining centres, compressed-air systems, paint curing ovens, dynamometers and engine test cells. Their pumps, compressors, fans, generators, drives and mobile industrial equipment can consume electricity or fuel for decades in factories, utilities, ports, mines and heavy industrial sites.

Why it may be material

Energy costs, customer science-based targets, ecodesign expectations, carbon pricing and tender requirements make manufacturing emissions and use-phase energy performance central to both impact and revenue resilience.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  2. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  3. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Customers / end-users, Suppliers.
  5. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Engineering design data, CAD models, bills of materials, product lifecycle management systems and embedded control software
  • Process-map item (customers): Manufacturers using pumps, compressors, conveyors, robotics, machine tools, bearings and process machinery in production lines
  • Process-map item (customers): Energy, mining, quarrying, oil and gas, chemicals, cement, pulp and paper, steel and water utilities using heavy rotating and process equipment
  • Process-map item (customers): Engineering, procurement and construction contractors specifying packaged machinery for industrial projects

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Product lifecycle stewardship for long-lived machinery, including repairable design, spare-parts availability, remanufacturing, core exchange, take-back, recyclability information and digital product passport readiness.

How it shows up in this industry

The subindustry has large installed bases of pumps, compressors, gearboxes, drives, bearings, valves, cranes, engines, power units and automation modules. Aftermarket service, condition monitoring, field repair, spare parts, core exchange, remanufacturing, upgraded control panels and take-back are part of many business models and are increasingly affected by right-to-repair and digital product passport expectations.

Why it may be material

Circular service models can stabilise revenue and reduce material demand, while weak parts availability, poor repair documentation or restrictive diagnostics can damage customer trust and attract regulatory scrutiny.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  2. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  3. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  4. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  5. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  6. Potential effects may reach supply-chain workers.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Business partners, Customers / end-users, Suppliers.
  8. The source places the pathway in Downstream, Own operations, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on downstream users?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Supplier workforce, audit, grievance and remediation records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Field service fleets, mobile cranes, lifting tackle, diagnostic kits and repair workshops
  • Process-map item (assets): Engineering design data, CAD models, bills of materials, product lifecycle management systems and embedded control software
  • Process-map item (customers): Manufacturers using pumps, compressors, conveyors, robotics, machine tools, bearings and process machinery in production lines
  • Process-map item (customers): Engineering, procurement and construction contractors specifying packaged machinery for industrial projects

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Climate transition exposure from manufacturing energy, fugitive fluorinated gases and long operational electricity losses in electrical equipment placed on the market.

How it shows up in this industry

Electrical and electronic equipment manufacturers operate reflow ovens, curing ovens, compressed-air systems, high-voltage test bays, coil impregnation lines and gas filling operations. Their transformers, motors, drives, power supplies and switchgear can influence electricity demand and fluorinated gas emissions for decades in grids, factories, buildings, data centres and renewable energy assets.

Why it may be material

The topic is central because it combines direct manufacturing emissions with long-lived downstream electricity losses and SF6 leakage in a core product family. Utility framework agreements, ecodesign rules, green procurement, grid expansion and investor scrutiny can affect revenue access, financing and capital allocation.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  2. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  3. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  4. Potential effects may reach workers.
  5. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  6. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees.
  7. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  7. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on the atmosphere?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Process-map item (assets): Switchgear and circuit breaker assembly lines with gas filling, vacuum interrupter handling, relay calibration and arc-fault testing
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for electronic components, copper, electrical steel, hazardous chemicals, spare parts and finished goods
  • Process-map item (assets): Enterprise resource planning, product lifecycle management, digital twin, traceability and quality management systems
  • Process-map item (customers): Electric utilities, transmission operators and distribution network operators buying transformers, switchgear, protection relays and grid automation equipment
  • Process-map item (customers): Renewable energy, battery storage and electric vehicle charging developers requiring inverters, converters, switchgear and monitoring systems

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Control, documentation and substitution of restricted, persistent or hazardous substances embedded in electrical products, components, coatings, solders, insulation, fluids and related manufacturing chemistries.

How it shows up in this industry

Electrical and electronic equipment uses solders, fluxes, conformal coatings, adhesives, paints, cable insulation, potting compounds, epoxy resins, flame retardant additives, contact materials, printed circuit boards, capacitor materials and transformer fluids. RoHS, REACH and UK REACH pressures affect PFAS, brominated flame retardants, lead, cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium and other substances used in insulation, coatings, solders and electronic components.

Why it may be material

Chemical restrictions can move faster than long product qualification cycles for switchgear, transformers, drives, lighting and control equipment. Non-compliance can block market access, trigger recalls, strand inventory and require redesign, while substitution must preserve fire safety, insulation, thermal performance, solder reliability and certification status.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  3. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  4. Potential effects may reach supply-chain workers.
  5. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  6. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  7. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  8. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  9. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees, Suppliers.
  10. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Supplier workforce, audit, grievance and remediation records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for electronic components, copper, electrical steel, hazardous chemicals, spare parts and finished goods
  • Process-map item (assets): Enterprise resource planning, product lifecycle management, digital twin, traceability and quality management systems
  • Process-map item (customers): Electric utilities, transmission operators and distribution network operators buying transformers, switchgear, protection relays and grid automation equipment
  • Process-map item (customers): Building services contractors, data centre developers and commercial property owners buying panels, lighting controls, uninterruptible power supplies and distribution boards
  • Process-map item (customers): Rail, marine, defence and aerospace integrators using specialised electrical cabinets, connectors, sensors and power electronics

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Identification, control and substitution of PFAS and other restricted or hazardous substances embedded in machinery components, consumables and spare parts while maintaining performance, safety and market access.

How it shows up in this industry

Machinery bills of materials can include fluorinated seals, high-performance hoses, lubricants, greases, corrosion coatings, electronics, batteries, refrigerants, adhesives and legacy lead, cadmium or chromium compounds. Surface finishing, degreasing, plating and coating processes can also introduce restricted chemistries that affect product qualification and spare-parts continuity.

Why it may be material

REACH, RoHS, WEEE, PFAS restrictions and customer substance declarations can block market access, force redesign, disrupt service parts and create liability, especially where components must withstand pressure, heat, abrasion, chemicals or long service lives.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  3. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  4. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  5. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  6. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  7. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  8. Potential effects may reach supply-chain workers.
  9. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees, Suppliers.
  10. The source places the pathway in Upstream, Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Supplier workforce, audit, grievance and remediation records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Engineering design data, CAD models, bills of materials, product lifecycle management systems and embedded control software
  • Process-map item (customers): Manufacturers using pumps, compressors, conveyors, robotics, machine tools, bearings and process machinery in production lines
  • Process-map item (customers): Energy, mining, quarrying, oil and gas, chemicals, cement, pulp and paper, steel and water utilities using heavy rotating and process equipment
  • Process-map item (customers): Engineering, procurement and construction contractors specifying packaged machinery for industrial projects

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Prevention, detection and remediation of unintended oil, solvent, chemical, metal-bearing or gas-related releases from electrical equipment manufacturing, storage, testing and legacy site areas.

How it shows up in this industry

Electrical equipment sites can include plating interfaces, solvent stores, resin and varnish areas, transformer oil filling and testing areas, gas-filled switchgear handling, chemical warehouses, powder coating lines and hazardous waste storage. Decommissioning and remediation liabilities can arise from historical contamination in plating shops, solvent stores, oil-filled equipment areas and site drainage systems.

Why it may be material

Unintended releases can create clean-up costs, enforcement action, insurance issues and asset devaluation, especially at older sites with solvent, oil, plating or chemical storage histories. The issue is separate from normal effluent controls because liabilities often arise from leaks, spills, containment failures or legacy contamination discovered during redevelopment or closure.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  2. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  3. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  4. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  5. Potential effects may reach workers.
  6. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities.
  8. The source places the pathway in Own operations.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on soil and groundwater?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on water bodies?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on ecosystems?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (customers): Industrial manufacturers, mines, water utilities and process plants using motors, drives, motor control centres and instrumentation
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Growth of connected equipment creating cyber security, patch management and data governance expectations for industrial control products
  • Process-map item (external_impacts): End-of-life contamination and resource loss if equipment is exported informally, dismantled unsafely or landfilled instead of being treated through authorised WEEE routes
  • Process-map item (financial_channels): Compliance costs for chemical management, product safety certification, WEEE registration, conflict minerals due diligence and market-specific labelling
  • Process-map item (financial_channels): Litigation and penalties from hazardous substance non-compliance, worker exposure, pollution incidents, misleading environmental claims or export control breaches

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality
  • Cross-cutting

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Unintended environmental releases and historical contamination from industrial chemicals, fuels, oils, hydraulic fluids, degreasers, plating lines, paint shops and storage areas.

How it shows up in this industry

Long-lived industrial machinery sites may include historic degreasing, plating, fuel storage, hydraulic oil systems, paint shops, quench tanks, chemical stores, wash-down areas and outdoor storage yards. Acquisitions and older facilities can carry soil and groundwater contamination from former practices.

Why it may be material

Uncontrolled releases and legacy contamination can create remediation provisions, property value impairment, permitting delays, transaction friction, insurance exclusions and community concern.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  2. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  3. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  4. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  5. Potential effects may reach workers.
  6. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Contractors, Employees.
  8. The source places the pathway in Own operations.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  2. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  3. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  4. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  5. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on soil and groundwater?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on water bodies?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on ecosystems?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (external_impacts): Land and groundwater contamination risks from historic degreasing, plating, fuel storage, hydraulic oil leakage and paint shops
  • Process-map item (financial_channels): Regulatory compliance costs for machinery safety certification, chemical restrictions, hazardous waste permits, air emissions and worker exposure limits
  • Process-map item (financial_channels): Litigation and liability from workplace injuries, downstream equipment accidents, pressure failures, fire, explosion, pollution or defective controls
  • Process-map item (impact_channels): Contractors performing maintenance, installation, rigging, commissioning, cleaning, refractory work, electrical work and site modifications
  • Process-map item (outputs): Mobile and site equipment components including hydraulic systems, transmissions, engines, attachments and power units for construction and agriculture

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Contractors
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Control of routine non-greenhouse-gas air emissions from electronics assembly, coating, curing, welding, metal fabrication and thermal manufacturing processes.

How it shows up in this industry

Surface-mount technology lines, selective soldering, solvent cleaning, conformal coating booths, powder coating enclosures, welding, resin curing, varnish impregnation, drying ovens, plating support processes and other thermal operations can emit solder fumes, volatile organic compounds, particulates and combustion gases around electronics assembly and metal fabrication facilities.

Why it may be material

Air extraction, filtration, solvent substitution and abatement can require operating and capital expenditure. Permit breaches, odour or nuisance from poorly controlled emissions may result in penalties, production restrictions, complaints and reputational damage near factories.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  2. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  3. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities.
  5. The source places the pathway in Own operations.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on the atmosphere?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on ecosystems?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Electronics assembly plants with surface-mount technology lines, selective soldering, reflow ovens and conformal coating booths
  • Process-map item (assets): Metal fabrication facilities for stamping, laser cutting, machining, busbar forming, enclosure welding and powder coating
  • Process-map item (customers): Building services contractors, data centre developers and commercial property owners buying panels, lighting controls, uninterruptible power supplies and distribution boards
  • Process-map item (customers): Original equipment manufacturers incorporating motors, controls, power supplies, cable assemblies and sensors into their own machines
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Investor and lender focus on Scope 3 emissions from purchased metals, use-phase energy losses and end-of-life waste

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities

Users of the information

  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Water use and routine wastewater discharges from cleaning, cooling, surface treatment and production support activities in electrical and electronic equipment manufacturing.

How it shows up in this industry

Process water, cooling water and deionised water are used in cleaning, surface treatment, cooling, plating-support activities, transformer oil areas and production testing. Wastewater can contain metals, flux residues, acids, alkalis, oils, suspended solids and treatment residues from fabrication, electronics assembly cleaning, metal finishing interfaces and oil-handling operations.

Why it may be material

Materiality is highest at sites with plating, surface treatment, cleaning, cooling and oil-handling operations, particularly where receiving waters or municipal systems are sensitive. Effluent treatment failures can lead to permit exceedances, operating restrictions, treatment upgrade costs and remediation costs for contaminated drainage infrastructure.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  2. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  5. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities.
  6. The source places the pathway in Own operations.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on water bodies?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on ecosystems?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Process-map item (assets): Metal fabrication facilities for stamping, laser cutting, machining, busbar forming, enclosure welding and powder coating
  • Process-map item (assets): Enterprise resource planning, product lifecycle management, digital twin, traceability and quality management systems
  • Process-map item (customers): Industrial manufacturers, mines, water utilities and process plants using motors, drives, motor control centres and instrumentation
  • Process-map item (customers): Building services contractors, data centre developers and commercial property owners buying panels, lighting controls, uninterruptible power supplies and distribution boards
  • Process-map item (customers): Original equipment manufacturers incorporating motors, controls, power supplies, cable assemblies and sensors into their own machines

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Water use and effluent quality from machining, cooling, washing, surface treatment, plating, hydrostatic testing and site drainage systems.

How it shows up in this industry

Machining centres, washing systems, plating and passivation lines, phosphating, cooling circuits, hydrostatic test benches and storage yards use water and generate effluent containing oils, emulsions, metals, phosphates, surfactants, acids or alkalis.

Why it may be material

Materiality is high for sites with wet finishing, plating, washing, cooling, hydrostatic testing or older drainage infrastructure, and lower for assembly-only facilities.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  2. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  5. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities.
  6. The source places the pathway in Own operations.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on water bodies?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on ecosystems?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Process-map item (assets): Foundries, forge shops and heat-treatment lines for castings, shafts, gears, housings and structural frames
  • Process-map item (assets): CNC machining centres, grinding cells, laser cutters, press brakes, welding bays and robotic fabrication cells
  • Process-map item (assets): Surface preparation and finishing facilities, including shot blasting, phosphating, powder coating, solvent painting and plating lines
  • Process-map item (assets): Industrial IoT platforms, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cybersecurity controls
  • Process-map item (customers): Energy, mining, quarrying, oil and gas, chemicals, cement, pulp and paper, steel and water utilities using heavy rotating and process equipment

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Local authorities
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Emerging issue
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Credible measurement, allocation and communication of embodied carbon in industrial machinery bills of materials and lower-carbon material claims.

How it shows up in this industry

Bills of materials for gearboxes, pumps, compressors, valves, bearings, lifting equipment and automation modules can contain high masses of steel, ductile iron, aluminium, copper, castings, forgings, motors, drives and electronics. Customer procurement teams increasingly request auditable embodied-carbon information from CAD, bills of materials and product lifecycle management systems.

Why it may be material

Large industrial customers are starting to compare machinery suppliers on embodied carbon and data assurance as well as performance and price. The issue is most material where engineered orders contain heavy castings, forgings and alloy metals.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  2. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  3. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Customers / end-users, Suppliers.
  5. The source places the pathway in Upstream, Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Engineering design data, CAD models, bills of materials, product lifecycle management systems and embedded control software
  • Process-map item (customers): Manufacturers using pumps, compressors, conveyors, robotics, machine tools, bearings and process machinery in production lines
  • Process-map item (customers): Engineering, procurement and construction contractors specifying packaged machinery for industrial projects
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Customer procurement requirements for lower embodied carbon steel, aluminium and castings in machinery bills of materials

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Safety, conformity and reliability controls for electrical and electronic equipment that protect installers, operators, service personnel, end users and critical-service customers.

How it shows up in this industry

Transformers, switchgear, circuit breakers, motor control centres, drives, inverters, uninterruptible power supplies, motors, control panels and industrial automation hardware are installed in substations, factories, hospitals, rail systems, data centres, water treatment plants and buildings. Failures can expose electricians, utility crews, operators and end users to electric shock, arc flash, fire, explosion, electromagnetic interference and mechanical hazards.

Why it may be material

Product failures can cause fatalities, fires, outages and customer asset damage, leading to liability claims, recalls, retrofit campaigns, warranty provisions, insurance impacts and loss of customer qualification. Safety certification and compliance with IEC product standards are direct market-access conditions in many utility, industrial and building applications.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  2. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  3. Potential effects may reach workers.
  4. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  5. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  6. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Business partners, Customers / end-users.
  8. The source places the pathway in Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on downstream users?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on consumers?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for electronic components, copper, electrical steel, hazardous chemicals, spare parts and finished goods
  • Process-map item (assets): Enterprise resource planning, product lifecycle management, digital twin, traceability and quality management systems
  • Process-map item (assets): Patents, firmware, embedded software, safety certifications, customer qualification records and long-term service know-how
  • Process-map item (customers): Electric utilities, transmission operators and distribution network operators buying transformers, switchgear, protection relays and grid automation equipment
  • Process-map item (customers): Rail, marine, defence and aerospace integrators using specialised electrical cabinets, connectors, sensors and power electronics

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Health and safety management for employees and contractors exposed to electrical, chemical, mechanical, thermal, lifting and field-service hazards across production and downstream work.

How it shows up in this industry

Workers and contractors assemble electronics, wind coils, handle epoxy resins, varnishes, solvents, mineral oils and solder, operate stamping and machining equipment, and conduct dielectric, partial-discharge, thermal-rise and high-voltage tests. Field service engineers install, commission, repair and decommission heavy transformers, switchgear and drives at substations, data centres, factories, renewable energy sites and other energised locations.

Why it may be material

The combination of chemicals, moving machinery, heavy lifting, stored electrical energy, high-voltage test bays and field service work creates direct pathways to serious harm. Incidents can stop production, increase insurance premiums, trigger enforcement action, create compensation liabilities and undermine retention of scarce skilled technicians.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Contractors, Employees, Trade unions.
  5. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  3. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  4. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on contractors?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Transformer, motor and generator shops with coil winding machines, varnish impregnation systems, drying ovens and high-voltage test bays
  • Process-map item (assets): Switchgear and circuit breaker assembly lines with gas filling, vacuum interrupter handling, relay calibration and arc-fault testing
  • Process-map item (assets): Environmental, electromagnetic compatibility, vibration, ingress protection and endurance test laboratories
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for electronic components, copper, electrical steel, hazardous chemicals, spare parts and finished goods
  • Process-map item (assets): Patents, firmware, embedded software, safety certifications, customer qualification records and long-term service know-how

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Contractors
  • Employees
  • Trade unions

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality
  • Cross-cutting

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Safety, conformity and performance assurance for industrial machinery, including guarding, pressure integrity, electrical safety, functional safety controls, certification, user information and corrective field actions.

How it shows up in this industry

The subindustry designs pumps, compressors, turbines, generators, engines, gearboxes, drives, bearings, fans, valves, actuators, cranes, hoists, conveyors, robotics cells, control cabinets and packaged process skids. Hazards include crushing, entanglement, stored energy, pressure failure, electric shock, arc flash, excessive noise, unsafe motion and foreseeable misuse outside design limits.

Why it may be material

Machinery safety approvals and customer qualification are prerequisites for market access. Product failures can lead to severe user harm, recalls, warranty provisions, liability claims, insurance increases and loss of dealer or customer confidence.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  2. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  3. Potential effects may reach workers.
  4. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  5. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  6. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Business partners, Customers / end-users.
  8. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  3. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  4. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  5. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on downstream users?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Assembly plants for pumps, compressors, turbines, drives, bearings, gearboxes, valves, lifting equipment and factory automation modules
  • Process-map item (assets): Tooling, moulds, jigs, fixtures, dies, gauges and metrology equipment with long asset lives
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Engineering design data, CAD models, bills of materials, product lifecycle management systems and embedded control software
  • Process-map item (assets): Industrial IoT platforms, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cybersecurity controls

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Prevention of injuries, occupational disease and high-potential incidents among employees and contractors in fabrication, finishing, assembly, testing, warehousing, installation and field service operations.

How it shows up in this industry

Employees and contractors work around CNC machining centres, grinding cells, welding bays, robotic fabrication cells, foundries, forge shops, heat-treatment lines, paint and plating lines, cranes, pressure benches, dynamometers, vibration rigs, warehouses and field service fleets. Hazards include fume, metalworking fluids, noise, vibration, heat, lifting, moving machinery, confined spaces and electrical work.

Why it may be material

Heavy fabrication, testing, lifting, maintenance and field service create frequent and high-severity exposure pathways. Serious incidents can disrupt production, increase insurance costs and jeopardise customer approvals.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees, Trade unions.
  5. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  3. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  4. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on contractors?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): CNC machining centres, grinding cells, laser cutters, press brakes, welding bays and robotic fabrication cells
  • Process-map item (assets): Test cells, dynamometers, hydraulic test rigs, pressure benches, vibration rigs, environmental chambers and calibration laboratories
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Field service fleets, mobile cranes, lifting tackle, diagnostic kits and repair workshops
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Electrification of mobile and stationary industrial equipment, increasing demand for batteries, power electronics and high-voltage safety competence

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees
  • Trade unions

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality
  • Cross-cutting

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Safety and emergency controls for transport, loading, unloading and route management of dangerous goods and oversized electrical equipment movements.

How it shows up in this industry

Inbound and outbound logistics include lithium batteries, capacitors, aerosols, solvents, corrosives, compressed gases, gas-filled switchgear components, oil-filled equipment, high-value semiconductors and oversized power transformers or generators. Heavy haulage often requires route surveys, cranes, specialist permits and interfaces with installation contractors at substations, factories and data centres.

Why it may be material

Transport incidents can harm drivers, installers, emergency responders and communities, and can release oils, gases or chemicals to roads, drains or waterways. Non-compliant documentation, packaging, carrier qualification or route planning can delay projects, invalidate insurance, trigger penalties and disrupt customer commissioning windows.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  5. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  6. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  7. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  8. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Business partners, Contractors, Customers / end-users, Suppliers.
  9. The source places the pathway in Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  3. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  4. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for electronic components, copper, electrical steel, hazardous chemicals, spare parts and finished goods
  • Process-map item (assets): Patents, firmware, embedded software, safety certifications, customer qualification records and long-term service know-how
  • Process-map item (customers): Building services contractors, data centre developers and commercial property owners buying panels, lighting controls, uninterruptible power supplies and distribution boards
  • Process-map item (customers): Renewable energy, battery storage and electric vehicle charging developers requiring inverters, converters, switchgear and monitoring systems
  • Process-map item (customers): Original equipment manufacturers incorporating motors, controls, power supplies, cable assemblies and sensors into their own machines

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Business partners
  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality
  • Cross-cutting

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Safety and emergency controls for transport, loading and unloading of hazardous materials, pressurised cylinders, batteries, fuels, solvents, corrosives, oils, waste chemicals and oversized machinery movements.

How it shows up in this industry

Industrial machinery supply chains include inbound and outbound movements of paints, solvents, industrial gases, batteries, fuels, acids, alkalis, oils, pressurised cylinders, waste chemicals and oversized machinery modules. Field service logistics also move technicians, lifting tackle, diagnostic kits and replacement modules to mines, factories, utilities and construction sites.

Why it may be material

Hazardous and oversized logistics can affect public safety, environmental releases, customer delivery performance, insurance and regulatory compliance, especially where carriers handle cylinders, batteries, corrosives, flammables or project cargo.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  5. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  6. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  7. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  8. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Business partners, Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees.
  9. The source places the pathway in Upstream, Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  3. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  4. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Surface preparation and finishing facilities, including shot blasting, phosphating, powder coating, solvent painting and plating lines
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Engineering design data, CAD models, bills of materials, product lifecycle management systems and embedded control software
  • Process-map item (assets): Industrial IoT platforms, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cybersecurity controls
  • Process-map item (customers): Manufacturers using pumps, compressors, conveyors, robotics, machine tools, bearings and process machinery in production lines

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Business partners
  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality
  • Cross-cutting

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Major-incident prevention for high-hazard manufacturing, finishing, storage and testing activities, including fires, explosions, pressure failures and loss of containment.

How it shows up in this industry

Industrial machinery production can include foundries, forge shops, heat-treatment furnaces, hot work, welding bays, combustible grinding dust, plating chemicals, industrial gases, paint shops, solvent stores, hydraulic systems, pressure benches, dynamometers and hydrostatic test rigs. These assets can create low-frequency but high-consequence incidents.

Why it may be material

Insurers and industrial customers scrutinise hot work, combustible dust, pressure testing, plating chemicals, lifting operations and fire controls because severe events can stop production, injure people, damage assets and affect neighbouring sites.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  5. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  6. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Contractors, Employees.
  8. The source places the pathway in Own operations.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on contractors?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Test cells, dynamometers, hydraulic test rigs, pressure benches, vibration rigs, environmental chambers and calibration laboratories
  • Process-map item (assets): Engineering design data, CAD models, bills of materials, product lifecycle management systems and embedded control software
  • Process-map item (assets): Industrial IoT platforms, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cybersecurity controls
  • Process-map item (customers): Public infrastructure owners operating water treatment, flood control, rail maintenance, port, waste handling and district energy assets
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Electrification of mobile and stationary industrial equipment, increasing demand for batteries, power electronics and high-voltage safety competence

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Contractors
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Business-model dependent
  • Entity-specific validation required
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Management of direct amenity and social licence impacts on communities near electrical equipment factories, high-power test facilities, warehouses and heavy logistics routes.

How it shows up in this industry

Neighbouring communities can be affected by noise from transformer test bays, fabrication, compressors, extraction systems and heavy vehicles, as well as traffic from component deliveries, abnormal-load movements for transformers and generators, and odour perception from coating or curing operations. Industrial clusters and urban-edge factories may have heightened community sensitivity.

Why it may be material

Materiality depends on site location, testing intensity, operating hours, logistics routes and proximity to residential areas. Poor engagement can lead to complaints, planning objections, operating restrictions, delayed expansion approvals and reputational damage with local authorities and customers.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  2. Potential effects may reach workers.
  3. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities.
  5. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Process-map item (external_impacts): Upstream land disturbance, tailings, water use and community impacts from copper, aluminium, nickel, tin, gold, rare earth and cobalt extraction
  • Process-map item (external_impacts): Noise, traffic and abnormal load movements affecting neighbouring communities around factories and transformer test facilities
  • Process-map item (impact_channels): Factory workers assembling electronics, winding coils, testing high-voltage equipment, handling chemicals and operating metalworking machinery
  • Process-map item (impact_channels): Communities near mines, smelters, component factories, plating shops and final assembly plants affected by emissions, water use, waste and traffic
  • Process-map item (outputs): Heat, noise, test discharges and electromagnetic emissions from production and high-power testing

It may be less material when…

  • Entity-specific evidence does not show meaningful scale, exposure or effects.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Local authorities
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

  • SASB SASB Electrical & Electronic Equipment does not clearly isolate community amenity; environmental management disclosures may provide indirect context

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Business-model dependent
  • Entity-specific validation required
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Direct effects on nearby communities from noise, vibration, traffic, light, odour perception, visual amenity and perceived safety around industrial machinery manufacturing and testing sites.

How it shows up in this industry

Fabrication plants, foundries, test cells, distribution yards and heavy goods vehicle routes generate noise, vibration, traffic, light and visual disturbance. Dynamometer cells, pressure tests, endurance testing, heavy fabrication, export crating and oversized transport can affect residents near industrial estates and mixed-use areas.

Why it may be material

Materiality depends on site location, operating hours, heavy goods vehicle routes and proximity to residential or sensitive receptors, but community amenity can affect permits, expansion approvals and trust.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  2. Potential effects may reach workers.
  3. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities.
  5. The source places the pathway in Own operations.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on contractors?
  • What civil-society scrutiny or campaigns could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Process-map item (assets): Test cells, dynamometers, hydraulic test rigs, pressure benches, vibration rigs, environmental chambers and calibration laboratories
  • Process-map item (assets): Industrial IoT platforms, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cybersecurity controls
  • Process-map item (customers): Engineering, procurement and construction contractors specifying packaged machinery for industrial projects
  • Process-map item (customers): Distributors, dealers and system integrators selling standard industrial components, spares and automation packages
  • Process-map item (customers): Leasing companies and rental fleets purchasing compressors, generators, lifts, pumps and portable industrial equipment

It may be less material when…

  • Entity-specific evidence does not show meaningful scale, exposure or effects.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Local authorities
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Emerging issue
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Management of reskilling, retention and workforce planning for automation, power electronics, high-voltage testing, connected products and field service in an expanding electrification market.

How it shows up in this industry

Automation and skills shortages affect coil winding, power electronics, testing and field service. Surface-mount lines, high-voltage test bays, varnish impregnation systems, firmware loading, relay calibration, switchgear servicing and commissioning teams require specialised competence as product platforms shift towards digital, low-loss and SF6-free equipment.

Why it may be material

Electrification and grid expansion are increasing order books while changing the skill mix needed for production and servicing. Without credible reskilling and retention, companies can face bottlenecks in engineered-to-order equipment, quality escapes, longer lead times and reduced worker security in legacy roles.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees, Trade unions.
  5. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on contractors?
  • What technology changes could alter the topic's impacts or financial effects?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Electronics assembly plants with surface-mount technology lines, selective soldering, reflow ovens and conformal coating booths
  • Process-map item (assets): Transformer, motor and generator shops with coil winding machines, varnish impregnation systems, drying ovens and high-voltage test bays
  • Process-map item (assets): Patents, firmware, embedded software, safety certifications, customer qualification records and long-term service know-how
  • Process-map item (customers): Electric utilities, transmission operators and distribution network operators buying transformers, switchgear, protection relays and grid automation equipment
  • Process-map item (customers): Building services contractors, data centre developers and commercial property owners buying panels, lighting controls, uninterruptible power supplies and distribution boards

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees
  • Trade unions

Users of the information

  • Board / management

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Emerging issue
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Safety, training, validation and lifecycle management for electrified industrial machinery and site equipment, including batteries, chargers, high-voltage drives, power electronics and field-service controls.

How it shows up in this industry

Restrictions on diesel engines and local air pollutants in ports, mines, warehouses, construction sites and industrial facilities are driving battery-electric drives, high-voltage motors, chargers and power electronics in compressors, generators, lifts, pumps, drives and mobile equipment components. This changes design, assembly, testing, commissioning, dealer and field-service requirements.

Why it may be material

Electrification creates new safety and training requirements across product design, factory testing, commissioning, service and end-of-life handling. Materiality depends on exposure to mobile equipment, generators, drives, power units and high-voltage controls.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  4. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  5. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  6. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  7. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  8. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Business partners, Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees.
  9. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Assembly plants for pumps, compressors, turbines, drives, bearings, gearboxes, valves, lifting equipment and factory automation modules
  • Process-map item (assets): Tooling, moulds, jigs, fixtures, dies, gauges and metrology equipment with long asset lives
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Engineering design data, CAD models, bills of materials, product lifecycle management systems and embedded control software
  • Process-map item (assets): Industrial IoT platforms, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cybersecurity controls

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Business partners
  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Financial materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of ethical conduct, anti-bribery controls, whistleblowing, third-party integrity and regulatory compliance across machinery design, certification, sales, sourcing, export and service activities.

How it shows up in this industry

Industrial machinery companies sell into public infrastructure, utilities, mining, energy, chemicals, water, construction and export markets where CE, UKCA, ATEX, Pressure Equipment Directive, machinery safety, REACH, RoHS, WEEE, environmental permitting, customs and customer qualification controls interact with distributor, dealer, agent and certification relationships.

Why it may be material

Compliance failures can block market access, disqualify tenders, trigger recalls or enforcement, disrupt exports and damage trust with industrial and public-sector customers. Bribery and third-party misconduct are relevant because sales often involve large engineered orders, project contractors, dealers and public infrastructure buyers.

Impact pathway

  1. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Business partners, Customers / end-users, Employees.
  2. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence shows current or anticipated financial effects on the organisation?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Industrial IoT platforms, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cybersecurity controls
  • Process-map item (customers): Manufacturers using pumps, compressors, conveyors, robotics, machine tools, bearings and process machinery in production lines
  • Process-map item (customers): Engineering, procurement and construction contractors specifying packaged machinery for industrial projects
  • Process-map item (customers): Public infrastructure owners operating water treatment, flood control, rail maintenance, port, waste handling and district energy assets

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Financial materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of ethical conduct, anti-corruption, whistleblowing, internal controls and regulatory compliance across product conformity, chemicals, circularity, trade and customer qualification regimes.

How it shows up in this industry

Electrical and electronic equipment manufacturers sell into regulated utility, building, industrial, rail, marine, defence and aerospace markets where product conformity, IEC certification, machinery requirements, RoHS, REACH, WEEE, ecodesign, Battery Regulation applicability, conflict minerals rules, customs classification, certificates of origin, sanctions screening and export controls can determine market access.

Why it may be material

Compliance failures can block shipments, invalidate customer qualification, trigger recalls, create penalties or expose companies to corruption and trade-control liabilities in global infrastructure procurement. Strong internal controls are essential where engineered-to-order products, certification records, distributors, customs documentation and regulated customer tenders interact.

Impact pathway

  1. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Business partners, Customers / end-users, Employees.
  2. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  5. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence shows current or anticipated financial effects on the organisation?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Enterprise resource planning, product lifecycle management, digital twin, traceability and quality management systems
  • Process-map item (customers): Industrial manufacturers, mines, water utilities and process plants using motors, drives, motor control centres and instrumentation
  • Process-map item (customers): Building services contractors, data centre developers and commercial property owners buying panels, lighting controls, uninterruptible power supplies and distribution boards
  • Process-map item (customers): Original equipment manufacturers incorporating motors, controls, power supplies, cable assemblies and sensors into their own machines
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Customer procurement requirements for product carbon footprints, recycled metal content, repairability and take-back arrangements

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality
  • Cross-cutting

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of cyber-secure product design, vulnerability management, firmware integrity, patch support and secure remote servicing for connected electrical and electronic equipment.

How it shows up in this industry

The subindustry supplies protection relays, drives, meters, gateways, remote monitoring systems, programmable logic controller cabinets, grid automation hardware and firmware-loaded power electronics used in substations, factories, data centres, renewable energy sites, buildings, rail systems and water utilities. IEC 62443 and customer security qualification are increasingly important for industrial automation and control products.

Why it may be material

Connected electrical equipment can influence power distribution, water treatment, rail systems, hospitals, data centres and industrial plants. Customers increasingly require secure-by-design evidence, patch support and vulnerability handling over long service lives, and weaknesses can lead to procurement exclusion, liability claims, incident response costs and insurance constraints.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  2. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach workers.
  5. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  6. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Business partners, Customers / end-users.
  8. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  5. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on downstream users?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Enterprise resource planning, product lifecycle management, digital twin, traceability and quality management systems
  • Process-map item (assets): Patents, firmware, embedded software, safety certifications, customer qualification records and long-term service know-how
  • Process-map item (customers): Electric utilities, transmission operators and distribution network operators buying transformers, switchgear, protection relays and grid automation equipment
  • Process-map item (customers): Industrial manufacturers, mines, water utilities and process plants using motors, drives, motor control centres and instrumentation
  • Process-map item (customers): Original equipment manufacturers incorporating motors, controls, power supplies, cable assemblies and sensors into their own machines

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality
  • Cross-cutting

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of cybersecurity controls for connected industrial machinery and remote service platforms where digital compromise can create safety, environmental and operational consequences for customers and service partners.

How it shows up in this industry

Industrial machinery increasingly includes embedded control software, sensors, safety PLCs, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cloud-connected diagnostics. Cyber misuse of networked pumps, compressors, robotics cells, valves, drives, cranes or process skids can cause unsafe motion, loss of emergency shutdown functionality, pressure excursions, production disruption or environmental release at customer facilities.

Why it may be material

Cybersecurity is becoming a qualification requirement for connected equipment, remote access and service contracts. Incidents can create safety, environmental, warranty, liability, insurance and subscription revenue consequences.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  2. Potential effects may reach workers.
  3. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  4. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  5. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  6. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  7. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  8. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Business partners, Customers / end-users, Employees.
  9. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  5. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on downstream users?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for bought-in components, spare parts, hazardous substances, finished machinery and service exchange units
  • Process-map item (assets): Engineering design data, CAD models, bills of materials, product lifecycle management systems and embedded control software
  • Process-map item (assets): Industrial IoT platforms, remote monitoring portals, condition-based maintenance algorithms and cybersecurity controls
  • Process-map item (customers): Manufacturers using pumps, compressors, conveyors, robotics, machine tools, bearings and process machinery in production lines
  • Process-map item (customers): Engineering, procurement and construction contractors specifying packaged machinery for industrial projects

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of provenance, due diligence and supply resilience for critical metals, conflict minerals, precision components and electronics used in industrial machinery.

How it shows up in this industry

Machinery producers source steel alloys, aluminium, copper, nickel, chromium, cobalt, rare earth magnets, tungsten carbide, molybdenum, high-performance ceramics, semiconductors, sensors, drives, motors, bearings, hydraulics, castings and forgings. Shortages, geopolitical concentration and conflict minerals expectations affect engineered orders, automation modules and aftermarket parts availability.

Why it may be material

Materiality is high because supply disruption, sanctions exposure, customer due diligence requirements and upstream human rights or ecosystem impacts can affect tender eligibility, production continuity, working capital and financing scrutiny.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach supply-chain workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  3. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  4. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  5. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  6. Potential effects may reach Indigenous peoples.
  7. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  8. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Customers / end-users, Suppliers, Value chain workers.
  9. The source places the pathway in Upstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on supply-chain workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on ecosystems?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Supplier workforce, audit, grievance and remediation records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Indigenous engagement, consent, grievance and impact records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Engineering design data, CAD models, bills of materials, product lifecycle management systems and embedded control software
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Customer procurement requirements for lower embodied carbon steel, aluminium and castings in machinery bills of materials
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Electrification of mobile and stationary industrial equipment, increasing demand for batteries, power electronics and high-voltage safety competence
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Digital product passports and traceability expectations for critical materials, repairability, spare parts availability and recyclability
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Shortages and geopolitical concentration of semiconductors, rare earth magnets, high-grade bearings and precision castings

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers
  • Value chain workers

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of high-risk mineral, metal and component supply chains to address provenance, sanctions, human rights, community, water, land and ecosystem impacts embedded in key inputs.

How it shows up in this industry

Electrical equipment manufacturing relies on copper cathode, busbars, aluminium, electrical steel, rare earth magnets, ferrites, printed circuit boards, semiconductors, tin-bearing solders, gold contacts, mica insulation and cobalt- or nickel-bearing components sourced through global distributors and multi-tier suppliers.

Why it may be material

Grid expansion and electrification are increasing demand for metals, semiconductors and magnetic materials with concentrated geopolitical supply and upstream human rights, water, tailings, land and community impacts. Weak traceability can block access to utility, defence, aerospace, automotive and public procurement customers and can disrupt engineered-to-order production.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach supply-chain workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  3. Potential effects may reach Indigenous peoples.
  4. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  5. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  6. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  7. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  8. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Customers / end-users, Suppliers, Value chain workers.
  9. The source places the pathway in Upstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on supply-chain workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Supplier workforce, audit, grievance and remediation records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Indigenous engagement, consent, grievance and impact records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Warehouses for electronic components, copper, electrical steel, hazardous chemicals, spare parts and finished goods
  • Process-map item (assets): Enterprise resource planning, product lifecycle management, digital twin, traceability and quality management systems
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Rising scrutiny of conflict minerals, cobalt, mica, rare earths and copper sourcing, including traceability beyond tier-one suppliers
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Shortages and geopolitical concentration in semiconductors, rare earth magnets, electrical steel and high-grade copper
  • Process-map item (external_impacts): Upstream land disturbance, tailings, water use and community impacts from copper, aluminium, nickel, tin, gold, rare earth and cobalt extraction

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers
  • Value chain workers

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance and transparency of lobbying, political engagement and trade association activity on regulations and standards shaping electrical and electronic equipment sustainability impacts.

How it shows up in this industry

Electrical and electronic equipment companies can influence standards and regulation affecting grid expansion, switchgear gases, ecodesign levels for motors and transformers, WEEE producer responsibility, chemical restrictions, industrial cyber security, public procurement and responsible sourcing. Sector associations may advocate on timelines, exemptions, technical standards and market-access rules that shape sustainability outcomes.

Why it may be material

Policy engagement can accelerate or delay rules that affect climate emissions, circularity, product safety, cyber security and hazardous substances. Misalignment between public sustainability commitments and association lobbying can create reputational, investor and customer trust issues, especially where utilities and public buyers screen suppliers for credible transition positions.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  2. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  3. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  4. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  5. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  6. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Customers / end-users.
  8. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (financial_channels): Revenue access through utility framework agreements, industrial customer qualification, energy efficiency standards, public procurement rules and grid codes

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Customers / end-users

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Business-model dependent
  • Entity-specific validation required
  • Financial materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Transparency and governance of public policy engagement, trade association activity and political contributions on machinery safety, product regulation, climate, circularity, chemical restrictions and market-access rules.

How it shows up in this industry

The industry is affected by policy debates on machinery safety, functional safety, ATEX, pressure equipment, ecodesign for motors, pumps and fans, diesel restrictions, right to repair, remanufacturing, digital product passports, PFAS restrictions, RoHS, WEEE, conflict minerals and border adjustment mechanisms. Trade associations and technical standardisation forums can influence requirements that shape product design and market access.

Why it may be material

Policy engagement can materially shape transition costs, aftermarket models, product design obligations and substance substitution timelines. Poor alignment between lobbying positions and public sustainability commitments can create investor, customer and reputational scrutiny.

Impact pathway

  1. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Customers / end-users.
  2. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  5. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.

Questions to test

  • What evidence shows current or anticipated financial effects on the organisation?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • Could this topic affect demand, pricing, market access or revenue?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Process-map item (assets): Field service fleets, mobile cranes, lifting tackle, diagnostic kits and repair workshops
  • Process-map item (customers): Maintenance, repair and overhaul providers buying replacement parts, rebuilt modules and diagnostic services
  • Process-map item (customers): Public infrastructure owners operating water treatment, flood control, rail maintenance, port, waste handling and district energy assets
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Growth in right-to-repair, remanufacturing and circular economy policies affecting parts pricing, diagnostics access and take-back models
  • Process-map item (processes): Aftermarket service, condition monitoring, field repair, spare parts supply, remanufacturing and end-of-life take-back

It may be less material when…

  • Entity-specific evidence does not show meaningful scale, exposure or effects.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Customers / end-users

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Emerging issue
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Controls over product-level carbon, recycled-content and energy-loss data used in customer tenders, environmental declarations, digital product records and marketing claims.

How it shows up in this industry

Customers for transformers, motors, drives, uninterruptible power supplies and power converters increasingly request product carbon footprints that combine purchased metals, semiconductors, manufacturing energy and use-phase energy losses. ERP, product lifecycle management, digital twin, traceability and quality systems are key controls for engineered-to-order carbon and performance claims.

Why it may be material

Product-level carbon and loss data is becoming a gateway to utility frameworks, data centre procurement, public tenders and financing narratives. Poorly evidenced efficiency, recycled-content or embodied-carbon claims can distort customer decarbonisation choices and create green-claims enforcement or litigation exposure.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  2. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  3. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Customers / end-users, Suppliers.
  5. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  5. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What evidence shows that customer demand is changing?

Evidence to collect

  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Enterprise resource planning, product lifecycle management, digital twin, traceability and quality management systems
  • Process-map item (customers): Building services contractors, data centre developers and commercial property owners buying panels, lighting controls, uninterruptible power supplies and distribution boards
  • Process-map item (customers): Renewable energy, battery storage and electric vehicle charging developers requiring inverters, converters, switchgear and monitoring systems
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Phase-down of SF6 in medium-voltage and high-voltage switchgear and accelerated customer demand for vacuum, clean air and fluoronitrile alternatives
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Customer procurement requirements for product carbon footprints, recycled metal content, repairability and take-back arrangements

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

An initial screening — not a materiality assessment

To turn a shortlist into a defensible result, you still need to:

  • engage affected stakeholders
  • assess severity and likelihood
  • evaluate financial effects
  • define thresholds
  • document governance and approval
  • keep an audit trail
How this screening is built, and what it is not

Candidate topics come from the LRA materiality topic catalogue (35 topics for this industry that passed quality checks), aligned to GRI sector numbering and the SASB SICS classification.

Topics, rationales, impact and financial channels, stakeholders and standard hints come from the reviewed catalogue. Workcards and activity matches are generated from it by fixed rules; where LRA has written a workcard or a disclosure mapping by hand, it is labelled as curated.

Your selections, decisions and notes stay in this browser. They are sent to LRA only to build an Excel file when you choose to export, and are not stored.

This is an educational screening aid. It is not issued or endorsed by GRI, the IFRS Foundation, EFRAG or SASB, and it is not a materiality assessment of any organisation.

Initial screening summary

Electrical Equipment and Machinery

Organisation profile

    Include for further assessment

      More evidence required

        Provisionally lower priority

          Important limitation. These are screening decisions only. They have not been validated through stakeholder engagement, severity assessment, financial-effect analysis or formal approval.

          The link carries only the sub-industry and the activities you ticked — never your decisions or notes.

          An .xlsx file with your screening, the workcards and the sources for the chosen sub-industry.