Skip to the screening

Materiality Navigator·Air Freight Transportation and Logistics

Which topics should you investigate first?

Choose a business model to see the candidate sustainability topics most likely to need investigation, and why. Then refine the shortlist, work through each topic and record a preliminary screening decision.

This is an industry-informed hypothesis. Your task is to test it against the organisation's impacts, dependencies, risks, opportunities and stakeholder evidence. Industry relevance does not make a topic material.

A forklift operator moves a pallet of boxed goods through a distribution warehouse.
Step 1 Choose the business model you are screening

Candidate topics — Air Freight Transportation and Logistics

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Greenhouse gas mitigation and transition planning for air freight line-haul operations, including fleet fuel efficiency, aircraft renewal, sustainable aviation fuel uptake, market-based climate measures and emerging attention to contrails and other non-CO2 aviation climate effects.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight operators use dedicated freighter aircraft, feeder aircraft and passenger bellyhold capacity to provide time-definite express, charter, cold-chain and airport-to-airport services. Jet A-1 combustion across long-haul and regional routes creates high emissions intensity per tonne-kilometre, while route planning, aircraft renewal, sustainable aviation fuel supply and customer demand for low-carbon freight shape transition options.

Why it may be material

Fuel is a major operating cost and the sector is directly exposed to CORSIA, EU and UK emissions trading, sustainable aviation fuel mandates and customer procurement requirements. Fleet age, route mix, fuel efficiency and preparedness for non-CO2 aviation climate methodologies can influence operating expenditure, customer retention, financing cost and residual values.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  2. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  3. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  4. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  5. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Customers / end-users.
  6. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on the atmosphere?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Dedicated freighter aircraft, including wide-body long-haul aircraft and narrow-body regional feeders
  • Process-map item (assets): Ground support equipment, delivery vans, line-haul lorries and alternative-fuel vehicle charging points
  • Process-map item (customers): Automotive, aerospace and electronics supply chains using air freight to prevent production stoppages
  • Process-map item (customers): Freight forwarders, customs brokers and third-party logistics providers buying capacity and handling services
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Tightening aviation climate policy, including expanded emissions trading, sustainable aviation fuel mandates and stronger CORSIA implementation

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Customers / end-users

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Management of routine local air pollutants from air cargo and ground logistics operations, together with the transition of airport cargo handling equipment, delivery vans and feasible road feeder assets to electric or alternative-fuel models.

How it shows up in this industry

Airport cargo terminals and express hubs combine aircraft movements, auxiliary power units, tugs, belt loaders, cargo loaders, diesel lorries, delivery vans and road feeder services. Electrifying ground support equipment and delivery fleets depends on airport permissions, depot charging, grid capacity and coordination with refrigeration and automated sortation loads.

Why it may be material

Local air-quality constraints can affect airport access, expansion approvals, fleet procurement and city delivery rules. Electrification can reduce exposure to diesel restrictions and customer pressure, but it requires capital expenditure for equipment, charging and grid upgrades.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  2. Potential effects may reach workers.
  3. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  4. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  5. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees.
  6. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  6. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  7. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Cold-chain infrastructure, including refrigerated rooms, active temperature-controlled containers and dry-ice handling areas
  • Process-map item (assets): Ground support equipment, delivery vans, line-haul lorries and alternative-fuel vehicle charging points
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport slots, route rights, air operator certificates, regulated agent status and customs authorisations

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Industry baseline
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality
  • Cross-cutting

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Adaptation and resilience of air cargo hubs, cold-chain infrastructure, ramp operations and feeder networks to physical climate hazards that can disrupt time-critical freight, affect worker safety and compromise critical shipments.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight networks concentrate time-critical flows through airport cargo terminals, automated sortation centres, refrigerated rooms, dry-ice handling areas and road feeder links. Extreme heat, flooding, storms and wildfire smoke can close runways, reduce aircraft payload performance, disrupt ramp work, interrupt road feeders and compromise refrigerated handovers for medicines, vaccines, perishables and emergency relief.

Why it may be material

Concentrated hub-and-spoke networks create dependency on a small number of gateways. Climate hazards can trigger service failures, cargo claims, adaptation capital expenditure, higher insurance costs and loss of confidence among healthcare, humanitarian and just-in-time manufacturing customers.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  5. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  6. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  7. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  8. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees.
  9. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  7. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on contractors?
  • What scientific evidence or consensus could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Cold-chain infrastructure, including refrigerated rooms, active temperature-controlled containers and dry-ice handling areas
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport slots, route rights, air operator certificates, regulated agent status and customs authorisations
  • Process-map item (customers): Humanitarian agencies and governments moving emergency relief, medical supplies and disaster response cargo

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Prevention, detection, response and remediation for unintended releases from aircraft and ground fleet fuel, de-icing chemicals, hydraulic fluids, oils, maintenance materials and damaged cargo around airport cargo infrastructure.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight operations use fuel storage services, aircraft maintenance inputs, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, de-icing fluids, ground vehicles, cargo loaders and dangerous-goods handling at airport ramps, bonded warehouses and cross-dock facilities. Packaging failures, damaged cargo, fuel leaks and contaminated de-icing runoff can enter drainage systems near airports and logistics parks.

Why it may be material

Releases can create clean-up expenditure, environmental liabilities, enforcement actions, insurance claims and constraints on terminal leases or expansion. Exposure is highest where operators control cargo terminals, maintenance areas, fuel interfaces or dangerous-goods handling facilities.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  2. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  3. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  4. Potential effects may reach workers.
  5. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  6. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  7. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  8. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Contractors, Employees.
  9. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on soil and groundwater?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Ground support equipment, delivery vans, line-haul lorries and alternative-fuel vehicle charging points
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport slots, route rights, air operator certificates, regulated agent status and customs authorisations
  • Process-map item (customers): Perishable goods exporters, including seafood, flowers, fresh produce and premium food suppliers

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Contractors
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Impact materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Waste prevention, reuse, recycling and circularity for air freight and express parcel packaging, including cold-chain packaging, pallets, plastic films, cartons, gel packs and reverse logistics materials.

How it shows up in this industry

Express parcel, e-commerce returns and cold-chain air freight use cartons, labels, plastic wrap, pallets, thermal blankets, insulated packaging, gel packs, dry-ice-compatible materials and reusable containers. Failed deliveries, returns and damaged shipments can multiply packaging flows across hubs, depots and last-mile routes.

Why it may be material

High-volume parcel and cold-chain operations create visible waste streams and purchasing costs. Customer pressure, waste regulation and extended producer responsibility schemes can affect e-commerce and healthcare logistics contracts, while reusable packaging can create new reverse logistics opportunities.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  2. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  3. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  4. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  5. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  6. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Customers / end-users, Suppliers.
  7. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence shows actual or potential impacts on people or the environment?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Cold-chain infrastructure, including refrigerated rooms, active temperature-controlled containers and dry-ice handling areas
  • Process-map item (customers): E-commerce platforms and online retailers requiring time-definite parcel delivery
  • Process-map item (customers): Manufacturers shipping high-value components, semiconductors, machinery spares and just-in-time inventory
  • Process-map item (customers): Automotive, aerospace and electronics supply chains using air freight to prevent production stoppages

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Business-model dependent
  • Entity-specific validation required
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Management of hazardous and regulated waste from aircraft, ground support equipment and vehicle maintenance, including secure storage, licensed treatment, contractor oversight, recovery and disposal controls.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight operations generate used oils, tyres, filters, hydraulic fluids, lubricants, absorbents, de-icing residues and other maintenance wastes from aircraft, ground support equipment, delivery fleets and cargo handling assets. These wastes may be managed at airport facilities, maintenance providers, depots and contracted treatment sites.

Why it may be material

Waste mismanagement can create enforcement action, clean-up costs, contractor liability and airport lease concerns. Materiality is higher for operators with in-house maintenance, ground fleet depots, de-icing interfaces or significant control over cargo terminal waste handling.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  2. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  3. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  4. Potential effects may reach workers.
  5. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  6. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  7. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Contractors, Employees, Suppliers.
  8. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  3. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  4. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on soil and groundwater?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on water bodies?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Dedicated freighter aircraft, including wide-body long-haul aircraft and narrow-body regional feeders
  • Process-map item (assets): Contracted bellyhold capacity on passenger aircraft and interline partner networks
  • Process-map item (assets): Ground support equipment, delivery vans, line-haul lorries and alternative-fuel vehicle charging points
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport slots, route rights, air operator certificates, regulated agent status and customs authorisations
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Electrification of ground fleets and cargo handling equipment, constrained by depot grid capacity and airport charging access

It may be less material when…

  • Entity-specific evidence does not show meaningful scale, exposure or effects.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Contractors
  • Employees
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Environment
  • Optional / niche
  • Entity-specific validation required
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Biodiversity, land-use and drainage impacts associated with expansion or development of air cargo terminals, warehouses, sortation centres, logistics parks, road access and supporting freight infrastructure.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight growth can require cargo terminal expansion, bonded warehouses, automated sortation centres, cross-dock facilities, logistics parks, lorry parking and road access near airports. These developments can seal land, alter drainage, fragment habitats and increase pressure on ecological areas around airport perimeters and freight corridors.

Why it may be material

Materiality depends on whether an operator owns, develops or leases major cargo terminals and logistics parks in ecologically sensitive or planning-constrained locations. Expansion projects can face planning delay, mitigation costs and opposition where habitat disturbance or drainage impacts are significant.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  2. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities.
  5. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  2. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  5. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on ecosystems?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on water bodies?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Cold-chain infrastructure, including refrigerated rooms, active temperature-controlled containers and dry-ice handling areas
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport slots, route rights, air operator certificates, regulated agent status and customs authorisations
  • Process-map item (customers): Automotive, aerospace and electronics supply chains using air freight to prevent production stoppages

It may be less material when…

  • Entity-specific evidence does not show meaningful scale, exposure or effects.
  • The optional or niche activity linked to the topic is not present.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Health, safety, fatigue management, training and working conditions across air cargo flight crews, maintenance, ramp handling, warehouses, sortation, driving, courier and subcontracted logistics roles.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight relies on pilots, loadmasters, mechanics, ramp agents, warehouse operatives, sortation staff, drivers and couriers working around aircraft, unit load devices, belt loaders, tugs, dollies, automated sortation centres and time-critical night hub waves. Third-party trucking, feeder capacity and last-mile contractors extend workforce impacts beyond direct employees.

Why it may be material

Injuries, fatigue and poor working conditions can raise compensation costs, damage aircraft and cargo, slow hub sortation, disrupt last-mile delivery and weaken service reliability. Labour shortages among pilots, mechanics, drivers and warehouse operatives increase overtime, training and retention costs.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach supply-chain workers.
  4. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  5. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Contractors, Employees, Trade unions, Value chain workers.
  6. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  2. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  3. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  4. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Supplier workforce, audit, grievance and remediation records
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Flight planning, shipment tracking, customs brokerage, warehouse management and customer booking platforms
  • Process-map item (customers): Humanitarian agencies and governments moving emergency relief, medical supplies and disaster response cargo
  • Process-map item (customers): Consumers and small businesses using courier, returns and international express services

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Contractors
  • Employees
  • Trade unions
  • Value chain workers

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Community amenity and social licence impacts from night cargo flights, aircraft and ground equipment noise, road feeder traffic, cargo terminal expansion and responsiveness to local grievances.

How it shows up in this industry

Express air freight often relies on night sortation waves, night flights, early-morning departures, auxiliary power units, cargo loaders and road feeder services. Cargo terminal expansion and logistics parks can intensify disturbance in residential areas already affected by airport activity.

Why it may be material

Community opposition can drive night-flight restrictions, planning refusal, airport expansion limits and route redesign. These outcomes can reduce network density, increase operating costs and weaken the value of slots, terminal leases and route rights.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  2. Potential effects may reach workers.
  3. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  4. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities.
  5. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  6. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on affected communities?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Ground support equipment, delivery vans, line-haul lorries and alternative-fuel vehicle charging points
  • Process-map item (assets): Flight planning, shipment tracking, customs brokerage, warehouse management and customer booking platforms
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport slots, route rights, air operator certificates, regulated agent status and customs authorisations

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Local authorities
  • Media
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality
  • Cross-cutting

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Safety and emergency controls for air transport of lithium batteries, chemicals, aerosols, biological samples, dry ice and other regulated cargo, from booking and acceptance through stowage, flight, handling and incident response.

How it shows up in this industry

Air cargo acceptance and screening must identify lithium batteries, aerosols, flammable liquids, corrosives, toxic substances, biological samples and dry-ice shipments before unit load device build-up and aircraft loading. Growth in e-commerce returns, electronics and e-mobility products increases exposure to undeclared or damaged batteries in aircraft cargo holds and express parcel flows.

Why it may be material

A misdeclared or improperly packed dangerous-goods shipment can cause aircraft fire, emergency diversion, cargo loss, regulatory penalties, insurance escalation and major liability. Compliance with ICAO Annex 18, ICAO Technical Instructions and IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations is central to asset protection, route continuity and customer confidence.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  5. Potential effects may reach emergency responders.
  6. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  7. Potential effects may reach soil and groundwater.
  8. Potential effects may reach water bodies.
  9. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Business partners, Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees.
  10. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  2. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  3. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  4. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  6. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Emergency-response plans, incident logs and responder feedback
  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Soil and groundwater monitoring, incident and remediation records
  • Water withdrawal, discharge, quality and catchment-impact records
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (customers): Pharmaceutical, biotechnology and healthcare companies moving temperature-sensitive medicines, vaccines and clinical trial materials
  • Process-map item (customers): Automotive, aerospace and electronics supply chains using air freight to prevent production stoppages
  • Process-map item (customers): Perishable goods exporters, including seafood, flowers, fresh produce and premium food suppliers

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Business partners
  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees

Users of the information

  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Social
  • Industry baseline
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Integrity, safety and reliability of temperature-sensitive and critical shipments, including medicines, vaccines, biologics, clinical trial materials, food, perishables and emergency healthcare cargo transported by air.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight companies move vaccines, biologics, clinical trial materials, seafood, flowers, fresh produce and emergency medical supplies using refrigerated rooms, active temperature-controlled containers, dry ice, gel packs, monitoring devices and validated lane procedures. Failures can occur during booking, acceptance, hub transhipment, customs hold, ramp exposure or last-mile delivery.

Why it may be material

Cold-chain performance directly affects high-margin pharmaceutical, biotechnology, healthcare and perishable contracts, as well as cargo claims, insurance costs and brand trust. A missed connection or failed handover can make high-value medical products ineffective or unsafe.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  2. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  3. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  4. Potential effects may reach workers.
  5. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  6. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Affected communities, Business partners, Customers / end-users.
  7. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  3. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  4. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  6. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on consumers?
  • What evidence shows that customer demand is changing?

Evidence to collect

  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Cold-chain infrastructure, including refrigerated rooms, active temperature-controlled containers and dry-ice handling areas
  • Process-map item (assets): Flight planning, shipment tracking, customs brokerage, warehouse management and customer booking platforms
  • Process-map item (customers): Pharmaceutical, biotechnology and healthcare companies moving temperature-sensitive medicines, vaccines and clinical trial materials

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Affected communities
  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Industry baseline
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of lawful and secure air cargo movements, including customs, sanctions, bonded storage, cargo screening, known consignor verification, regulated-agent obligations and controls against misuse of express logistics channels.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight operators provide customs brokerage, bonded movements, export filing, import clearance, temporary storage, proof of delivery and security screening across international gateways. They rely on regulated-agent status, customs authorisations, air operator certificates, known consignor checks, screening equipment and access controls to keep freight moving securely across borders and airport perimeters.

Why it may be material

Breaches can lead to regulatory penalties, shipment seizure, loss of customs authorisations, suspension of regulated-agent status, route disruption and customer loss. Geopolitical sanctions, advance cargo data regimes and aviation security requirements make accurate documentation and screening financially critical for cross-border express and high-value logistics.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  2. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  3. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  4. Potential effects may reach workers.
  5. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  6. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Business partners, Customers / end-users.
  7. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  3. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  4. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  5. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.
  6. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Flight planning, shipment tracking, customs brokerage, warehouse management and customer booking platforms
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport slots, route rights, air operator certificates, regulated agent status and customs authorisations
  • Process-map item (assets): Security screening equipment, X-ray systems, explosive trace detection and access control systems

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Financial materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of lobbying, political engagement and trade association activity on aviation climate regulation, airport access, night operations, cargo security, customs regimes and clean transport rules affecting air freight networks.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight operators are affected by aviation climate policy, airport slots, night-flight restrictions, airport expansion planning, customs advance cargo information regimes, security rules and clean transport access requirements. Public policy engagement can shape the operating environment for hard-to-abate aviation, sustainable aviation fuel supply, cargo terminal development and cross-border express services.

Why it may be material

Policy outcomes influence fuel costs, access to airports, expansion permissions, night operations, customs processing and capital allocation. Misalignment between lobbying positions and stated climate or community commitments can attract investor scrutiny, NGO campaigns and reputational damage.

Impact pathway

  1. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  4. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  6. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.

Questions to test

  • What evidence shows current or anticipated financial effects on the organisation?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • Could this topic affect demand, pricing, market access or revenue?
  • Could this topic change operating costs or the cost of controls and remediation?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport slots, route rights, air operator certificates, regulated agent status and customs authorisations
  • Process-map item (assets): Security screening equipment, X-ray systems, explosive trace detection and access control systems
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Tightening aviation climate policy, including expanded emissions trading, sustainable aviation fuel mandates and stronger CORSIA implementation
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Rising scrutiny of non-CO2 aviation effects, including contrail formation and nitrogen oxides at cruising altitude

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Local authorities
  • Media
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Due diligence and governance of contracted logistics and aviation partners whose performance affects worker welfare, cargo safety, trade compliance, security, service reliability and customer commitments across air freight networks.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight networks rely on contracted bellyhold capacity, interline partners, third-party trucking, road feeder services, last-mile couriers, ground handlers, maintenance providers, airport service providers and digital platforms. Weak partner controls can affect labour conditions, safety competence, customs compliance, cargo security, shipment visibility and service reliability across international routes.

Why it may be material

Complex subcontracted networks extend safety, labour, security and compliance exposures beyond directly controlled hubs and aircraft. Partner failures can lead to cargo claims, regulatory action, customer contract loss, labour controversies and disruption to time-definite networks.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach supply-chain workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach workers.
  4. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  5. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  6. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Business partners, Contractors, Customers / end-users, Suppliers, Value chain workers.
  7. The source places the pathway in Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on supply-chain workers?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Supplier workforce, audit, grievance and remediation records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Contracted bellyhold capacity on passenger aircraft and interline partner networks
  • Process-map item (assets): Cold-chain infrastructure, including refrigerated rooms, active temperature-controlled containers and dry-ice handling areas
  • Process-map item (customers): Automotive, aerospace and electronics supply chains using air freight to prevent production stoppages
  • Process-map item (customers): Freight forwarders, customs brokers and third-party logistics providers buying capacity and handling services
  • Process-map item (emerging_pressures): Expansion of nearshoring and supply chain resilience strategies changing lane density, inventory models and premium air freight demand

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.

Affected stakeholders

  • Business partners
  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers
  • Value chain workers

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Business-model dependent
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Financial materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of cyber resilience and data confidentiality across digital booking, tracking, customs, sortation, routing and proof-of-delivery systems used to operate air freight networks.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight depends on customer booking platforms, rate setting, capacity allocation, shipment tracking, customs data links, warehouse management, automated sortation centres, route planning and proof-of-delivery systems. Sensitive records include recipient details, trade documents, high-value routing information and customs declarations, while system outages can halt hub sortation and border clearance.

Why it may be material

Cyber incidents or data breaches can create delivery failures, customs delays, cargo theft exposure, claims, legal liability and higher cyber-insurance costs. Automation and artificial intelligence in sortation, routing and customs documentation increase dependency on resilient systems and third-party digital controls.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach consumers.
  2. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  3. Potential effects may reach workers.
  4. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  5. Potential effects may reach affected communities.
  6. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Business partners, Customers / end-users, Suppliers.
  7. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Upstream, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect insurance availability, coverage terms, premiums or claims.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  6. The topic may affect asset useful lives, impairment assumptions, valuations or stranded-asset exposure.

Questions to test

  • What evidence shows current or anticipated financial effects on the organisation?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What technology changes could alter the topic's impacts or financial effects?

Evidence to collect

  • Consumer outcome, complaint and product-impact records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Community engagement, grievance and impact records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Insurance coverage, premium, exclusion and claims records
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Asset valuations, useful-life assumptions, impairment tests and stranded-asset analysis
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Flight planning, shipment tracking, customs brokerage, warehouse management and customer booking platforms
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport slots, route rights, air operator certificates, regulated agent status and customs authorisations
  • Process-map item (assets): Security screening equipment, X-ray systems, explosive trace detection and access control systems
  • Process-map item (customers): Freight forwarders, customs brokers and third-party logistics providers buying capacity and handling services

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The relevant business model, activity, asset or product is not present or is not significant.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Business partners
  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Emerging issue
  • Strong industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of granular emissions accounting and verified climate claims for air freight services, including consignment-level carbon allocation methods, sustainable aviation fuel chain-of-custody, certificate reconciliation, book-and-claim integrity, offset claim controls and assurance of low-carbon freight products.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight companies sell parcel, charter, cold-chain and airport-to-airport services using dedicated aircraft, passenger bellyhold, road feeder services and interline partners. Shippers in e-commerce, pharmaceuticals, electronics and manufacturing increasingly request auditable shipment emissions data, verified sustainable aviation fuel attribution and low-carbon routing claims for individual consignments.

Why it may be material

Customer procurement requirements, fuel blending regimes and sustainable finance scrutiny are making emissions data quality and sustainable aviation fuel claim controls commercially material. Weak shipment allocation methods, double counting or unsupported fuel certificates can trigger greenwashing allegations, contract disputes and loss of customer trust, while robust controls can support credible low-carbon freight products.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach the atmosphere.
  2. Potential effects may reach future generations.
  3. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  4. Potential effects may reach ecosystems.
  5. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Customers / end-users, Suppliers.
  6. The source places the pathway in Upstream, Own operations, Downstream, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may affect access to finance, funding terms or the cost of capital.
  4. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.
  5. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which upstream activities, suppliers or inputs create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Which products, services, customers or end uses create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What current or proposed regulation could change the topic's relevance?

Evidence to collect

  • Emissions, air-quality and atmospheric-impact records linked to the topic
  • Long-term scenario, cumulative-impact and intergenerational analysis
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Biodiversity, habitat and ecosystem-impact evidence
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Funding terms, lender or investor requirements and cost-of-capital analysis
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Ground support equipment, delivery vans, line-haul lorries and alternative-fuel vehicle charging points
  • Process-map item (assets): Flight planning, shipment tracking, customs brokerage, warehouse management and customer booking platforms
  • Process-map item (customers): Automotive, aerospace and electronics supply chains using air freight to prevent production stoppages

It may be less material when…

  • Organisation-specific evidence does not support significant scale, severity, likelihood or financial effect.
  • The organisation has no meaningful exposure to or influence over the relevant upstream or downstream pathway.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Customers / end-users
  • Suppliers

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Investors / creditors
  • NGOs / civil society
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

  • Governance
  • Emerging issue
  • Moderate industry signal
  • Double materiality

Workcard generated from the catalogue

What this topic covers

Governance of AI-enabled and robotic systems in air freight operations, including human oversight, documentation accuracy, workforce impacts, cyber controls and accountability for automated decisions affecting routing, customs filings and sortation.

How it shows up in this industry

Air freight and express networks increasingly use automated sortation centres, route optimisation tools, warehouse management systems, customer booking platforms and automated customs data links. These systems influence labour scheduling, parcel prioritisation, customs declarations, sanctions screening hand-offs and time-definite delivery performance.

Why it may be material

Automation can improve speed and accuracy in hub waves, but poor governance can create documentation errors, unsafe work intensity, cyber vulnerabilities, customs non-compliance and service failures. The issue is gaining salience as operators combine robotics, AI and cross-border data flows in bonded warehouses and cargo gateways.

Impact pathway

  1. Potential effects may reach workers.
  2. Potential effects may reach contractors.
  3. Potential effects may reach downstream users.
  4. Potential effects may reach supply-chain workers.
  5. Affected stakeholder groups identified in the source include Contractors, Customers / end-users, Employees, Trade unions.
  6. The source places the pathway in Own operations, Cross value chain.

Financial pathway

  1. The topic may require capital expenditure to adapt assets, processes or infrastructure.
  2. The topic may change operating costs through resource use, controls, remediation or ongoing management.
  3. The topic may create provisions, penalties, remediation costs, claims or other liabilities.
  4. The topic may affect demand, pricing, market access or product and service revenue.
  5. The topic may affect reputation, licences to operate, intellectual property or other intangible value.

Questions to test

  • What evidence supports both the impact and financial materiality pathways?
  • Which own operations, assets or decisions create or concentrate the pathway?
  • Where across the value chain is the pathway most significant?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on workers?
  • What is the scale, scope, likelihood and remediability of effects on contractors?
  • What technology changes could alter the topic's impacts or financial effects?

Evidence to collect

  • Workforce, health and safety, engagement and grievance records
  • Contractor working-condition, incident and engagement records
  • Downstream-user outcome, complaint and product-use evidence
  • Supplier workforce, audit, grievance and remediation records
  • Capital plans, asset adaptation budgets and investment approvals
  • Operating-cost records and budgets linked to the topic
  • Provision, claim, penalty, remediation and contingent-liability records
  • Revenue, demand, pricing and market-access analysis linked to the topic
  • Reputation, licence-to-operate, intellectual-property and other intangible-value evidence
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport cargo terminals, bonded warehouses, cross-dock facilities and automated sortation centres
  • Process-map item (assets): Unit load devices, pallets, containers, nets, dollies, tugs, belt loaders and cargo loaders
  • Process-map item (assets): Flight planning, shipment tracking, customs brokerage, warehouse management and customer booking platforms
  • Process-map item (assets): Airport slots, route rights, air operator certificates, regulated agent status and customs authorisations
  • Process-map item (customers): Freight forwarders, customs brokers and third-party logistics providers buying capacity and handling services

It may be less material when…

  • The organisation's scale, exposure or effects are below the threshold set for further assessment.
  • The emerging signal has not yet created a relevant exposure, impact or financial effect for the organisation.

Affected stakeholders

  • Contractors
  • Customers / end-users
  • Employees
  • Trade unions

Users of the information

  • Board / management
  • Regulators

Standards to check

Your preliminary screening decision

Saved in this browser. Your notes leave it only when you export the screening.

An initial screening — not a materiality assessment

To turn a shortlist into a defensible result, you still need to:

  • engage affected stakeholders
  • assess severity and likelihood
  • evaluate financial effects
  • define thresholds
  • document governance and approval
  • keep an audit trail
How this screening is built, and what it is not

Candidate topics come from the LRA materiality topic catalogue (17 topics for this industry that passed quality checks), aligned to GRI sector numbering and the SASB SICS classification.

Topics, rationales, impact and financial channels, stakeholders and standard hints come from the reviewed catalogue. Workcards and activity matches are generated from it by fixed rules; where LRA has written a workcard or a disclosure mapping by hand, it is labelled as curated.

Your selections, decisions and notes stay in this browser. They are sent to LRA only to build an Excel file when you choose to export, and are not stored.

This is an educational screening aid. It is not issued or endorsed by GRI, the IFRS Foundation, EFRAG or SASB, and it is not a materiality assessment of any organisation.

Initial screening summary

Air Freight Transportation and Logistics

Organisation profile

    Include for further assessment

      More evidence required

        Provisionally lower priority

          Important limitation. These are screening decisions only. They have not been validated through stakeholder engagement, severity assessment, financial-effect analysis or formal approval.

          The link carries only the sub-industry and the activities you ticked — never your decisions or notes.

          An .xlsx file with your screening, the workcards and the sources for the chosen sub-industry.