Level 2 · Decision guide·UK SRS S2 · Disclosure guides
UK SRS S2 Carbon Credits: Planned Use, Quality Attributes and Greenwashing Controls
How to disclose planned carbon-credit reliance within net targets, preserve the gross inventory, explain credit types and integrity factors, and control public claims
Published passport
Current as at 10 August 2026
Reviewed by
Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn
Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert
GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert
15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures
Canary Wharf, London
LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by UK Government
Edition written against
—
UK SRS S2 requires specified disclosure of planned use of carbon credits to achieve a net …
Published
10 Aug 2026
Knowledge Hub guide
Last reviewed
10 Aug 2026
Short answer
The answer, before the reasoning
For each net GHG emissions target, UK SRS S2 requires disclosure of the entity’s planned use of carbon credits. The entity explains the extent to which and how the target relies on credits, the third-party schemes expected to verify or certify them, the type of credit, whether the underlying outcome is nature-based or technological and whether it is a reduction or removal, plus other factors needed to understand credibility and integrity, such as permanence assumptions.
The gross GHG inventory and associated gross target remain separately visible. Purchased credits may also be described when they are planned for use and help users understand the target. The disclosure is about planned reliance, not permission to subtract credits from the gross Scope 1, Scope 2 or Scope 3 inventory. Claims such as “carbon neutral”, “net zero” or “fully offset” need separate legal and evidence review and must match actual retirement, scope, period and limitations.
Educational practitioner guidance. Not legal or assurance advice. Verify the current UK SRS text, applicable reporting rules and entity-specific facts before acting.
Quick orientation
Quick orientation
- Applies to
- Entities with a net GHG emissions target that plan to use carbon credits, including credits already purchased for future use.
- Primary decision
- Whether the net target transparently shows gross reductions, residual emissions, planned credit reliance and the evidence supporting credit quality and claims.
- Key sources
- UK SRS S2 paragraph 36(e), B68-B71 and Appendix A; UK SRS S1 faithful representation and connected information; relevant UK claims rules where applicable.
- Common confusion
- Netting carbon credits from the gross emissions inventory or assuming disclosure under UK SRS S2 automatically permits a carbon-neutrality marketing claim.
Keep three records separate
Carbon-credit reporting becomes misleading when the gross GHG inventory, the target calculation and public claims are combined into one “net emissions” number. UK SRS S2 preserves separate information needs. The inventory reports absolute gross Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions. The target disclosure distinguishes the associated gross target from the net target. The carbon-credit disclosure explains planned reliance on credits to bridge residual emissions.
The gross inventory and gross target remain visible; planned carbon credits are a separate bridge to a net target and must not obscure operational emissions reduction.
In practice
| Record | Purpose | Treatment of carbon credits |
|---|---|---|
| Gross GHG inventory | Shows emissions generated during the reporting period within the measurement boundary. | Do not deduct credits from absolute gross Scope 1, Scope 2 or Scope 3 emissions. |
| Gross GHG target | Shows planned changes in emissions within the target value-chain boundary before offsetting. | Credits do not reduce the gross target outcome. |
| Net GHG target | Shows the gross target outcome minus planned offsetting efforts. | Disclose planned reliance, credit schemes, types and integrity factors. |
| Credit procurement and registry record | Tracks projects, vintages, serial numbers, ownership, status and planned use. | Supports but does not replace the target disclosure. |
| Public claim record | Controls wording to the actual scope, period, residual emissions and retirement status. | Requires separate legal and evidence review beyond UK SRS S2. |
What UK SRS S2 requires for planned carbon-credit use
Extent and manner of reliance
Explain how much of the net target is expected to be achieved through credits and how that reliance changes over time. Useful disclosure can show the planned volume or proportion of residual emissions, the target years in which credits are expected, and whether reliance is a backstop, a material continuing component or a temporary bridge.
Third-party scheme
Identify the third-party scheme or schemes expected to verify or certify the credits. The description should be precise enough to understand the programme and should not imply that scheme registration guarantees every quality attribute, claim or future availability.
Credit type
Explain whether the underlying activity is nature-based or based on technological carbon removals and whether the outcome is an emissions reduction or a removal. These distinctions affect durability, monitoring, reversal risk, delivery timing and the relationship with a net target.
Other credibility and integrity factors
Disclose other factors necessary for users to understand the credits, such as permanence assumptions. Depending on the facts, useful information may include additionality assessment, reversal and replacement arrangements, leakage, project location, vintage, correspondence between the credit period and target period, registry controls and uncertainty. Some of these are implementation judgements rather than an exhaustive list prescribed by UK SRS S2.
Credits already purchased for planned use
The required focus is planned use. The entity may also include credits already purchased when they are planned to be used for the net target and the information helps users understand the target. Purchased, issued and retired are different statuses and should not be collapsed into one number.
A carbon-credit evidence and control chain
1. Link the net target to its associated gross target and residual-emissions pathway.
2. Define the planned credit need by target year, emissions scope, activity and residual-emissions category.
3. Approve a procurement and quality policy covering eligible schemes, project types, reductions or removals, vintages, geographies and integrity criteria.
4. Perform project and programme due diligence using current evidence, not only marketing material or broker summaries.
5. Record scheme, project, methodology, vintage, quantity, serial number, registry, ownership and current status.
6. Separate forecast, contracted, purchased, issued, transferred and retired quantities.
7. Control retirement or cancellation evidence for any claim about credits actually used. Retirement is a claims and evidence control; it is not a substitute for the UK SRS S2 planned-use disclosure.
8. Reconcile planned quantities to the net-target model and prevent double use across entities, products, periods or claims.
9. Review permanence, reversal, replacement and other integrity assumptions and explain material uncertainty.
10. Approve UK SRS disclosure and any external claim through separate technical, legal and communications controls.
A credible carbon-credit disclosure follows the evidence from target design through due diligence, registry status, retirement and claim approval.
In practice
Quality attributes: disclose facts, not a single “high quality” label
| Attribute | Why it matters | Evidence and disclosure question |
|---|---|---|
| Reduction or removal | A reduction avoids or lowers emissions; a removal takes GHGs from the atmosphere. They play different roles in residual-emissions strategies. | What outcome is credited and how is it measured? |
| Nature-based or technological | Project type affects permanence, monitoring, co-risks, cost and availability. | What project type and methodology underlie the planned credits? |
| Permanence | Stored carbon may be reversed or may have a defined storage duration. | What durability assumption, reversal monitoring and replacement mechanism applies? |
| Additionality | Users may need to understand whether the outcome depends on carbon-credit finance. | What test was applied and what uncertainty remains? |
| Verification or certification | Independent processes can provide evidence against programme rules. | Which scheme, verifier or certification process applies, to which vintage and scope? |
| Registry and serialisation | Prevents uncontrolled ownership records and supports cancellation or retirement. | Where are credits issued, tracked and cancelled, and who controls access? |
| Vintage and timing | A credit from a different period may not correspond to the target year or claim period. | Do vintage, issuance, use and target periods align? |
| Double counting risk | One outcome should not support incompatible uses or claims. | How are ownership, host-country treatment, transfers and retirement controlled? |
Claims controls and greenwashing risk
UK SRS S2 is an investor-focused disclosure standard. It does not determine whether a consumer, product, service or financial-product claim is lawful. In the UK, environmental claims can also engage consumer-protection rules, and FCA-authorised firms making sustainability-related claims about products or services are subject to the FCA anti-greenwashing rule. Applicability and wording require specialist review.
In practice
| Claim | Evidence risk | Controlled replacement |
|---|---|---|
| “Our operations are carbon neutral.” | Scope, period, gross emissions, reduction effort, credits and retirement may be unclear. | State the exact boundary, period, gross emissions, reductions, credit quantity, project type, retirement status and limitations, subject to legal review. |
| “We use only high-quality credits.” | “High quality” is undefined and may conceal trade-offs. | Describe the scheme, project type, reduction/removal, permanence and other assessed attributes. |
| “Credits eliminate our emissions.” | Credits do not erase gross inventory emissions. | Maintain gross emissions disclosure and describe credits as planned or retired offsetting for the defined net target or claim. |
| “Net zero target achieved.” | May rely on purchased but unretired credits or exclude material scopes. | Confirm target boundary, gross result, residual emissions, retired credits and any exclusions before making the claim. |
| “Verified credits guarantee impact.” | Verification may test programme criteria, not every broader environmental or social outcome. | Describe the actual verification scope and remaining uncertainty. |
Hypothetical example: planned removals for residual process emissions
The disclosure shows the gross pathway and residual-emissions estimate separately. It states that planned credits could represent approximately 12% of base-period emissions in 2040, identifies the expected certification programme and removal type, explains permanence assumptions and notes that procurement is not yet contracted. The entity does not deduct any planned credit from the current gross inventory and does not claim current carbon neutrality.
Hypothetical scenario
ILLUSTRATIVE SCENARIO
<p>A hypothetical materials producer has a 2040 net Scope 1 and Scope 2 target. Its associated gross target reduces emissions by 88%, leaving residual process emissions that management plans to address through technological removals.</p>
Illustrative only. It shows how the decision is made, not wording that can be copied or relied on.
Illustrative disclosure wording
The example is transparent about gross reduction, residual emissions, planned credit type, uncertainty and current status. It must be adapted to actual schemes, quantities, evidence and claim rules.
Hypothetical scenario
ILLUSTRATIVE WORDING — ADAPT TO FACTS
<p>The Group’s 2040 net Scope 1 and Scope 2 target is supported by an associated gross emissions-reduction target of 88% from the 2022 base period. The remaining 12% reflects estimated residual process emissions. The Group currently plans to use certified technological-removal credits for these residual emissions. No credits are deducted from the gross emissions inventory. The expected programme, project type, quantity, vintage, permanence assumptions and procurement status are subject to annual review. At 31 December 2026, no credits had been retired for this target.</p>
Illustrative only. It shows how the decision is made, not wording that can be copied or relied on.
In practice
Purchased, issued and retired are not synonyms
| Status | Meaning for control | Possible disclosure or claim consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Forecast | Modelled future need; no contractual right. | Supports planned-use disclosure with uncertainty; cannot support a current use claim. |
| Contracted | Agreement exists, subject to terms and delivery risk. | Disclose commitment and dependencies accurately. |
| Purchased | Economic purchase may exist, but issuance, transfer or retirement may differ. | May be described when planned for target use and useful to users. |
| Issued / held | Credit exists in a registry account and is controlled by the entity. | Does not by itself mean the credit has been used for a claim. |
| Retired / cancelled | Registry action removes the credit from further circulation for the stated use. | Key evidence for an actual offsetting claim, subject to complete scope and legal review. |
Common review findings
Carbon credits are subtracted from gross Scope 1, Scope 2 or Scope 3 emissions.
A net target is disclosed without the associated gross target.
The extent of planned reliance is hidden behind “residual emissions” language.
Credit type, scheme, reduction/removal and nature/technology distinctions are absent.
Permanence or other significant integrity assumptions are not explained.
Purchased, issued and retired credits are combined.
The planned-use quantity cannot be reconciled to the target model and residual-emissions pathway.
The same credits could be allocated to more than one entity, product, period or claim.
“High quality”, “carbon neutral” or “net zero achieved” claims exceed the evidence.
UK SRS disclosure approval is assumed to resolve separate consumer or FCA claims requirements.
Myth
“A company can report net emissions after deducting the carbon credits it plans to buy.”
Reality
UK SRS S2 requires absolute gross Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions and separately requires disclosure of planned carbon-credit use for a net target. Planned credits do not reduce the gross inventory.
Readiness
Pre-publication checklist
- The gross GHG inventory is disclosed without deducting carbon credits.
- Every net GHG target has an associated gross target.
- Planned credit reliance is quantified or otherwise explained clearly enough to understand its extent and timing.
- Third-party schemes expected to verify or certify credits are identified accurately.
- Credit types distinguish nature-based or technological and reduction or removal.
- Permanence and other material credibility and integrity factors are disclosed.
- Purchased credits planned for future use are distinguished from issued, held and retired credits.
- The target model reconciles residual emissions and planned credit quantities.
- Registry ownership, serial numbers, status and retirement evidence are controlled.
- Double use and allocation across entities, products, periods and claims are prevented.
- UK SRS disclosure and marketing or product claims receive separate legal and technical approval.
- “High quality”, “carbon neutral”, “net zero” and “fully offset” wording is supported by the exact facts and applicable rules.
Self-check
- Can a reader see the operational gross reductions separately from planned offsetting?
- What proportion of the net target depends on credits, and how does that change over time?
- Do the scheme, project, vintage, registry and retirement records support the exact public wording?
- Would the claim remain accurate if a planned project does not issue the expected credits?
Take it with you
The checklists as a working spreadsheet
Every checklist and table on this page, with empty status, owner and evidence columns for your team to fill in and keep.
✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop
Ask about this guide
It answers from this page, and reaches into the linked disclosure cards when your question is about the standard itself. Your first two answers are free without signing in.
Go deeper · UK SRS S2
ESG Reporting Full Stack
There is no standalone LRA course for this framework yet. The Full Stack programme covers the reporting system it sits in — materiality, data, drafting and assurance — with exercises on your own data.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.