Level 2 · Decision guide·UAE FDL 11 / 2024 · Disclosure guides
How to Build a UAE Climate Law GHG Inventory: Sources, Boundaries and Evidence
A practical, authority-aware method for building a traceable emissions inventory without assuming that one voluntary framework or one filing route applies to every UAE Source.
Published passport
Current as at 10 August 2026
Reviewed by
Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn
Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert
GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert
15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures
Canary Wharf, London
LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by MOCCAE
Edition written against
—
Published
10 Aug 2026
Knowledge Hub guide
Last reviewed
10 Aug 2026
Short answer
The answer, before the reasoning
Build the inventory in two connected layers. First, establish the legal and authority-defined reporting perimeter: which Source, facility, activity, gas, period and submission route are actually covered.
Second, build a traceable calculation and evidence system within that perimeter. At minimum, create a controlled source register, boundary memo, gas screen, activity-data register, emission-factor and GWP register, calculation sheets, estimate log, QA/QC record, evidence index and authority-output reconciliation. Article 6 requires designated Sources to measure emissions, prepare an emissions inventory, report periodically, support verification and retain relevant data for at least five years, but the Decree-Law leaves important technical detail to MOCCAE and the competent authority.
A spreadsheet containing tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent is not yet a defensible GHG inventory. A reviewer must be able to see why each site and source is included or excluded, where each activity figure came from, which factor and GWP version was used, how estimates were approved, how totals reconcile and who reviewed the result.
The most important sequencing rule is to start with the regulated perimeter rather than with a generic Scope 1–3 template. GHG Protocol and IPCC methods can provide a strong accounting architecture where accepted, but they do not replace designation, facility thresholds, sector instructions, reporting forms or verification rules issued by the relevant UAE authority. One controlled evidence base may support several outputs; each output still needs its own boundary and compliance decision.
Technical status
EDITORIAL STATUS
<p>Confirm designation and authority instructions before treating a method as mandatory Federal Decree-Law No. (11) of 2024 entered into force on 30 May 2025, and the one-year adjustment period in Article 18 reached 30 May 2026. That transition date is not, by itself, evidence that every UAE legal entity had the same emissions filing deadline. Article 6 duties attach to Sources determined by the Ministry of Climate Change and Environment and the relevant competent authority, in coordination with the entity concerned. The Decree-Law does not itself prescribe a universal Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 taxonomy, consolidation approach, factor set, reporting period, portal field or nationwide timetable. Confirm the current designation, competent authority, approved methodology, form, platform, verification route and deadline. The official Arabic text and current authority instructions control final legal conclusions.</p>
Quick orientation
Figure 1. A defensible inventory connects the legal perimeter to calculations, controls, evidence and the authority output. London Reporting Academy learning visual.
Quick orientation
- Applies to
- Organisations preparing for Article 6 MRV, an emirate facility scheme, authority engagement, verification, lender requests or a controlled UAE GHG inventory.
- Primary decision
- Define the regulated perimeter and create a calculation-and-evidence structure that can be updated when authority instructions become more specific.
- Key source
- Federal Decree-Law No. (11) of 2024, especially Articles 1, 3 and 6, read with current MOCCAE and competent-authority instructions.
- Common confusion
- Starting with a consolidated corporate carbon footprint and assuming that it is automatically the same as the Source or facility inventory required by the competent authority.
In practice
2. Lock nine decisions before calculating emissions
| Decision | Question to answer | Controlled output |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Designation | Has the entity, facility, sector or Source been formally identified, contacted or brought into a reporting scheme? | Designation record and authority correspondence. |
| 2. Competent authority | Which federal, emirate or free-zone body sets the applicable method, form and deadline? | Authority register with named contact and source links. |
| 3. Reporting perimeter | Is the regulated object a legal entity, installation, facility, activity, permit holder, group or another Source? | Approved boundary memo and perimeter list. |
| 4. Reporting period | Which dates and cut-off rules apply, including acquisitions, closures and partial months? | Period memo and cut-off calendar. |
| 5. Source universe | Which combustion, process, fugitive, purchased-energy and other activities can emit covered gases? | Complete emissions source register. |
| 6. Gases and methods | Which gases, quantification methods, tiers and GWPs are approved or expected? | Methodology note and gas screen. |
| 7. Data and factors | Which activity data, factors, units and evidence support each calculation? | Activity-data and factor registers. |
| 8. Estimates and controls | How are missing data, proxies, uncertainty, changes and reviewer challenges handled? | Estimate log, control matrix and issue register. |
| 9. Output and retention | How will the controlled inventory map to the authority form and five-year evidence requirement? | Submission reconciliation, sign-off and retention index. |
3. Build the source register before the calculation workbook
The source register is the completeness control for the inventory. It should start from the organisation’s actual operating model: legal entities, permits, site maps, process-flow diagrams, utility accounts, fleet lists, fixed-asset registers, fuel purchase records, refrigerant equipment, leases, joint ventures and outsourced activities. The objective is to identify potential emission sources even where data are incomplete or the final classification is still under review.
A source should not disappear because its emissions are expected to be small. Record it, estimate its order of magnitude, assign a status and document the basis for exclusion or simplified treatment. This approach makes later authority changes manageable: the team can activate an existing source record rather than rediscovering the operation under deadline pressure.
In practice
Minimum emissions source register
| Field | Purpose | Example control |
|---|---|---|
| Source ID and description | Creates a stable reference for calculations, evidence and authority forms. | Unique code tied to facility and equipment register. |
| Legal entity, facility and location | Shows which regulated perimeter and authority may apply. | Reconcile to licences, permits and site master. |
| Activity and emission point | Connects the source to the physical process. | Reference process-flow diagram and emission-point identifier. |
| Potential gases | Prevents a CO2-only inventory where CH4, N2O or fluorinated gases may arise. | Seven-gas screen or authority-specific list. |
| Likely classification | Organises direct, purchased-energy or value-chain treatment without making it the legal conclusion. | Label as provisional until boundary and method are approved. |
| Data owner and source system | Makes collection operational. | Named role, system, report and extraction date. |
| Method and factor | Links the source to the calculation route. | Method ID and controlled factor-register reference. |
| Evidence reference | Provides traceability. | Invoice, meter, laboratory result, logbook, contract or system extract. |
| Completeness and quality status | Shows gaps and priorities. | Complete / estimated / missing / under review, with remediation date. |
| Inclusion decision and approval | Preserves judgement and prevents silent deletion. | Decision, rationale, reviewer and approval date. |
4. Write a boundary memo that can survive an authority challenge
The boundary memo should explain the legal perimeter and any external consolidation method separately. Its purpose is not to choose the most convenient number; it is to show how the reported population was identified and how differences from financial, operational or sustainability-reporting boundaries are reconciled.
Identify the Source, legal entity, permit holder, facility or group covered by the current instruction.
List included and excluded facilities, operations, vehicles, leased assets, joint ventures and contractors.
State whether operational control, financial control, equity share or a facility-specific rule is used for any supporting corporate inventory.
Explain cut-off treatment for acquisitions, disposals, temporary shutdowns, construction, commissioning and discontinued operations.
Identify intercompany data flows and controls that prevent duplicate consolidation.
Record unresolved questions and the exact confirmation requested from the competent authority.
Approve the memo through legal/compliance, operations, finance and the reporting owner before calculations are finalised.
In practice
5. Screen gases and source types explicitly
| Gas or group | Typical UAE operating sources | Evidence and method questions |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 | Fuel combustion, process reactions, flaring and certain industrial production. | Fuel quantity and carbon content; process chemistry; biomass treatment; oxidation or conversion factors. |
| CH4 | Incomplete combustion, oil and gas systems, waste, wastewater and biological processes. | Leak, vent, flare, waste or wastewater method; measurement versus factor; materiality. |
| N2O | Combustion and selected industrial or treatment processes. | Technology-specific factor; operating conditions; whether the authority requires separate reporting. |
| HFCs | Refrigeration, air-conditioning, chillers, fire suppression and industrial gases. | Equipment inventory, gas type, charge, additions, recovery, disposal and leakage method. |
| PFCs | Selected industrial processes and semiconductor or metals activities. | Process-specific method and plant records. |
| SF6 | Electrical switchgear and specialised industrial equipment. | Equipment capacity, additions, recovery, leak events and maintenance records. |
| NF3 | Electronics and specialised industrial applications. | Gas purchase, consumption, abatement and process-specific factors. |
In practice
6. Design activity data as a controlled record, not a pasted number
| Data element | Preferred evidence | Core control |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel consumed | Calibrated meter or tank issue record, supported by invoices and opening/closing stock. | Reconcile purchases + opening stock − closing stock − transfers to consumption. |
| Fleet fuel or distance | Fuel-card file, telematics, odometer, vehicle register and invoices. | Reconcile vehicles, periods, fuel type, duplicates and personal/non-company use. |
| Electricity and cooling | Utility invoice, meter export, landlord statement and contract. | Account-to-site mapping, meter completeness, units, estimated bills and cut-off. |
| Production or process input | ERP production data, weighbridge, laboratory analysis and mass balance. | Reconcile to production, inventory and sales; review yield and abnormal losses. |
| Refrigerant movement | Equipment register, service log, gas purchase and recovery documentation. | Mass-balance logic, gas identity, charge capacity and technician sign-off. |
| Waste or wastewater | Manifests, weighbridge data, treatment records and contractor confirmations. | Destination, treatment route, wet/dry basis, volume-to-mass conversion and completeness. |
| Estimate or proxy | Approved estimate note with source, rationale and uncertainty. | Named approval, sensitivity, replacement plan and no silent carry-forward. |
7. Control emission factors, GWPs and unit conversions
Create one factor register with a unique factor ID; do not paste factor values independently into multiple sheets.
Record source, publication, year, geography, technology, fuel basis, unit, calorific-value basis and whether the factor is combustion-only or life-cycle.
Confirm whether the factor is expressed per mass, volume, energy, distance, production unit or another denominator.
Document gross versus net calorific value, standard-temperature assumptions, density and any oxidation or conversion factor.
Maintain a controlled GWP table with the assessment report or authority source and the inventory period to which it applies.
Lock formulas or use controlled calculation code; review all manual overrides and unit conversions.
When the factor or GWP changes, assess the impact on comparatives, base years, targets and other public reports before updating the current inventory.
In practice
8. Use a standard calculation and estimate control
| Calculation component | Minimum documentation | Reviewer test |
|---|---|---|
| Activity data | Value, unit, period, source system, extraction date and evidence ID. | Trace a sample back to the original record and test completeness. |
| Factor and conversion | Factor ID, unit, source, year, geography and conversion steps. | Reperform unit conversion and confirm the factor matches the activity. |
| Gas calculation | Formula, oxidation/conversion factor and gas-specific result. | Recalculate and test formula consistency across rows. |
| CO2e conversion | GWP source and version. | Confirm the correct gas and GWP table are used. |
| Estimate | Missing-data reason, proxy, assumptions, uncertainty and approval. | Challenge bias, compare with historical/operational data and track replacement. |
| Aggregation | Facility, source, gas and category mapping. | Reconcile source totals to facility and group totals; test duplicates and omissions. |
| Change or restatement | Change request, rationale, impact and approval. | Check consistency with prior submissions and public disclosures. |
In practice
9. Recommended inventory workbook structure
| Tab or controlled object | Purpose | Key controls |
|---|---|---|
| 00_Control | Version, preparer, reviewer, reporting period, status and approval. | Change log, access rights and release lock. |
| 01_Authority_Requirements | Designation, competent authority, method, deadline, form and correspondence. | Source links, dates, named owner and unresolved questions. |
| 02_Boundary | Entity/facility perimeter and inclusion/exclusion decisions. | Approved boundary memo and reconciliation to legal/financial masters. |
| 03_Source_Register | Complete source and gas population. | Unique IDs, owner, evidence and inclusion status. |
| 04_Activity_Data | Controlled input values by source and period. | Validation, units, evidence references and data-quality status. |
| 05_Factors_GWP | Controlled factor and GWP library. | Version, geography, unit and approval. |
| 06_Calculations | Gas-by-gas and source-by-source calculations. | Protected formulas, reasonableness tests and re-performance. |
| 07_Estimates_Issues | Missing data, proxies, uncertainty and remediation. | Materiality, approval, expiry and owner. |
| 08_QA_QC | Completeness, reconciliations, review tests and findings. | Preparer/reviewer separation and issue closure. |
| 09_Evidence_Index | Links calculations to invoices, meters, logs, contracts and approvals. | Access level, retention date and immutable reference. |
| 10_Authority_Output | Maps controlled totals into the required form or portal. | Submission-to-ledger reconciliation and sign-off. |
| 11_Reduction_Data | Actions, expected/actual effects and supporting records. | Keep reduction claims separate from gross inventory totals. |
10. Reconciliation and QA/QC tests that catch real errors
Reconcile facility and account masters to the boundary list, including new, closed and dormant sites.
Compare current-year consumption, production and emissions with prior periods and operational explanations.
Reconcile fuel consumption to purchases and stock movements; electricity and cooling to all utility accounts; refrigerants to equipment and service records.
Test that each source has one calculation route and that no source is consolidated twice through entity and facility totals.
Search for blank units, zero factors, negative quantities, broken links, hidden rows, overwritten formulas and inconsistent GWP references.
Perform independent re-calculation of material sources and targeted testing of estimates and manual entries.
Reconcile the final authority output to the approved inventory, and retain the submission confirmation and any resubmission history.
Hypothetical example: a multi-site industrial group
A UAE industrial group operates a mainland manufacturing plant, a free-zone warehouse, a leased head office, a captive generator fleet and a minority joint venture. It initially prepares a group carbon footprint using operational control. During authority engagement, the team learns that the current reporting instruction is facility-based and applies only to the manufacturing installation; the joint venture and head office are outside that particular regulated submission, although they remain in the voluntary group inventory.
The team therefore preserves one source register but tags each record by output. The manufacturing facility inventory includes combustion, process and refrigerant sources under the approved method. The group inventory additionally includes purchased electricity and other operations under its corporate method. A reconciliation explains the difference. The controlled evidence repository stores invoices, flowmeter extracts, production records, refrigerant logs, factors, calculation files, reviews and the authority correspondence that supports the perimeter decision.
Hypothetical scenario
ILLUSTRATIVE WORDING · ADAPT TO AUTHORITY AND FACTS
<p>Inventory basis and limitations The 20X6 regulated inventory covers the activities and emission sources of Facility A identified in the competent authority’s reporting instruction dated [date]. The inventory was prepared source by source using approved calculation and measurement methods. Activity data were obtained principally from calibrated meters, fuel issue records, production systems and maintenance logs. Where complete primary data were unavailable, the organisation used documented estimates approved by the reporting owner and recorded in the estimate register. Emission factors and GWP values are identified in the controlled factor register. The authority submission reconciles to this inventory; the wider corporate GHG inventory uses a different organisational boundary and is reported separately.</p>
Illustrative only. It shows how the decision is made, not wording that can be copied or relied on.
In practice
Illustrative methodology wording
| Annotation | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Regulated perimeter | Names the facility and links the boundary to an authority instruction rather than an unsupported group assumption. |
| Method and evidence | Explains the main quantification routes and evidence families. |
| Estimates | Does not hide missing data and identifies the approval control. |
| Factor version | Makes factor and GWP selection traceable. |
| Multiple outputs | Prevents users from assuming the authority submission and corporate footprint are identical. |
In practice
Weak versus stronger inventory practice
| Weak practice | Why it fails | Stronger practice |
|---|---|---|
| “We used GHG Protocol, so the boundary is compliant.” | A voluntary method does not prove the authority-defined Source perimeter. | Document designation, authority instruction and a reconciliation to any GHG Protocol boundary. |
| One annual total per site. | The number cannot be traced to source, gas, data, factor or evidence. | Calculate source by source and preserve unique IDs and evidence links. |
| Factors copied from last year’s workbook. | Version, unit, geography and GWP may be wrong or obsolete. | Use a controlled factor register and formal change assessment. |
| Missing months filled with an unexplained average. | The estimate may be biased and unreviewable. | Record the gap, proxy, assumptions, uncertainty, approval and replacement plan. |
| Submission values manually retyped. | Creates transcription and reconciliation risk. | Map approved inventory outputs to the form and reconcile the submitted file or portal receipt. |
In practice
Common mistakes and fixes
| Mistake | Consequence | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Treating 30 May 2026 as one nationwide filing deadline. | The team may prepare the wrong output or miss an actual emirate/facility instruction. | Separate transition date from designation, scheme registration, reporting period and filing date. |
| Using the 0.5 million tCO2e carbon-registry threshold as the Article 6 test. | Misstates legal applicability and may exclude designated Sources below that level. | Keep the Federal Decree-Law and Cabinet Resolution No. 67 tests in separate decision records. |
| Starting with the general ledger only. | Misses process, fugitive, refrigerant and operational sources not visible in expenditure accounts. | Combine finance data with permits, asset registers, site walks, process maps and maintenance records. |
| Reporting CO2 only. | Potentially omits material non-CO2 gases. | Complete an explicit gas screen for every source. |
| No source-level evidence index. | Verification becomes slow and findings are difficult to resolve. | Assign evidence IDs, owners, access and retention to each calculation input. |
| Mixing avoided emissions or offsets into the gross inventory. | Obscures actual emissions and creates an unsupported net figure. | Report gross inventory, contractual accounting and avoided/offset information in separate controlled layers. |
| No change log after methodology updates. | Comparatives and other reports may become inconsistent. | Use a formal methodology-change and restatement process. |
Readiness
Reader checklist
- We have a dated authority and designation register rather than an assumption of universal filing.
- The boundary memo identifies every included and excluded legal entity, facility, lease, joint venture and material outsourced activity.
- The source register is reconciled to permits, processes, assets, utility accounts, fleet, refrigerants and operational records.
- Every source has gases, data owner, method, factor, evidence and inclusion status.
- Factors, GWPs and unit conversions are centrally controlled and versioned.
- Estimates and data gaps have written rationale, approval, uncertainty and remediation.
- Independent review and source-to-total reconciliations are complete.
- The authority output reconciles to the approved inventory and submission receipt.
- Evidence and changes are retained under the applicable record policy, including the Article 6 minimum where relevant.
In practice
Source register
| Source | Version / status | Main anchors — Use in this article |
|---|---|---|
| UAE Federal Decree-Law No. (11) of 2024 On the Reduction of Climate Change Effects | Official federal law; effective 30 May 2025 | Articles 1, 3, 6, 14, 18 and 21 — Controlling legal architecture: Source concept, designation-triggered MRV, inventory, reports, verification, records and transition. |
| MOCCAE and relevant competent-authority resolutions, notices, technical guidance, forms and portals | Current instructions must be checked at publication and before filing | Designation, approved standards, reporting perimeter, period, deadline, verification and submission route — Authority-specific legal and technical requirements; not assumed from voluntary frameworks. |
| GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, Revised Edition | Current published Corporate Standard; revision work is ongoing | Chapters 3–7 and reporting principles — External inventory architecture for organisational boundaries, source classification, calculation and QA where accepted. |
| 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories and 2019 Refinement | Current methodological reference used in UAE national inventory work | Energy, industrial processes and product use, waste and cross-cutting guidance — Method, gas, factor, GWP, uncertainty and documentation reference where accepted by the authority. |
| UAE Third Nationally Determined Contribution and national transparency materials | Current national policy and MRV context | National MRV, inventory methodology and sectoral context — Context only; national inventory methodology does not automatically determine a corporate or facility filing method. |
| Entity legal, operational, finance, procurement, facilities and environmental records | Entity-specific controlled evidence | Permits, ownership and control records, meters, invoices, logs, calculations, contracts and approvals — Supports the entity’s boundary, source list, activity data, factor selection, estimates, claims and governance. |
| Environment Agency – Abu Dhabi Facility-Level MRV technical guidance and workshop materials | Emirate-specific implementation example, February–March 2026 | Facility register, threshold, monitoring plan, quantification approaches, self-verification and annual reporting — Illustrates how one competent authority operationalises Article 6; must not be generalised to all UAE entities or emirates. |
| GHG Protocol Sample GHG Inventory Reporting Template | Illustrative corporate reporting template | Boundary, sources, gases, methods and reporting fields — Useful workbook design reference; not an official UAE form. |
Take it with you
The checklists as a working spreadsheet
Every checklist and table on this page, with empty status, owner and evidence columns for your team to fill in and keep.
✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop
Ask about this guide
It answers from this page, and reaches into the linked disclosure cards when your question is about the standard itself. Your first two answers are free without signing in.
Go deeper · UAE FDL 11 / 2024
UAE Climate Law training
Obligations under Federal Decree-Law 11 of 2024, from inventory to the reduction plan.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.