Skip to the answer

Disclosure GuidesPillar guides, articles, FAQ and expert notes

Level 2 · Decision guide·IFRS S1 / S2 · Disclosure guides

IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 Explained

What they require and how the Standards work together

Who this is for A 18-minute read for reporting teams working through Climate risks, scenario analysis and resilience under IFRS S2, and for reviewers testing whether the evidence behind it holds.

Short answer

The answer, before the reasoning

IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 form one investor-focused reporting system. IFRS S1 sets the general requirements for disclosing material information about sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect an entity's prospects.

IFRS S2 applies that architecture specifically to climate-related physical risks, transition risks and opportunities, adding requirements such as climate scenario analysis, greenhouse gas emissions and climate metrics and targets. The Standards use the same four core content areas - governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets - and are designed to be applied together.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Why these Standards matter

The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) developed IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards as a global baseline for capital-market information. The phrase global baseline describes the Standards' function: they are intended to provide a consistent investor-focused foundation that jurisdictions can adopt or build upon. It does not mean that the Standards automatically have the force of law in every country. Mandatory status depends on the relevant jurisdiction, regulator, securities rule or listing requirement.

For reporting teams, the main change is not simply a new climate table. IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 connect sustainability information to general purpose financial reports and to the entity's prospects - its cash flows, access to finance and cost of capital over the short, medium and long term. This requires finance, risk, strategy, sustainability, legal and governance teams to work from one controlled reporting architecture rather than produce a separate ESG narrative after the financial statements are complete.

Quick orientation

Applies to
Entities required by a jurisdiction to apply ISSB-based requirements and entities choosing to apply IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 voluntarily.
Primary decision
What information belongs in investor-focused sustainability-related financial disclosures and what is required for an ISSB compliance statement.
Key sources
IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information and IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures.
Common confusion
The Standards are effective from 1 January 2024, but they become mandatory for an entity only through the applicable jurisdictional framework.

1. What is the ISSB?

The ISSB is an independent standard-setting body within the IFRS Foundation. Its Standards focus on information needed by existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors. These users make decisions about buying, selling or holding equity and debt instruments, providing or selling loans and other credit, and exercising voting or other influence over management's use of economic resources.

This user focus determines the reporting lens. IFRS S1 does not ask for every sustainability fact that may be important to every stakeholder. It asks for material information about sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect the entity's prospects. Dependencies and impacts can be important inputs because they can give rise to risks and opportunities, but the disclosure objective remains the information needs of primary users of general purpose financial reports.

2. The role of IFRS S1

IFRS S1 is the general requirements Standard. It applies when an entity prepares and reports sustainability-related financial disclosures in accordance with IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. It covers all sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect the entity's cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital over the short, medium or long term. Matters that could not reasonably be expected to affect the entity's prospects are outside its scope.

IFRS S1 establishes the reporting architecture used across current and future ISSB Standards. It defines material information, requires fair presentation and connected information, aligns the reporting entity with the financial statements, governs the location and timing of disclosures, specifies how to use sources of guidance, requires disclosure of significant judgements and measurement uncertainty, and controls the statement of compliance.

In practice

IFRS S1 function What it means in practice
Scope and objective Identify sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect prospects and disclose material information about them.
Materiality Assess whether omitting, misstating or obscuring information could reasonably be expected to influence primary-user decisions.
General presentation Provide fair, connected, comparable, verifiable, timely and understandable information without obscuring material matters.
Sources of guidance Apply specific ISSB Standards and refer to and consider SASB topics and metrics where relevant; disclose the sources and industries used.
Reporting architecture Use the same reporting entity and period as the financial statements, report at the same time and make cross-references controlled and accessible.
Judgements and uncertainty Explain material judgements, assumptions, methods and significant measurement uncertainty.
Compliance Use an explicit and unreserved statement only when all requirements of the ISSB Standards are satisfied.

3. The role of IFRS S2

IFRS S2 is the climate-specific Standard. It applies to climate-related physical risks, climate-related transition risks and climate-related opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect the entity's prospects. It builds on IFRS S1 rather than replacing it. An entity applying IFRS S2 still uses IFRS S1 for materiality, fair presentation, reporting entity, connected information, location, timing, judgements, uncertainty and compliance.

IFRS S2 adds climate-specific depth. It requires classification of identified climate risks as physical or transition risks, information about climate-related transition plans if the entity has one, climate-related scenario analysis to assess resilience, cross-industry and industry-based metrics, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, and information about climate-related targets.

Figure 1. IFRS S1 provides the general architecture used by IFRS S2. Both Standards organise disclosures around governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.

4. The four core content areas

Both Standards use four core content areas. The structure is familiar to organisations that used the TCFD recommendations, but the ISSB requirements are not merely a TCFD checklist. Each content area is connected to the others and to the financial statements.

In practice

Core content area Primary information need Typical evidence and work products
Governance How governance bodies and management oversee, monitor and manage sustainability-related risks and opportunities. Board and committee mandates, reporting frequency, skills assessment, decision records, target oversight and remuneration links.
Strategy Which risks and opportunities could affect prospects; effects on the business model, value chain, strategy, decisions, financial position, performance, cash flows and resilience. Risk/opportunity register, business-model map, strategy papers, capital plans, financial-effect analysis, transition plan and scenario analysis.
Risk management How the entity identifies, assesses, prioritises and monitors risks and opportunities and how the processes integrate with overall risk management. ERM methodology, thresholds and qualitative criteria, scenario inputs, monitoring dashboards, opportunity process and change log.
Metrics and targets How performance is measured, which industry-based information is used and how progress against targets is monitored. Metric dictionary, calculation files, GHG inventory, SASB/industry analysis, target approvals, baselines, trend analysis and controls.

5. Primary users, prospects and materiality

Primary users are existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors. IFRS S1 focuses on information that could influence their resource-provision decisions. The link to prospects is expressed through expected effects on cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital over short, medium or long time horizons.

Materiality is applied to information. Information is material when omitting, misstating or obscuring it could reasonably be expected to influence primary-user decisions. The judgement is entity-specific and depends on the nature or magnitude, or both, of the item to which the information relates. IFRS S1 does not prescribe a universal score or threshold. Information is assessed individually and in combination, using qualitative and quantitative factors.

In practice

Materiality question Practical test
Could the risk or opportunity affect prospects? Connect the matter to cash flows, financing access or cost of capital over the entity's relevant time horizons.
What information could influence a primary user? Identify the governance, strategy, risk process, metric, target, financial-effect or uncertainty information needed for the decision.
Is the information material individually or in combination? Consider quantitative magnitude, qualitative nature, likelihood, time horizon and interaction with other information.
Could presentation obscure it? Challenge vague language, scattering, inappropriate aggregation or disaggregation and clutter from immaterial information.
Has the judgement changed? Reassess at every reporting date and after significant changes in the business, value chain or external environment.

6. Industry-specific information and SASB Standards

Industry-specific information is an important part of ISSB reporting. In identifying sustainability-related risks and opportunities under IFRS S1, the entity refers to and considers the applicability of disclosure topics in the SASB Standards. When no ISSB Standard specifically applies to a risk or opportunity, the entity applies judgement to identify relevant, faithfully representative information and refers to and considers the applicability of SASB metrics. The entity can conclude that a topic or metric is not applicable to its circumstances.

For climate, IFRS S2 requires the entity to refer to and consider the applicability of the Industry-based Guidance on Implementing IFRS S2. This is not permission to copy every industry metric without assessment. The reporting team should document the entity's industries, the topics reviewed, applicability decisions, metrics selected or adapted, and the source of any entity-developed metric.

7. Reporting entity, location and timing

The sustainability-related financial disclosures use the same reporting entity as the related financial statements. They form part of general purpose financial reports and can be located in management commentary, a strategic report, an integrated report or another report that forms part of the general purpose financial reports, subject to local requirements. Required information can be incorporated by cross-reference if the referenced report is available on the same terms and at the same time and the cross-reference does not make the disclosures less understandable.

The disclosures cover the same reporting period as the related financial statements and are normally reported at the same time. IFRS S1 contains a first-year transition relief that can permit later publication within specified limits, but a jurisdiction may adopt a different timetable. Reporting teams should separate the Standard's transition relief from local filing deadlines.

In practice

Architecture decision Control
Reporting entity Reconcile the sustainability boundary to the financial reporting group and explain any permitted or required jurisdictional difference.
Reporting period Use the same period as the financial statements and control cut-off, subsequent-events and comparative information.
Location Identify the general purpose financial report and ensure sustainability disclosures are clearly identifiable.
Cross-references Use precise links or references, confirm simultaneous availability and test that referenced information remains complete and accessible.
Authorisation Align governance approval and authorisation dates with the reporting and subsequent-events process.

8. Climate requirements under IFRS S2

IFRS S2 applies the four core content areas to climate and adds specific information. Reporting teams should plan at least six linked climate workstreams.

Identify climate-related physical risks, transition risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect prospects, with defined time horizons and value-chain concentration.

Explain effects on the business model and value chain, strategy and decision-making, including any climate-related transition plan the entity has and how it is resourced.

Analyse current and anticipated financial effects and connect them to financial planning and the related financial statements.

Use climate-related scenario analysis, commensurate with the entity's circumstances, to assess and disclose climate resilience.

Prepare cross-industry metrics, including Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 GHG emissions, transition-risk, physical-risk, opportunity, capital-deployment, carbon-price and remuneration information as applicable and material.

Identify industry-based metrics and disclose climate targets, methodologies, baselines, progress, revisions and any planned use of carbon credits for net targets.

9. Effective date, early application and transition reliefs

IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2024. Earlier application is permitted only when the two Standards are applied at the same time and the fact of early application is disclosed. This effective date governs application of the Standards; it does not itself impose a legal obligation on entities in every jurisdiction.

In practice

Transition mechanism What it permits Important condition
No first-year comparatives The entity need not provide disclosures for periods before initial application. Comparative requirements apply in later periods subject to the specific reliefs used.
First-year timing relief Sustainability-related financial disclosures can be published after the related financial statements within the timetable specified by IFRS S1. Check whether the adopting jurisdiction permits, modifies or removes this relief.
Climate-first relief In the first annual period, the entity may disclose only climate-related risks and opportunities under IFRS S2 and apply IFRS S1 only insofar as it relates to climate. Disclose use of the relief and prepare for broader IFRS S1 reporting in the next period.
IFRS S2 GHG method relief The entity may continue a pre-existing GHG measurement method in its first year. The relief is transition-specific and the method and future change should be controlled.
IFRS S2 Scope 3 relief The entity may omit Scope 3 emissions in its first year. The relief includes financed-emissions information where relevant; build the data roadmap rather than treating the omission as permanent.

10. What compliance means

An entity can make an explicit and unreserved statement of compliance only when its sustainability-related financial disclosures comply with all requirements of IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. The statement is not a general description of direction of travel. An entity that applies selected requirements, uses the Standards as a reference or is building towards compliance should explain the extent of application without using the compliance statement.

The compliance conclusion should be a controlled output of the project. It requires a requirement-level disclosure map, evidence of materiality judgements, a record of transition reliefs and local modifications, review of all open gaps and confirmation that the reporting location, timing, comparatives and connected information requirements have been met.

In practice

Wording Assessment
'Our disclosures comply with IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards.' Use only with the explicit and unreserved statement after confirming all applicable requirements are met.
'Prepared with reference to IFRS S1 and IFRS S2.' May describe partial or voluntary use, but must explain what was and was not applied and must not create an impression of compliance.
'Aligned with the ISSB framework.' Potentially ambiguous. Explain the exact basis, scope, reporting period and differences rather than relying on the label.
'IFRS S2 compliant climate report.' Risky if IFRS S1 has not also been applied as required. IFRS S2 is not a stand-alone compliance route.

11. What the Standards do not require

They do not automatically become law worldwide merely because the ISSB has issued them or because their effective date has passed.

They do not require disclosure of every sustainability topic, every SASB metric or every fact requested by all stakeholder groups.

They do not prescribe a universal materiality score, threshold, survey, software platform or report template.

IFRS S2 does not require an entity to create a climate transition plan if it does not have one; it requires information about any plan the entity has and about its strategy and targets.

They do not themselves impose a universal external-assurance requirement, although local law, listing rules or the entity's chosen assurance arrangements may do so.

They do not replace the related financial statements or remove the need to explain connections, consistency and differences between sustainability disclosures and financial reporting.

12. Hypothetical example: a diversified retailer

A listed retailer operates stores, warehouses and an online marketplace in several countries. Its risk register identifies climate-related supply disruption, energy-price exposure, water stress in selected agricultural sourcing regions, labour-practice disruption in outsourced logistics, and an opportunity from lower-energy store formats. Management has already developed a climate transition plan but has not yet designed an organisation-wide IFRS S1 process.

The reporting team uses IFRS S2 for the climate workstream: it classifies physical and transition risks, performs scenario analysis, prepares Scope 1-3 emissions, evaluates financial effects and discloses the transition plan and targets. In parallel, IFRS S1 is used to identify other sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could affect prospects. The team refers to and considers the relevant SASB retail and e-commerce topics, reviews ERM, investor questions, supplier disruptions and financial planning, and assesses material information for each identified matter.

The final report uses one integrated governance disclosure because the board and management oversee sustainability-related risks and opportunities through the same structures. Strategy and metrics are disaggregated where the matters differ. The climate scenario analysis is not presented as evidence for labour or water risks. The compliance statement is released only after the requirement map and transition-relief decisions have been approved.

In practice

13. Weak versus stronger opening disclosure

Weak wording Stronger illustrative wording Why stronger
'We report in line with global ISSB best practice and cover all material ESG matters.' 'For the year ended 31 December 20X6, the Group prepared sustainability-related financial disclosures applying IFRS S1 and IFRS S2. The disclosures use the same reporting entity and period as the consolidated financial statements. Material information was identified for risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect cash flows, access to finance or cost of capital over the Group's short-, medium- and long-term horizons. The Group used the first-year Scope 3 transition relief [only if factually applicable].' Specifies period, reporting entity, materiality lens, prospects, time horizons and relief. The wording still requires adaptation and a complete compliance review.

In practice

14. Common mistakes

MISTAKE 1 Treating IFRS S2 as a stand-alone climate reporting standard.
Why it happens Teams recognise the climate metrics but overlook the general presentation, materiality, timing and compliance requirements in IFRS S1.
Why it matters A report can omit IFRS S1 requirements while still making an unsupported ISSB compliance claim.
Correction Build one disclosure map with IFRS S1 requirements and the additional IFRS S2 climate requirements.
Evidence of correction Approved combined requirement matrix and compliance gate showing every applicable S1 and S2 requirement.

In practice

MISTAKE 2 Assuming every sustainability issue or SASB topic must be disclosed.
Why it happens A topic list is mistaken for a material-information conclusion.
Why it matters The report becomes cluttered and can obscure material information while consuming resources on low-value metrics.
Correction Document the risk/opportunity identification and material-information assessment, including SASB applicability decisions.
Evidence of correction Risk/opportunity universe, SASB review, information-level materiality records and reviewer approval.

In practice

MISTAKE 3 Starting with a report draft instead of the reporting system.
Why it happens The project is treated as a communications exercise rather than a general purpose financial reporting process.
Why it matters Narrative claims, metrics, financial effects and governance evidence do not reconcile.
Correction Establish ownership, source registers, methodologies, controls and disclosure workpapers before final drafting.
Evidence of correction Data lineage, calculation files, financial-statement connection checks, issue log and sign-offs.

In practice

MISTAKE 4 Using the 1 January 2024 effective date as proof of legal applicability.
Why it happens Standard-setting effective dates and local adoption dates are conflated.
Why it matters The entity may overstate or understate its legal obligations and use incorrect filing or assurance requirements.
Correction Complete a jurisdiction-specific applicability assessment using the binding legal or regulatory instrument.
Evidence of correction Dated applicability memo with entity scope, first reporting period, local modifications and legal reviewer.

In practice

15. Myth versus reality

MYTH IFRS S1 is the non-climate Standard and IFRS S2 is the climate Standard, so an e
REALITY IFRS S1 is the general requirements Standard. IFRS S2 is applied together with IFRS S1 for climate disclosures. IFRS S1 also covers other sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could affect prospects.
Why the confusion arises The titles make the Standards look like parallel topic options, and climate-only regulatory regimes can reinforce that impression.
Practical consequence The reporting architecture, materiality, timing, reporting-entity and compliance requirements of IFRS S1 must be built into the climate workstream even when a jurisdiction begins with climate reporting.

16. Implementation roadmap

Figure 2. High-level roadmap from applicability and governance through risk/opportunity identification, materiality, data and publication.

Confirm the reporting basis. Identify the jurisdictional requirement or voluntary objective, reporting entity, reporting period, intended claim and applicable source edition.

Create programme governance. Assign a board sponsor, executive owner, technical lead and workstream owners across finance, sustainability, risk, strategy, legal and internal control.

Build the risk and opportunity universe. Use the value chain, ERM, strategy, dependencies and impacts, SASB topics, climate analysis and external evidence.

Assess material information. Apply the primary-user decision test, nature and magnitude, qualitative and quantitative factors, combined effects and obscuring test.

Complete climate-specific analysis. Develop GHG data, scenario analysis, resilience, transition-plan disclosures, climate metrics, targets and financial effects.

Build the disclosure and evidence system. Map requirements, owners, sources, methods, controls, judgements, estimates, limitations and approvals.

Draft connected disclosures. Organise the report by the four core content areas while showing the links between risks, strategy, metrics, financial effects and financial statements.

Run the compliance gate. Resolve gaps, validate transition reliefs, test location and timing, approve the statement and retain a complete review trail.

In practice

19. Related standards and mapping

Standard / material Relationship Role in this article
IFRS S1 paragraphs 1-4, 11-25 Direct Objective, fair presentation, materiality, connected information and four core content areas.
IFRS S1 paragraphs 54-72 Direct Sources of guidance, location, timing, comparatives and compliance statement.
IFRS S1 Appendix B and E Direct Risk/opportunity identification, materiality application guidance, effective date and transition reliefs.
IFRS S2 paragraphs 1-37 and Appendices B-C Direct Climate-specific requirements, scenario analysis, metrics, targets, GHG emissions and transition.
SASB Standards and IFRS S2 Industry-based Guidance Implementation Industry-specific inputs and metrics considered for relevant risks and opportunities.
IFRS Foundation Jurisdictional Guide and profiles Applicability Support understanding of adoption approaches; local binding instruments remain decisive.

Primary users are existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors. They use the disclosures when deciding whether to buy, sell or hold equity or debt, provide or sell credit, or exercise voting and other rights over management's use of economic resources.

IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 do not create a worldwide legal reporting obligation merely because their effective date has passed. They are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2024, but each jurisdiction decides whether and when to mandate them for local entities.

IFRS S1 does not require every SASB metric. The entity refers to and considers relevant SASB topics and metrics, then applies entity-specific judgement and documents which metrics are selected, adapted or found inapplicable.

Questions

Questions people ask

What is the main difference between IFRS S1 and IFRS S2?

IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 form one investor-focused reporting system. IFRS S1 sets the general requirements for disclosing material information about sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect an entity's prospects. IFRS S2 applies that architecture specifically to climate-related physical risks, transition risks and opportunities, adding requirements such as climate scenario analysis, greenhouse gas emissions and climate metrics and targets.

Who are the primary users?

Primary users are existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors. They use the disclosures when deciding whether to buy, sell or hold equity or debt, provide or sell credit, or exercise voting and other rights over management's use of economic resources.

Are IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 mandatory everywhere?

IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 do not create a worldwide legal reporting obligation merely because their effective date has passed. They are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2024, but each jurisdiction decides whether and when to mandate them for local entities.

Does IFRS S1 require every SASB metric?

IFRS S1 does not require every SASB metric. The entity refers to and considers relevant SASB topics and metrics, then applies entity-specific judgement and documents which metrics are selected, adapted or found inapplicable.

Can an entity comply with IFRS S2 without IFRS S1?

It builds on IFRS S1 rather than replacing it. An entity applying IFRS S2 still uses IFRS S1 for materiality, fair presentation, reporting entity, connected information, location, timing, judgements, uncertainty and compliance.

When can the entity state compliance?

An entity can make an explicit and unreserved statement of compliance only when its sustainability-related financial disclosures comply with all requirements of IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. The statement is not a general description of direction of travel. An entity that applies selected requirements, uses the Standards as a reference or is building towards compliance should explain the extent of application without using the compliance statement.

Sources

Primary sources

Take it with you

The checklists as a working spreadsheet

Every checklist and table on this page, with empty status, owner and evidence columns for your team to fill in and keep.

Download .xlsx

✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop

Ask about this guide

It answers from this page, and reaches into the linked disclosure cards when your question is about the standard itself. Your first two answers are free without signing in.

Try
2 free answers Automated · the LRA team is one click away

Go deeper · IFRS S1 / S2

IFRS S1 and S2 training

Financial materiality, scenario analysis and the S2 climate disclosures, applied to your own reporting.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

See course formats
/en/knowledge-hub/disclosure-guides/ifrs-issb/ifrs-issb-climate-risk-scenarios-resilience/ifrs-s1-and-ifrs-s2-explained/