Short answer
The answer, before the reasoning
ESRS S1 combines a people-impact narrative with a tightly controlled workforce dataset. When own-workforce impacts, risks or opportunities are material, the undertaking reports policies, engagement and grievance/remedy arrangements, actions and targets, then provides the applicable worker-characteristic and outcome metrics.
The first control is population: distinguish employees from non-employees in the own workforce and from workers in the value chain. The second is metric governance: reconcile headcount, contract type, collective bargaining, pay, training, health and safety, leave and substantiated-incident data to defined periods, lawful sources, privacy rules and review controls.
Start ESRS S1 with a population decision: employees, S1 non-employees and S2 workers must be separated.
Why this question matters
ESRS S1 is demanding because the public narrative and the workforce dataset must describe the same people, period and impacts. HR, payroll, health and safety, employee relations, compliance and finance often use different populations. Payroll can exclude agency labour; contractor registers can include workers who belong in S2; and sensitive incident or disability data can be restricted by law.
The safest sequence is boundary first, material impacts second, disclosure architecture third and metrics fourth. That prevents a polished table that cannot be reconciled to the workforce model or due-diligence narrative.
Quick orientation
At a glance
- Applies to
- Undertakings with material impacts, risks or opportunities relating to employees and relevant non-employees in their own workforce.
- Primary decision
- How to determine the S1 population and control the applicable workforce metrics and narratives.
- Core sources
- Revised ESRS S1, ESRS 1 materiality/boundary provisions and ESRS 2 general disclosure requirements.
- Common confusion
- Assuming payroll equals the complete S1 population or combining agency, contractor and supplier workers without a definition-based review.
- Technical status
- Commission-adopted revised ESRS dated 3 July 2026; final Official Journal and entry-into-force check required.
The first decision: who is in ESRS S1?
Start ESRS S1 with a population decision: employees, S1 non-employees and S2 workers must be separated.
In practice
| Population | Examples | Control question |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Permanent, temporary and non-guaranteed-hours employees under national definitions | Is there an employment relationship with the reporting undertaking? |
| S1 non-employees | Certain self-employed and agency-provided people forming part of the own workforce | Do they personally perform work and form part of the operating workforce? |
| S2 workers | Supplier-managed or outsourced workers outside the S1 definition | Does another organisation manage and deliver the service or value-chain activity? |
In practice
The 16 S1 disclosure requirements
| DR | Subject |
|---|---|
| S1-1 | Policies |
| S1-2 | Engagement, channels and remedy |
| S1-3 | Actions and resources |
| S1-4 | Targets |
| S1-5 | Employee characteristics |
| S1-6 | Non-employee characteristics |
| S1-7 | Collective bargaining and social dialogue |
| S1-8 | Gender diversity in top management |
| S1-9 | Adequate wages |
| S1-10 | Social protection |
| S1-11 | Persons with disabilities |
| S1-12 | Training and skills |
| S1-13 | Health and safety |
| S1-14 | Work-life balance |
| S1-15 | Remuneration |
| S1-16 | Discrimination and other human-rights incidents |
1. Policies, engagement, grievance and remedy
The narrative layer is not an HR-policy inventory. It should explain how policies cover material impacts, which groups and geographies are in scope, how workers and representatives are engaged, which channels are available, how effectiveness is assessed and how remedy is provided or supported when the undertaking caused or contributed to harm.
Link policy coverage to the material working-condition, equality, safety or rights issue.
Identify whether engagement is direct or through workers’ representatives and how it influenced decisions.
Distinguish employee communication, speak-up, grievance, trade-union and formal legal routes.
Assess channel effectiveness through accessibility, trust, non-retaliation, timeliness, resolution and recurrence.
Distinguish systemic corrective action from remedy for affected people.
2. Employee characteristics: denominator context
S1-5 reports total employee headcount by gender; employee headcount for each country with 50 or more employees among the ten largest countries; permanent, temporary and non-guaranteed-hours employees; permanent-employee turnover; and an explanation of inconsistency with the most representative financial-statement employee number.
In practice
| Metric | Control |
|---|---|
| Total employees | Headcount; reporting date or average stated; gender and “not reported” treatment defined |
| Country data | Countries with 50+ employees and ten largest selected consistently |
| Contract type | National definitions mapped to group categories; headcount or FTE stated |
| Turnover | Specified leavers divided by average permanent-employee headcount |
| Finance reconciliation | Scope and timing bridge to financial reporting |
3. Non-employees in the own workforce
S1-6 applies where non-employees in the own workforce are connected to material S1 IROs—for example because flexible labour is critical to the business model, reliance is increasing or impacts are material. Report headcount or FTE and state whether the measure is period-end or average. If exact data are unavailable, use a transparent reasonable estimate and explain coverage and limitations.
Reconcile procurement, contingent-labour platforms, site access and HR records. Prevent duplicate people across invoices, access systems and project logs, and identify remote or decentralised populations that central systems omit.
In practice
4. Collective bargaining, equality, wages, protection and skills
| Topic | Implementation focus | Key control |
|---|---|---|
| Collective bargaining | Coverage and social dialogue by defined employee population and geography | Prevent double counting and explain local legal context |
| Top management | Define the management population and gender measure consistently | Protect small-population privacy |
| Adequate wages | Select benchmark and compare relevant pay components by country/population | Record benchmark edition, hours, currency and exclusions |
| Social protection | Assess protection against major life events and identify gaps | Distinguish statutory and employer coverage |
| Disability | Use data only where lawful and reliably collected | Privacy/legal review and “not reported” treatment |
| Training | Define review coverage and training hours by population and period | Separate booked, attended and completed training |
5. Health and safety
S1-13 requires a coherent health-and-safety account: management-system coverage, fatalities, recordable accidents and rate per one million hours worked, work-related ill health and days lost where applicable. Define the population, recordability basis and hours denominator; reconcile contractor hours or estimates and explain changes in boundary or capture.
State whether employees and S1 non-employees are covered.
Map local legal categories to a controlled group definition.
Use hours worked or a documented estimate; avoid unexplained paid-hours denominators.
Protect health information and maintain work-relatedness and case review.
Explain acquisitions, disposals, better capture and restatements.
6. Work-life balance and remuneration
Family-related leave metrics require defined entitlement and take-up populations. The unadjusted gender pay gap uses gross hourly pay of all male and female employees and is not an equal-pay-for-equal-work test. The annual total remuneration ratio compares the highest-paid individual with median employee annual total remuneration excluding that individual. Pay elements, currency conversion, population and period must be controlled.
7. Discrimination and human-rights incidents
S1-16 focuses on substantiated incidents identified in the reporting period, not all concerns received. Discrimination and other human-rights incidents are reported separately, alongside fines, penalties and compensation recognised in the financial statements. A restricted register should preserve intake, issue, population, investigation, substantiation basis, remedy, cut-off, finance linkage and privacy classification.
ESRS S1 architecture: material impacts drive narrative disclosures and the applicable workforce metrics.
Nine-step implementation workflow
Confirm material S1 sub-topics and affected worker groups.
Build and approve the employee, S1 non-employee and S2 population register.
Map S1-1 to S1-4 to policies, engagement, grievance/remedy, actions and targets.
Create the S1 metric dictionary with population, unit, period, source, owner and privacy class.
Reconcile S1-5 to HRIS, local HR and financial statements.
Build the S1-6 non-employee data or estimate control.
Calculate S1-7 to S1-15 with metric-specific denominators.
Operate the restricted S1-16 incident register and legal/privacy review.
Complete narrative/metric consistency review and governance approval.
Hypothetical case: a logistics group with mixed labour models
The group classifies employees in S1, tests agency workers for S1 non-employee treatment and leaves independently managed delivery-provider workers in S2. It reports exact employee data, a controlled estimate for a material non-employee population and a separate S2 worker-impact analysis. Health-and-safety rates use hours by population and explain estimated contractor hours.
In practice
Weak versus stronger reporting
| Weak wording | Stronger structure |
|---|---|
| “Our workforce includes 25,000 employees and contractors.” | Separate employees, S1 non-employees and S2 workers; define relationship, unit, period, coverage and estimates. |
| “We have zero tolerance and no issues.” | Identify material issues, policy scope, engagement, incidents, actions, remedy and limitations. |
| “Our accident rate improved.” | State population, recordability definition, hours denominator, boundary changes and movement context. |
| “We pay everyone fairly.” | Report applicable adequate-wage and remuneration metrics with method and context. |
In practice
Common mistakes and corrections
| Mistake | Correction |
|---|---|
| Using payroll as the entire S1 boundary | Use a relationship-based population register. |
| One denominator across all metrics | Define metric-specific population and eligibility. |
| Summing local categories without mapping | Maintain local-to-group definitions. |
| Reporting complaints as incidents | Separate intake, investigation and substantiation. |
| Using privacy as blanket omission | Apply lawful collection, aggregation and legal review. |
| Unsupported causal explanations | Describe supported factors and uncertainty. |
Readiness
S1 evidence checklist
- Materiality and IRO record by worker group and issue.
- Worker-population register with approved S1/S2 rationale.
- Policies, worker engagement, channels and remedy records.
- HRIS, payroll, contingent-labour and finance reconciliations.
- Metric dictionary and calculation files for S1-7 to S1-15.
- Local legal definitions and group mapping.
- Restricted incident register and finance linkage.
- Comparative/restatement controls and governance approval.
In practice
Connections to other ESRS
| Standard | Connection |
|---|---|
| ESRS 1 | Materiality, reporting undertaking, value chain and estimates. |
| ESRS 2 | Strategy, IROs, policies, actions, targets, metrics and financial effects. |
| ESRS S2 | Boundary for workers outside the own-workforce definition. |
| ESRS G1 | Speak-up and non-retaliation can support but do not replace S1. |
| E1-E5 | Environmental transitions can create own-workforce and just-transition impacts. |
Sources
Primary sources
Take it with you
The checklists as a working spreadsheet
Every checklist and table on this page, with empty status, owner and evidence columns for your team to fill in and keep.
✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop
Ask about this guide
It answers from this page, and reaches into the linked disclosure cards when your question is about the standard itself. Your first two answers are free without signing in.
Go deeper · ESRS
ESRS and CSRD training
Double materiality, datapoints and the sustainability statement, with a mentor on your own report.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.
