Level 2 · Decision guide·ESRS · Disclosure guides
Revised ESRS 2026: What Changed and How to Prepare for 2027 Reporting
A transition guide to the simplified architecture, datapoint reduction, top-down materiality, information materiality, reliefs, fair presentation and targeted topical changes - with system and comparative impacts.
Published passport
Current as at 10 August 2026
Reviewed by
Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn
Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert
GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert
15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures
Canary Wharf, London
LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by European Commission
Edition written against
—
Published
10 Aug 2026
Knowledge Hub guide
Last reviewed
10 Aug 2026
Short answer
The answer, before the reasoning
The revised ESRS keep the core model - double materiality, two cross-cutting standards and ten topical standards - but materially simplify how companies decide and present what is material. The Commission states that mandatory datapoints are reduced by over 60% and total datapoints by over 70%.
The revision formalises a top-down materiality route, makes information materiality explicit, clarifies that fair presentation applies to the statement as a whole, adds reliefs and changes selected topical requirements. Companies should treat this as a controlled transition of methodology, data definitions, systems, comparatives, evidence and report structure, not merely a shorter disclosure checklist.
The implementation opportunity is significant: teams can remove low-value data collection, simplify narrative and focus on decision-useful information. The implementation risk is equally significant: if a company assumes that every old datapoint can simply be deleted, it may overlook changed definitions, new judgement controls, revised boundaries, comparative treatment or information that remains necessary for fair presentation.
Technical status
EDITORIAL STATUS
<p>Publication and legal-status control Status at 2 August 2026: the Commission adopted revised ESRS on 3 July 2026, but the delegated regulation is not yet in force. The adopted act is designed to apply to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027 and permits FY2026 choices once it is in force. Do not describe the revised text as mandatory until scrutiny, publication and entry into force are complete.</p>
Quick orientation
Figure 1. Revised ESRS 2026 change logic and transition timeline. London Reporting Academy learning visual.
Quick orientation
- Applies to
- Companies already reporting under 2023 ESRS and companies preparing for mandatory reporting from FY2027.
- Primary decision
- Identify changes that affect methodology, data, controls, comparatives and the chosen FY2026 transition route.
- Key source
- Commission act C(2026) 5010 final, its Annex I revised ESRS and Article 2 transitional provisions.
- Common confusion
- Equating “fewer datapoints” with “less need for judgement, evidence or assurance-ready controls”.
In practice
1. Status: adoption, entry into force, early use and mandatory application are different events
| Event | Meaning | Company consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Adoption · 3 July 2026 | The Commission approved the delegated act and annexes. | Use the text for transition planning and technical analysis. |
| Scrutiny and Official Journal publication | The European Parliament and Council scrutiny process and publication must be completed. | Do not treat the revised standards as legally in force before completion. |
| Entry into force | The final published regulation becomes legally operative on its specified date; the adopted text states this should be not earlier than four months after adoption. | Confirm the exact date in the Official Journal text. |
| FY2026 optional application | For financial years starting in 2026, the adopted act allows specified version choices once the regulation is in force. | Approve and disclose the route selected; check local-law and filing context. |
| FY2027 mandatory application | The act is designed to apply for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027. | Build the FY2027 process and systems around the final revised text. |
2. Datapoint reduction and simpler architecture
The Commission’s adoption communication states that mandatory datapoints are reduced by over 60% and total datapoints by over 70%, with estimated reporting-cost reductions of more than 30% per company. The legal act explains the simplification approach: reduce datapoints, prioritise quantitative information over repetitive narrative, distinguish mandatory from voluntary information more clearly, simplify materiality instructions and improve consistency with other EU and global reporting frameworks.
These percentages are portfolio-level indicators, not a promise that every company’s data effort falls by the same amount. A company with complex climate, workforce or value-chain matters may still need extensive evidence. Entity-specific information remains necessary where the standards do not capture a material impact, risk or opportunity with sufficient granularity.
3. Top-down double materiality and information materiality
The revised ESRS make a top-down route explicit. Instead of beginning with a line-by-line list of every possible impact, risk and opportunity, the undertaking may use its business model, sectors, activities, geographies, products, relationships, due-diligence findings and risk information to identify the matters that plausibly require detailed assessment. This can avoid unnecessary work, but it does not remove the obligation to test whether plausible matters have been missed.
Information materiality is also made more explicit. After identifying a material topic or material impact, risk or opportunity, the undertaking assesses which prescribed and entity-specific information is material and decision-useful. Except in clearly defined circumstances, the revised text states that non-material information shall not be reported. Supplementary information may be included, but it must not obscure material disclosures.
In practice
| Old implementation habit | Revised implementation logic | Control needed |
|---|---|---|
| Assess every possible IRO and datapoint from the bottom up. | Start with the undertaking’s context and focus detailed work on plausible material matters. | Coverage check, sector/location evidence and reviewer challenge. |
| Treat all datapoints under a material topic as automatically reportable. | Assess information materiality within applicable disclosures. | Datapoint rationale tied to user decision usefulness. |
| Include extra non-material information “to be safe”. | Do not report non-material information except in defined cases; avoid obscuring material content. | Editorial materiality review and report-length control. |
4. Fair presentation applies to the statement as a whole
The revised text emphasises fair presentation of the sustainability statement as a whole, not perfection at every individual datapoint. Application of ESRS is designed to result in fair presentation when the company provides relevant, faithfully represented, comparable, verifiable and understandable information. This increases the importance of balanced narrative, entity-specific disclosures, connected information, transparent uncertainty and a final whole-statement review.
Rule
Reviewer implication
<p>A company should not use a completed checklist as the final quality test. The review team should ask whether the statement, taken as a whole, fairly presents all material impacts, risks and opportunities and how they are managed - and whether omissions, aggregation or supplementary information distort that picture.</p>
In practice
5. New and clarified reliefs
| Relief or clarification | What it changes | Control expectation |
|---|---|---|
| Reasonable and supportable information without undue cost or effort | Supports proportionate use of available information in specified circumstances. | Document alternatives considered, evidence available and why further effort would be undue. |
| Acquisitions and disposals | Allows controlled treatment where group composition changes during the year. | Transaction register, boundary decision, significant-event disclosure and future integration plan. |
| Metrics for non-significant activities | Provides relief where activities are not significant in the specified context. | Define significance and prevent material local issues being hidden by group aggregation. |
| Partial value-chain scope | Allows proportionate treatment under specified conditions. | Explain coverage, limitations, estimation and improvement plans. |
| Joint operations | Clarifies treatment and boundary decisions. | Reconcile operational and financial reporting responsibilities. |
| EU Taxonomy appendix | Permits a separate appendix for Taxonomy information. | Keep it identifiable, connected, accessible and within the assurance/release process. |
| Executive summary | Permits a clearly identified summary. | Do not allow the summary to replace, contradict or obscure the full material disclosures. |
| Protected or commercially sensitive information | Implements legal omission routes in defined circumstances. | Apply conditions, disclose use of the exemption where required and reassess each period. |
In practice
6. Targeted topical changes
| Area | Key adopted change | System or evidence impact |
|---|---|---|
| GHG emissions | Flexibility to use financial control or operational control for the reporting boundary. | Reconcile the chosen approach to the group perimeter, Scope 1-3 methods and prior-year comparatives. |
| Climate transition plans | A reported plan with targets not compatible with 1.5°C must be transparent about that fact. | Add target-alignment review and claim approval. |
| Microplastics | Metric disclosure is limited to primary microplastics; secondary microplastics are not required. | Update pollutant taxonomy and remove unsupported secondary-microplastic collection. |
| Pollutants | Material pollutants are selected through managerial assessment considering activities and sector. | Retain assessment criteria, environmental data and management approval. |
| Substances of very high concern | One-year phase-in for users of articles containing SVHC. | Tag role in the supply chain and plan first required year. |
| Due diligence | Technical alignment is improved with the CSDDD. | Align terminology and avoid claiming that reporting itself proves due-diligence effectiveness. |
| Human-rights and discrimination incidents | Report substantiated verified instances; not every allegation is automatically a substantiated incident. | Define verification, legal review, privacy and case-status controls. |
| Asset management | Specified fiduciary-mandate investments may be excluded from the sustainability statement. | Document mandate conditions and prevent broader portfolio exclusions. |
7. Statement structure and presentation
The revised ESRS 1 provides a clearer four-part sustainability statement: general, environmental, social and governance information. It allows an executive summary and a separate EU Taxonomy appendix, and retains conditional incorporation by reference. Presentation choices should be made early because they affect ownership, assurance scope, cross-references, digital tagging and the accessibility of incorporated information.
8. System and comparative impacts
Revised ESRS 1 retains prior-period comparatives for quantitative metrics and amounts, but provides transition relief. Wave-one undertakings do not have to present comparative information in their first year under the revised regulation for metrics and amounts that are not the same as those required by the 2023 ESRS. Other undertakings are not required to present comparative information in their first year of ESRS reporting. The relief must be applied narrowly and the company should still explain major definition and methodology changes needed to understand trends.
In practice
| Control area | Transition question | Required action |
|---|---|---|
| Disclosure inventory | Which old datapoints disappear, change or remain through entity-specific needs? | Create a requirement-level mapping, not a title-only crosswalk. |
| Data dictionary | Have definitions, units, boundaries or calculation methods changed? | Version every metric and assign an effective period. |
| Materiality system | Can the workflow support top-down screening and information materiality? | Separate matter-level conclusions from datapoint-level conclusions. |
| Comparatives | Are revised metrics comparable to prior 2023-ESRS figures? | Restate where required and practicable; use transition reliefs only when eligible. |
| Estimates | Will anticipated financial effects or value-chain data change with new information? | Document estimation uncertainty and distinguish updates from prior-period errors. |
| Evidence register | Do new judgement points have review evidence? | Add source, owner, methodology, approval and retention fields. |
| Report production | Does the four-part structure change drafting and tagging? | Update templates, cross-references, taxonomy appendix and executive summary controls. |
| Assurance | Has the assurance provider assessed changed methods and transition choices? | Agree a change log and evidence request list before year-end. |
9. FY2026 transition choices
The adopted act provides three practical routes for financial years starting between 1 January and 31 December 2026, once the regulation is in force. Route A uses the 2023 ESRS as amended by the 2025 Quick Fix. Route B uses the full revised 2026 ESRS. Route C uses the 2023 ESRS plus Quick Fix but applies only the listed revised reliefs: the top-down approach; undue-cost-or-effort and value-chain limitation provisions; acquisitions and disposals; non-significant activities; partial value-chain scope; joint operations; the Taxonomy appendix; and the executive summary. The sustainability statement must clearly state the version used.
In practice
10. Preparation roadmap for 2027
| Timing | Milestone | Realistic output |
|---|---|---|
| Now - legal completion | Monitor scrutiny and Official Journal publication; appoint transition owner. | Status tracker and source-controlled final text. |
| Month 1 | Complete paragraph-level 2023-to-2026 mapping and identify changed definitions. | Change register by disclosure, metric, method and system. |
| Month 2 | Redesign double materiality and information-materiality workflow. | Approved methodology and decision records. |
| Month 3 | Select FY2026 route and approve version statement. | Board/management version memorandum. |
| Months 3-6 | Update data dictionary, boundaries, calculation methods, evidence and controls. | Tested reporting manual and control matrix. |
| Months 6-9 | Dry-run revised disclosures, comparatives, estimates and statement structure. | Mock statement and assurance findings log. |
| Pre-year-end | Resolve gaps and agree assurance evidence. | Ready-to-operate FY2027 close plan. |
| Reporting close | Prepare, review, assure and release under the final legal text. | Version-controlled sustainability statement. |
Hypothetical scenario
Illustrative scenario - wave-one industrial group
<p>A group reported under the 2023 ESRS for FY2024 and FY2025. Its change register shows that several narrative datapoints can be removed, the GHG boundary policy can move to operational control, the pollutant assessment needs a new managerial approval and incident metrics need a “substantiated verified” status. The group considers full revised ESRS for FY2026 because its systems already support the new definitions, but identifies comparative breaks in two metrics. It documents the version choice, applies the relevant comparative transition relief, explains methodology changes and retains a reconciliation from the FY2025 disclosure inventory to FY2026 outputs.</p>
Illustrative only. It shows how the decision is made, not wording that can be copied or relied on.
In practice
Common mistakes and fixes
| Mistake | Why it is risky | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Deleting every removed datapoint without a materiality check | The information may remain necessary for entity-specific disclosure or fair presentation. | Assess residual information needs and document the conclusion. |
| Calling the revised standards mandatory before entry into force | Misstates legal status and may create an invalid FY2026 basis. | Use precise adoption, entry-into-force and application wording. |
| Treating the top-down route as no detailed assessment | Plausible matters can be missed. | Add coverage checks and targeted detailed assessment. |
| Changing a metric without comparative analysis | Trend information becomes misleading. | Version definitions, assess restatement and explain breaks. |
| Using every new relief automatically | Reliefs have conditions and can weaken transparency if overused. | Approve each relief with eligibility, rationale and evidence. |
| Updating templates but not systems and controls | The report may look revised while data remains based on old definitions. | Update the full data lineage and assurance trail. |
Readiness
Readiness checklist
- The final legal text and entry-into-force date are monitored by a named owner.
- A paragraph-level change register distinguishes deleted, modified, retained and new requirements.
- The DMA workflow supports top-down screening and separate information-materiality decisions.
- Every changed metric has a versioned definition, boundary, unit, method and comparative treatment.
- Each relief has an eligibility test, approval and disclosure consequence.
- FY2026 Route A, B or C is selected and the version statement is drafted.
- The four-part statement, executive summary and Taxonomy appendix choices are controlled.
- Assurance providers have reviewed the transition plan and evidence expectations.
- Board and management approvals cover methodology, version, material matters, reliefs and release.
In practice
Source register
| ID | Official source | Role in article — Status |
|---|---|---|
| S1 | Commission Delegated Regulation C(2026) 5010 final | Legal elements, transition provisions, application and principal modifications — Adopted; not yet in force at review date |
| S2 | Annex I to C(2026) 5010 | Full revised ESRS — Adopted text |
| S3 | Commission adoption communication, 3 July 2026 | Datapoint and cost-reduction summary — Official status source |
| S4 | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 | Current ESRS baseline — In force |
| S5 | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1416 | Quick Fix baseline for FY2026 Route A/C — In force |
| S6 | Directive (EU) 2026/470 | Simplification mandate, omissions and revised scope — In force; transposition pending |
Take it with you
The checklists as a working spreadsheet
Every checklist and table on this page, with empty status, owner and evidence columns for your team to fill in and keep.
✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop
Ask about this guide
It answers from this page, and reaches into the linked disclosure cards when your question is about the standard itself. Your first two answers are free without signing in.
Go deeper · ESRS
ESRS and CSRD training
Double materiality, datapoints and the sustainability statement, with a mentor on your own report.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.