Disclosure GuidesThe questions that hold a report up, settled

London Reporting Academy·Disclosure guides

Understand the questions behind the standards.

Expert-written answers to the questions that slow reporting teams down. Each one opens with the conclusion, shows the requirement it rests on, explains the conditions and the judgement involved, and links to the disclosure cards the decision affects.

  • 478 guides published
  • Practitioner-written, technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Free to read

✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop

Not sure how to phrase the question? Describe the situation.

The assistant answers from reviewed LRA content, names the missing fact instead of inventing one, and points you to the guide or disclosure card the decision lands on. Your first two answers are free without signing in.

Try
2 free answers Automated · the LRA team is one click away

Answers from the published guides · 275 disclosure cards · 1,211 indexed reports

Disclosure guides

Metrics and methodologies

Clear the filters and show every guide →

UK S1·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

UK SRS S1 for CFOs: Linking Sustainability Risks to Budgets, Finance and the Annual Report

Finance should own the conversion of material sustainability conclusions into controlled financial information. The process starts with the same reporting entity and planning horizons used for the financial statements, maps operational transmission channels, tests current and anticipated effects, documents ranges and uncertainty, and reconciles the result to budgets, forecasts, capex plans, treasury assumptions and the annual report.

Helps you decideHow to translate material sustainability matters into finance evidence and annual-report disclosures without inventing precision.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 15 min Read the guide →

UK S1·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

UK SRS S1 SASB Optionality: What 'May Refer to and Consider' Means in Practice

“May refer to and consider” means that UK SRS S1 does not require an entity to consult or apply SASB as the mandatory specific source when no topic-specific UK SRS exists. The entity can use SASB, adapt relevant SASB information, use other eligible sources or develop entity-specific information.

Helps you decideWhether SASB, another recognised source, peer practice or an entity-developed measure provides relevant and faithfully representative information for the entity’s industries and material matters.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

UK S1·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

UK SRS S1 Metrics and Targets: Industry Information, Entity-Specific KPIs and Progress

UK SRS S1 does not ask an entity to publish every ESG metric it can calculate. For each sustainability-related risk and opportunity that could reasonably be expected to affect prospects, the entity discloses metrics required by an applicable UK SRS and the metrics it actually uses to monitor the matter, performance and progress towards targets.

Helps you decideWhich metrics are relevant and material, how to document entity-specific measures, and how to report target progress without hiding methods, estimates or missed milestones.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

UK S1·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

Current and Anticipated Financial Effects Under UK SRS S1: A Guide for Finance Teams

UK SRS S1 requires information about both current financial effects for the reporting period and anticipated effects over the short, medium and long term. Finance teams should trace each material sustainability-related risk or opportunity through a business transmission channel to revenue, costs, assets, liabilities, cash flows or financing.

Helps you decideWhat financial effect is supportable, at what level of quantification, over which time horizon and with which assumptions, controls and connected disclosures.

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 12 min Read the guide →

How an LRA guide is built

Every answer follows the same discipline.

You should be able to stop reading after the first paragraph and still have what you came for. Everything below it exists so you can defend the answer to a reviewer.

  1. 01
    Answer

    The question is stated as a reporting team would ask it, and settled in the opening lines.

  2. 02
    Basis

    The official source and edition are named, and kept clearly apart from our reading of them.

  3. 03
    Judgement

    The points the standard leaves open are marked, with what a defensible position looks like.

  4. 04
    Action

    The answer links to the disclosures and evidence it affects, so a decision turns into fields to fill.

  • Practitioner-written, then technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Requirements kept separate from practice and interpretation
  • Stated update triggers for re-reading each answer

Coverage

Which frameworks have answers yet.

The guides tier is written framework by framework rather than thinly across all of them, so this says where the writing has actually reached. Disclosure cards, which cover the requirements themselves, run ahead of it.

Found the answer?

Turn the decision into a disclosure.

An answer settles what to do. The disclosure card is where it becomes data to collect, owners to name, evidence to retain and wording to draft — and when the whole reporting cycle is the problem, the programme walks it with a mentor on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

/en/knowledge-hub/disclosure-guides/ Wave 1 — English only