Disclosure focus
The statement must be clearly attributable to one of these two sources. A Board Chair, committee Chair, functional executive, or other senior leader should not be treated automatically as a qualifying source. A Chair can present the statement where the Chair is speaking on behalf of the highest governance body or is otherwise the organization’s most senior executive.
The statement should explain not only how sustainability affects the organization’s strategy, risks, resilience or value creation, but also how the organization intends to contribute to sustainable development through the management of its impacts on the economy, environment, and people.
GRI recommends that the statement describe the organization’s short-, medium- and long-term vision and strategy for managing impacts, including human rights impacts, across its activities and business relationships.
It should explain how the organization’s purpose, business strategy and business model aim to prevent negative impacts and achieve positive impacts on the economy, environment, and people.
The statement should describe short- and medium-term strategic priorities for contributing to sustainable development and explain how these priorities align with relevant authoritative intergovernmental instruments.
It should address the broader macroeconomic, social, political and other trends affecting the organization and its strategy.
The statement should provide a balanced account of key events, achievements and failures during the reporting period and a view of performance against the goals and targets related to the organization’s material topics.
It should also describe the organization’s main challenges, goals and targets for the next year and for the coming three to five years.
These seven areas are Guidance rather than separate mandatory requirements. Nevertheless, they provide the official basis for preparing a substantive, balanced and decision-useful statement rather than a short generic leadership message.
The organization can use a statement from the highest governance body, a statement from the most senior executive, or clearly attributed complementary statements from both. Where multiple statements are used, the GRI content index should identify all relevant locations.
Internal approval, version control and source-document records are useful evidence and quality-control measures, but they are not additional requirements of GRI 2-22.
Actual reporting-period performance should be distinguished from future plans, commitments and aspirations. Forward-looking statements should be supported by approved strategy and target documents.
Reasons for omission are permitted for Disclosure 2-22 where the mandatory statement cannot be reported. Missing individual Guidance elements should be identified as quality gaps but should not automatically be treated as omitted mandatory requirements.
This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official GRI source.
Prepare
What to collect before drafting
Tick each field as the evidence lands. Owners are the teams that usually hold the source files.
-
Statement on sustainable development and strategy
Sustainability reporting / StrategyProvide a clearly attributable statement from the highest governance body or most senior executive covering the relevance of sustainable development and the organisation's strategy for contributing to it.
Evidence Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting statement on sustainable development and strategy.
Watch for The published response for statement on sustainable development and strategy is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.
Before you start
- Use a statement attributable to the highest governance body or most senior executive; do not assume that any chair, committee chair or functional leader is a qualifying source.
- Treat the seven recommended content areas as GRI Guidance supporting a substantive statement, not as seven separate mandatory requirements.
- Have the supporting records and the final response been reconciled?
How to prepare it
Request the data
Request the disclosure evidence
Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.
Provide the approved attributable statement, strategy and business-model papers, reporting-period performance against material-topic goals, future priorities and publication sign-off.
Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined GRI terms and the scope described above.
Better request
Provide the approved attributable statement, strategy and business-model papers, reporting-period performance against material-topic goals, future priorities and publication sign-off.
Draft your disclosure
Notes that turn data into a disclosure
LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.
Method note
Explain the qualifying source and distinguish reporting-period performance from future plans, commitments and aspirations.
Context note
Identify all statement locations in the GRI content index where complementary statements from both qualifying sources are used.
Download Centre
Preparation tools & forms
Download preparation tools for GRI 2-22 with free verified email access for 24 hours. Source-report links remain public.
Check
For each claim, check the evidence
Statement on sustainable development and strategy is reported accurately and completely.
Risk The response omits, misclassifies or overstates statement on sustainable development and strategy.
Evidence to check Dated source records, governance papers and approval evidence supporting statement on sustainable development and strategy.
Evidence pack to prepare
Common reporting gaps
- Using a generic leadership message with no qualifying attribution.
- Discussing only how sustainability affects enterprise value rather than contribution through impact management.
- Presenting Guidance areas as separate mandatory requirements.
- Mixing actual performance with future aspirations.
- Using unapproved forward-looking claims.
Ask the Knowledge Hub AI Assistant about this disclosure
Get practical answers for your reporting context.
Check your text
Paste one or two paragraphs. The fragment is used for this check only and is not stored in your conversation.
Peer comparison uses examples on this card, not prevalence in the report corpus.
Advice, not assurance
Framework references
Relevant GRI requirements and related disclosures
GRI
GRI 2-22
within GRI 2: General Disclosures
Guides that settle this question
Related & explore
More in GRI 2 →Browse full catalogue →Search all disclosures →