ESRS G1: Business Conduct·Disclosure Requirement G1-4
Corruption & Bribery Metrics
إرشادات عملية لإعداد هذا الإفصاح. استخدم هذه البطاقة لتحديد المعلومات المطلوب إعدادها والتحقق من الادعاءات وتنظيم الأدلة الداعمة. وللاطلاع على المتطلبات الدقيقة، ارجع دائمًا إلى المصدر الرسمي لـ European Commission.
بطاقة النشر
المراجعة قيد الانتظارالمعيار
ESRS G1: Business Conduct
Disclosure Requirement G1-4 · 2026-5010-final
آخر مراجعة
—
مواد تعليمية من LRA · لم تصدرها أو تعتمدها European Commission
جوهر الإفصاح
This disclosure asks an organisation to report the numbers that show how it manages corruption and bribery risks in practice. The focus is on measurable information, such as how many relevant incidents, allegations, investigations, training completions, or other tracked events there are, so readers can see whether the organisation’s anti-corruption controls are active and being used, not just described in policy documents.
In practical terms, the reporting should cover the organisation’s full relevant footprint, not only a few well-controlled or flagship locations, unless the scope is clearly explained. The key question is whether the figures reflect the parts of the business where corruption and bribery risk actually exists, including operations, subsidiaries, and other relevant activities, so users can judge the breadth and consistency of the organisation’s approach.
تدعم هذه المواد التعليمية من LRA إعداد الإفصاح. وللاطلاع على المتطلبات الدقيقة، ارجع دائمًا إلى المصدر الرسمي لـ European Commission.
قبل أن تبدأ
قبل أن تبدأ
قائمة تحقق موجزة قبل إعداد هذا الإفصاح — ضع علامة أمام كل بند بمجرد الانتهاء منه.
الإعداد
المعلومات الأساسية المطلوب إعدادها
| حقل الإعداد | ما يجب تسجيله | إشارة إلى الدليل | الجهة المسؤولة |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conviction count | Record the total number of convictions that fall within the reporting scope for the period. | Court records, legal case logs, compliance register, or a legal affairs summary that reconciles to the final count. | Legal / Compliance |
| Sanction count | Capture the total number of sanctions that apply to the reporting scope for the period. | Regulatory notices, enforcement tracker, compliance register, or a legal affairs summary that ties to the reported total. | Legal / Compliance |
| Total fines amount | Capture the full euro amount of fines that belong in scope for the period, using the same basis across all included items. | Penalty notices, finance/legal schedule, or an enforcement summary that reconciles to the euro total reported. | Finance / Legal |
كيفية إعداده
اطلب البيانات
Request the corruption case metrics from Legal / Secretariat
حوّل الإفصاح إلى سؤال عمل داخلي، ثم كيّفه بما يتوافق مع مصطلحات مؤسستك.
How many corruption or bribery cases in the period ended in a conviction, a sanction, or a financial penalty, and what was the total amount of fines in euros?
Use your organisation’s own case-handling terms first, then map them to the reporting fields. For example, if you track matters as investigations, enforcement actions, settlements, or court outcomes, keep those labels in the request and ask the owner to translate them into the reporting view before sign-off. This is a training template only; adapt it to your organisation and check the source disclosure before sign-off.
طلب ضعيف
Please provide the ESRS G1-4 corruption and bribery metrics for the period, including convictions, sanctions and fines, in line with the disclosure.
لماذا يفشل: It uses framework language instead of the organisation’s own case terms, does not say which register or system to pull from, and leaves the counting basis and currency treatment unclear. That makes it hard for the owner to know what to extract and how to map it.
طلب أفضل
Please provide the [period] case outcome data from your [legal case tracker / compliance register] for the [boundary]. We need the number of matters that ended in a conviction, the number that ended in a sanction, and the total fines in euros. Please keep your normal case labels in the extract and add a short mapping note so we can translate them into the reporting view.
نموذج بريد إلكتروني رسمي
Subject: Data request for corruption case outcomes and fines Dear [name/team], Please could you provide the case outcome data for [reporting period] for the [group/boundary]? We need the figures for matters that ended in a conviction, a sanction, or a fine, together with the total fine amount in euros. Please use your normal case labels in the first instance, and include a short mapping note so we can translate them into the reporting view. If any items sit outside your main register, please note where they came from. Could you return the data in the table below, plus the supporting evidence list, by [date]? Many thanks, [preparer name] [role] Training note: this is a possible LRA template only. Adapt it to your organisation and check the source disclosure before sign-off.
نسخة مختصرة لـ Teams / Slack
Hi [name] — could you send over the [period] corruption/bribery case outcomes for [boundary]? We need counts for convictions, sanctions, and the total fines in euros. Please use your usual case labels and add a quick mapping note so we can translate them for reporting. Thanks — [name]
أمثلة قطاعية
Financial services
السياق. The organisation tracks enforcement matters, regulatory actions, and court outcomes in a central compliance log.
الطلب المُكيَّف. Please pull the [period] enforcement and court outcome data from the compliance log for [boundary]. We need counts for matters that ended in a conviction, a regulatory sanction, and the total fines in euros. Please keep the internal labels used in the log and add a mapping note for any items that need translation.
مثال على الرد. Returned table includes case ID, internal matter type, outcome date, jurisdiction, outcome label, conviction flag, sanction flag, fine amount in original currency, EUR equivalent, and source document reference.
Construction / infrastructure
السياق. The organisation records legal claims and regulator actions in a project risk register and a legal matters tracker.
الطلب المُكيَّف. Please share the [period] legal matters extract from the project risk register and legal tracker for [boundary]. We need the number of cases that finished with a conviction, the number that ended with a sanction, and the total fines in euros. Please use the project/legal labels you already track and note how each item maps to the reporting view.
مثال على الرد. Returned table includes matter ID, project name, internal label, final outcome, decision date, authority/court, count status, fine amount, currency, EUR amount, and evidence reference.
صُغ إفصاحك
ملاحظات تحوّل البيانات إلى إفصاح
نماذج تدريبية من LRA — كيّفها بما يناسب مؤسستك وتحقّق من المصدر الرسمي قبل الاعتماد.
ملاحظة منهجية
State how each figure was counted, what was included in the totals, and the reporting period and scope used to compile the three measures.
ملاحظة سياقية
Explain what the counts and euro total indicate about enforcement activity in the period, and whether the monetary amount reflects a small number of large cases or many smaller ones.
بيان التقلبات
If the figures moved materially, describe the main drivers, such as changes in case volume, case severity, timing of decisions, or one-off events that affected the totals.
مُدخل في فهرس المحتوى
G1-4 Corruption & Bribery Metrics — [location / page] / [notes]مركز التنزيلات
أدوات ونماذج الإعداد
أدوات إعداد احترافية لـ G1-4 — مجانًا مع عضوية LRA Community. سجّل مرة واحدة (مجانًا) لتُفتح جميع التنزيلات، إلى جانب مكتبة الإفصاحات والنماذج ومساعد LRA الذكي.
الجاهزية للتحقق
لكل ادعاء، تحقّق من الأدلة
| الادعاء | المخاطر | الأدلة الواجب فحصها |
|---|---|---|
| We separated out the number of court findings and regulatory penalties linked to bribery or corruption matters for the period, using a clear cut-off date and a single counting rule. | The assurer will check whether the two categories were kept distinct, whether the period boundary was applied consistently, and whether the counting method could double-count the same case. | Case log or incident register; legal/compliance tracker; period-end extraction showing the cut-off date; documented counting methodology; reconciliation from source cases to the published totals. |
| We included only matters that met our internal definition of a bribery or corruption breach, and we applied that definition consistently across all business units before aggregating the figures. | The assurer will probe whether the inclusion criteria were applied consistently, whether any borderline cases were excluded or included without justification, and whether the scope was complete. | Written inclusion criteria; review notes for borderline cases; business-unit submissions; consolidation workbook; sign-off showing the same rule set was used across the group. |
| We based the published numbers on source records held by legal, compliance, and finance, and we checked that each reported item could be traced back to supporting documentation. | The assurer will look for traceability from the published figure to underlying records and will test whether the source files are complete, authentic, and aligned to the final output. | Underlying notices, judgments, settlement letters, or penalty records; finance postings where relevant; traceability schedule; document index; evidence of file retention and version control. |
| Before publication, we reviewed the draft figures against the underlying case files and resolved any mismatches between local records and the consolidated disclosure. | The assurer will assess whether pre-publication checks were performed, whether discrepancies were investigated, and whether the final numbers reflect the corrected source data. | Draft-to-final comparison; review checklist; discrepancy log and resolution notes; approval emails or sign-off memo; evidence of corrections made before release. |
| Where a matter involved more than one outcome, we recorded each outcome separately and checked that the total amount reported for monetary penalties matched the supporting finance records. | The assurer will test whether outcomes were classified consistently, whether the monetary total is complete, and whether the amount agrees to the accounting or payment evidence. | Matter-by-matter schedule; penalty calculation support; payment confirmations or ledger extracts; reconciliation to finance records; reviewer sign-off on the final total. |
حزمة الأدلة المطلوب إعدادها
الثغرات الشائعة في التقارير
الثغرات الشائعة
أخطاء يجب تجنبها عند جمع البيانات
حيث يلزم غالبًا الحكم المهني
أمثلة
أمثلة توضيحية
أمثلة اصطناعية من إعداد LRA — ليست مقتبسة من تقرير شركة ولا من نص أي معيار.
: during the reporting period, we recorded 3 convictions and 5 sanctions linked to business conduct matters, with total fines of €420,000. This example is internally consistent and shown for training purposes only.
Shows how to present the count of convictions, the count of sanctions, and the combined monetary amount of fines in a concise quantitative note.
Illustrative conduct outcomes for the period (count / €)
| Measure | Count |
|---|---|
| Convictions | 3 |
| Sanctions | 5 |
: in our group, the period included 1 conviction and 2 sanctions, and the related fines came to €75,000. The figures below are illustrative, internally consistent, and provided for practitioner training.
Shows the same three data points for a different reporter and sector, using a separate synthetic fact pattern.
Illustrative conduct outcomes for the period (count / €)
| Measure | Count |
|---|---|
| Convictions | 1 |
| Sanctions | 2 |
تقارير الشركات
كيف تُفصح الشركات عن G1-4 عمليًا
أمثلة على ممارسات إفصاح كاملة وجزئية. هذه تحليلات قائمة على الأدلة، وليست نماذج جاهزة للنسخ.
اسأل مساعد Study Studio الذكي عن هذا الإفصاح
احصل على إجابات عملية تناسب سياق تقاريرك. أول إجابتين مجانيتان — انضم إلى LRA Community مجانًا للمتابعة بلا حدود.
اختبر فهمك
سيناريوهات للتمرّن
A group’s legal team confirms that one overseas subsidiary was convicted in the reporting year for a bribery-related offence, and a separate regulator issued a financial penalty in the same year for a different anti-corruption breach. The finance team is preparing the year-end disclosure and has to decide how to count each outcome.
A preparer has two matters on file: one ended with a conviction and a fine, while the other ended with a warning letter and no court case. The draft note currently lists both matters under the same heading because both relate to bribery concerns.
During consolidation, one business unit reports a bribery conviction in local currency and another reports a sanction with no monetary amount attached. The group reporting team is unsure whether to leave the euro total blank until all subsidiaries have replied.
A sustainability analyst finds an internal spreadsheet showing three bribery-related court outcomes, but one was overturned before the reporting date and another was still under appeal at year-end. The draft disclosure currently includes all three because they were all mentioned in incident logs.
مراجع الإطار
متطلبات ESRS ذات الصلة والإفصاحات المرتبطة
المراجع المتاحة للإطار والإفصاحات القريبة ذات الصلة بإعداد هذا المتطلب.
ESRS
G1-4
ضمن ESRS G1: Business Conduct
ذات صلة واستكشاف
المزيد في ESRS G1 ← تصفّح الفهرس الكامل ← الصفحة الرئيسية لمكتبة الإفصاحات ← ابحث في جميع الإفصاحات ←
الأسئلة الشائعة
أسئلة تجيب عنها هذه الصفحة
The page says to prepare three datapoints: conviction count, sanction count and total fines amount. Use the step-by-step preparation section to turn those into a draft and keep the evidence pack ready for review.
Use the page’s plain-language explainer and preparation steps to decide what sits in scope before you collect figures. The page does not set a formal scope rule, so you need to apply the guidance consistently and document your approach.
The page is designed for sustainability/ESG managers, HR or data owners, and assurance reviewers, so ownership should sit with the people who can source, check and explain the figures. The workbook is there to help assign and track those responsibilities.
The page includes an evidence pack with five items and five assurance claims to verify, each framed around claim, risk and evidence. Use those together so you can show where each number came from and how it was checked.
The page says there are five claims to verify, each linked to a risk and evidence point. In practice, use them as a checklist to test whether the disclosure is complete, accurate and supported before it goes into a report.
The page lists common reporting gaps and mistakes, so it is meant to help you spot issues before drafting. Use that section to check for missing datapoints, weak evidence or inconsistent treatment across the disclosure.
The Download Centre includes a Prep & Assurance workbook in .xlsx format. Use it to organise the datapoints, track evidence and support the step-by-step preparation process.
The Download Centre includes a printable Library Card in PDF format. It is there as a practical reference alongside the workbook, so you can keep the key preparation and assurance points to hand while drafting.
Yes, the page includes synthetic illustrative example disclosures, including a quantitative table, to show how the disclosure can be presented. Treat it as a format guide only and make sure your own numbers and narrative match your actual evidence.
The draft-output section gives visualisation ideas, narrative starters and a content-index line. Use those prompts to turn the prepared figures into a clear draft, then check it against the evidence pack and assurance claims.
أسئلة أخرى يمكن أن تساعد فيها هذه الصفحة
تعمّق أكثر · G1-4
تعلّم إعداد هذا الإفصاح من البداية إلى النهاية
This guide covers one Disclosure Requirement. The ESRS / CSRD Reporting course walks the full European workflow — double materiality, datapoints, evidence and assurance — with exercises on your own data.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.
احصل على أدوات G1-4 — مجانًا
أدوات الإعداد مجانية لأعضاء LRA Community وللطلاب. سجّل مرة واحدة (مجانًا) ويبدأ تنزيلك على الفور — إلى جانب مكتبة الإفصاحات والنماذج ومساعد LRA الذكي.
تم — يبدأ تنزيلك الآن
يجري تنزيل ملفك الآن. كما أصبح حسابك في المجتمع (Cabinet) جاهزًا — مع مكتبة الإفصاحات والنماذج ومساعد LRA الذكي.
افتح حسابك ←