Aller à l’essentiel de l’information

Bibliothèque des disclosuresGuide pratique pour chaque information à publier

IFRS S2: Climate-related Disclosures·Paragraph 35

Target performance and trends

Guide pratique pour préparer cette information. Utilisez cette fiche pour identifier les données à préparer, vérifier les affirmations et organiser les preuves. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle IFRS.

Passeport publié

Révision en attente
··· En cours de révision Révision éditoriale en cours Élaboré à partir des sources officielles et de preuves issues de rapports publiés. Aucun approbateur n’est encore enregistré : cette page ne porte donc pas de signature. Utilisez-la avec la source officielle IFRS tant que cette révision est en cours.

Norme

IFRS S2: Climate-related Disclosures

Paragraph 35 · 2024

En vigueur

2024-01-01

Source officielle : Ouvrir ↗

Dernière révision

Support pédagogique LRA · Non publié ni approuvé par IFRS

Objet de l’information

This disclosure asks an organisation to explain how its climate-related targets are performing over time, and what the trend looks like. In practice, that means showing whether progress is moving in the intended direction, where it is improving or slipping, and giving enough context for a reader to understand the pattern rather than just seeing a single year’s result.

The practical focus is on the scope and consistency of what is being tracked. An organisation should make clear whether the reported performance covers all relevant operations, entities or activities, or only selected sites, business units or flagship locations. The aim is to help users judge how representative the trend is and whether the target performance reflects the organisation as a whole.

Ce support pédagogique LRA aide à préparer l’information. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle IFRS.

Avant de commencer

Avant de commencer

Une courte liste de contrôle avant de préparer cette information — cochez chaque point une fois réglé.

Préparation

Informations clés à préparer

Champ à préparer Ce qu’il faut recueillir Indice de preuve Responsable
Current versus target Capture the latest measured result alongside the intended target so the reader can see how far the reported item sits from plan. Use the source report or dashboard that shows the current figure and the agreed target in the same period. Performance management / reporting
Direction of progress Capture whether the reported item is moving in the intended direction over time, using the same basis for each point in the sequence. Use a time-series extract, management pack or tracker that shows the measure across successive periods. Performance management / reporting
Change over time Capture how the measure has shifted across the relevant periods so the pattern can be seen clearly and consistently. Use a trend chart, ledger extract or KPI history that keeps the definition unchanged across the periods shown. Performance management / reporting
Reason for gap Capture the specific cause of any difference between the reported result and the expected level, with enough detail to explain the gap. Use the variance note, issue log or management commentary that records the agreed explanation for the shortfall or overshoot. Performance management / reporting
+ Afficher les sous-éléments de s2-35 (liste de travail LRA)

Comment le préparer

Set the reporting boundary first: decide which business units, sites, activities, and time period the disclosure will cover, so the figures and narrative are built on one clear scope.
Agree the meaning of each reported item before drafting: define what you will treat as the current position against the goal, the movement path, the pattern over time, and any gap or difference you need to explain.
Gather the support behind each item: pull together the working papers, source data, calculations, and management notes that show how each statement was reached.
Prepare the disclosure content in full: write the numbers or narrative for the current position versus the goal, the direction of travel, the trend, and the explanation for any shortfall or change.
Record any exclusions, assumptions, or methodology changes that affect the result, so a reviewer can see why the reported picture is what it is and whether it has shifted from prior periods.
Check the draft against the official source and internal evidence pack, confirming that the scope, definitions, figures, and explanations align before sign-off.

Demander les données

Request the target tracking pack from Finance

Traduisez l’information en une question métier interne, puis adaptez-la au vocabulaire de votre organisation.

How are the agreed targets tracking against actual results, what is the direction of travel, and what explains any gap or change?

Use your organisation’s own performance language first, then map it to the disclosure. For example, if your team talks about KPIs, scorecards, business plans, or management reporting, use those terms in the request and only translate them later for the sustainability report. Keep the ask practical and evidence-led; check the source material before sign-off.

Demande faible

Please provide the disclosure wording for target performance and trends.

Pourquoi elle échoue : This asks for report language rather than the underlying management evidence. It does not say which internal pack, period, comparison basis, or commentary is needed, so the owner cannot tell what to pull or how to frame the data.

Meilleure demande

Please send the latest management pack for [business area] showing actuals against the approved target or plan for [period], plus the trend over time and the main reasons for any variance. Include the source system, version of the target used, and any notes the team already uses internally.

Modèle d’e-mail formel
Subject: Request for target tracking data and commentary

Hi [Name],

Could you please send over the latest target tracking pack for [business area / metric family] for [reporting period]?

We need a clear view of:
- the latest actual result against the agreed target or plan;
- the direction of travel over the period;
- any trend notes that help explain whether performance is improving, flat, or weakening; and
- the main reasons for any gap between actual and target.

Please include the source file or system, the version of the target or plan used, the period covered, and any internal notes that explain the movement.

If helpful, you can use your normal management reporting format and we will map it for the sustainability disclosure. Please adapt this to your organisation’s own terms and check the source material before sign-off.

Thanks,
[Your name]
Version courte pour Teams / Slack
Hi [Name] — could you share the latest [scorecard / KPI pack / management report] for [business area] covering [period]? We need actual vs target, the trend over time, and the main reasons for any gap. Please include the source file/system and the version of the target used. Use your normal internal terms; we’ll map them later. Thanks.

Exemples sectoriels

Manufacturing

Contexte. A plant team tracks output, scrap, and on-time delivery against monthly operational targets.

Demande adaptée. Please share the latest plant scorecard for [site] covering [period], showing actual output against the approved plan, the month-by-month trend, and the reasons for any shortfall or improvement. Include the source system, the plan version, and any notes on downtime, yield, or delivery issues. Use your normal production terms; we will map them later and check the source before sign-off.

Exemple de réponse. Prepared by: Site performance analyst; Reviewed by: Plant manager; Period: Apr–Jun 2026; Target version: June reforecast; Source: MES and monthly scorecard; Metric rows: output, scrap rate, on-time delivery; Commentary: downtime reduced in May, scrap improved after line change, June shortfall linked to maintenance outage.

Retail

Contexte. A trading team monitors sales, margin, and footfall against weekly and monthly targets.

Demande adaptée. Please send the latest trading report for [region / store group] for [period], showing actual sales against the agreed plan, the trend across the period, and the main reasons for any gap. Include the report version, the source dashboard, and notes on promotions, stock, or customer traffic. Use your usual trading language and we will translate it for the disclosure.

Exemple de réponse. Prepared by: Trading analyst; Reviewed by: Regional manager; Period: Weeks 1–13 of Q2 2026; Target version: Approved trading plan v2; Source: Trading dashboard; Metric rows: sales, gross margin, footfall; Commentary: sales trend improved during promotion weeks, margin softened due to discounting, footfall dipped in two stores after local disruption.

Rédigez votre information

Des notes qui transforment les données en information publiée

Modèles pédagogiques LRA — adaptez-les à votre organisation et vérifiez la source officielle avant validation.

Note méthodologique

Explain what was measured, how the target or reference point was set, which periods are included, and any assumptions or estimation methods used to prepare the figures.

Note de contexte

Set out what the numbers indicate about delivery against the intended level, including whether performance is improving, holding steady or moving away from plan.

Déclaration sur les variations

Describe the main operational, market or timing factors that caused the reported result to differ from the intended level, and note whether those factors are temporary or likely to continue.

Entrée de l’index de contenu

s2-35 Target performance and trends — [location / page] / [notes]

Centre de téléchargement

Outils et formulaires de préparation

Outils de préparation professionnels pour s2-35 — gratuits avec l’adhésion à LRA Community. Inscrivez-vous une fois (c’est gratuit) et tous les téléchargements se débloquent, avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA.

Gratuit · Membres de la Community

Préparation à l’assurance

Pour chaque affirmation, vérifiez les preuves

Affirmation Risque Preuves à vérifier
We prepared the coverage figure from the underlying working papers and reconciled it to the source records before drafting the disclosure.The reported coverage may not tie back to the population actually reviewed, or exclusions may have been applied without a clear basis.Population listing, reconciliation workbook, inclusion/exclusion log, and sign-off showing the final figure agrees to source records.
We used the same cut-off date and scope basis across the related figures so the comparison is internally consistent.Different dates, entities, or boundaries may have been mixed, making the comparison misleading.Scope memo, reporting timetable, boundary decisions, and evidence that the same reporting period and entity set were used throughout.
We checked the underlying data for obvious gaps, duplicates, and unusual movements before publication.Errors in the source data may have flowed into the published figure without being detected.Data quality checks, exception logs, query resolution notes, and evidence of follow-up on outliers or missing entries.
We kept support for the explanation of movement against the target, including the working assumptions used to describe the change.The explanation may be unsupported, overly general, or not aligned to the numbers shown.Variance analysis, management commentary drafts, calculation sheets, and documents showing the assumptions behind the explanation.
We retained the evidence used to describe the direction of travel over time, including the trend review and the basis for the narrative.The trend statement may be selective, incomplete, or not backed by the underlying time-series data.Multi-period dataset, trend analysis paper, charts or tables used in drafting, and review notes showing how the narrative was derived.

Dossier de preuves à préparer

Lacunes fréquentes dans les rapports

The information is presented without a date or as-at point.
The scope or boundary of the statement is left undefined.
Key terms are used inconsistently across the report.
Material changes since the previous period are not disclosed.
Assertions are made without supporting detail or a source record.
Boilerplate is used that does not actually answer what is asked.

Lacunes fréquentes

Erreurs à éviter lors de la collecte des données

Wrong ownerThe request goes to the wrong team or person, so the figures are pulled from someone who does not hold the working records.
Framework language usedPeople ask for the data using reporting-framework terms instead of the business’s own labels, and the source team cannot match the request to its records.
Scope left vagueNo one agrees which business unit, activity, or target set is in scope, so different teams send different populations.
+ Afficher 6 de plus

Là où un jugement professionnel est souvent nécessaire

Set the comparison base after a business changeIf a purchase, sale, or reorganisation changes the group you are tracking, explain whether you restated the starting point and later figures so the comparison stays like-for-like, or whether you kept the original base and described the break in continuity.
Choose one way to handle mixed country definitionsWhere local teams measure the same target differently, pick a single group-wide method for the report period, explain any conversion or alignment steps, and note any places where local practice still differs.
Decide how to treat borderline activities or peopleFor sites, products, customers, workers, or other populations that sit near the scope line, state the rule used to include or exclude them and disclose any material judgement where the boundary is not clear-cut.
+ Afficher 5 de plus

Exemples

Exemples illustratifs

Synthétiques, rédigés par LRA — ils ne proviennent ni d’un rapport d’entreprise ni du texte d’une norme.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — manufacturing

We compare our current-year outcome with the level we set at the start of the year, and the gap is explained by slower-than-planned efficiency gains in two plants.
- Our target was 120 units of output per unit of energy; we achieved 114, which is 95% of plan.
- The line of travel is improving: 108 in the prior year, 111 at mid-year, and 114 at year-end.
- Against the target, we are 6 units short; the shortfall narrowed from 12 units at mid-year, showing steady catch-up.
- The difference is mainly due to delayed equipment upgrades and a longer maintenance shutdown than expected.

This example shows how to present the current result against the planned level, describe the direction of movement over time, and explain why the outcome differs from plan, using simple figures that stay internally consistent.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — food retail

We set a year-end goal for reducing food waste, and our reported result sits close to that aim, with the remaining gap linked to store roll-out timing.
- The plan was to cut waste to 8.0 tonnes per £1m sales; we finished at 8.6, equal to 93% of the target level.
- The pattern has moved in the right direction: 9.8 last year, 9.1 at the half-year point, and 8.6 at year-end.
- The gap to plan is 0.6 tonnes per £1m sales, smaller than the 1.1 gap seen at mid-year.
- The main reason for the miss is that three stores joined the new process later than scheduled, so the full benefit arrived after year-end.

This example illustrates a plain-language comparison with the planned figure, a short trend view, and a brief explanation of the variance, all written as a synthetic disclosure.

Rapports d’entreprises

Comment les entreprises publient S2-35 en pratique

Exemples de pratiques de publication complètes et partielles. Ce sont des analyses fondées sur des preuves, non des modèles à recopier.

Rapports réels publiés
Hang Lung Properties Limited
Real Estate · Hong Kong · 2025
Ouvrir le rapport →
Hang Lung Properties Limited’s Sustainability Report 2025 provides detailed coverage of performance against each climate-related target, including an analysis of trends or changes in the entity’s performance, as shown on pages 220 and 234. The report also discloses the progress trajectory towards these targets on page 220. However, there is no evidence found regarding explanations for any variances between actual performance and targets.
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited
Retailing · India · 2025
Ouvrir le rapport →
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited’s Integrated Annual Report 2024-25 provides evidence of actual performance against each climate-related target along with an analysis of trends or changes in the entity’s performance, as shown on page 112. The report also discusses climate-related risks and opportunities in its strategy and decision-making processes (p.110). However, there is no quotable evidence regarding the progress trajectory or explanations for variances between targets and actual performance.
SITC International Holdings Company Limited
Water Transportation · Hong Kong · 2025
Ouvrir le rapport →
SITC International Holdings Company Limited’s 2025 Environmental, Social and Governance Report includes a trend analysis of performance against each climate-related target, with discussion of changes in the entity’s performance on page 198. The report references the metrics used to set climate-related targets on page 197, indicating some disclosure of target-setting methodology. However, clear disclosures on actual versus target performance and progress trajectory are unclear on page 197, and there is no evidence found regarding explanations for variances.

Comparer côte à côte →

✓ Assistant IA LRA · Supervision humaine
Dr Ross Kurinko

Interrogez l’assistant IA de Study Studio sur cette information

Obtenez des réponses concrètes pour votre contexte de reporting. Les deux premières réponses sont gratuites — rejoignez gratuitement LRA Community pour continuer sans limite.

Essayez Comment préparer s2-35 ? Quelles données dois-je collecter ? Où voir un exemple issu d’un rapport réel ? Quelles erreurs éviter ?
2 réponses gratuites

Vérifiez votre compréhension

Scénarios à travailler

A group has a 2030 emissions target and has reported this year’s result as 18% below the baseline, compared with 12% below baseline last year. The draft note also says the gap to target has narrowed, but it does not explain why.

QShould the narrative include both the current position against the target and a plain explanation of the change in the gap, or is the percentage alone enough?
Afficher la réponse type →

A preparer has two years of data showing steady improvement in energy intensity, but the latest quarter is worse than the prior quarter because a new site came online. Management wants to describe the latest quarter only, because it looks cleaner than the full-year pattern.

QShould the disclosure focus on the latest quarter, or should it also describe the broader direction of travel and the reason for the short-term setback?
Afficher la réponse type →

A company has a water-reduction target and the actual result is slightly ahead of plan. The team has prepared a chart, but the written commentary only says the target is being monitored and gives no view on whether progress is accelerating, slowing, or flat.

QDoes the commentary need to say more than the current result, and if so what should it add?
Afficher la réponse type →

A preparer is drafting the section on a methane target. The numbers show the organisation is 5% behind plan this year, but the team has not agreed whether the cause was operational disruption, a change in measurement, or both, and the draft leaves the shortfall unexplained.

QCan the disclosure leave the shortfall unexplained until next year, or should it set out the reason now?
Afficher la réponse type →

Références au référentiel

Exigences IFRS / ISSB applicables et informations connexes

Références disponibles du référentiel et informations voisines utiles à la préparation de cette exigence.

IFRS / ISSB

s2-35

au sein de IFRS S2 : Climate-related Disclosures

Ouvrir la source officielle →

Connexes et exploration

Plus dans IFRS S2 → Parcourir le catalogue complet → Accueil de la Bibliothèque des informations → Rechercher dans toutes les informations →

FAQ

Questions auxquelles cette page répond

For s2-35, what data points do I need to gather before I start drafting the disclosure?+
How do I use the step-by-step 'how to prepare' section for s2-35 in practice?+
What should I include in the evidence pack for s2-35 if I want to be assurance-ready?+
What are the five assurance claims I should verify for s2-35, and how do I use them?+
What are the common reporting gaps or mistakes on the s2-35 page, and how do I avoid them?+
How can I turn the s2-35 datapoints into a draft disclosure using the page's output section?+
What is the synthetic example on the s2-35 page meant to show, and can I copy it into my report?+
How do I use the Prep & Assurance workbook for s2-35?+
What is the printable Library Card for s2-35 for?+
Can I use the 'From company reports' table to find real examples for s2-35?+
Is there a cross-framework reference for s2-35 that helps me reuse data for ESRS E1?+

Autres questions auxquelles cette page peut aider

Aller plus loin · s2-35

Apprenez à préparer cette information de bout en bout

This guide covers one requirement. The IFRS S1 & S2 Reporting course walks the full ISSB workflow — governance, strategy, risk management and metrics — with exercises on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

Explore the IFRS S1 & S2 course →
Comment cette bibliothèque est construite 312 rapports publiés indexés 63 171 pages avec citations au niveau de la page 272 fiches disclosure conçues par des praticiens
/fr/knowledge-hub/disclosure-cards/s2-35/