Aller à l’essentiel de l’information
Gratuit · Membres de la Community
＋ Afficher 5 de plus− Afficher moins
＋ Afficher 5 de plus− Afficher moins
Rapports réels publiés
Ouvrir le rapport →
Ouvrir le rapport →
Ouvrir le rapport →
✓ Assistant IA LRA · Supervision humaine
Ouvrir la source officielle →
Explore the ESRS / CSRD course →
ESRS E1: Climate Change·Disclosure Requirement E1-3
Resilience in relation to climate change
Guide pratique pour préparer cette information. Utilisez cette fiche pour identifier les données à préparer, vérifier les affirmations et organiser les preuves. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle European Commission.
Passeport publié
Révision en attente
···
En cours de révision
Révision éditoriale en cours
Élaboré à partir des sources officielles et de preuves issues de rapports publiés. Aucun approbateur n’est encore enregistré : cette page ne porte donc pas de signature.
Utilisez-la avec la source officielle European Commission tant que cette révision est en cours.
Norme
ESRS E1: Climate Change
Disclosure Requirement E1-3 · 2026-5010-final
Dernière révision
—
Support pédagogique LRA · Non publié ni approuvé par European Commission
Pour préparer cette information
Objet de l’information
This disclosure asks an organisation to explain how resilient its business model and strategy are when climate change is considered over time. In practice, that means describing whether the organisation has thought through how different climate-related conditions could affect its ability to operate, invest, and deliver its plans, and what that means for the long term.
The practical focus is on the organisation’s own assessment of resilience, not just a statement about a few well-performing sites or a flagship location. It should cover the parts of the business that matter to the overall strategy and operations, so readers can see whether the conclusion reflects the organisation as a whole rather than a limited sample.
Ce support pédagogique LRA aide à préparer l’information. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle European Commission.
Avant de commencer
Avant de commencer
Une courte liste de contrôle avant de préparer cette information — cochez chaque point une fois réglé.
Préparation
Informations clés à préparer
| Champ à préparer | Ce qu’il faut recueillir | Indice de preuve | Responsable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resilience analysis results | Summarise the main findings from the climate resilience review, including what the analysis shows about how the business holds up under the scenarios assessed. | Scenario analysis pack, risk assessment outputs, board or management papers, and the final narrative used in reporting. | Sustainability / climate risk team |
| Strategy and model impacts | Set out how the climate findings affect the organisation’s strategy and operating model, including any changes to priorities, products, services, assets or ways of working. | Strategy review papers, business model change logs, executive papers, and planning documents showing agreed implications. | Strategy / corporate planning |
| Scenario-based response | Describe the actions or response the organisation has chosen because of the scenario work, showing how the analysis informed those decisions. | Scenario analysis outputs, decision papers, action plans, and governance minutes linking the analysis to the chosen response. | Climate risk / strategy |
| Transition plan resilience | Explain how the transition plan supports resilience, including the specific ways planned changes help the organisation stay robust under climate-related pressures. | Transition plan, implementation roadmap, resilience assessment, and governance papers showing the link between the plan and resilience. | Transition planning / sustainability |
| Key uncertainty areas | Identify the main areas where the climate assessment remains uncertain, and explain what is not yet clear in the analysis or assumptions. | Assumptions log, model limitations note, sensitivity analysis, and risk register entries covering unresolved points. | Climate risk / finance |
| Near-term adaptation capacity | Describe the organisation’s ability to adapt in the short term, including the practical measures, resources and constraints that affect near-term response. | Short-term adaptation plan, operational risk assessments, resource plans, and business continuity or resilience documents. | Operations / risk |
| Mid-term adaptation capacity | Describe the organisation’s ability to adapt over the medium term, including planned changes, enabling actions and any limits on delivery in that timeframe. | Medium-term planning documents, capital or programme plans, adaptation roadmap, and approved milestones. | Strategy / programme management |
| Long-term adaptation capacity | Describe the organisation’s ability to adapt over the long term, including structural changes, strategic options and enduring constraints relevant to that horizon. | Long-range strategy, scenario planning outputs, investment plans, and board papers covering long-horizon resilience. | Strategy / climate risk |
＋ Afficher les sous-éléments de E1-3 (liste de travail LRA)
Set out the findings from the climate resilience review.
Explain what those findings mean for the strategy and operating model.
Show how the response has been shaped by scenario analysis.
Describe how the transition plan supports resilience.
Identify the main areas where uncertainty remains significant.
Explain the organisation’s ability to adapt over the long term.
Explain the organisation’s ability to adapt over the medium term.
Explain the organisation’s ability to adapt over the short term.
Comment le préparer
Set the reporting boundary first. Decide which parts of the business, value chain links, and time horizons are in scope for the climate-resilience assessment, so the final write-up clearly covers the periods and activities the datapoints ask about.
Define the criteria you will use to judge resilience. Agree in advance what counts as a meaningful climate risk, a relevant response, a material uncertainty, and a credible adaptation capability, so the team applies one consistent basis throughout.
Gather the underlying support. Pull together scenario work, internal planning papers, risk registers, transition planning material, and any other records that show how the assessment was formed and what it relied on.
Prepare the disclosure content in the required form. For the narrative parts, explain the assessment outcome, what it means for the business model and strategy, how the response was shaped by scenario work, how the transition plan supports resilience, where uncertainty remains, and how adaptation capacity looks in the short, medium, and long term.
Record any gaps, exclusions, or changes in approach. If a topic, period, assumption, or source was left out or treated differently from prior reporting, note that clearly and explain why, so readers can understand the limits of the information.
Check the draft against the official source before sign-off. Confirm that each required point is covered, the wording matches the underlying requirement in substance, and nothing important has been missed, overstated, or added beyond the source material.
Demander les données
Request climate resilience evidence from Strategy / Risk
Traduisez l’information en une question métier interne, puis adaptez-la au vocabulaire de votre organisation.
How has the business tested whether its current plan and operating model can cope with climate-related change over time, and what did that testing show?
Use your organisation’s own language first (for example, your planning cycles, risk review process, scenario work, adaptation planning, or business continuity terms), then map the outputs to the disclosure points. Keep the ask practical and evidence-led; do not use framework wording unless that is already how your teams talk internally.
Demande faible
Please provide the ESRS E1-3 resilience disclosure evidence, including the results of the climate resilience analysis, implications for strategy and business model, scenario analysis response, transition plan contribution to resilience, uncertainties, and adaptation capacity over short, medium and long term.
Pourquoi elle échoue : It uses framework language that many teams will not recognise, so the owner may not know which internal papers or outputs to pull. It also bundles several ideas without pointing to the business documents, review forums, or planning artefacts that actually hold the evidence.
Meilleure demande
Please send the latest internal materials that show how the business tested climate-related resilience, what those tests mean for the plan and operating model, any scenario-based response work, how the transition plan helps resilience, where the main uncertainties remain, and how adaptation looks across the short, medium and long term. Include the source deck, model, tracker, or minutes, plus the owner and date.
Modèle d’e-mail formel
Subject: Request for climate resilience evidence for [reporting period]\n\nHi [name/team],\n\nWe are pulling together the evidence pack for our climate resilience disclosure and need your help with the materials your team holds. Please share the latest internal outputs that show:\n- what the business found when it tested how well the current plan and operating model hold up under climate-related change;\n- what that means for strategy and the way the business is run;\n- any response work that was shaped by scenario-based analysis;\n- how the transition plan, if relevant, supports resilience;\n- any areas where the team still sees material uncertainty; and\n- how the organisation’s ability to adapt looks over the short, medium and long term.\n\nPlease send the source documents and, if possible, a short summary in the attached response form. Use your team’s own terminology and systems, and we will map it into the reporting pack. If there are multiple versions, please include the latest approved one and note any key differences.\n\nPlease also include the period covered, the business area, the assumptions used, and the owner for follow-up questions.\n\nThank you,\n[preparer name]
Version courte pour Teams / Slack
Hi [name/team] — could you share the latest climate resilience materials for [reporting period]? We need the outputs showing what the business found, what it means for strategy/operations, any scenario-based response work, the main uncertainties, and how adaptation looks over short / medium / long term. Please send the source file(s) plus the completed response form. Use your own team terms; we’ll map them later. Thanks, [preparer name]
Exemples sectoriels
Manufacturing
Contexte. A plant network is exposed to heat stress, water constraints, and supply interruptions.
Demande adaptée. Please share the latest plant and network resilience pack for [reporting period], including the outputs from any climate-related stress testing, the implications for production planning and capex, the scenario-based actions agreed, how the decarbonisation or transition plan supports site resilience, the main uncertainty points, and the short / medium / long-term adaptation view for each major site.
Exemple de réponse. A pack with site-by-site summaries, a scenario workbook, a board slide on production continuity, and a tracker showing adaptation actions, owners, and timing.
Financial services
Contexte. A lender or insurer is assessing whether climate impacts could affect operations, premises, and client-facing services.
Demande adaptée. Please provide the latest resilience assessment materials for [reporting period], including the outputs from climate-related testing, what they mean for the operating model and service delivery, any scenario-informed response actions, how the transition plan supports resilience where relevant, the key uncertainty areas, and the short / medium / long-term adaptation view for premises, technology, and critical suppliers.
Exemple de réponse. A risk committee paper, a scenario analysis summary, a business continuity addendum, and an action log covering premises, technology, and supplier resilience.
Rédigez votre information
Des notes qui transforment les données en information publiée
Modèles pédagogiques LRA — adaptez-les à votre organisation et vérifiez la source officielle avant validation.
Note méthodologique
Explain the basis used to assess climate resilience, including how the scenario work was applied, how the short-, medium- and long-term views were defined, and what was included when judging uncertainty and adaptation capacity.
Note de contexte
Set out what the results mean for the organisation’s strategy, operating model and ability to stay resilient under different climate conditions, including how the transition plan supports that position.
Déclaration sur les variations
If the results vary across periods or scenarios, describe the main drivers of the change, such as shifts in assumptions, different exposure levels, or changes in the organisation’s response capacity.
Entrée de l’index de contenu
E1-3 Resilience in relation to climate change — [location / page] / [notes]Centre de téléchargement
Outils et formulaires de préparation
Outils de préparation professionnels pour E1-3 — gratuits avec l’adhésion à LRA Community. Inscrivez-vous une fois (c’est gratuit) et tous les téléchargements se débloquent, avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA.
01XLSClasseur préparation et assurancePoints de données, risques, preuves à vérifier, responsable et dossier de preuves.Obtenir gratuitement ↧
02XLSPack de demande de donnéesE-mail de demande, modèle de message, champs de réponse et structure de validation.Obtenir gratuitement ↧
03PDFFiche de bibliothèqueRésumé imprimable d’une page de cette fiche d’information.Obtenir gratuitement ↧
Préparation à l’assurance
Pour chaque affirmation, vérifiez les preuves
| Affirmation | Risque | Preuves à vérifier |
|---|---|---|
| We based the coverage figure on the climate risks we had already flagged as material, and we checked that the same boundary was used when looking at the wider implications for the business model and strategy. | An assurer may test whether the scope was set consistently, or whether the team left out relevant parts of the business or used a different boundary from the risk assessment. | Boundary paper for the analysis; link to the material risk assessment; mapping showing which entities, sites or activities were included; review notes confirming the same scope was used across the disclosure. |
| We used the latest risk assessment available at the reporting date, and we refreshed the analysis where the earlier assessment had been updated. | The assurer may probe whether the disclosure reflects the most recent assessment or relies on an out-of-date version. | Version history of the risk assessment; dated working papers; sign-off pack showing the update was incorporated before publication; change log explaining what was refreshed. |
| We looked at the disclosed operations over the short, medium and long term, so the figure reflects how the business could adjust over different time horizons. | The assurer may ask whether the time horizons were actually considered, or whether the analysis only covered one period and was then generalised. | Scenario or resilience workpapers showing the three time horizons; internal guidance on horizon selection; management review notes; final draft showing the horizon references used in the published text. |
| We assessed how current and planned climate actions, including the transition programme and adaptation measures, feed into resilience, rather than treating them as separate workstreams. | The assurer may challenge whether the actions were genuinely linked to resilience, or whether the disclosure simply listed initiatives without showing their effect. | Action tracker; transition programme documents; adaptation plan; cross-reference table linking actions to risk reduction or resilience outcomes; evidence of internal challenge on the linkage. |
| We documented the main uncertainties in the assessment, including where the evidence was less certain or assumptions had a wider range. | The assurer may test whether the uncertainty was clearly identified, or whether key judgement areas were left out. | Assumption log; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty register; meeting minutes showing discussion of judgement areas; draft-to-final comparison showing the uncertainties were retained in the published version. |
| We kept evidence showing how the analysis was built from scenario outputs into the final narrative, and we checked the figures and wording before issue. | The assurer may probe whether the published statement is supported by the underlying scenario work and whether basic review checks were performed before release. | Scenario analysis outputs; reconciliation from model results to the disclosure text; internal review checklist; evidence of numerical and narrative checks; approval records from the final publication stage. |
Dossier de preuves à préparer
Lacunes fréquentes dans les rapports
The information is presented without a date or as-at point.
The scope or boundary of the statement is left undefined.
Key terms are used inconsistently across the report.
Material changes since the previous period are not disclosed.
Assertions are made without supporting detail or a source record.
Boilerplate is used that does not actually answer what is asked.
Lacunes fréquentes
Erreurs à éviter lors de la collecte des données
Wrong ownerThe team asks a policy lead or sustainability contact for inputs that sit with operations, risk, finance or strategy, so the evidence comes from the wrong part of the business.
Framework language onlyPeople ask for answers using disclosure labels instead of the organisation’s own terms, and the source team cannot map the request to the reports, models or plans they actually use.
No clear boundaryThe data pull is started without fixing which entities, sites, activities or time horizons are in scope, so different teams send numbers from different parts of the group.
Wrong time basisOne team uses the latest forecast while another uses the reporting period cut-off, which makes the resilience inputs impossible to compare on the same timing basis.
Mixed counting basisOperational counts, financial values and qualitative ratings are merged into one file without separating the basis for each, so the final pack cannot be traced back cleanly.
Source labels lostOriginal file names, scenario tags, version marks and table headings are stripped out during consolidation, leaving no way to see where each input came from.
Populations mergedShort-, medium- and long-range inputs are combined into one dataset even though they should stay separate, which hides differences in how the business performs over each horizon.
No evidence trailThe working papers do not keep the underlying extracts, dates, reviewer notes or approval trail, so no one can show how the figures were checked before sign-off.
Là où un jugement professionnel est souvent nécessaire
Set the reporting perimeter for bought-in and sold businessesUse the same organisational boundary you apply for the rest of the climate narrative, explain any acquisition or disposal cut-off that changes the picture, and note where the resilience story is based on a different perimeter from the prior period.
Choose one way to handle country-by-country climate assumptionsWhere local operations face different weather, regulation or market conditions, group them using a clear common basis or split them where that better reflects the business, then explain the basis used and why it is the most faithful fit.
Decide how to treat sites, assets or activities that sit near the boundaryState whether marginal operations, joint arrangements, leased assets or other borderline items are included, excluded or treated separately, and explain the practical rule used so readers can see what sits inside the analysis.
Fix the time horizon for each resilience viewLink the short-, medium- and long-range assessments to your own planning horizons, keep the cut-offs consistent across the narrative, and disclose any change in timing basis from one period to the next.
Separate modelled outputs from observed evidenceMake clear which parts of the resilience assessment come from measured performance, which come from estimates or assumptions, and where judgement fills gaps because direct evidence is not yet available.
Explain the main uncertainty drivers and how they were weighedIdentify the climate, operational or market factors that make the result less certain, describe the assumptions that matter most, and say how those uncertainties affect the confidence you place in the strategy and business model conclusions.
Use a consistent approach when combining different data sourcesIf the analysis draws on internal records, external datasets or expert views, describe how you reconciled them, what hierarchy you used when they conflicted, and whether any source was updated or restated for comparability.
Round and aggregate without hiding material differencesApply a clear rounding rule and, where privacy or sensitivity means you cannot show site-level detail, aggregate enough to protect people or assets while still giving a faithful view of the resilience outcome.
Exemples
Exemples illustratifs
Synthétiques, rédigés par LRA — ils ne proviennent ni d’un rapport d’entreprise ni du texte d’une norme.
Illustrative (synthetic) example — Electricity generation and supply
We used climate scenario work to test how our assets, supply chain and customer service would hold up under hotter summers, more flooding and tighter policy settings, and the results show that our current plan remains workable but needs extra investment in network hardening and flexible generation. - Those findings changed our medium-term capital allocation, our site design standards and our fuel mix assumptions, and our transition plan now includes resilience actions that support the business case for those changes. - The main areas where judgement remains open are the pace of policy change, the cost and timing of grid upgrades, and the extent to which extreme weather could disrupt maintenance windows; we judge our ability to cope as strong over the next 12 months, moderate over the next 3–5 years, and dependent on further adaptation measures over the longer horizon.
This synthetic example shows how to explain the outcome of climate scenario work, the knock-on effects for strategy and operating model, the way the transition plan supports resilience, the main uncertainties left open, and a plain-language view of adaptation strength across short, medium and long horizons.
Illustrative (synthetic) example — Food processing and packaging
Our scenario review indicates that water stress, heatwaves and supply interruptions could affect raw material availability and plant throughput, so we have adjusted sourcing, storage and process cooling plans to keep the company viable under those conditions. - In response, we have reworked our product mix, supplier contracts and site investment programme, and the transition plan now helps fund measures that make those changes more robust. - The biggest unknowns are regional water regulation, crop yield volatility and the speed at which suppliers can adapt; we assess our current ability to respond as adequate in the short term, improving in the middle period, and still requiring further upgrades over the long term.
This synthetic example shows how to describe the practical outcome of scenario work, the implications for strategy and the business model, how the transition plan contributes to resilience, where uncertainty remains, and how adaptation capacity can be described over three time horizons without using the standard’s wording.
Rapports d’entreprises
Comment les entreprises publient E1-3 en pratique
Exemples de pratiques de publication complètes et partielles. Ce sont des analyses fondées sur des preuves, non des modèles à recopier.
Ferrovial SE
Construction and Engineering · Netherlands · 2024
Ferrovial SE’s 2024 Integrated Annual Report includes references to its resilience analysis and the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on its business, strategy, and financial planning, notably on pages 83 and 291. The report mentions climate resilience and mitigation strategies and processes for identifying and assessing material climate-related impacts, risks, and opportunities (p.81, p.291). However, the disclosures are unclear and do not provide a definitive or detailed description of these processes or a clear transition plan, with several datapoints not found or only partially addressed.
Redeia Corporación, S.A.
Electric Utilities / IPP / Energy Traders · Spain · 2025
Redeia Corporación’s 2025 report provides some evidence related to its ability to adjust to climate-related challenges, as noted on page 43. The report includes references to a transition plan for climate change mitigation and outlines climate change actions and targets, such as a zero emissions goal for 2050 and interim targets for 2030, mentioned on pages 42, 47, 49, and 148-149. However, the report lacks clear, direct disclosures on specific narrative items related to business conduct, quality of supply, innovation, or the linkage between strategy and business model, with only unclear context found on page 18 and no quotable evidence elsewhere.
Pirelli & C. S.p.A.
Automobiles and Components · Italy · 2025
Pirelli & C. S.p.A.'s 2025 Annual Report includes evidence of analysis conducted using the Group’s Climate strategy and business model to strengthen resilience to climate change, as noted on page 152. The report also references identification of climate-related issues and greenhouse gas emissions management policies on page 118. However, several narrative items relevant to the disclosure are not found or lack quotable evidence elsewhere in the report.
Interrogez l’assistant IA de Study Studio sur cette information
Obtenez des réponses concrètes pour votre contexte de reporting. Les deux premières réponses sont gratuites — rejoignez gratuitement LRA Community pour continuer sans limite.
Essayez
Comment préparer E1-3 ?
Quelles données dois-je collecter ?
Où voir un exemple issu d’un rapport réel ?
Quelles erreurs éviter ?
2 réponses gratuites
Vérifiez votre compréhension
Scénarios à travailler
A manufacturer has run a climate stress test showing that repeated heatwaves could reduce output at one site and raise cooling costs, while a second site is less exposed. The draft report currently lists the test result but does not explain what it means for the group’s operating model.
QHow should the preparer turn that analysis into a clear narrative for the disclosure?
Afficher la réponse type →Masquer la réponse ↑
Set out the main findings from the climate stress test, then explain what they mean for the organisation’s strategy and operating model. The write-up should connect the resilience assessment to practical business consequences, such as which parts of the business are more exposed and whether any changes to operations, assets or sourcing are being considered.
Pourquoi c’est important · The analysis is not enough on its own; the reader also needs to see what it means for the business and how management plans to respond.
A utility group has used several climate scenarios, but one of them gives very different results depending on assumptions about regulation, technology costs and customer behaviour. The team is unsure whether to mention that uncertainty because the figures are still being refined.
QWhat should the preparer do about the areas where the outcome is still highly uncertain?
Afficher la réponse type →Masquer la réponse ↑
Describe the main areas where the assessment is less certain, rather than presenting the results as more precise than they are. The disclosure should make clear which assumptions or inputs create the biggest doubt, so users can understand where the resilience view is strongest and where it is still developing.
Pourquoi c’est important · Be open about the limits of the analysis; uncertainty is part of the picture and should be explained plainly.
A food producer has a transition plan covering energy efficiency, electrification and supplier changes. Management believes the plan will also help the business cope with drought and supply disruption, but the draft only describes emissions reductions and omits any link to resilience.
QHow should the preparer handle the relationship between the transition plan and climate resilience?
Afficher la réponse type →Masquer la réponse ↑
Explain whether, and in what way, the transition plan supports the organisation’s ability to withstand climate-related pressures. If the plan strengthens resilience through measures such as more efficient operations, lower dependence on vulnerable inputs or better flexibility in the supply chain, that connection should be described in the narrative.
Pourquoi c’est important · If the transition plan also helps the business cope with climate risk, that link should be made visible rather than left implicit.
A property group has assessed resilience over the near, middle and longer horizons. The short-term view suggests manageable flood risk, but the longer-term view points to possible asset impairment and relocation costs; the team is tempted to summarise everything in one sentence to save space.
QHow should the preparer present the organisation’s ability to adapt across different time horizons?
Afficher la réponse type →Masquer la réponse ↑
Separate the discussion by time horizon and explain the organisation’s capacity to adjust in each period. The short, middle and longer-term views may differ, so the disclosure should show how the business expects to cope now, what it can do in the medium run, and whether its longer-term adaptation remains credible.
Pourquoi c’est important · Resilience can change over time, so the assessment should be shown across the relevant horizons rather than blended into one generic statement.
Références au référentiel
Exigences ESRS applicables et informations connexes
Références disponibles du référentiel et informations voisines utiles à la préparation de cette exigence.
ESRS
E1-3
au sein de ESRS E1 : Climate Change
Connexes et exploration
Transition plan for climate change mitigation → FicheInternal carbon pricing → FicheAnticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities → FicheIdentification of climate-related risks and scenario analysis → FichePolicies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation → Fiche
Parcourir toutes les informations →
Plus dans ESRS E1 → Parcourir le catalogue complet → Accueil de la Bibliothèque des informations → Rechercher dans toutes les informations →
FAQ
Questions auxquelles cette page répond
How do I use the E1-3 page to draft a climate resilience disclosure from scratch?+−
Start with the plain-language explainer, then work through the step-by-step preparation section and the listed datapoints. Use the draft-output section to turn your notes into narrative, visuals and a content-index line.
What data do I need to collect for ESRS E1-3 climate resilience analysis?+−
The page points you to resilience analysis results, strategy and model impacts, scenario-based response, transition plan resilience, key uncertainty areas, and near-, mid- and long-term adaptation capacity. Use those headings as your data collection checklist before drafting.
How should I set the scope and methodology for the E1-3 disclosure?+−
Use the page’s step-by-step preparation guidance to define what is in scope, how the resilience analysis is being approached, and how scenario-based response is being assessed. Keep the method consistent with the datapoints you plan to disclose and document any key uncertainty areas.
Who should own the E1-3 climate resilience disclosure in practice?+−
The page is designed for sustainability/ESG managers, HR or data owners, and assurance reviewers, so ownership should sit with the person coordinating those inputs and evidence. Use the workbook to assign tasks and track who is responsible for each datapoint and evidence item.
What should go into the evidence pack for E1-3 assurance readiness?+−
The page includes an evidence pack with five items and six assurance claims to verify, each framed around claim, risk and evidence. Build the pack around the specific datapoints, the method used, and the supporting records that show how the disclosure was prepared.
What are the common mistakes to avoid when preparing an E1-3 disclosure?+−
The page lists common reporting gaps and mistakes, so use that section as a pre-submission check. In practice, the main risk is leaving the disclosure too generic or failing to back up the resilience story with evidence and a clear method.
How do I use the Prep & Assurance workbook for E1-3?+−
The downloadable workbook is there to help you organise preparation and assurance work in one place. Use it to capture the datapoints, assign ownership, track evidence, and check the six assurance claims before turning the material into a draft.
What can I take from the synthetic illustrative example for E1-3?+−
The page includes synthetic illustrative example disclosures, including a quantitative table, to show how the disclosure can be written up. Treat it as a drafting aid only and adapt the structure and level of detail to your own data and evidence.
How do I turn E1-3 data into a draft disclosure text?+−
Use the draft-output section for visualisation ideas, narrative starters and a content-index line. That section is meant to help you convert your prepared data into a readable draft without starting from a blank page.
Where can I find real company examples of climate resilience reporting for E1-3?+−
The page has a 'From company reports' table that links to real published reports at the pages where the topic is disclosed. Use those links as practical reference points for style and presentation, not as a substitute for your own evidence.
Autres questions auxquelles cette page peut aider
E1-3 climate resilience disclosure checklist for sustainability managersWhat evidence do I need for ESRS E1-3 climate resilience analysis?How to assign ownership for E1-3 climate resilience data collectionE1-3 scenario-based response and transition plan resilience data pointsHow to use the E1-3 Prep & Assurance workbook downloadE1-3 common reporting gaps and mistakes to avoidHow to write a draft climate resilience disclosure for E1-3What should an assurance reviewer check in an E1-3 evidence pack?E1-3 narrative starters and content-index line examplesWhere to find company report examples for E1-3 climate resilienceHow to document key uncertainty areas for E1-3E1-3 near-term mid-term long-term adaptation capacity data
Aller plus loin · E1-3
Apprenez à préparer cette information de bout en bout
This guide covers one Disclosure Requirement. The ESRS / CSRD Reporting course walks the full European workflow — double materiality, datapoints, evidence and assurance — with exercises on your own data.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.
Comment cette bibliothèque est construite
312 rapports publiés indexés
63 171 pages avec citations au niveau de la page
272 fiches disclosure conçues par des praticiens
/fr/knowledge-hub/disclosure-cards/esrs-e1-3/
Gratuit · LRA Community
Obtenez vos outils E1-3 — gratuitement
Vos outils de préparation sont gratuits pour les membres de LRA Community et les étudiants. Inscrivez-vous une fois (c’est gratuit) et votre téléchargement démarre aussitôt — avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA.
✓
C’est fait — votre téléchargement démarre
Votre fichier est en cours de téléchargement. Votre Cabinet Community — avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA — est prêt lui aussi.
Ouvrir votre Cabinet →