Ir al foco de la divulgación

London Reporting Academy ESRS S1 · Own Workforce · Disclosure Requirement S1-13

Aplicable desde el ejercicio 2027

Esta edición revisada de ESRS se aplica desde el ejercicio de reporte 2027. Para los ejercicios 2024–2026, utilice la edición ESRS de 2023.

Health & Safety

S1-13 · mandatory · coverage + narrative

This disclosure asks an organisation to explain how it manages health and safety for its own workforce and what the actual outcomes are. In practice, that means reporting the main risks, the controls and processes in place to prevent harm, and the results achieved over the reporting period, such as incidents, injuries, work-related ill health, and any serious events that show how effective the approach is.

Foco de la divulgación

The practical focus is on whether health and safety coverage is real and consistent across the organisation, not just at a few well-managed sites. Readers will want to understand whether the approach applies across all operations, locations and types of workers, how issues are identified and followed up, and whether the organisation can show that its system works in day-to-day practice rather than only on paper.

Este material formativo de LRA apoya la preparación de la divulgación. Para los requisitos exactos, consulte siempre la fuente oficial de European Commission.

Preparar

Qué recopilar antes de redactar

Marque cada campo cuando llegue la evidencia. Los responsables son los equipos que suelen custodiar los archivos fuente.

  • Reporting coverage share

    Sustainability reporting / HR analytics

    The share of the relevant workforce or activity base that is included in the reported figure, using the same population and period as the underlying source data.

    Evidencia Coverage calculation file, source population definition, and reconciliation to the HR or operational system used for the denominator.

    Atención a The numerator is taken from one population while the denominator comes from a different source system or period, so the percentage does not reconcile to the underlying headcount or activity base.

  • Work-related deaths

    Health and safety

    A narrative summary of any deaths linked to work, separating those arising from accidents and those arising from illness, with the reporting period and affected population clear.

    Evidencia Incident log, occupational health records, investigation notes, and any internal fatality review or case file.

    Atención a Accident-related deaths and illness-related deaths are merged or one category is omitted, so the reported narrative does not match the underlying case classification.

  • Work accident count

    Health and safety

    The number of reportable work accidents in the period, using the organisation’s agreed incident definition and counting method.

    Evidencia Incident register, investigation log, and monthly safety dashboard reconciled to the central incident system.

    Atención a Local incident logs are counted differently from the central incident system, so the accident total does not reconcile to the source register.

  • Accident frequency rate

    Health and safety / HR analytics

    The accident rate expressed per one million hours worked, using the same accident count and hours base for the same reporting period.

    Evidencia Safety KPI calculation sheet, accident count source, and hours-worked extract from payroll or timekeeping.

    Atención a The rate is calculated from a different hours base or period than the accident count, so the per-million-hours figure is not aligned to the source inputs.

  • Work illness cases

    Occupational health

    The number of work-related illness cases recognised in the period, using the organisation’s agreed case definition and classification rules.

    Evidencia Occupational health case log, medical referral records, and case classification summary.

    Atención a Non-work-related conditions are included, or work-related cases are missed because the case definition is not applied consistently to the source log.

  • Lost work days

    Health and safety / HR

    The total days lost because of work-related injury or illness in the reporting period, counted on the same basis used in the incident and absence records.

    Evidencia Absence records, incident case files, return-to-work notes, and the days-lost calculation worksheet.

    Atención a Days lost are mixed with calendar days or partial absences, or the count is taken from a different case set than the incident records.

Antes de empezar

  • Have you fixed the headcount base for the period, so the coverage percentage is calculated against the right group of workers?
  • For deaths linked to work incidents or work-related illness, have you agreed which cases are included and which reporting period they sit in?
  • Before counting injuries, have you settled what counts as a work accident in your organisation and whether the tally covers the full period you are reporting on?
  • If you are using an injury rate, have you confirmed the hours base and the calculation method so the figure is built on the same work-hours measure throughout?
  • For work-related illness cases, have you agreed the definition and source of the count, so the number can be traced back to a clear record?
  • Have you decided how to total time away from work after incidents or illness, and whether the days are taken from a consistent internal source?
+ Mostrar los subelementos de S1-13 (lista de trabajo de LRA)

Cómo prepararlo

Set the reporting boundary first: decide which people and work locations are included in the figures, and make sure the same boundary is used for every measure in this disclosure.
Agree the counting rules before you start compiling data: define what will be treated as a fatal case, an accident, an illness case, and a lost-day event, so the numbers are built on one consistent basis.
Gather the source records that support each figure: incident logs, absence or case records, and any working-time data needed to calculate the accident rate per million hours and the coverage percentage.
Compile the required outputs in the format needed for the report: the coverage percentage, fatalities from accidents and illness, accident count, accident rate, illness cases, and lost days.
Record any exclusions, boundary changes, or method changes clearly, so a reviewer can see what was left out, what changed, and why the current figures are not directly comparable with an earlier period if that applies.
Check the completed disclosure against the official source before sign-off: confirm the boundary, definitions, calculations, and labels all match the underlying requirement and that nothing required has been missed.

Solicitar los datos

Request the health and safety incident data

Traduzca la divulgación a una pregunta de negocio interna y adáptela después al lenguaje propio de su organización.

What are the period-end health and safety figures we need to report for our own workforce and work activities?

Use your organisation’s own terms first, then map them to the reporting labels. For example, ask for your incident log, case register, absence records and hours worked data in the language your teams already use, rather than using framework wording in the request.

Solicitud débil

Please provide the ESRS S1:S1-13 health and safety metrics for the reporting period, including coverage, fatalities, accidents, accident rate, illness cases and lost days.

Por qué falla: It uses framework language only, does not say which internal records to pull, and leaves the owner guessing about the population, source system, counting basis and exclusions. That makes it harder to return a usable, auditable pack.

Solicitud mejor

Please send the latest figures from your incident log, case register and absence records for [period] and [boundary]: fatal work-related events, accident cases, accident rate per 1m hours, work-related illness cases, lost days, and the coverage % for the group you track. Include the source file, the population covered, the counting method, the hours-worked basis, and any exclusions so we can map your terms to the reporting labels.

Plantilla de correo formal
Subject: Request for health and safety data for [reporting period]

Hi [name/team],

I’m pulling together the health and safety figures for [reporting period] and need your latest data for [entity / site / business unit].

Please send, in your own working format if easier:
- the count of fatal events linked to work activities, including any cases tied to injury or illness;
- the number of accident cases;
- the accident rate calculated per one million hours worked, or the inputs needed to calculate it;
- the number of work-related illness cases;
- the number of lost days linked to those cases;
- the coverage percentage for the population included in your tracking.

Please also include:
- the period covered;
- the population and boundary used;
- the source system or file;
- the counting method;
- any exclusions or special cases;
- the person who prepared the data and the date it was last updated.

If you already have a report, export or dashboard extract, that is fine. Please attach the file or share the link and note any assumptions.

Thanks,
[preparer name]
Versión corta para Teams / Slack
Hi [name] — could you send the latest H&S figures for [period] for [site/business unit]? I need: fatal work-related events, accident count, accident rate per 1m hours, illness cases, lost days, and the coverage % for the group you track. Please include the source file/system, boundary, counting method, and any exclusions. A dashboard export is fine. Thanks.

Ejemplos sectoriales

Manufacturing

Contexto. Multiple plants with shop-floor incidents, contractor activity and shift-based hours tracking.

Solicitud adaptada. Please send the latest plant H&S extract for [period] covering employees and contractors at [site(s)]. Include fatal work-related events, accident cases, accident rate per 1m hours, work-related illness cases, lost days, and the coverage % for the population in your plant dashboard. Please add the incident log export, hours worked basis from roster/timekeeping, and any exclusions such as off-site travel or legacy cases.

Ejemplo de respuesta. Attached: plant dashboard export, incident log extract, roster hours file, and a note confirming the site boundary, the worker groups included, and the counting rules used for accidents, illness cases and lost days.

Financial services

Contexto. Office-based workforce with occupational health cases, travel-related incidents and central HR / H&S reporting.

Solicitud adaptada. Please send the latest workplace safety and occupational health figures for [period] across [entity / office locations]. Include fatal work-related events, accident cases, accident rate per 1m hours, work-related illness cases, lost days, and the coverage % for the population in your central tracker. Please include the tracker export, the hours worked basis used for office staff, and any exclusions such as commuting or non-work-related medical absences.

Ejemplo de respuesta. Attached: central H&S tracker export, occupational health case summary, payroll hours basis note, and a short memo confirming the office boundary, the worker groups included, and the exclusions applied.

Redacte su divulgación

Notas que convierten los datos en una divulgación

Plantillas formativas de LRA: adáptelas a su organización y consulte la fuente oficial antes de la aprobación.

Nota metodológica

Explain how the organisation defined the workforce population covered by the figures, how it counted deaths, accidents, illness cases and lost days, and how it calculated the accident rate per million hours.

Nota de contexto

Set out what the figures say about the reach of the reporting population and the level of harm experienced in the period, including whether the numbers point to isolated events or a broader pattern.

Declaración sobre las variaciones

If any figure moved materially, describe the main operational or reporting reasons for the change, such as a shift in workforce coverage, a change in incident frequency, or a different mix of accidents and illness cases.

Entrada del índice de contenidos

S1-13 Health & Safety — [location / page] / [notes]

Centro de descargas

Herramientas y formularios de preparación

Descargue herramientas de preparación para S1-13 durante 24 horas con acceso gratuito mediante correo electrónico verificado. Los enlaces a los informes originales siguen siendo públicos.

Gratis · acceso por correo

Verificación

Para cada afirmación, compruebe la evidencia

  • We included non-staff cases in the accident and fatality figures where they arose within the organisation’s own labour force.

    Riesgos An assurer will test whether the boundary really captures non-employees and whether those cases were counted consistently rather than omitted or double-counted.

    Evidencia que comprobar Incident logs, investigation files, workforce boundary notes, consolidation rules, and the working paper showing how non-staff cases were identified and added to the totals.

  • We split the accident and fatality figures into separate lines for staff and non-staff so the two groups can be read apart.

    Riesgos An assurer will check whether the split is genuine, whether the categories are applied consistently, and whether the totals reconcile to the underlying incident records.

    Evidencia que comprobar The reporting template, source incident register, classification guidance, reconciliation to the final table, and any review notes confirming the split between the two groups.

  • For the accident-rate calculation, we used standard hours that reflect paid leave and documented how those hours were estimated.

    Riesgos An assurer will probe whether the hours basis is reasonable, whether leave was treated consistently, and whether the estimation method could distort the rate.

    Evidencia que comprobar Payroll or timekeeping extracts, the hours-estimation methodology, assumptions for leave, calculation sheets, and sign-off showing the basis used for the denominator.

  • We reported both the count and the rate for recordable accidents affecting our own workforce during the period.

    Riesgos An assurer will test whether the numerator and denominator are complete, whether the rate maths is correct, and whether the period boundary was applied properly.

    Evidencia que comprobar Accident register, period cut-off checks, calculation workbook, source data extracts, and a review trail showing how the count and rate were derived.

  • We disclosed the number of calendar days lost by employees because of recordable accidents and recordable ill-health cases.

    Riesgos An assurer will check whether days lost were counted on a calendar basis, whether only employee cases were included, and whether the totals tie back to case records.

    Evidencia que comprobar Case files, absence records, return-to-work records, day-count methodology, and a reconciliation from individual cases to the published total.

  • We counted employee cases of recordable work-related ill health for the reporting period and used the case register as the source.

    Riesgos An assurer will probe whether the health cases meet the internal recording rule used, whether duplicates were removed, and whether the period coverage is complete.

    Evidencia que comprobar Occupational health records, case classification notes, the incident or health register, duplicate-check evidence, and the final tally working paper.

Paquete de evidencia que preparar

Carencias habituales en los informes

  • A percentage is stated without the underlying counts (numerator and denominator).
  • The denominator — what the figure is a share of — is not explained.
  • Partial scope is reported as if it were complete coverage.
  • One-off activities are counted as if they were ongoing programmes.
  • Boundary or period changes that move the figure are not flagged.
  • Exclusions from the reported scope are not listed or explained.

Dónde fallan los borradores

Errores que evitar y dónde se requiere juicio profesional

La columna izquierda muestra lo que los preparadores hacen mal al recopilar; la derecha, dónde tendrá que tomar y explicar un juicio.

Errores que evitar

  • Wrong ownerThe request goes to a manager who does not hold the incident logs, so the team chases the wrong person instead of the operational owner who keeps the records.
  • Framework language onlyThe ask is written in reporting jargon, so site teams cannot match it to their own injury, absence, or case-tracking terms.
  • Unclear boundaryThe data pull does not state which sites, workers, or business units are in scope, so different teams count different populations.
  • Wrong period basisThe team mixes events from different reporting windows, so the figures do not line up with the same time period.
+ Mostrar 5 más

Requiere juicio profesional

  • Set the reporting boundary after buyouts and disposalsUse the same cut-off rule across the group for new and sold businesses, explain which sites or teams were added or removed, and note any effect on the headcount base, incident totals and hours used for the coverage figure.
  • Choose one working definition where local rules differIf countries or business units record injuries, illness or lost time differently, pick one group-wide method for the report, describe the local differences, and say how you converted the source records into one consistent set of figures.
  • Decide how to treat people close to the boundaryState whether you include contractors, agency staff, interns, temporary workers or other near-boundary groups in the safety data, and explain the rule used so readers can see who sits inside the count and who does not.
  • Fix the timing rule for when an event enters the yearExplain whether you count an accident, illness or lost day when it happens, when it is reported, or when it is confirmed, and keep that timing rule consistent across all measures in the disclosure.
+ Mostrar 5 más

Ejemplos

Cómo se lee en la página

Sintéticos, redactados por LRA: no proceden del informe de ninguna empresa ni del texto de ninguna norma.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — Manufacturing

we report the share of our workforce covered by the figures below, alongside work-related deaths, injury events, injury frequency, illness cases and days lost. The numbers are internally consistent and shown for a single reporting period.

Illustrative workforce health and safety summary (people / cases / days / %)

MeasureWomenMen
People covered by the reporting scope42005800
Deaths from work-related causes12
Injury events4872
Illness cases69
Days lost310490

Use this as a model for a concise quantitative disclosure that brings together coverage and the main health-and-safety outcomes for the period.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — Transport and logistics

we set out the proportion of our people included in the data, then the period’s fatal outcomes, injuries, injury rate, sickness cases and time lost. All figures are internally consistent and intended purely for training.

Illustrative workforce health and safety summary (people / cases / days / %)

MeasureDirect employeesAgency workers
People covered by the reporting scope36001400
Deaths from work-related causes01
Injury events3515
Illness cases42
Days lost22095

Use this as a second model with a different sector and a different mix of figures, while still covering the same required datapoints.

Escalera de calidad

  • Básico

    I report a 92% workforce coverage rate, with 3 work-related deaths, 18 accidents, 2.4 cases per million hours, 5 illness cases and 120 lost days.

  • Mejor

    I report that our 92% coverage figure relates to the people included in our health and safety tracking, and for that group we recorded 3 work-related deaths, 18 accidents, 2.4 cases per million hours, 5 illness cases and 120 lost days.

  • Óptimo

    I report that, for the 92% of our workforce covered by our health and safety tracking this year, we recorded 3 work-related deaths, 18 accidents, 2.4 cases per million hours, 5 illness cases and 120 lost days, and the higher lost-day total mainly reflects two longer recovery periods after serious incidents.

Compruebe su comprensión

Escenarios para trabajar

Your group has three subsidiaries and one joint operation. Two subsidiaries keep full incident logs, while the joint operation only shares quarterly summaries, so you can see the total headcount but not every worker covered by the same safety tracking method.

PHow do you decide whether the coverage figure is ready to report, and what should you do if the tracking basis is not the same across all parts of the group?
Mostrar la respuesta modelo →

A contractor working on your site dies after a workplace accident, and later in the year an employee dies from a work-related illness. The draft report team is unsure whether to separate these events or combine them in one line.

PWhat is the right way to handle the fatality disclosure when the causes differ but both are work-related?
Mostrar la respuesta modelo →

During the year, one site records 14 lost-time accidents and another records 6 more. The safety team also has the total hours worked and can calculate a rate, but the draft narrative only mentions the accident count because the rate looks small.

PShould you report only the number of accidents, or also include the rate based on hours worked?
Mostrar la respuesta modelo →

Your occupational health provider sends a year-end file showing 9 work-related illness cases, but two of those cases were first logged by HR and one was later reclassified as not work-related. The draft table still shows 9 because that was the first number received.

PWhat should you do before finalising the illness figure and the lost-days figure linked to those cases?
Mostrar la respuesta modelo →
✓ Asistente de IA de Knowledge Hub · Humano en el circuito
Dr Ross Kurinko

Pregunte al AI Assistant del Knowledge Hub sobre esta divulgación

Obtenga respuestas prácticas adaptadas a su contexto de elaboración de informes.

Prueba ¿Cómo preparo S1-13? ¿Qué datos necesito recopilar? ¿Qué errores debo evitar?

Referencias del marco

Requisitos aplicables de ESRS y divulgaciones relacionadas

ESRS

S1-13

dentro de ESRS S1: Own Workforce

Abrir la fuente oficial →

Guides that settle this question

Relacionado y explorar

Más en ESRS S1 →Ver el catálogo completo →Buscar en todas las divulgaciones →

Preguntas frecuentes

Preguntas que responde esta página

How do I prepare disclosure S1-13 on own workforce using this page step by step?+
What data do I need to collect for S1-13 own workforce before I start drafting?+
How should I define the reporting coverage share for S1-13 in practice?+
Who should own the S1-13 own workforce data collection and sign-off?+
What evidence should I keep for assurance on S1-13 own workforce?+
What are the common mistakes to avoid when reporting S1-13 own workforce?+
How do I use the S1-13 workbook download to build the disclosure?+
Can I use the synthetic example on the S1-13 page as a template for my own numbers?+
What should the draft output for S1-13 own workforce include?+
Where can I find real company examples for S1-13 own workforce reporting?+

Más preguntas con las que puede ayudar esta página

Cómo se construye esta biblioteca 1 211 informes publicados indexados 315 012 páginas con citas a nivel de página 272 fichas publicadas en el catálogo activo
/es/knowledge-hub/disclosure-cards/esrs-s1-13/