Disclosure GuidesThe questions that hold a report up, settled

London Reporting Academy·Disclosure guides

Understand the questions behind the standards.

Expert-written answers to the questions that slow reporting teams down. Each one opens with the conclusion, shows the requirement it rests on, explains the conditions and the judgement involved, and links to the disclosure cards the decision affects.

  • 478 guides published
  • Practitioner-written, technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Free to read

✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop

Not sure how to phrase the question? Describe the situation.

The assistant answers from reviewed LRA content, names the missing fact instead of inventing one, and points you to the guide or disclosure card the decision lands on. Your first two answers are free without signing in.

Try
2 free answers Automated · the LRA team is one click away

Answers from the published guides · 275 disclosure cards · 1,211 indexed reports

Disclosure guides

Metrics and methodologies

Clear the filters and show every guide →

TNFD·Toolkit·Metrics and methodologies

TNFD DIRO, Financial Effects and Disclosure Working Toolkit

A package-level toolkit containing TNFD_DIRO_Financial_Effects_and_Disclosure_Working_Toolkit.pdf; TNFD_DIRO_Financial_Effects_and_Disclosure_Working_Toolkit.docx, with 4 related Knowledge Hub guides.

Helps you decideWhich package files and related guides belong to this toolkit?

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 3 min Read the guide →

TNFD·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

TNFD Nature Targets: Baselines, Locations, Value Chains and Progress

A credible TNFD nature target identifies the material dependency, impact, risk or opportunity it addresses; the locations and value-chain boundary covered; the baseline and reference condition; the metric and method; the target date and interim milestones; the actions and resources expected to deliver the result; and the governance process for monitoring, revision and missed performance. Organisation-wide targets can support strategic direction, but they should not replace location-associated targets where the nature issue is local.

Helps you decideTNFD Nature Targets: Baselines, Locations, Value Chains and Progress

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 11 min Read the guide →

TNFD·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

TNFD Metrics and Targets: Core Global, Sector and Additional Metrics Explained

TNFD does not ask organisations to publish every nature metric they can calculate. Its architecture distinguishes core global and core sector disclosure metrics, additional global and additional sector disclosure metrics, and assessment metrics used internally.

Helps you decideTNFD Metrics and Targets: Core Global, Sector and Additional Metrics Explained

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 11 min Read the guide →

TNFD·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

Does TNFD Require a Biodiversity Footprint? Metrics, Models and False Precision

No. TNFD does not require every organisation to calculate one universal biodiversity-footprint score. TNFD asks organisations to disclose material nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks and opportunities using appropriate metrics, including core global, sector and additional metrics.

Helps you decideDoes TNFD Require a Biodiversity Footprint? Metrics, Models and False Precision

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 8 min Read the guide →

TNFD·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

TNFD Core Global Disclosure Metrics: Land, Water, Pollution, Resources and Nature Risk

TNFD's core global disclosure metrics are intended to create a consistent cross-sector starting point, not a universal table that every organisation fills in identically. The current architecture groups 14 core global indicators around dependencies and impacts on nature and nature-related risks and opportunities.

Helps you decideTNFD Core Global Disclosure Metrics: Land, Water, Pollution, Resources and Nature Risk

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

TNFD·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

TNFD Prepare Phase: Responses, Targets, Governance and Disclosure Readiness

Prepare is the decision and reporting phase of LEAP, not simply the moment when the report is drafted. It converts material dependencies, impacts, risks and opportunities into response and resource-allocation decisions; sets controlled targets and performance measures; confirms governance and engagement; performs a disclosure gap assessment; obtains management and board approvals; and establishes a repeat cycle.

Helps you decideWhat will the organisation do, measure, approve and disclose - and how will progress feed the next LEAP cycle?

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

TNFD·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

Nature Impacts and State of Nature: Drivers, Condition, Extent and Species

Assess nature impacts as a causal chain rather than a list of activities. Start with the business activity and the direct impact driver - land, freshwater or sea-use change; resource exploitation; pollution; climate change; or invasive alien species - then identify the affected ecosystem and species, spatial and temporal pathway, and resulting change in the state of nature.

Helps you decideWhat direct driver occurs, what element of nature changes, how significant/uncertain is the impact and what evidence or action is required?

Reviewed 10 Aug 2026 10 min Read the guide →

TNFD·Decision guide·Metrics and methodologies

TNFD Financial Effects: nature dependencies, impacts, revenue, costs, capex, assets, liabilities, cash flows, scenarios and access to finance

TNFD financial effects are the present or anticipated consequences of nature-related risks and opportunities for an organisation’s financial performance, financial position, cash flows and financing. The analysis should not begin with an invented monetary figure.

Helps you decideWhich operational or strategic transmission channel could affect revenue, expenditure, capital expenditure, assets, liabilities, cash flows, insurance or access to and cost of capital?

Reviewed 11 Aug 2026 13 min Read the guide →

How an LRA guide is built

Every answer follows the same discipline.

You should be able to stop reading after the first paragraph and still have what you came for. Everything below it exists so you can defend the answer to a reviewer.

  1. 01
    Answer

    The question is stated as a reporting team would ask it, and settled in the opening lines.

  2. 02
    Basis

    The official source and edition are named, and kept clearly apart from our reading of them.

  3. 03
    Judgement

    The points the standard leaves open are marked, with what a defensible position looks like.

  4. 04
    Action

    The answer links to the disclosures and evidence it affects, so a decision turns into fields to fill.

  • Practitioner-written, then technically reviewed
  • A named reviewer, with a date
  • Requirements kept separate from practice and interpretation
  • Stated update triggers for re-reading each answer

Coverage

Which frameworks have answers yet.

The guides tier is written framework by framework rather than thinly across all of them, so this says where the writing has actually reached. Disclosure cards, which cover the requirements themselves, run ahead of it.

Found the answer?

Turn the decision into a disclosure.

An answer settles what to do. The disclosure card is where it becomes data to collect, owners to name, evidence to retain and wording to draft — and when the whole reporting cycle is the problem, the programme walks it with a mentor on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

/en/knowledge-hub/disclosure-guides/ Wave 1 — English only