Practical guidance for preparing this disclosure. Use this card to identify datapoints, verify claims and organise supporting evidence. For exact requirements, always refer to the official GRI source.
This disclosure asks an organisation to explain how many people it employs and how that workforce is made up, using a clear breakdown rather than a single headline figure. The emphasis is on the organisation's own employees, so the report should help a reader understand the scale and composition of the workforce that sits within the business, not just the people it works with more broadly.
In practice, the focus is on coverage across the organisation's operations, so the information should reflect the full employee population rather than only selected sites, business units, or flagship locations. The useful question is whether the figures give a complete and consistent picture of employees across the reporting boundary, so that changes, concentrations, or gaps in the workforce can be understood properly.
This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official GRI source.
Before you start
A quick mental checklist before you prepare this disclosure — tick each as you settle it.
Preparation
Key datapoints to prepare
DatapointWhat to captureEvidence hintOwner
Total workforceThe overall employee count for the reporting period, using the organisation's chosen counting basis consistently.HRIS headcount extract; payroll reconciliation; period-end or average basis note.HR / People Analytics
Workforce by genderEmployee numbers split by gender, using the organisation's defined gender categories for the reporting basis used.HRIS demographic fields; employee self-identification records; category mapping note.HR / People Analytics
Workforce by regionEmployee numbers split by geographic region, using one consistent regional mapping across the dataset.HRIS location fields; regional mapping table; legal entity or site list.HR / People Analytics
Permanent staff totalThe total number of employees on ongoing contracts for the reporting period, counted on the same basis as the wider workforce data.HRIS contract-type extract; payroll status report; contract classification rules.HR / People Analytics
Permanent staff by genderPermanent employee numbers split by gender, using the same contract classification and gender categories throughout.HRIS contract-type and demographic fields; reconciliation to permanent staff total.HR / People Analytics
Permanent staff by regionPermanent employee numbers split by region, on the same regional mapping used for the total workforce.HRIS contract-type + location fields; regional mapping table.HR / People Analytics
Temporary staff totalEmployees on fixed-term or otherwise time-limited contracts, on the same counting basis as the total.HRIS contract-type extract; fixed-term register; payroll status report.HR / People Analytics
Non-guaranteed hours totalEmployees with no minimum guaranteed hours (for example casual or zero-hours arrangements).HRIS working-pattern flags; casual/zero-hours register.HR / People Analytics
Full-time / part-time splitEmployees split into full-time and part-time using the organisation's own threshold, each also by gender and region.HRIS working-time fields; full-time threshold definition note.HR / People Analytics
Methodology & timing basisThe counting method (headcount / FTE), the as-at or averaging basis, and any material contextual notes.Methodology note; data cut-off record; prior-period comparison.Reporting lead
a-i Total number of employeesa-ii Employees by gendera-iii Employees by regionb Permanent / temporary, by gender & regionc Non-guaranteed hours, by gender & regiond Full-time / part-time, by gender & regione Methodology & contextual informationf Significant fluctuations explained
How to prepare
1Set the reporting boundary firstDecide which workers sit inside the disclosure and keep that scope consistent across the whole table, so totals, splits and commentary refer to the same population.
2Define each worker group before countingSeparate the workforce into the required employment types, then split each group by gender and region using one clear rule set for every category.
3Choose and record the counting methodState whether you use person counts, FTE, or another approach, and note whether figures reflect a period-end position, an average, or a different timing basis.
4Gather the source records and build the numbersPull the underlying payroll or HR records needed for the overall totals and each breakdown, then check every subgroup adds up sensibly to its parent total.
5Add the explanatory notes that make data usableInclude any context needed to read the figures properly, and explain notable rises or falls in headcount during the year and versus the previous period.
6Review the draft against source before sign-offConfirm every required figure and narrative point is present, that exclusions or method changes are explained, and the wording matches the official source.
Join and learn this in practice
Hot courseLive · 2 daysSeasonal intakes
GRI Standards Certified Training
Official GRI Certified Partner — live with Dr. Kurinko.
Prepare GRI social disclosures on a real report — exercises, trainer review and the official GRI Standards Certified credential.
Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.
What is the workforce count and how is it split by contract type, gender and region for the reporting period, with the method and any notable movements explained?
Use your organisation's own workforce terms first (for example, staff, colleagues, workers, contingent labour, fixed-term, casual, zero-hours, office/region names), then map them to the reporting categories in the pack. This is a possible LRA training template only; adapt it and check the official source before sign-off.
Weak request
"Please send the GRI 2-7 employee breakdown by gender and region, including permanent, temporary, non-guaranteed hours, full-time and part-time employees, plus methodology and contextual information."
Why it fails: It uses framework language first, which is hard to action internally, and bundles many labels without telling the owner what their own source terms should be — making extraction and mapping slower and more error-prone.
Better request
"Please send the workforce headcount file for [period] for [boundary]. Include the total workforce and the splits your team already tracks for permanent, fixed-term, casual/zero-hours, full-time and part-time staff, each by gender and region. Also include the counting basis, whether the figures are taken at period end or averaged, the source system, and a short note on any major changes or unusual movements."
Hi [name], for our sustainability report we need the workforce headcount for [period] covering [boundary]. Please include the total plus the splits you already track — permanent, fixed-term, casual/zero-hours, full-time and part-time — each by gender and region. Also note the counting basis (headcount or FTE), whether figures are period-end or averaged, the source system, and any major movements. Happy to jump on a quick call.
Hi [name] — could you pull the [period] headcount for [boundary]? Total + permanent / fixed-term / casual / full-time / part-time, each by gender & region. Note if it's period-end or averaged, and flag any big changes. Thanks!
Map "colleagues" and "team members" to employees; "seasonal" and "bank / flex" to non-guaranteed hours; split by store vs. distribution-centre vs. head-office as your region/site geography.
Map "operatives", "shop-floor" and "staff" to employees; agency line workers usually sit outside employees — confirm before counting; split by plant/site and by shift where relevant.
The full request pack — response form, data table, evidence metadata and sign-off — is in the Download Centre.
Draft your disclosure
Four notes that turn data into a disclosure
LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.
Method note
Explain the counting basis used for each figure, including how you define an employee, how you classify contract type and region, and whether the counts reflect a point in time or another reporting basis.
Context note
Set out what the figures show about the shape of the workforce, including the overall size of the employee base and how it is distributed across gender, geography and contract arrangements.
Fluctuation statement
If any year-on-year movement is material, describe the main drivers such as hiring, exits, restructures, changes in contract mix or shifts in regional footprint, and note any definitional changes that affect comparability.
Content index entry
The line that points readers from the GRI index to where this disclosure lives in your report.
GRI 2-7 Employees — [location / page] / [notes]
Download Centre
Preparation tools & forms
Professional preparation tools for GRI 2-7 — free with an LRA Community membership. Register once (it's free) and every download unlocks, together with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant. Each file includes a concise "How to use" guide.
The information reconciles to the underlying source records.What is reported cannot be traced back to the systems or documents it was drawn from, or does not tie out to them.calculation_workbook reconciling the reported value to source_system_export
The information is current as at the reporting date.The disclosure reflects a different period, a cut-off before the reporting date, or stale data carried over from a prior period.approval_record showing the data cut-off date and the period covered
The scope behind the information is applied consistently.Parts of the organisation are silently in or out of scope, or the scope differs from the prior period without that change being explained.methodology defining the scope and a site_register of what it covers
Everything in scope is included — nothing material is left out.Parts of the population that should be reported are omitted, understating or overstating the disclosure.site_register of the full population vs the calculation_workbook of what was actually included
Evidence pack to prepare
Common reporting gaps
The information is presented without a date or as-at point.The scope or boundary of the statement is left undefined.Key terms are used inconsistently across the report.Material changes since the previous period are not disclosed.Assertions are made without supporting detail or a source record.Boilerplate is used that does not actually answer what is asked.
Common gaps
Mistakes to avoid when collecting the data
Wrong data owner
People teams sometimes ask the wrong manager for the figures, so the source sits in payroll, HR systems, or local country records and never gets reconciled.
Framework terms instead of business terms
The request is sent using disclosure language rather than the organisation's own job and contract labels, which leads the data owner to pull the wrong population.
Scope not fixed up front
No one agrees which legal entities, countries, or worker groups are in scope, so the final extract mixes covered staff with people who should sit outside it.
Counting basis switched mid-table
Headcount is used for some groups and FTE for others, so the totals and splits no longer reconcile to one another.
Regions mapped inconsistently
Different teams use different regional groupings, so the same person can fall into two buckets or none.
Gender categories not aligned
Source systems and the report use different gender categories, so the splits don't add back to the total.
Contractors quietly included
Agency or contractor headcount is folded into employees without being flagged, overstating the population.
No prior-period basis
This year's method differs from last year's with no note, so the comparison is misleading.
Explain whether headcount includes businesses added or removed during the period, and state the cut-off date or averaging basis used so readers can see which people sit inside the reported population.
Choose one people-counting basis and stick to it
If you use direct person counts, full-time equivalent, or another internal method, say which one you used and keep the same basis across the totals and the splits by gender and region.
Decide how to treat workers near the employment line
State whether agency staff, contractors, interns, or other borderline workers are included or left out, and apply the same rule consistently across all employee categories.
Set the full-time / part-time threshold
Decide the hours cut-off between full-time and part-time and apply it the same way everywhere.
People holding multiple contracts
Decide whether someone with two contracts is counted once or twice, and be consistent.
Long-term absence
State whether people on long leave (parental, sick, sabbatical) are in the headcount.
Joiners and leavers near the cut-off
Set a clear rule for people who joined or left right around the reporting date.
Undisclosed or non-binary gender
Decide how to present employees who don't fall into the main gender categories, without losing them from the total.
Synthetic, written by LRA — not from a company report, not text from any standard.
Food manufacturing · Synthetic · Written by LRA
Illustrative workforce profile (people)
CategoryWomenMenTotal
All staff420380800
Permanent staff300260560
Temporary staff8070150
Non-guaranteed hours staff405090
Full-time staff260300560
A synthetic workforce snapshot for the year-end date, split by contract type and gender. Figures are illustrative only and internally consistent across the different views.
Retail distribution · Synthetic · Written by LRA
Illustrative workforce profile (people)
CategoryEuropeAmericasAsia-PacificTotal
All staff260180160600
Permanent staff200120100420
Temporary staff40302090
Non-guaranteed hours staff20304090
Full-time staff180120100400
The same workforce at the reporting date, presented by region. A practical disclosure can combine one overall headcount with several breakdowns, provided each subset sits within the relevant total and the figures reconcile cleanly.
Draft output & visualisation ideas
How to turn the collected data into a draft disclosure. The charts below are drawn from the illustrative figures above — swap in your own data.
Food manufacturing — workforce by gender
All staff
800
Permanent
560
Temporary
150
Non-guaranteed hrs
90
Full-time
560
WomenMen
Retail distribution — workforce by region
All staff
600
Permanent
420
Temporary
90
Non-guaranteed hrs
90
Full-time
400
EuropeAmericasAsia-Pacific
Other views you could build
Table
Workforce size by employment type — headcount across the four contract groups, with totals.
Stacked bar
Gender mix across the workforce, for the whole population and each contract group.
Map
Where employees are based — the spread across regions, overall and by category.
Bar
Permanent, temporary and flexible-hours roles — relative size of each contract type.
Donut
Full-time workforce profile — share of full-time staff, with a gender split.
From a number to a disclosure
What separates a figure from a disclosure
The same headcount, told with progressively more of what a reader needs.
Basic
We had 1,240 people on the payroll.
Better
We had 1,240 people on the payroll, split into 680 women and 560 men, with 900 in Europe and 340 in the rest of the world.
Best
We counted 1,240 people on the payroll at year-end using a headcount basis, split into 680 women and 560 men, with 900 in Europe and 340 elsewhere; the total rose by 80 because we opened a new site and filled roles for it.
Real reports where this topic is disclosed. The confidence label shows how closely each match maps to GRI 2-7 — these are report practice, not exact disclosure examples.
Tanla Platforms Limited’s Integrated Report FY25 provides coverage of employee welfare programs, noting communication channels such as email advisories, newspapers, websites, stock exchange intimations, and in-person meetings on page 216. The report also details programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance, referencing GRI 404-2 on page 378, and mentions specific training initiatives including AI/ML training for 269 employees and participation across behavioral and functional training categories (pages 66-67). However, the report does not clearly specify the extent or impact of these welfare programs beyond communication methods, nor does it provide detailed outcomes related to employee transition assistance.
Evidence-based summary of this company's own report — not a disclosure template to copy, and not a compliance verdict.
Datapoint coverage
Skills upgrade supportcoveredp.216
Career transition supportcoveredp.378
Source trail
p.216“Employee welfare programs
Investors
No
• Email advisories, newspaper,
website,
• Intimation to stock
exchanges
• In-person meetings
• Quarterly”
p.41“Employee welfare
programs
5
Investors
No
Email advisories, newspaper,
website,Intimation to stock
exchanges In-person meetings”
p.67“Employee Development Programs
• AI/ML Training - 269 employees underwent specialized training in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning,
rein…”
p.66“Employee Participation Across Training Programs – by
Training Category
Type of Training
FY24
FY25
Behavioral
157
156
Functional”
p.228“e order in intellectual property related disputes wherein usage of traditional knowledge is involved. Not applicable 6. Details of beneficiaries of…”
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.'s 2024 CSR Report provides information on employee skill development programs, including non-mandatory trainings aimed at improving employee skills (p.253) and talent cultivation initiatives detailed under "6.2 Talent Cultivation and Development ASEH" (p.263). The report mentions various training formats such as new employee training, management academy courses, and self-paced online learning (p.180), as well as specific efforts to enhance knowledge transfer and cross-departmental collaboration (p.182). However, the report does not clearly specify transition assistance programs or detailed metrics on training outcomes, leaving some aspects of employee development unclear. p.262 · p.263 · p.167
Firstsource Solutions Limited
Professional Services · India · 2025 · Assurance BSI
Firstsource Solutions Limited's ESG Report FY 2024-25 includes coverage of operational improvements such as SOP navigation, next-best actions, autonomous execution, and an end-to-end claims adjudication system with traceability, as noted on page 33. The report also details employee-related initiatives including retention, talent acquisition, apprenticeships, career mobility programs like FirstLeap and THRIVE, and transition assistance, with information found on pages 96-104 and 128-129. However, while some environmental targets for energy and emissions reduction are mentioned on page 195, the report indicates emissions continue to rise, and the overall progress or impact of these initiatives is not fully clear. p.102 · p.103 · p.128
✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop
Ask Study Studio AI assistant about this disclosure
Get a practical answer for your reporting context. Your first answer is free — create a free account to continue the conversation.
TryHow do I prepare GRI 2-7?What data do I need to collect?Where can I see a real-report example?What mistakes should I avoid?
1 free answer
Check your understanding
Four scenarios to work through
A group HR team has payroll data for 31 December, but one overseas branch only closes its headcount file two weeks later. The draft note currently shows only the year-end total and does not split the workforce by contract type or location.
QWhat should the preparer do before sign-off so the disclosure is complete and understandable?
State the cut-off and how the late-closing branch is handled (period-end position or estimate), then add the required contract-type and location splits so the total is broken down consistently across the whole population.
A company uses a mix of payroll records and local HR spreadsheets. For some countries it counts people at period-end, while for others it uses an average over the year, and the draft currently gives no explanation of that difference.
QHow should the preparer handle the methodology note?
Disclose that mixed bases are used, name which countries use period-end vs. average, and explain why — ideally moving to one basis, or clearly flagging the inconsistency so the figures aren't compared as if identical.
A business has 420 people on permanent contracts, 85 on fixed-term arrangements, 30 on variable-hours arrangements, 210 full-time staff and 325 part-time staff. The draft report gives the totals, but only the permanent group is split by gender and region.
The other contract groups also need the same breakdowns where the spine asks for them: temporary, variable-hours, full-time and part-time staff each need their own totals, plus gender and region splits — not undifferentiated totals.
Why this matters · Apply the same level of detail across every workforce category named in the disclosure.
During the year, a company closed one site, opened another, and transferred staff between countries. The headcount moved from 1,050 at the start of the year to 920 at year-end, but the draft only shows the end figure and says nothing about the swing.
QWhat should the preparer add to help a reader understand the movement in staff numbers?
Add a fluctuation statement: give the opening and closing headcount and explain the drivers — the site closure, the new site and the cross-border transfers — plus any change in counting basis, so the −130 movement is understandable.
Framework references
Related framework references
How this disclosure maps across the major reporting frameworks.
Fix the reporting boundary, collect the total workforce and the required splits (contract type, gender, region), record your counting basis, then draft the method, context and fluctuation notes and reconcile everything to source before sign-off.
Total employees plus splits by gender and region, and by permanent, temporary, non-guaranteed-hours, full-time and part-time — each on a consistent basis — with a methodology note and any material fluctuations.
Use the same boundary as the rest of the report: decide which legal entities, countries and worker groups are in scope, and keep that scope identical across every total, split and commentary.
Pick one basis and disclose it. Headcount and FTE both work; state whether figures are taken at period-end or averaged, and apply the same choice to the totals and every split.
Define each category in your own records first, map your terms to the reporting categories, and split every group by gender and region using one consistent rule set so subsets reconcile to their totals.
Join for free and get access to the LRA Disclosure Library across GRI, ESRS, IFRS S1 & S2 and many other standards, practical reporting tools and templates, and the specialised LRA AI Assistant — one of the most advanced AI tools built specifically for sustainability and ESG reporting.
Your preparation tools are free for LRA Community members and students. Register once (it's free) and your download starts right away — plus the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.
✓
You're in — your download is starting
Your file is downloading now. Your Community Cabinet — with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant — is ready too.