مكتبة الإفصاحاتإرشادات عملية لكل إفصاح في التقارير

ESRS S1: Own Workforce·Disclosure Requirement S1-16

Human Rights Incidents

Q: For S1-16, what data points do I need to collect before I start drafting the disclosure?

The page says to prepare four datapoints: incident count, HR case count, penalty amount and compensation amount. Use those as the starting checklist before you draft anything.

Q: How do I use the step-by-step 'how to prepare' section for S1-16 in practice?

Use it as a working sequence for getting the disclosure ready, rather than as a final answer. It is there to help you organise scope, data collection, evidence and drafting in a practical order.

Q: What should I include in the evidence pack for S1-16 assurance readiness?

The page includes an evidence pack with five items to support assurance readiness. Use it alongside the assurance claims so you can show where the numbers came from and how they were checked.

Q: What are the six assurance claims on the S1-16 page and how should I use them?

The page provides six claims with related risks and evidence prompts. Treat them as a checklist for testing whether the disclosure is supported, rather than as a substitute for your own controls and records.

Q: What are the common reporting gaps or mistakes for S1-16 that I should avoid?

The page lists common gaps and mistakes to help you spot weak points before submission. Use that section to check whether your scope, data and evidence are consistent and complete.

Q: How can I turn the S1-16 data into a draft disclosure?

The page has a draft-output section with visualisation ideas, narrative starters and a content-index line. Use those to turn the prepared data into a first draft that is easier to review and assurance-test.

Q: How should I use the synthetic illustrative example disclosure for S1-16?

The example is there to show what a worked-up disclosure can look like, including a quantitative table. It is synthetic, so use it for structure and presentation only, not as a real reporting benchmark.

Q: What is in the S1-16 Prep & Assurance workbook and when should I use it?

The Download Centre includes a Prep & Assurance workbook in .xlsx format. Use it to organise the preparation work, track the assurance checks and keep the disclosure build in one place.

Q: What is the printable Library Card for S1-16 and how is it different from the workbook?

The Download Centre also includes a printable Library Card in .pdf format. The page presents it as a companion resource, so it is useful for quick reference while the workbook is better for active preparation.

Q: Does the S1-16 page show real company report examples I can use as references?

Yes. The page includes a 'From company reports' table that links to real published reports at the pages where the topic is disclosed, which can help you see how others present similar information.

إرشادات عملية لإعداد هذا الإفصاح. استخدم هذه البطاقة لتحديد المعلومات المطلوب إعدادها والتحقق من الادعاءات وتنظيم الأدلة الداعمة. وللاطلاع على المتطلبات الدقيقة، ارجع دائمًا إلى المصدر الرسمي لـ European Commission.

افتح المصدر الرسمي لـ European Commission قارن تقارير حقيقية ← ↗ مشاركة

بطاقة النشر

المراجعة قيد الانتظار

··· قيد المراجعة المراجعة التحريرية جارية أُعدّت من مواد المصادر الرسمية وأدلة التقارير المنشورة. لم يُسجَّل بعد أي معتمِد باسمه، ولذلك لا تحمل هذه الصفحة توقيع مؤلف. استخدمها إلى جانب المصدر الرسمي لـ European Commission ريثما تكتمل تلك المراجعة.

المعيار

ESRS S1: Own Workforce

Disclosure Requirement S1-16 · 2026-5010-final

ساري اعتبارًا من

2027-01-01

المصدر الرسمي: فتح ↗

آخر مراجعة

—

مواد تعليمية من LRA · لم تصدرها أو تعتمدها European Commission

لإعداد هذا الإفصاح

4حقول للإعداد 6ادعاءات للتحقق 5مجالات الأدلة 3أمثلة من التقارير

جوهر الإفصاح

This disclosure asks an organisation to explain how it identifies, tracks and responds to human rights incidents involving its own workforce. In practice, the report should describe the types of incidents it considers, how it records them, and what it does when issues are found, including any follow-up, remediation or escalation. The emphasis is on giving a clear picture of the organisation’s approach rather than listing isolated events without context.

The practical focus is on coverage across the whole workforce and all relevant operations, not just a few well-controlled sites or headline cases. An organisation should be able to show whether its reporting and response processes apply consistently across locations, business units and worker groups, and whether there are any gaps in coverage. The aim is to help readers understand how complete and reliable the organisation’s incident reporting is in practice.

تدعم هذه المواد التعليمية من LRA إعداد الإفصاح. وللاطلاع على المتطلبات الدقيقة، ارجع دائمًا إلى المصدر الرسمي لـ European Commission.

قبل أن تبدأ

قائمة تحقق موجزة قبل إعداد هذا الإفصاح — ضع علامة أمام كل بند بمجرد الانتهاء منه.

Have you fixed the scope: are you counting only human-rights-related incidents, or every incident in the period, and do you need both figures kept separate? Have you agreed the time basis for the numbers: which reporting period they come from, and whether you are using incident date, case closure date, or another internal cut-off? Can each figure be traced back to a source record, so the incident totals, any penalties, and any compensation amounts all reconcile to underlying files or registers? Have you settled the definitions your team will use for a human-rights incident, so the same rule is applied consistently across the count? Have you checked whether any amounts are to be shown in euros and whether they cover only sums linked to these incidents, with no double counting across categories?

الإعداد

المعلومات الأساسية المطلوب إعدادها

حقل الإعداد	ما يجب تسجيله	إشارة إلى الدليل	الجهة المسؤولة
Incident count	Record the number of incidents covered by this disclosure for the reporting period, using one consistent counting basis and the same cut-off date across the source records.	Incident log, case register, or incident tracker; reconcile the final count to the period-end extract used for reporting.	Risk / Compliance
HR case count	Capture the number of people-related incidents included in the period, keeping the definition of an HR case consistent with the source system and the reporting cut-off.	HR case management system, employee relations log, or grievance/disciplinary tracker; tie the reported figure back to the period extract.	Human Resources
Penalty amount	Capture the total monetary penalties linked to the relevant incidents for the period, in euros, using the same scope and period as the incident count.	Finance ledger, legal case file, or compliance penalty schedule; reconcile the amount to the booked or approved penalty records.	Finance / Legal
Compensation amount	Capture the total compensation paid or recognised for the relevant incidents in the period, in euros, using the same incident set and reporting cut-off as the other figures.	Claims file, finance ledger, or settlement schedule; check the total against the compensation records used for reporting.	Finance / Legal

＋ إظهار العناصر الفرعية لـ S1-16 (قائمة عمل LRA)

كيفية إعداده

Set the reporting boundary first: decide which workforce-related incidents fall inside the period and organisation scope you are using for this disclosure, so the same boundary is applied to every figure you report.

Agree the counting rules before you start collecting data: define what you will treat as an incident, what you will treat as a human-rights-related incident, and how you will separate those two counts from each other.

Gather the source records that support each number: incident logs, case files, finance records, and any other internal evidence needed to back the incident totals, the human-rights incident total, and the monetary amounts.

Compile the reported outputs in the required form: provide the two incident counts and the two euro amounts for penalties and compensation, using a clear and consistent method so the figures can be traced back to the underlying records.

Explain any exclusions, restatements, or changes in method: if a case is left out, reclassified, or counted differently from a prior period, record the reason and the effect on the reported numbers.

Check the draft against the official source before sign-off: confirm that the scope, definitions, counts, and monetary figures match the underlying evidence and that nothing required by the disclosure has been missed or added.

اطلب البيانات

Request the incident log and case outcomes

حوّل الإفصاح إلى سؤال عمل داخلي، ثم كيّفه بما يتوافق مع مصطلحات مؤسستك.

What human-rights-related incidents were recorded in the period, and what amounts were paid or imposed as a result?

Use your organisation’s own case, grievance, conduct, complaints, or incident terms first, then map them to the disclosure wording when you prepare the reporting pack. Keep the request in the language the owner already uses internally, and check the source material before sign-off.

طلب ضعيف

Please provide all human rights incidents and related fines and compensation for the period.

لماذا يفشل: It uses framework language that many teams do not use day to day, so the owner may not know which register, case type, or payment fields to pull. It also leaves out the boundary, counting approach, and source system, which makes the extract hard to verify.

طلب أفضل

Please pull the [reporting period] extract from your [case log / grievance register / conduct tracker] for the records you would normally treat as [your internal case categories]. For each record, include the case reference, dates, status, internal label, and any amounts paid or imposed, split between [your terms for sanctions] and [your terms for compensation]. Please also note the source system, the counting rule used, and any exclusions.

نموذج بريد إلكتروني رسمي

Subject: Request for incident and case data for [reporting period]

Dear [name/team],

Please could you provide the incident and case data for [reporting period] for the entities in [reporting boundary]. We need the records from your [system/register name] covering the cases you would normally classify as [your internal category terms].

For each record, please include the case reference, date recorded, date closed if applicable, current status, internal category, brief description, and any amounts paid or imposed, split between [your organisation’s terms for fines/sanctions] and [your organisation’s terms for compensation/settlement]. If you use a different counting approach for linked records or multiple affected people, please note that clearly.

Please also include the source system name, the person who prepared the extract, and any assumptions or exclusions.

Could you send this by [date]? Please adapt this to your organisation’s own terms and check the source material before sign-off.

Many thanks,
[Name]
[Role]

نسخة مختصرة لـ Teams / Slack

Hi [name/team] — could you send the [reporting period] extract from your [system/register] for the cases you’d normally tag as [internal category terms]? Please include case ref, dates, status, category, and any amounts paid or imposed, split between [your terms for fines/sanctions] and [your terms for compensation/settlement]. Also note the counting approach, source system, and any exclusions. Thanks — [name]

أمثلة قطاعية

Retail and consumer services

السياق. The business tracks customer-facing and worker complaints in a central case tool, with separate fields for conduct issues and settlement payments.

الطلب المُكيَّف. Please send the [reporting period] extract from the case tool for records tagged as [conduct issue / grievance / rights complaint]. Include case ref, date opened, date closed, status, internal label, and any amounts paid or imposed, split between [penalties] and [settlements].

مثال على الرد. Prepared by: Case Management Lead; Source system: Central case tool; Period: 1 Jan 2025 to 31 Dec 2025; Boundary: Group entities A, B and C; Records: 14 cases; Amount imposed as fine or sanction: €12,000; Amount paid as compensation or settlement: €48,500; Notes: 3 linked records counted as 1 matter under the team’s normal practice.

Manufacturing

السياق. The business logs site-level complaints and legal matters separately, with payments tracked by Finance but linked back to the case register.

الطلب المُكيَّف. Please provide the [reporting period] list from the site complaint register and legal matter log for cases you would classify as [worker complaint / site grievance / rights allegation]. Include the case ID, site, status, internal category, and any fine, settlement, or compensation amounts linked to the matter.

مثال على الرد. Prepared by: Legal Operations; Source system: Site grievance log and legal matter register; Period: FY2025; Boundary: All owned sites in scope; Records: 9 matters; Amount imposed as fine or sanction: €0; Amount paid as compensation or settlement: €31,200; Notes: One matter had two payments, both linked to the same case ID.

صُغ إفصاحك

ملاحظات تحوّل البيانات إلى إفصاح

نماذج تدريبية من LRA — كيّفها بما يناسب مؤسستك وتحقّق من المصدر الرسمي قبل الاعتماد.

ملاحظة منهجية

State how the organisation defined each incident measure, how it identified the work-related subset, and the basis used to total any penalties and compensation amounts.

ملاحظة سياقية

Explain what the counts and amounts indicate about the scale of incidents and their financial consequences during the reporting period.

بيان التقلبات

If any figure moved materially, note the main operational, legal, or reporting reasons that drove the change and whether it reflects a one-off event or a broader shift.

مُدخل في فهرس المحتوى

S1-16 Human Rights Incidents — [location / page] / [notes]

مركز التنزيلات

أدوات ونماذج الإعداد

أدوات إعداد احترافية لـ S1-16 — مجانًا مع عضوية LRA Community. سجّل مرة واحدة (مجانًا) لتُفتح جميع التنزيلات، إلى جانب مكتبة الإفصاحات والنماذج ومساعد LRA الذكي.

مجانًا · لأعضاء المجتمع

01XLSملف عمل الإعداد والتحققنقاط البيانات والمخاطر والأدلة الواجب فحصها والجهة المسؤولة وحزمة الأدلة.احصل عليه مجانًا ↧ 02XLSحزمة طلب البياناتبريد الطلب ونموذج الرسالة وحقول الرد وهيكل الاعتماد.احصل عليه مجانًا ↧ 03PDFبطاقة المكتبةملخص من صفحة واحدة قابل للطباعة لبطاقة الإفصاح هذه.احصل عليه مجانًا ↧

الجاهزية للتحقق

لكل ادعاء، تحقّق من الأدلة

الادعاء	المخاطر	الأدلة الواجب فحصها
I have linked the incident figures to the related follow-up actions or remedies, so a reviewer can trace each case from the disclosed numbers to the response recorded elsewhere in the report.	An assurer will check that the cross-reference is real, complete and points to the right follow-up information. They may test whether the incidents counted here are the same ones discussed in the separate actions/remedies section, and whether anything material has been left out or linked to the wrong place.	Cross-reference map or disclosure index; incident log with case IDs; the separate actions/remedies disclosure; internal review notes showing how the link was made; sign-off pack confirming the referenced information matches the incident set.
I have pointed readers from the incident discussion to the section on concern-raising routes, so the report shows where people could raise issues connected with those cases.	An assurer will probe whether the link to the concern-raising information is accurate and whether the report actually connects the relevant incidents to the right channel information. They may also check that the route described is the one used for the disclosed cases, not a generic or outdated process.	Published report cross-reference; whistleblowing/grievance or speak-up channel description; case files showing how concerns were raised; internal mapping note linking the incidents to the channel information; approval evidence for the final wording.
I have included the monetary amounts recognised in the accounts for penalties, fines and compensation tied to those incidents during the period, using the figures that were booked in the financial records.	An assurer will test whether the amounts are actually recognised in the financial statements, whether they relate to the right incident set, and whether the totals are complete and correctly classified. They may also check that the period cut-off and currency treatment are consistent with the accounts.	General ledger extracts; journal entries; supporting legal/accounting papers; financial statement note or trial balance tie-out; reconciliation showing the disclosed amount agrees to the recognised accounting figure; evidence of review by finance and legal teams.
I have set out the method used to build the incident dataset, including how cases were gathered, screened and counted before publication.	An assurer will look for a clear, repeatable method and may challenge whether the approach was applied consistently across the full population. They will test whether the method explains the source systems, inclusion/exclusion choices, verification steps and any judgement used in compiling the figures.	Written methodology or reporting protocol; data flow diagram; source-system extracts; counting rules; exception log; version-controlled working papers; evidence of management review and approval of the method used.
I have reported the number of confirmed discrimination cases at work that were identified in the period, based on the cases that met our verification threshold.	An assurer will check whether the count is complete, whether only confirmed cases were included, and whether the verification threshold was applied consistently. They may also test whether the period boundary, duplicate handling and classification of cases were correct.	Case register; investigation outcomes; verification criteria; count reconciliation to source records; duplicate check; period-end cut-off review; evidence that the final number was reviewed and approved.
I have reported the number of confirmed human-rights-related cases involving our own workforce, excluding the discrimination cases already counted separately, using the same reporting period and validation process.	An assurer will test whether the non-discrimination cases are genuinely separate from the discrimination count, whether the workforce link is correct, and whether the count is complete and verified. They may also check for double counting, misclassification or overlap between categories.	Incident log with category tags; workforce linkage evidence; exclusion list showing discrimination cases removed from this count; investigation files; reconciliation between category totals; review notes confirming no overlap and consistent validation.

حزمة الأدلة المطلوب إعدادها

The governing policy or written commitment behind this disclosureA methodology / definition note setting out how the disclosure was scoped and preparedSource-system exports the figures or facts were drawn fromThe internal approval / sign-off record for the disclosure before publicationMinutes or records evidencing the relevant engagement or consultation

الثغرات الشائعة في التقارير

The information is presented without a date or as-at point.

The scope or boundary of the statement is left undefined.

Key terms are used inconsistently across the report.

Material changes since the previous period are not disclosed.

Assertions are made without supporting detail or a source record.

Boilerplate is used that does not actually answer what is asked.

الثغرات الشائعة

أخطاء يجب تجنبها عند جمع البيانات

Wrong ownerAsking the policy team or legal team for the figures, instead of the case-handling owner who tracks incidents in day-to-day operations, leads to incomplete or delayed data.

Framework language onlyRequesting the numbers using disclosure labels rather than the organisation’s own case, complaint, or incident terms means the right records may never be pulled together.

No clear scopeFailing to state which parts of the business, sites, or worker groups are in scope causes teams to mix in records that should have been left out.

＋ عرض 6 عناصر إضافية

حيث يلزم غالبًا الحكم المهني

Set the cut-off for counting events that span a reporting dateChoose one clear rule for whether an incident is counted when it starts, when it is confirmed, or when it is closed, then use that same timing consistently and explain it in your note.

Decide how to treat a business bought or sold during the yearState whether you include events and amounts from the acquired or disposed operation for the part of the year it was under your control, and describe any boundary change so readers can see why the year-on-year figure moved.

Handle local legal labels and internal case types with one mapping ruleIf different countries or sites use different labels for the same kind of event, map them to one internal category set, explain the mapping, and note any cases that could not be aligned cleanly.

＋ عرض 6 عناصر إضافية

أمثلة

أمثلة توضيحية

أمثلة اصطناعية من إعداد LRA — ليست مقتبسة من تقرير شركة ولا من نص أي معيار.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — Food processing

: we report four workplace incidents in the year, of which two involved our own staff. We also show the related financial outcomes: €18,000 paid in penalties and €42,000 paid in compensation.

Illustrative only; figures are invented for training purposes and are internally consistent.

Synthetic illustration of workplace incidents and related amounts (count / €)

Category	Count
All recorded incidents	4
Incidents involving our own workers	2
Penalties paid (€)	18000
Compensation paid (€)	42000

Illustrative (synthetic) example — Logistics

: during the reporting period we recorded six workplace incidents, including three affecting our employees. The associated financial impact was €9,500 in penalties and €27,500 in compensation.

Illustrative only; figures are invented for training purposes and are internally consistent.

Synthetic illustration of workplace incidents and related amounts (count / €)

Category	Count
All recorded incidents	6
Incidents involving our own workers	3
Penalties paid (€)	9500
Compensation paid (€)	27500

تقارير الشركات

كيف تُفصح الشركات عن S1-16 عمليًا

أمثلة على ممارسات إفصاح كاملة وجزئية. هذه تحليلات قائمة على الأدلة، وليست نماذج جاهزة للنسخ.

تقارير منشورة حقيقية

Indra Sistemas, S.A.

Software and Services · Spain · 2025

افتح التقرير ←

Indra Sistemas, S.A.'s Sustainability Report 2025 includes some data on incidents of corruption and bribery, noting the total number of confirmed incidents, though specific figures are not provided (p.159). The report also details accident metrics, including fatalities and accident frequency rates among its workforce over multiple years (p.125). However, there is no clear or quotable narrative evidence found in the report regarding the company’s human rights policies or due diligence strategies, despite brief mentions of rights identification and due diligence strategy for customers (p.98, p.235).

Continental AG

Tires · Germany · 2025

افتح التقرير ←

Continental AG's 2025 Annual Report provides data on fines, penalties, and compensation related to human rights incidents, indicating zero amounts paid and zero known incidents on page 182. The report also mentions figures related to human rights matters excluding discrimination, with values of 56 and 139, though the context is unclear (p.182). Additionally, the report states that fines, penalties, and compensation paid during the reporting year are included and related expenses as defined by ESRS are reported (p.197). However, no further narrative or detailed explanation on these disclosures is found in the report.

Prysmian S.p.A.

Electrical Equipment and Machinery · Italy · 2025

افتح التقرير ←

Prysmian S.p.A.'s 2025 Integrated Annual Report provides data on human rights incidents, reporting no severe cases in FY24 and detailing 104 incidents overall, with no fines, penalties, or compensation paid related to these incidents (p.202). The report partially addresses diversity, equity, inclusion, and wellbeing through a mention of the HR and Group DE&I and Wellbeing VP, but lacks headline values or comprehensive metrics in this area (p.267). There is no clear evidence on other specific human rights disclosures or detailed complaint investigations beyond internal handling, leaving some aspects of the disclosure unclear or not found in the report.

قارن جنبًا إلى جنب ←

✓ مساعد LRA الذكي · بإشراف بشري

اسأل مساعد Study Studio الذكي عن هذا الإفصاح

احصل على إجابات عملية تناسب سياق تقاريرك. أول إجابتين مجانيتان — انضم إلى LRA Community مجانًا للمتابعة بلا حدود.

جرّب كيف أُعِدّ S1-16؟ ما البيانات التي يلزم جمعها؟ أين أجد مثالًا من تقرير حقيقي؟ ما الأخطاء التي ينبغي تجنبها؟

إجابتان مجانيتان

اختبر فهمك

سيناريوهات للتمرّن

During the year, the group logged 7 incidents in its grievance and case-tracking system. After review, 3 of those were confirmed as human-rights related, and the rest were health-and-safety, conduct, or payroll matters.

سHow should the preparer separate the incident totals for the disclosure, and what should be kept distinct from the human-rights subset?

أظهر الإجابة النموذجية ←

A supplier complaint led to a settlement payment of €120,000 and a regulator later imposed a €30,000 penalty. Internal records show both amounts relate to the same human-rights matter.

سShould the preparer combine the two amounts into one figure, or present them separately for the disclosure?

أظهر الإجابة النموذجية ←

The legal team says one case involved a labour-rights breach, but the operations team argues it was only a contract dispute because the worker was later rehired. The incident file contains witness notes, a settlement agreement, and an internal investigation summary.

سWhat should the preparer do before deciding whether this case belongs in the human-rights count?

أظهر الإجابة النموذجية ←

At year-end, the company has 5 open cases and 2 closed cases that were confirmed as human-rights related. Finance has already booked €18,000 of compensation for one closed case, while a regulator has not yet decided whether any penalty will be issued.

سWhat should the preparer include in the disclosure when some matters are still unresolved?

أظهر الإجابة النموذجية ←

مراجع الإطار

متطلبات ESRS ذات الصلة والإفصاحات المرتبطة

المراجع المتاحة للإطار والإفصاحات القريبة ذات الصلة بإعداد هذا المتطلب.

ESRS

S1-16

ضمن ESRS S1: Own Workforce

افتح المصدر الرسمي ←

ذات صلة واستكشاف

Policies (Own Workforce) → بطاقة Social Protection → بطاقة Disabilities → بطاقة Training → بطاقة Health & Safety → بطاقة تصفّح جميع الإفصاحات ←

الأسئلة الشائعة

أسئلة تجيب عنها هذه الصفحة

For S1-16, what data points do I need to collect before I start drafting the disclosure?+

How do I use the step-by-step 'how to prepare' section for S1-16 in practice?+

What should I include in the evidence pack for S1-16 assurance readiness?+

What are the six assurance claims on the S1-16 page and how should I use them?+

What are the common reporting gaps or mistakes for S1-16 that I should avoid?+

How can I turn the S1-16 data into a draft disclosure?+

How should I use the synthetic illustrative example disclosure for S1-16?+

What is in the S1-16 Prep & Assurance workbook and when should I use it?+

What is the printable Library Card for S1-16 and how is it different from the workbook?+

Does the S1-16 page show real company report examples I can use as references?+

Can I use the S1-16 page to check whether my disclosure is ready for assurance?+

أسئلة أخرى يمكن أن تساعد فيها هذه الصفحة

S1-16 own workforce disclosure: what should an HR data owner gather first?S1-16 incident count and HR case count: how do I prepare the numbers for drafting?S1-16 penalty amount and compensation amount: what evidence should support the figures?How do I use the S1-16 step-by-step preparation section with the workbook?What does the S1-16 evidence pack contain for assurance review?What are the S1-16 common reporting gaps before finalising the draft?How do I turn the S1-16 illustrative example into my own disclosure draft?Where can I find real published reports linked from the S1-16 page?What should a sustainability manager check before sending S1-16 for assurance?How do I use the S1-16 content-index line in a draft report?What is the S1-16 plain-language explainer meant to help me do?Can the S1-16 page help me build an evidence pack and draft narrative at the same time?

تعمّق أكثر · S1-16

تعلّم إعداد هذا الإفصاح من البداية إلى النهاية

This guide covers one Disclosure Requirement. The ESRS / CSRD Reporting course walks the full European workflow — double materiality, datapoints, evidence and assurance — with exercises on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

Explore the ESRS / CSRD course →

كيف بُنيت هذه المكتبة 312 تقريرًا منشورًا مفهرسًا 63171 صفحة باستشهادات على مستوى الصفحة 272 بطاقة إفصاح من إعداد ممارسين

/ar/knowledge-hub/disclosure-cards/esrs-s1-16/

مجانًا · LRA Community

احصل على أدوات S1-16 — مجانًا

أدوات الإعداد مجانية لأعضاء LRA Community وللطلاب. سجّل مرة واحدة (مجانًا) ويبدأ تنزيلك على الفور — إلى جانب مكتبة الإفصاحات والنماذج ومساعد LRA الذكي.

	التقرير أ	التقرير ب	التقرير ج
نقطة بيانات 1	✓ p.213	غير واضح	✓ p.87
نقطة بيانات 2	✓ p.214	—	✓ p.90

يرى الأعضاء خريطة التغطية الكاملة لنقاط البيانات — ✓ مع الإشارات إلى الصفحات — عبر ثلاثة تقارير حقيقية، بكلمات الشركات نفسها.

Human Rights Incidents

بطاقة النشر

قبل أن تبدأ

المعلومات الأساسية المطلوب إعدادها

كيفية إعداده

Request the incident log and case outcomes

ملاحظات تحوّل البيانات إلى إفصاح

أدوات ونماذج الإعداد

لكل ادعاء، تحقّق من الأدلة

أخطاء يجب تجنبها عند جمع البيانات

حيث يلزم غالبًا الحكم المهني

أمثلة توضيحية

كيف تُفصح الشركات عن S1-16 عمليًا

اسأل مساعد Study Studio الذكي عن هذا الإفصاح

سيناريوهات للتمرّن

متطلبات ESRS ذات الصلة والإفصاحات المرتبطة

أسئلة تجيب عنها هذه الصفحة

تعلّم إعداد هذا الإفصاح من البداية إلى النهاية

تواصل معنا