Disclosure LibraryPractitioner guidance for every reporting disclosure
Home Disclosure Library GRI GRI 401 GRI 401-1
GRI 401: Employment · 2016
Disclosure GRI 401-1

New employee hires and employee turnover 8

Practical guidance for preparing this disclosure. Use this card to identify datapoints, verify claims and organise supporting evidence. For exact requirements, always refer to the official GRI source.

Dr Ross Kurinko, GRI Certified Trainer
Reviewed by Dr Ross Kurinko · GRI Certified Trainer LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by GRI
To prepare this disclosure
Disclosure focus

This disclosure asks an organisation to report two basic workforce movements over the reporting period: how many people joined and how many people left. The point is to show the scale of hiring and turnover in a way that can be compared over time and, where relevant, across different parts of the business.

The practical focus is on the scope of coverage. An organisation should be clear whether the figures cover the whole workforce or only certain entities, countries, or sites, and it should apply the same boundary consistently. If it only reports on flagship locations or selected operations, that limitation should be obvious so readers do not assume the numbers represent the entire organisation.

This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official GRI source.

Before you start

A quick mental checklist before you prepare this disclosure — tick each as you settle it.

Preparation

Key datapoints to prepare

Datapoint What to capture Evidence hint Owner
Age bands The age categories used to split the workforce figure, with the exact band names and cut-offs applied in the report. HRIS demographic fields, reporting workbook, and the age-band definition used for the period. HR / People Analytics
Gender split The gender categories used for the workforce breakdown, using the same labels and classification basis as the source data. HRIS self-identification fields, reporting extract, and the category mapping used for the disclosure. HR / People Analytics
Geographic split The regional categories used to group the workforce, with the exact geography basis and region names applied in the report. HRIS location data, regional mapping table, and the reporting extract for the period. HR / People Analytics
New joiner count The number of people who started employment in the reporting period, counted on the same basis as the HR source and the report cut-off. HRIS joiner report, payroll starter records, and period-end reporting extract. HR / People Analytics
New joiner rate The share of the workforce represented by new starters in the reporting period, using the same numerator and denominator basis as the underlying headcount measure. Joiner count, workforce denominator used for the period, and the calculation workbook. HR / People Analytics
Leaver count The number of employees who left during the reporting period, using the same employment status rules and cut-off dates as the source records. HRIS leaver report, payroll termination records, and the period reporting extract. HR / People Analytics
Leaver rate The share of the workforce that left in the reporting period, calculated from the leaver count and the agreed workforce base for the same period. Leaver count, workforce denominator used for the period, and the calculation workbook. HR / People Analytics
+ Show GRI 401-1 sub-elements (LRA working checklist)

How to prepare it

1Set the reporting boundary first: decide which workforce population, locations and time period you will use, so the figures are built from one consistent basis.
2Define the categories you will split the data by. For this disclosure, prepare the breakdowns by age band, gender and region, and make sure those labels are applied the same way across all figures.
3Pull together the source records that support the counts. Use the underlying HR or payroll evidence that shows new joiners and leavers during the period, together with the details needed for each breakdown.
4Calculate and present both the headcounts and the rates for new hires and turnover. Keep the totals and the percentages aligned to the same reporting period and the same workforce scope.
5Record any exclusions, adjustments or changes in method. If you have excluded any part of the workforce or changed how you classify the data, note that clearly so the reported numbers can be traced and understood.
6Check the final disclosure against the official source before sign-off. Confirm that every required data point is covered, the wording of the categories matches your chosen definitions, and the evidence file supports the published figures.
Request the data

Request the joiners and leavers data

Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.

How many people joined and left during the period, and how do those movements break down by age band, gender and region?

Use your organisation’s own people-data terms first, then map them to the reporting labels. For example, ask for joiners/leavers, starters/exits or headcount movements if that is how the data is held internally. Adapt the wording to your HRIS, payroll or workforce reporting setup, and check the source used before sign-off.

Weak request

Please provide the GRI 401-1 data for the year, including the required breakdowns and rates.

Why it fails: It uses framework language instead of the organisation’s own people-data terms, so the owner has to translate the ask before they can respond. It also leaves out the source system, population boundary, internal category labels and the basis for the rates, which makes the extract harder to validate.

Better request

Please send the joiner and leaver extract for [reporting period] for [entity], using the age bands, gender groups and regions from your HRIS or workforce report. Include the totals, the percentages, the definitions used, any exclusions and the final-check contact.

Formal email template
Subject: Request for joiner and leaver data for [reporting period]

Hi [name],

Could you please share the workforce movement data for [reporting period] for [entity / population boundary]?

We need the figures split by the age bands, gender categories and regions used in your system, together with:
- total number of people who joined during the period
- joiner rate for the period
- total number of people who left during the period
- leaver rate for the period

Please also include:
- the source system or report used
- the definitions applied for joiners and leavers
- the grouping labels used for age, gender and region
- any exclusions, adjustments or known data issues
- the person who can confirm the extract is final

A possible LRA training template is attached below for ease of response. Please adapt this to your organisation’s own terms and check the source before sign-off.

Thanks,
[preparer name]
Short Teams / Slack version
Hi [name] — could you send the [reporting period] joiner/leaver extract for [entity]? Please include the age bands, gender groups and regions you use internally, plus the totals and rates for people who joined and left. Also share the source report, definitions, any exclusions and who can confirm it’s final. Please adapt to your own terms and check the source before sign-off. Thanks.
Industry examples
Retail

Context. Store and distribution workforce across multiple regions

Adapted request. Please share the store and warehouse joiner/leaver report for [reporting period] for [entity], split by the age bands, gender groups and regions used in the people dashboard. Include the total starters, starter rate, total exits and exit rate, plus the source report, definitions and any exclusions.

Example response. Extract from the workforce dashboard covering all employees in scope, with age bands, gender categories and region labels as held in the system; totals and rates for starters and exits; notes confirming that internal transfers were excluded; and the HR reporting lead as the sign-off contact.

Manufacturing

Context. Plant workforce with site-based reporting and shift patterns

Adapted request. Please send the site workforce movement file for [reporting period] for [entity], using the age groups, gender categories and site regions already used in your monthly people pack. Include joiners, leavers, the related rates, the source report and any rules used to exclude temporary records or internal moves.

Example response. CSV export from the plant people report showing age group, gender and site region; joiner and leaver counts and percentages; a note that agency workers were excluded; and confirmation from the HR operations lead that the file is final.

Draft your disclosure

Notes that turn data into a disclosure

LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.

Method note

State how you defined a new starter and a leaver for this report, and explain the basis used to count and rate them across the period.

Context note

Use the figures to show the scale of workforce inflow and outflow, and to indicate whether the organisation is expanding, stable, or seeing more exits than entries.

Fluctuation statement

If the numbers moved materially, point to the main operational drivers, such as recruitment activity, restructuring, seasonal demand, or local labour-market conditions.

Content index entry
GRI 401-1 New employee hires and employee turnover 8 — [location / page] / [notes]
Download Centre

Preparation tools & forms

Professional preparation tools for GRI 401-1 — free with an LRA Community membership. Register once (it's free) and every download unlocks, together with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.

Free · Community members
Assurance readiness

For each claim, check the evidence

ClaimRiskEvidence to check
I prepared the coverage figure using the age bands we apply in our HR system, and I checked that the grouping was consistent across the full population included in the calculation.The assurer may probe whether the age bands were applied consistently, whether any employees were left out, and whether the grouping could be reproduced from source records.HR extract showing employee ages or age bands; the calculation file; a note of the age-band definitions used; reconciliation to the headcount population included in the figure.
I built the figure from the workforce records we hold for sex or gender, and I verified that the same classification was used throughout the reporting population.The assurer may probe whether the classification basis was stable, whether any records were missing or duplicated, and whether the reported split matches the underlying data.HR master data extract; data dictionary or field definition for the classification used; calculation workbook; exception log for missing or corrected records.
I compiled the location split from the worksite or country information in our employee records, and I checked that the geographic grouping matched the way we manage the disclosed workforce.The assurer may probe whether the regional grouping was defined before calculation, whether employees were assigned to the correct location, and whether cross-border cases were handled consistently.Employee location extract; mapping of sites or countries to the reported regions; calculation file; evidence of review for employees with multiple or changing locations.
I counted the people who joined during the period from the payroll and onboarding records, and I reconciled the total to the source systems before publication.The assurer may probe whether the joiner count includes only the intended population, whether duplicates or reversals were removed, and whether the total agrees with the underlying records.Joiner report from HR or payroll; onboarding list; reconciliation to the final count; review sign-off showing the total was checked before release.
I calculated the joiner rate from the same underlying count and the agreed workforce base, and I checked the arithmetic before the figure went into the report.The assurer may probe whether the denominator was the correct base, whether the formula was applied correctly, and whether the rate can be recalculated from the evidence held.Calculation workbook with formulae; source count for joiners; agreed base population used in the rate; reviewer check or sign-off on the calculation.
I derived the leaver count from the exit records and payroll data, and I confirmed that the final number matched the reconciled source evidence.The assurer may probe whether the turnover count includes the right leavers, whether timing cut-offs were applied consistently, and whether any adjustments were fully supported.Exit or termination report; payroll movement data; reconciliation schedule; evidence of review of late or corrected leaver records.

Evidence pack to prepare

Common reporting gaps

A percentage is stated without the underlying counts (numerator and denominator).The denominator — what the figure is a share of — is not explained.Partial scope is reported as if it were complete coverage.One-off activities are counted as if they were ongoing programmes.Boundary or period changes that move the figure are not flagged.Exclusions from the reported scope are not listed or explained.
Common gaps

Mistakes to avoid when collecting the data

Wrong data owner
Chasing the HR lead by default can miss the person who actually holds the joiners-and-leavers file, so the figures come from the wrong team.
Framework words, not business terms
Asking for the data in disclosure language instead of the organisation’s own labels can leave people unsure which report, extract, or dashboard to use.
Scope not pinned down
If the team does not agree which parts of the business are in scope, one site or subsidiary can be left out or counted twice.
Wrong time basis
Pulling numbers from the wrong date range or using a different cut-off from the reporting period can make the headcount movement inconsistent with the rest of the pack.
Mixed counting methods
Combining a point-in-time headcount with a period total in the same working paper can distort both the hire count and the exit count.
Source labels lost
Copying figures into a new sheet without keeping the original file names, tab names, or field labels makes it hard to trace where each number came from.
Populations merged
Putting permanent staff, contractors, and other worker groups into one pool can blur the joiner and leaver totals that should stay separate.
No evidence trail
Saving the numbers without the supporting extract date, owner, and approval note leaves no clear path for later review or sign-off.

Where judgement is often needed

Set the reporting perimeter after acquisitions or disposals
Decide whether people added or removed through a business change sit inside the period counts, then explain the cut-off you used so the headcount and movement figures are read on the same basis.
Choose one rule where local employment definitions differ
If countries classify starters, leavers, or worker status differently, apply a single group-wide approach or clearly map local rules to it and state the method used.
Agree how to treat people on the boundary of the workforce
Make a consistent call on interns, agency workers, fixed-term staff, contractors, and similar edge groups, then disclose which categories were included or left out.
Align the timing for hires and exits
Use one date rule for when a person counts as joining or leaving, and explain whether that is based on contract start, first day worked, notice date, or another internal trigger.
Decide whether to use actual records or estimates
Where complete records are not available, use a documented estimate only if it is the best available basis, and say which parts were measured and which were approximated.
State the denominator used for the rate figures
Explain the workforce base behind the percentages, including whether it reflects average staff, year-end staff, or another internal population measure.
Handle partial-year service and part-time staff consistently
Apply the same counting logic to people who worked only part of the year or part of the week, and describe any normalisation used before calculating totals or rates.
Round numbers in a way that still ties back
Use one rounding rule across the table, and check that rounded totals and percentages remain understandable against the underlying records.
Protect privacy when the workforce is small
If a split by age band, gender, or region could identify individuals, combine categories or suppress detail and explain the aggregation approach used.
Examples

Illustrative examples

Synthetic, written by LRA — not from a company report, not text from any standard.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — Retail

Synthetic example only: we show new joiners and leavers for the year, split by age band, sex and region. The figures below are internally consistent and are meant to illustrate how we might present this information.

This example shows how to present hiring and turnover counts and rates with a simple breakdown by age, gender and region. It is illustrative only.

Illustrative workforce movement by age band, gender and region (people)
Under 30 — hires1822
Under 30 — turnover911
30 to 49 — hires1416
30 to 49 — turnover78
50 and over — hires46
50 and over — turnover34
Illustrative (synthetic) example — Manufacturing

Synthetic example only: we summarise recruitment and exits for the period across age bands and regions, with a split by gender. The numbers are made up for training purposes and remain mathematically consistent.

This example demonstrates a second way to disclose workforce inflows and outflows, using age, gender and region as the breakdowns. It is not a real company disclosure.

Illustrative workforce movement by region, age band and gender (people)
Women 18 to 29 — hires12108
Women 18 to 29 — turnover654
Men 18 to 29 — hires14119
Men 18 to 29 — turnover765
Women 30 and over — hires987
Women 30 and over — turnover443
Company reports

How companies report GRI 401-1

Real reports where this topic is disclosed. These are report practice, not exact disclosure templates to copy.

Compal Electronics, Inc.
Technology Hardware and Equipment · Taiwan · 2025
Open report →
Compal Electronics’ 2025 ESG Report provides detailed data on workforce composition and turnover rates, including new hire rates and total turnover percentages by gender and age group (pp.125, 128-129). The report also includes numeric values on plant personnel distribution across regions (p.169) and turnover calculations explained on page 128. However, the report does not clearly present aggregated turnover rates or voluntary turnover trends over multiple years, nor does it provide contextual analysis of these figures.
Yuanta Financial Holding Co., Ltd.
Banks / Diverse Financials / Insurance · Taiwan · 2024
Open report →
Yuanta Financial Holding Co., Ltd.'s 2024 ESG Report provides detailed data on workforce demographics and initiatives, including a "work adaptability management plan for middle-aged and senior workers" with six organised seminars (p.141). The report also presents gender distribution across regions with specific numbers for male and female employees (p.159), regional employee percentages (p.157), and employee turnover rates by gender and region (p.158). However, the report lacks clear numeric values or narrative items related to some other specific sustainability metrics, as no quotable evidence was found for those aspects.
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Semiconductors · Taiwan · 2024
Open report →
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.'s 2024 CSR Report provides detailed data on workforce demographics and related metrics, including the percentage of employees qualified for parental leave by gender (63.82% male, p.251), new hire percentages by gender (55.76% male, p.250), and employee turnover rate at 11.4% with a noted decrease from the previous year (p.168). The report also includes information on occupational injury rates (p.254) and employee engagement survey coverage exceeding 90% (p.163). However, there is no clear evidence regarding other specific diversity or inclusion metrics beyond these datapoints, and some narrative items expected for comprehensive disclosure are not found in the report.
✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop
Dr Ross Kurinko
Ask Study Studio AI assistant about this disclosure
Get a practical answer for your reporting context. Your first answer is free — create a free account to continue the conversation.
TryHow do I prepare GRI 401-1?What data do I need to collect?Where can I see a real-report example?What mistakes should I avoid?
1 free answer
Check your understanding

Scenarios to work through

Your HR system shows 18 people joined during the year and 12 left. The draft table also breaks the joiners and leavers down by age band, gender and region, but one region has been left blank because the team thought it was optional.

QShould you leave that region blank, or do you need to complete the breakdown before sign-off?
Reveal model answer →

A preparer has 24 new starters in the period and calculates a hire rate of 20%. Later, they realise the workforce denominator used for the rate was based on a different headcount date from the one used elsewhere in the report.

QCan you keep the 20% rate if the underlying base is not the same as the rest of the disclosure pack?
Reveal model answer →

The HR team reports 9 leavers in total, but the exit records show 6 voluntary departures and 3 redundancies. The draft only includes the total turnover number and rate, with no supporting split in the working file.

QDo you need to keep the underlying leaver categories in the evidence pack even though the published line only asks for the total?
Reveal model answer →

A business unit hired 10 people in the year, but 2 of them were internal transfers from another part of the group. The preparer is unsure whether those 2 should sit inside the new-hire count or be excluded.

QHow should you decide whether those 2 people belong in the new-hire total for this disclosure?
Reveal model answer →
Framework references

Related framework references

How this disclosure maps across the major reporting frameworks.

GRI
GRI 401-1
within GRI 401: Employment
Open official source →
Primary
Related & explore
FAQ

Questions this page answers

How do I prepare GRI 401-1 Employment data for this page step by step?+
What data do I need to collect for GRI 401-1 Employment on this page?+
How should I set the scope and methodology for the GRI 401-1 Employment figures on this page?+
Who should own the GRI 401-1 Employment data and evidence pack?+
What should go into the evidence pack for GRI 401-1 Employment?+
What are the six assurance claims I need to verify for GRI 401-1 Employment?+
What are the common reporting gaps or mistakes on the GRI 401-1 Employment page?+
How do I use the workbook and printable Library Card downloads for GRI 401-1 Employment?+
Can I use the synthetic example disclosure on this page to draft my own GRI 401-1 Employment table?+
How do I turn the GRI 401-1 Employment data into a draft narrative and content index line?+
Can I reuse my GRI 401-1 Employment data for ESRS S1 Own Workforce reporting?+
More questions this page can help with