IFRS S2: Climate-related Disclosures·Paragraphs 29–b
Transition-risk vulnerability metric
Guía práctica para preparar esta divulgación. Use esta ficha para identificar la información a preparar, verificar afirmaciones y organizar la evidencia de soporte. Para los requisitos exactos, consulte siempre la fuente oficial de IFRS.
Pasaporte publicado
Revisión pendienteNorma
IFRS S2: Climate-related Disclosures
Paragraphs 29–b · 2024
Última revisión
—
Material formativo de LRA · No emitido ni avalado por IFRS
Foco de la divulgación
This disclosure asks an organisation to explain how exposed its activities are to transition risk by using a metric that shows where the business is more or less vulnerable as the economy shifts. In practice, it is about identifying which parts of the organisation could be affected by changes such as policy, technology, market demand or customer expectations, and presenting that exposure in a way that is understandable and decision-useful.
The practical focus is on coverage and comparability across the organisation, not just on a few headline sites or the most visible operations. An organisation should think about whether the metric reflects the full business, how it is broken down by relevant parts of the value chain or operations, and whether it helps users see concentrations of vulnerability rather than only an overall average.
Este material formativo de LRA apoya la preparación de la divulgación. Para los requisitos exactos, consulte siempre la fuente oficial de IFRS.
Antes de empezar
Antes de empezar
Una breve lista de comprobación antes de preparar esta divulgación: marque cada punto a medida que lo resuelva.
Preparación
Información clave que preparar
| Campo de preparación | Qué recopilar | Pista de evidencia | Responsable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability basis | Record the criteria, assumptions and source information used to decide why an asset, activity or exposure is treated as vulnerable, including the specific factors considered and the basis for that judgement. | Assessment memo, methodology note, risk register entry, model output or internal review papers showing how the vulnerability call was made. | Risk management |
| Exposure concentration profile | Set out where the concentration sits by location, asset class and expected timing, using the same grouping logic across all three dimensions so the reported profile matches the underlying portfolio view. | Portfolio analytics, asset inventory, location mapping, scenario or horizon analysis, and management reporting used to build the concentration view. | Finance / Risk |
| Share of total | Capture the proportion this item represents of the relevant overall total, using the same numerator and denominator basis as the source calculation and the correct reporting period. | Calculation workbook, source ledger or register, and the total used as the denominator, with a clear audit trail from source data to the reported percentage. | Finance |
| At-risk assets and activities | Identify the assets and activities that are exposed to vulnerability and quantify the related amount, keeping the scope limited to the defined vulnerable set and the same measurement basis throughout. | Asset register, activity inventory, risk assessment output, valuation or exposure schedule, and the working papers showing which items were included. | Risk management / Finance |
Cómo prepararlo
Solicitar los datos
Request the transition-risk exposure data
Traduzca la divulgación a una pregunta de negocio interna y adáptela después al lenguaje propio de su organización.
Which assets or activities are most exposed to transition-related risk, how is that exposure grouped, and what share of the total does it represent?
Use your organisation’s own labels first, then map them to the reporting wording. For example, ask for the team’s existing portfolio, asset, site, product, project, or activity categories rather than using framework terms in the request.
Solicitud débil
Please provide the transition-risk vulnerability metric for the group.
Por qué falla: It uses framework language without telling the owner what internal records to pull, what categories to use, or what numbers and splits are needed. It is too vague to trace back to source data or to check the basis used.
Solicitud mejor
Please provide the current analysis of which assets, sites, projects, or activities are most exposed to transition-related risk for [period] and [boundary]. Use your own category names, show the currency value exposed, the total reference value, the share of total, and any split by region, asset type, or timing. Include the source file and the basis used to judge exposure.
Plantilla de correo formal
Subject: Request for transition-risk exposure data for [reporting period] Dear [name/team], We are preparing the sustainability reporting pack and need your help with the data behind our transition-risk exposure analysis. Please send a table for [reporting period] covering [business boundary]. Use your team’s own terms for the relevant assets, activities, sites, projects, or portfolios, and include the basis you used to judge exposure. Please include: - the categories you used; - the value of the exposed items in currency terms; - the total value used as the reference point; - the share of the total for each category; - any split by region, asset type, or expected timing of impact; - the source system or file; - the method or judgement used; - any assumptions, exclusions, or limitations. If helpful, you can return the information in the attached template. Please adapt this to your organisation’s language and check the official source before sign-off. Many thanks, [preparer name] [team] [contact details]
Versión corta para Teams / Slack
Hi [name] — could you send the transition-risk exposure data for [period] for [boundary]? Please use your team’s own category names and include the value exposed, the total used, the % of total, the basis used, and any split by region / asset type / timing. Thanks — [name]
Ejemplos sectoriales
Manufacturing
Contexto. A group with several plants, product lines, and a central asset register.
Solicitud adaptada. Please send the transition-risk exposure table for [period] covering our owned plants and major production activities. Use the plant, line, or product names your team already uses, and show the exposed value, total value, % of total, region, asset type, and expected timing of impact.
Ejemplo de respuesta. Plant A | UK | Production line | Near term | 12,000,000 | 80,000,000 | 15.0 | Internal risk screen | Main exposure from planned policy change Plant B | EU | Warehouse | Medium term | 3,000,000 | 80,000,000 | 3.8 | Internal risk screen | Lower exposure due to flexible use
Real estate / Property
Contexto. A portfolio team tracks buildings, leasehold improvements, and development projects.
Solicitud adaptada. Please provide the transition-risk exposure analysis for [period] across our property portfolio. Use your portfolio’s own building and project names, and include the value exposed, the total portfolio value, the share of total, and a split by geography, property type, and timing.
Ejemplo de respuesta. Office portfolio | London | Office | Near term | 25,000,000 | 200,000,000 | 12.5 | Management assessment | Higher exposure from energy-efficiency upgrade needs Retail portfolio | North West | Retail | Long term | 10,000,000 | 200,000,000 | 5.0 | Management assessment | Exposure concentrated in older assets
Redacte su divulgación
Notas que convierten los datos en una divulgación
Plantillas formativas de LRA: adáptelas a su organización y consulte la fuente oficial antes de la aprobación.
Nota metodológica
Explain the basis used to identify exposed assets or activities, including the criteria applied, the way locations and asset types were grouped, and the time periods used for the assessment.
Nota de contexto
Set out what the figures mean in practice by showing how much of the portfolio or activity base is considered exposed, where that exposure is concentrated, and which parts of the business are most affected.
Declaración sobre las variaciones
If the numbers moved materially, point to the main drivers, such as changes in the asset mix, a shift in geographic concentration, or a different view of the relevant time horizon.
Entrada del índice de contenidos
s2-29-b Transition-risk vulnerability metric — [location / page] / [notes]Centro de descargas
Herramientas y formularios de preparación
Herramientas profesionales de preparación para s2-29-b — gratuitas con la membresía de LRA Community. Regístrese una vez (es gratis) y se desbloquean todas las descargas, junto con la Biblioteca de divulgaciones, las plantillas y el asistente de IA de LRA.
Preparación para el aseguramiento
Para cada afirmación, compruebe la evidencia
| Afirmación | Riesgos | Evidencia que comprobar |
|---|---|---|
| We documented the method we used to judge which parts of the business were more exposed to transition-related climate risk, so the figure is based on a clear and repeatable assessment approach. | The basis may be vague, inconsistent across teams, or not actually used in the calculation; an assurer may test whether the stated method matches the underlying analysis. | Assessment methodology note; working papers showing the criteria used; version-controlled calculation file; sign-off from the preparer and reviewer. |
| We mapped the exposed items by location, asset class and expected timing, so the disclosed breakdown reflects where the concentration sits rather than a broad estimate. | The concentration view may omit relevant locations, asset categories or time periods, or may double count items across segments. | Asset register or activity inventory; geographic and asset-type tagging logic; time-horizon classification rules; reconciliation from source data to the published breakdown. |
| We calculated the share of the total using the same population and denominator throughout, so the percentage is directly tied to the amount shown in the disclosure. | The percentage may be based on a different total, an outdated denominator, or a formula error; an assurer will check internal consistency. | Calculation sheet showing numerator and denominator; control totals; spreadsheet formula checks; tie-out between the percentage, the amount and the underlying total. |
| We identified the assets or activities we considered exposed to transition risk using our internal screening and classification process, and we kept the supporting records for each inclusion. | The population may be incomplete, misclassified, or unsupported by evidence; an assurer may test whether the included items were selected consistently. | Screening criteria; source listings of assets or activities; classification outputs; supporting documents for each included item; exception log for exclusions. |
| Before publication, we ran a final review to check the numbers, the labels and the cross-references, and we retained evidence of the approval trail. | Errors may remain in the published figure, the narrative may not match the underlying workings, or approvals may be missing; an assurer will look for pre-publication controls. | Review checklist; evidence of management approval; reconciliation to source systems; proof-reading or quality-control notes; change log showing final edits. |
Paquete de evidencia que preparar
Carencias habituales en los informes
Carencias habituales
Errores que evitar al recopilar los datos
Dónde suele hacer falta juicio profesional
Ejemplos
Ejemplos ilustrativos
Sintéticos, redactados por LRA: no proceden del informe de ninguna empresa ni del texto de ninguna norma.
We assessed where climate stress could most affect our thermal fleet by combining flood maps, heat-stress projections and outage history, then ranking assets by expected interruption risk over the next 10 years. The most exposed assets were 6 gas-fired plants and 2 substations in coastal and riverine locations, representing 8 of our 20 operating sites (40%).
- By location, 5 of the exposed sites are in the south-east and 3 are in the north-west; by asset type, 6 are generation plants and 2 are grid substations.
- All 8 exposed sites sit in the short-to-medium term risk window we use for planning, and together they account for 40% of our operating asset base.
This example shows how to explain the method used to identify exposure, then summarise where the vulnerable assets sit, what kinds of assets they are, and how much of the total portfolio they represent.
We screened our production network using water-stress forecasts, supplier disruption data and asset criticality scores to identify where climate-related pressure could interrupt output. On that basis, 12 of our 30 facilities are classed as vulnerable, with 7 in water-scarce regions and 5 in flood-prone areas; by asset type, 9 are processing plants and 3 are cold-storage hubs.
- The vulnerable set is concentrated in the medium-term planning horizon, covering 12 sites in total, which is 40% of our facility base.
- We use this assessment to prioritise resilience work for the sites most likely to face operational disruption.
This example shows a different sector using a different screening basis, while still covering the method, the main concentrations, the asset types affected, the time horizon used, and the share of the total base.
Informes de empresas
Cómo informan las empresas sobre S2-29-b en la práctica
Ejemplos de práctica de reporte completa y parcial. Son análisis basados en evidencia, no plantillas exactas para copiar.
Pregunte al asistente de IA de Study Studio sobre esta divulgación
Obtenga respuestas prácticas para su contexto de reporte. Las dos primeras respuestas son gratuitas: únase gratis a LRA Community para continuar sin límite.
Compruebe su comprensión
Escenarios para trabajar
A group owns a portfolio of warehouses and processing sites. Its climate team has split the portfolio into sites exposed to policy change, sites exposed to market shift, and sites with no material exposure, and has also grouped the exposed sites by region and expected timing of impact.
A preparer has calculated that 18% of the company’s vulnerable assets sit in one country, 12% in another, and the rest are spread across several smaller locations. The same analysis also shows that most of the exposure is in one asset type and in the near term.
A finance team has identified vulnerable equipment worth £240 million out of a £1.2 billion asset base. It also wants to mention that £90 million of that vulnerable amount is in one region and £60 million is tied to a single asset class.
A business has two transition-risk hotspots: one is a set of older production lines in a coastal area, and the other is a group of distribution assets that may be affected later than the production lines. The team is unsure whether to describe the exposure by geography first or by asset type first.
Referencias del marco
Requisitos aplicables de IFRS / ISSB y divulgaciones relacionadas
Referencias disponibles del marco y divulgaciones cercanas relevantes para preparar este requisito.
IFRS / ISSB
s2-29-b
dentro de IFRS S2: Climate-related Disclosures
Relacionado y explorar
Más en IFRS S2 → Ver el catálogo completo → Inicio de la Biblioteca de divulgaciones → Buscar en todas las divulgaciones →
Preguntas frecuentes
Preguntas que responde esta página
Start with the plain-language explainer, then work through the step-by-step preparation section and the four datapoints listed for this disclosure. The page is designed to help you move from data gathering to a draft output, with workbook and library-card downloads to support the process.
The page says to prepare four datapoints: vulnerability basis, exposure concentration profile, share of total, and at-risk assets and activities. Use those as the core data set before you draft the disclosure or build any visuals.
Use the step-by-step preparation section to work out what is in scope and how each datapoint is being built. The page also points you to common reporting gaps, which is useful for checking whether your method is consistent and complete.
The page is set up for sustainability/ESG managers, HR or data owners, and assurance reviewers, so ownership should sit with whoever can evidence the underlying data and explain the method. Use the workbook to assign tasks and keep the evidence pack aligned to the owner of each datapoint.
The page includes an evidence pack with five items for assurance readiness, plus five assurance claims to verify. Build the pack around the claim, the risk it addresses, and the supporting evidence so a reviewer can trace the numbers back to source.
The page lists common reporting gaps and mistakes, so use that section as a final check before sign-off. It is especially useful for spotting missing datapoints, weak explanations, or a draft that does not line up with the evidence pack.
The workbook is there to help you prepare the disclosure and organise assurance evidence in one place. Use it alongside the step-by-step guidance to track the datapoints, claims, and supporting documents needed for a draft.
The page includes synthetic illustrative examples, including a quantitative table, to show what a finished disclosure can look like. Treat them as drafting aids only and make sure any figures in your own version are internally consistent.
The draft-output section gives visualisation ideas, narrative starters, and a content-index line to help you turn prepared data into a report-ready draft. Use those prompts to keep the narrative tied to the datapoints and evidence you have collected.
The page notes ESRS E1 (Climate Change) as the closest correspondence, so the data may be reusable across frameworks where your internal definitions and scope line up. Do not assume the reporting asks are identical; use the page as a practical bridge, not a substitute for checking the other framework.
Más preguntas con las que puede ayudar esta página
Profundizar · s2-29-b
Aprenda a preparar esta divulgación de principio a fin
This guide covers one requirement. The IFRS S1 & S2 Reporting course walks the full ISSB workflow — governance, strategy, risk management and metrics — with exercises on your own data.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.
Consiga sus herramientas para s2-29-b — gratis
Sus herramientas de preparación son gratuitas para los miembros de LRA Community y los estudiantes. Regístrese una vez (es gratis) y su descarga comenzará de inmediato, además de la Biblioteca de divulgaciones, las plantillas y el asistente de IA de LRA.
Ya está: su descarga está comenzando
Su archivo se está descargando. Su Cabinet de Community — con la Biblioteca de divulgaciones, las plantillas y el asistente de IA de LRA — también está listo.
Abrir su Cabinet →