Disclosure LibraryPractitioner guidance for every reporting disclosure
Home Disclosure Library IFRS / ISSB IFRS S1 s1-30-a
IFRS S1: General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information · 2024
Paragraphs 30–a

Sustainability-related risks and opportunities

Practical guidance for preparing this disclosure. Use this card to identify the information to prepare, verify claims and organise supporting evidence. For exact requirements, always refer to the official IFRS source.

Under review Editorial review in progress Prepared from official source material and published report evidence Use alongside the official IFRS source while human review is in progress.
To prepare this disclosure
Disclosure focus

This disclosure asks an organisation to explain the sustainability-related risks and opportunities it has identified and how it has considered them in preparing its reporting. In practice, the focus is on giving a clear picture of what matters to the business, rather than listing every possible issue. The organisation should describe the main matters it has found and the way they relate to its activities and reporting.

The practical emphasis is on coverage across the organisation, not just a few well-known sites or flagship operations. Readers should be able to understand whether the explanation reflects the full business, including relevant operations, locations and activities, and whether any parts of the organisation are more exposed than others. The aim is a balanced, decision-useful summary of the sustainability-related risks and opportunities that are most relevant overall.

This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official IFRS source.

Before you start

A quick mental checklist before you prepare this disclosure — tick each as you settle it.

Preparation

Key information to prepare

Preparation field What to capture Evidence hint Owner
Impact pathway Describe the chain of cause and effect showing how the activity leads to the sustainability outcome, from the starting action through the intermediate steps to the final effect. Impact assessment, causal model, issue analysis, project logic note, or stakeholder evidence that links actions to outcomes. Sustainability / strategy
Financial linkage estimate Capture the expected money effect of the issue, including any influence on cash generation, funding access, or borrowing cost, using the same basis and period as the underlying financial model. Financial model, treasury analysis, funding papers, scenario analysis, or business case showing the quantified linkage. Finance / treasury
Sustainability theme State the main sustainability topic the item relates to, using the organisation’s agreed topic naming and classification. Topic register, materiality assessment, reporting taxonomy, or internal issue list used for the report. Sustainability / reporting
Risk or upside summary Write a short plain-language summary of the issue, covering what could happen, why it matters, and whether it is a downside or upside. Risk register, opportunity log, issue paper, management memo, or assessment note describing the matter. Risk management / sustainability
Issue direction Mark whether the item is being treated as a downside risk or an upside opportunity, using one consistent category only. Risk/opportunity register, assessment template, or governance paper showing the chosen classification. Risk management / sustainability
Value chain stage Identify where in the organisation’s chain of activities the issue sits, such as upstream, own operations, or downstream, using the same stage definitions as the report. Value-chain map, process map, supplier/customer analysis, or issue assessment that tags the location. Operations / supply chain
+ Show s1-30-a sub-elements (LRA working checklist)

How to prepare it

1Set the boundary for each item first: decide which part of the business or value chain it relates to, and keep that scope consistent across the disclosure.
2Classify the item in plain terms: identify the sustainability theme it belongs to, whether it is a downside risk or an upside opportunity, and where in the value chain it sits.
3Gather support for the link to money: collect the records or analysis that show how the matter could affect cash generation, funding access, or the price of capital, using the currency amount where relevant.
4Write the disclosure from the evidence: prepare a clear description of the matter itself, using the supporting material to explain the pathway and the financial connection in a way that is easy to trace.
5Record any gaps or changes: note what has been left out, any assumptions used, and any changes in scope, labels, or measurement approach so the reader can follow the trail.
6Check the final draft against the source material: confirm that each required item is covered, the wording matches the underlying evidence, and nothing has been missed or added.
Request the data

Request the risk and opportunity evidence from Finance

Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.

Which sustainability-linked risks or opportunities could affect cash flow, funding access, or the cost of capital, and how should we describe them in business terms?

Use your own internal labels first, then map them to the reporting categories. For example, use the names your teams already use for business risks, commercial opportunities, funding impacts, or value-chain issues rather than framework wording.

Weak request

Please provide the sustainability-related risks and opportunities data for the disclosure.

Why it fails: It uses framework language only, gives no clue which team should respond, and does not specify the business fields needed to evidence the issue, its location in the business, or the financial linkage. That makes it hard to extract usable evidence from existing finance or risk materials.

Better request

Please send the finance or treasury items you already track that could affect cash flow, funding access, or the cost of capital. For each item, include the internal name, plain-English description, business area, value-chain location, theme or driver, estimated financial effect, assumptions, source file, and the person who can confirm it. Use your own team terms first, then we will map them for the disclosure.

Formal email template
Subject: Request for finance evidence on sustainability-linked risks and opportunities

Hi [Name],

We are preparing a disclosure pack and need your help with the finance-side evidence for sustainability-linked risks and opportunities.

Please send, for each item you own or can validate:
- the internal name you use for the issue
- a plain-language description of the risk or opportunity
- where it sits in the business or value chain
- the theme or driver behind it
- the expected link to cash flow, funding access, or cost of capital
- the estimated financial effect and the basis for that estimate
- the period covered and any key assumptions
- the source file or system, plus the person who can confirm it

Please use your team’s own terminology first, then we will map it to the reporting categories. If helpful, you can return it in the table format below. This is a training template only; please adapt it to your organisation and check the official source before sign-off.

Thanks,
[Your name]
[Team]

Table format:
[Insert table or attach file]
Short Teams / Slack version
Hi [Name] — could you share the finance evidence for our sustainability-linked risks/opportunities pack?

Please include the internal issue name, plain-English description, business area, value-chain location, theme/driver, financial linkage, estimated effect, period, source file, and owner/approver.

Use your team’s own terms first; we’ll map them later. This is a training template only — please adapt to your organisation and check the official source before sign-off.

Thanks, [Your name]
Industry examples
Manufacturing

Context. A plant network with energy, water, and supplier exposure tracked in FP&A and risk registers.

Adapted request. Please share the finance evidence for plant-level issues that could change cash flow, funding access, or the cost of capital. For each item, include the internal issue name, the site or supply chain link, the driver, the estimated financial effect, and the source pack used by FP&A or treasury.

Example response. Example response: 'Electricity price exposure' at 'UK plants' linked to cash flow, estimated downside £850k for FY2026, based on the latest budget sensitivity model, source: FP&A workbook v3.

Financial services

Context. A lender tracking climate, conduct, and regulatory exposures through treasury, credit risk, and strategy papers.

Adapted request. Please provide the treasury and risk items that could affect funding access or the cost of capital, plus any linked commercial upside or downside. Include the internal issue name, portfolio or business line, value-chain location if relevant, theme, estimate, and the paper or model used.

Example response. Example response: 'Wholesale funding spread pressure' in 'Group treasury' linked to cost of capital, estimated downside £2.4m for FY2026, based on the funding plan sensitivity, source: treasury committee pack.

Draft your disclosure

Notes that turn data into a disclosure

LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.

Method note

We based this disclosure on the issues we had already identified, using our own working definitions for the pathway, the business area affected, the issue type, and any possible financial connection.

Context note

Taken together, these figures show which sustainability issues could matter most for future performance, funding conditions, or financing costs, and where in the business value chain those effects may arise.

Fluctuation statement

Any changes from the prior period can be explained by updates to the issue list, a different view of which themes are most relevant, or a revised assessment of how each issue could affect the business financially.

Content index entry
s1-30-a Sustainability-related risks and opportunities — [location / page] / [notes]
Download Centre

Preparation tools & forms

Professional preparation tools for s1-30-a — free with an LRA Community membership. Register once (it's free) and every download unlocks, together with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI Assistant.

Free · Community members
Go deeper · s1-30-a
Learn to prepare this disclosure end-to-end

This guide covers one requirement. The IFRS S1 & S2 Reporting course walks the full ISSB workflow — governance, strategy, risk management and metrics — with exercises on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

Assurance readiness

For each claim, check the evidence

ClaimRiskEvidence to check
We have shown which sustainability topic sits behind the figure, and we have tied it to the part of the business or value chain where it arises.The assurer may find the topic is too broad, the location is vague, or the link between the issue and the reported figure is not supported by the underlying analysis.Issue mapping papers, topic selection notes, value-chain maps, source data extracts, and working papers showing how the reported item was linked to the relevant business area or stage in the chain.
We have separated each matter into a downside or upside case, so the reader can see whether we are describing a threat or a chance.The assurer may question whether the classification is consistent, whether mixed cases were handled sensibly, or whether the label matches the narrative and supporting analysis.Drafts and review notes, decision logs for classification, internal analysis showing the basis for the label, and sign-off evidence from the preparers and reviewers.
We have explained the issue in terms of how it could affect future performance, including possible effects on cash generation, funding access, or financing cost.The assurer may probe whether the linkage to financial effects is speculative, overstated, or missing for items that should have been connected.Scenario analysis, sensitivity work, treasury or finance papers, management papers linking the matter to financial outcomes, and evidence that the wording in the report matches the underlying analysis.
We have used a consistent method to decide which matters to include, and we have applied it across the disclosed items without cherry-picking.The assurer may look for omitted items, inconsistent thresholds, or selective inclusion that could make the set of reported matters incomplete or biased.Inclusion criteria, screening logs, completeness checks, comparison against the wider issue universe, and evidence of management review over the final population.
Before publication, we checked the wording, the figures, and the cross-references against the source files and obtained approval from the relevant reviewers.The assurer may test whether the final version was reconciled to source records, whether changes were controlled, and whether the published text was properly authorised.Reconciliation sheets, version control records, proofing checklists, approval emails or minutes, and evidence of final review against the supporting files.

Evidence pack to prepare

Common reporting gaps

Figures are stated without the supporting narrative, or narrative without figures.Scope is inconsistent between the text and the numbers.The reporting boundary is left undefined.Material changes since the previous period are not disclosed.Estimates and measured values are not distinguished.Source records for the figures are not identified.
Common gaps

Mistakes to avoid when collecting the data

Wrong owner
The team asks the wrong business lead for the source data, so the file comes from someone who knows the topic in theory but does not hold the operational records.
Framework language only
The request is sent using reporting jargon instead of the organisation’s own terms, and the data owner cannot map it back to the systems or reports they actually use.
Scope left vague
No one defines which business units, sites, products or value-chain links are in scope, so different teams collect different populations.
+ Show 6 more

Where judgement is often needed

Set the reporting boundary after acquisitions and disposals
Use the same cut-off date and group perimeter for all six data points, and explain any bought-in or sold-on operations that change the picture during the period.
Choose one country rule where local definitions differ
If the same theme or risk is described differently across jurisdictions, pick the definition your organisation uses for reporting and say where that choice affects the description or location in the value chain.
Decide how to handle activities just inside or just outside scope
State the inclusion rule for borderline sites, entities, products or suppliers, and explain any material exclusions or inclusions that sit near the edge of the boundary.
+ Show 6 more
Examples

Illustrative examples

Synthetic, written by LRA — not from a company report, not text from any standard.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — manufacturing

We have identified a climate-related supply interruption in our metals sourcing, where hotter summers and water stress could reduce output at a key upstream supplier and delay our own production schedule.
- This sits in the upstream part of our value chain and is linked to our dependence on a single processing site for a critical input.
- The issue is tied to climate change, and we assess it as a risk because it could raise working capital needs, increase logistics costs, and weaken our borrowing terms if delivery reliability falls.
- In this illustration, 35% of our annual input spend (£70m of £200m) is exposed to that supplier, and a two-week delay would affect about 8% of quarterly shipments; both figures are internally consistent and shown only to explain the pathway to cash flow and financing effects.

Synthetic example for practitioner review only; not legal or compliance advice.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — financial services

We have identified a transition-related opportunity in our lending book, where demand for retrofit finance from commercial property clients could increase fee income and improve portfolio resilience as customers respond to tighter energy rules.
- The relevant theme is the move to lower-carbon buildings, and the effect arises in our client-facing activities rather than in our own operations.
- We treat this as an opportunity because stronger origination volumes could lift future cash receipts and support access to funding on better terms if investors view the book as more aligned with transition demand.
- In this illustration, 22% of new corporate lending commitments (£110m of £500m) are targeted at retrofit projects, and those commitments are expected to generate 30% of the projected fee uplift; the figures are synthetic and internally consistent.

Synthetic example for practitioner review only; not legal or compliance advice.

Company reportsReal published reports
Compare side by side →Get it free

How companies report S1-30-a in practice

Examples of full and partial reporting practice. These are evidence-led reviews, not exact disclosure templates to copy.

Temenos AG
Software and Services · Switzerland · 2025
Open report →
Temenos AG’s Sustainability Report 2025 covers relevant sustainability themes, noting that their activities have significant actual or potential impacts on people or the environment, assessed by scale and scope (p.12). The report also describes sustainability-related risks and opportunities that could influence enterprise value (p.13). However, the report provides only partial context on potential linkages to cash flows or access to finance (p.17), and does not clearly disclose a dependency impact pathway, specific risk opportunity types, or value chain locations.
Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co.,Ltd.
Construction and Engineering · South Korea · 2025
Open report →
Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd.'s 2025 Sustainability Report includes evidence on the effects of sustainability-related risks and opportunities on the company’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows (p.138). The report also identifies physical risks in the construction phase by considering the geographic location of projects and assessing their financial impact (p.44). However, the report does not clearly disclose a dependency impact pathway, and while it provides related context on sustainability themes and risk opportunity descriptions, these are not explicitly detailed or clearly defined (pp.21, 138).
SITC International Holdings Company Limited
Water Transportation · Hong Kong · 2025
Open report →
SITC International Holdings Company Limited’s 2025 Environmental, Social and Governance Report provides evidence of sustainability-related risks and opportunities affecting the entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows, as noted on page 188. The report also references impact assessments conducted at multiple operational sites and commercial office areas (p.100), though it does not clearly disclose a dependency impact pathway. Notably, the report lacks clear disclosures on specific sustainability themes, types of risks or opportunities, and value chain locations.
✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop
Dr Ross Kurinko
Ask the Study Studio AI Assistant about this disclosure
Get practical answers for your reporting context. Your first two answers are free — join LRA Community for free to continue without a limit.
TryHow do I prepare s1-30-a?What data do I need to collect?Where can I see a real-report example?What mistakes should I avoid?
2 free answers
Check your understanding

Scenarios to work through

A procurement team flags that a key raw material comes from a region facing water stress. The issue could disrupt supply and raise input prices, but the finance team has not yet linked it to any forecast.

QShould you treat this as a sustainability-related risk for the disclosure, and what details need to be captured before sign-off?
Reveal model answer →

A business unit has identified a chance to win lower-cost financing if it meets a new emissions target, but the estimate is still being refined and no final loan terms have been agreed. The team wants to mention only the financing benefit and leave out the operational driver.

QCan you disclose only the financing upside, or do you need to explain the underlying sustainability driver as well?
Reveal model answer →

An operations team has two linked issues: a flood risk at one supplier site and a separate chance to redesign sourcing to reduce disruption. Both affect the same product line, but one is a downside exposure and the other is a potential benefit.

QHow should you decide whether to present these as one item or two, and what must each item make clear?
Reveal model answer →

A treasury paper says a climate-related supply issue may increase working capital needs by about £4 million and could make lenders more cautious, but the sustainability team has only written a broad note about 'resilience'. The draft disclosure also names the issue as both a risk and an opportunity in the same sentence.

QWhat should you do before finalising the disclosure?
Reveal model answer →
Framework references

Relevant IFRS / ISSB requirements and related disclosures

Available framework references and nearby disclosures relevant to preparing this requirement.

IFRS / ISSB
s1-30-a
within IFRS S1: General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information
Open official source →
Primary
Related & explore
Go deeper · s1-30-a
Learn to prepare this disclosure end-to-end

This guide covers one requirement. The IFRS S1 & S2 Reporting course walks the full ISSB workflow — governance, strategy, risk management and metrics — with exercises on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

FAQ

Questions this page answers

For s1-30-a, what data do I need to gather before I start drafting the disclosure?+
How do I use the step-by-step 'how to prepare' section for s1-30-a in practice?+
What should I include in the evidence pack for s1-30-a if I want to be assurance-ready?+
What are the five assurance claims I need to verify for s1-30-a?+
What are the common reporting gaps or mistakes on the s1-30-a page, and how do I avoid them?+
How do I turn the s1-30-a datapoints into a draft narrative and content index line?+
What can I use from the s1-30-a workbook download, and when should I use it?+
Is there a printable version of the s1-30-a guidance I can share with colleagues or data owners?+
How should I use the 'From company reports' table on the s1-30-a page?+
What does the synthetic illustrative example on s1-30-a help me do?+
How does the ESRS 2 correspondence on this page help me if I am trying to reuse data across frameworks?+
More questions this page can help with
How this library is built 312 published reports indexed 63171 pages with page-level citations 272 practitioner guides