This disclosure asks an organisation to explain what it is doing, and what it is putting in place, to manage its water and marine-related impacts, risks and opportunities. In practice, that means describing the main actions, programmes, investments, policies or operational changes that are relevant to the topic, rather than only stating high-level commitments. The focus is on showing how the organisation is responding in a concrete way, and how those responses link to the material issues it has identified.
The practical emphasis is on coverage and relevance: the report should make clear whether these actions and resources apply across the whole business, specific sites, or only certain activities, and why that scope is appropriate. It should also be clear where the organisation is concentrating effort, for example on operations with the greatest water dependence or impact, and whether the resources allocated are enough to support the stated response.
This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official EFRAG source.
A quick mental checklist before you prepare this disclosure — tick each as you settle it.
Key datapoints to prepare
How to prepare it
Request the water actions and spend details from Operations
Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.
Use your organisation’s own names for teams, sites, projects, controls and spend codes first, then map them to the reporting categories. Keep the ask in day-to-day operational language rather than framework wording, and check the source material before sign-off.
Please provide the ESRS E3:E3-2 actions and resources disclosure, including all actions implemented, water efficiency measures, pollution prevention, remediation actions, timelines, CapEx, OpEx, actions in water stress areas, resources allocated, and geographic scope.
Why it fails: This uses framework language that many operational teams will not recognise, so it is harder to answer quickly and accurately. It also bundles several concepts into one ask without telling the owner which tracker, site list, or spend basis to use, which increases the risk of inconsistent or incomplete evidence.
Please send your current water programme tracker for [period] covering [sites/business units]. Include each action in plain operational terms, the site or area it affects, whether it is in a water-stressed area, the delivery status and dates, and the budget or spend split between capital and operating cost if you track that. If you use a different internal grouping, send that and add a short mapping note.
Notes that turn data into a disclosure
LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.
State how the company defined the reported water actions, how it grouped them into efficiency, pollution control, and remediation work, and how it identified the locations covered by the water-stress analysis.
Explain that the figures show the company’s practical response to water-related impacts, including the measures put in place, the timing of delivery, and the resources committed to those actions.
If the numbers moved materially, note whether that was driven by new measures starting, work being completed, a shift in the locations covered, or changes in the level of capital and operating spend.
Preparation tools & forms
Professional preparation tools for E3-2 — free with an LRA Community membership. Register once (it's free) and every download unlocks, together with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.
For each claim, check the evidence
Evidence pack to prepare
Common reporting gaps
Mistakes to avoid when collecting the data
Where judgement is often needed
Illustrative examples
Synthetic, written by LRA — not from a company report, not text from any standard.
We set out the main steps we have taken to cut water use, reduce contamination risk, and repair any harm linked to our operations, with delivery planned over 2025–2027. For these measures, we expect capital spend of 12.0 and operating spend of 3.4; the package covers 8 actions in total, including 5 efficiency upgrades, 2 pollution-control measures, and 1 remediation project. - In the two water-stressed catchments where we operate, we have assigned 4.2 of resources to 3 site-level actions, all within our manufacturing network in Spain and South Africa. - The work includes closed-loop rinsing, leak detection, upgraded effluent treatment, and a riverbank clean-up programme; each item is scheduled to finish by Q4 2027.
Synthetic example for practitioner training only; figures are internally consistent and illustrative, not reported data.
We have a three-year plan to lower freshwater demand, stop avoidable releases, and restore affected land and waterways, with delivery running from 2024 to 2026. The programme carries 9.6 of capital spend and 2.8 of operating spend, and it brings together 6 actions: 4 aimed at using less water, 1 focused on preventing pollution, and 1 dedicated to remediation. - For our two water-stressed operating regions, we have set aside 3.1 of resources for 2 site actions, both in our dyeing and finishing facilities in India and Mexico. - The work covers low-liquor dyeing, reuse of process water, bunded chemical storage, and a wetland restoration project; all measures are expected to be complete by the end of 2026.
Synthetic example for practitioner training only; figures are internally consistent and illustrative, not reported data.
How companies report E3-2 in practice
Real reports where this topic is disclosed. These are report practice, not exact disclosure templates to copy.

Scenarios to work through
A manufacturer has two water-saving projects underway: one at a plant in a water-stressed basin and one at a site with normal supply. The draft note lists both projects together, but only one site is in the stressed area.
A business has installed leak detection, process recycling and a new treatment step, but the draft only says it is “improving water performance”. The project team also wants to mention a supplier pollution-control upgrade and a customer-facing clean-up programme.
A group approved a water programme in March, but procurement delays mean some equipment will not be installed until the following year. Finance has recorded the full budget, while operations has only spent part of it so far.
A company operates in three countries, but only two have water-stressed regions. The draft says the programme is global and gives one combined resource figure, even though the measures in the stressed regions are different from those elsewhere.
Related framework references
How this disclosure maps across the major reporting frameworks.
Questions this page answers
Start with the plain-language explainer, then work through the step-by-step preparation section and the datapoints list. The page is designed to help you turn source data into a draft narrative, table content and a content-index line.
The page points you to implemented actions, water-saving measures, pollution controls, remediation steps, delivery timetable, capital spend, operating spend, water-stress actions, allocated resources and location coverage. Use that list as your collection checklist so you can see what is already available and what still needs to be requested.
Use the page’s preparation steps to decide which actions, spend items and locations are in scope for the disclosure you are drafting. The location coverage datapoint is especially useful for checking whether the information you have is complete enough to support the narrative and any table or visual.
The page is set up for a sustainability or ESG manager to coordinate inputs from data owners such as operations, finance, environment or site teams. Use the datapoint list to assign each item to a clear owner and make sure the evidence pack can be signed off before drafting.
The page includes an evidence pack with five items to support assurance readiness, alongside six assurance claims to verify. Use those materials to show where each claim comes from, what risk it addresses and what evidence supports it.
The page lists common reporting gaps and mistakes so you can check for missing datapoints, weak scope decisions and unsupported claims before you draft. It is useful as a final quality-control step before the disclosure goes to review or assurance.
The Download Centre includes a Prep & Assurance workbook in .xlsx format, which is intended to help you organise the preparation and evidence-checking process. Use it to track the datapoints, ownership, claims and supporting documents in one place.
The Download Centre also includes a printable Library Card in .pdf format. It is useful as a quick reference while you are collecting data, checking the assurance claims and drafting the final content.
The page includes draft-output support with visualisation ideas, narrative starters and a content-index line. Use those prompts to convert your collected data into a readable draft rather than starting from a blank page.
Yes, but only as a worked illustration. The example is synthetic, so you should use it to understand the style and structure of the disclosure, then replace it with your own internally consistent data.
The page has a 'From company reports' table that links to real published reports where the topic is disclosed. Use it for practical reference on how others present similar information, not as a substitute for your own data and judgement.
Get your E3-2 tools — free
Your preparation tools are free for LRA Community members and students. Register once (it's free) and your download starts right away — plus the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.
You're in — your download is starting
Your file is downloading now. Your Community Cabinet — with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant — is ready too.
Open your Cabinet →