Aller à l’essentiel de l’information

Partenaire de formation GRI GRI 405 · Diversity and Equal Opportunity · Disclosure GRI 405-1

Diversity of governance bodies and employees

GRI 405-1 · mandatory · coverage + narrative

This disclosure provides a quantitative measure of diversity within the organization.

Statut juridique

GRI 405: Diversity and Equal Opportunity 2016 remains the applicable published GRI Topic Standard and is effective for reports or other materials published on or after 1 July 2018. The Diversity and Inclusion exposure draft is not an effective reporting requirement.

Objet de l’information

The organisation shall report the percentage of individuals within the organisation's governance bodies in each of the following diversity categories: gender; age group (under 30 years old, 30–50 years old, over 50 years old); other indicators of diversity where relevant, such as minority or vulnerable groups.

It shall also report the percentage of employees per employee category in each of the same diversity categories.

The percentages for employees are calculated within each employee category. They are not the percentages that employee categories represent within the total workforce.

Governance bodies should be identified using the GRI definition. Board committees should not be included automatically, and a management committee should not be excluded automatically.

The disclosure does not require a narrative assessment of whether representation is balanced, a description of diversity policies or an explanation of the outcomes of diversity initiatives. Those matters may be relevant to Disclosure 3-3 if diversity and equal opportunity is a material topic.

Ce support pédagogique LRA aide à préparer l’information. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle Global Reporting Initiative.

Préparer

Que rassembler avant de rédiger

Cochez chaque champ à l'arrivée des preuves. Les responsables sont les équipes qui détiennent habituellement les fichiers sources.

  • Governance body or bodies

    Company Secretariat / Governance

    Identify each formalized governance body included and its total membership. Report the percentage of individuals within the organisation's governance bodies in each of the following diversity categories: gender; age group (under 30 years old, 30–50 years old, over 50 years old); other indicators of diversity where relevant, such as minority or vulnerable groups.

    Éléments probants Governance structure, board or management-committee registers and membership records.

    Point de vigilance The published response for governance body or bodies is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.

  • Governance-body gender percentages

    Governance / People

    Percentage of individuals in each gender category within each relevant governance body.

    Éléments probants Membership-level demographic data and calculation file.

    Point de vigilance The published response for governance-body gender percentages is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.

  • Governance-body age percentages

    Governance

    Percentage under 30, aged 30–50 and over 50 within each relevant governance body.

    Éléments probants Date-of-birth data, measurement date and calculation file.

    Point de vigilance The published response for governance-body age percentages is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.

  • Other governance-body diversity indicators

    Governance / People

    Other relevant diversity percentages, where applicable.

    Éléments probants Self-identification or governance demographic records and legal assessment.

    Point de vigilance The published response for other governance-body diversity indicators is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.

  • Employee categories

    People / HR

    Categories derived from the HR system by level or function, with the total employees in each category. Report the percentage of employees per employee category in each of the same diversity categories.

    Éléments probants HRIS classification dictionary and GRI 2-7 reconciliation.

    Point de vigilance The published response for employee categories is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.

  • Employee-category gender percentages

    People / HR

    Percentage of employees in each gender category within every employee category.

    Éléments probants HRIS demographic extract and category-level calculation.

    Point de vigilance The published response for employee-category gender percentages is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.

  • Employee-category age percentages

    People / HR

    Percentage under 30, aged 30–50 and over 50 within every employee category.

    Éléments probants Date-of-birth data and calculation workbook.

    Point de vigilance The published response for employee-category age percentages is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.

  • Other employee diversity indicators

    People / HR

    Other relevant diversity percentages within every employee category, where applicable.

    Éléments probants Employee self-identification records and methodology.

    Point de vigilance The published response for other employee diversity indicators is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.

  • Calculation and omission basis

    Sustainability Reporting / HR

    Numerators, denominators, missing data, aggregation, rounding and any reasons for omission.

    Éléments probants Calculation methodology and exception log.

    Point de vigilance The published response for calculation and omission basis is incomplete or does not match the supporting records.

Avant de commencer

  • Which formalized governance body or bodies meet the GRI definition?
  • Will multiple governance bodies be shown separately or in a clearly explained aggregation?
  • What is the total number of individuals in each relevant governance body?
  • Which employee categories are used in the organization’s HR system by level or function?
  • What is the total number of employees in each employee category?
  • Can gender data be reported for each governance body and employee category?
  • Can all individuals be allocated to the prescribed age groups: under 30, 30–50 and over 50?
  • Are there other indicators of diversity that are relevant for reporting?
  • Does the employee population reconcile to the employee data reported under GRI 2-7?
  • Are the percentages calculated within each governance body or employee category?
  • Are unavailable, undisclosed or legally restricted data handled transparently?
  • Can every percentage be traced to its numerator, denominator and source records?
+ Afficher les sous-éléments de GRI 405-1 (liste de travail LRA)

Comment le préparer

Identify all formalized governance bodies that meet the GRI definition.
Determine whether they will be reported separately or through a clearly explained aggregation.
Obtain the total membership and demographic data for each governance body.
Identify the employee categories used in the HR system by level or function.
Reconcile the employee population with Disclosure 2-7 data.
Apply the prescribed age groups: under 30, 30–50 and over 50.
Identify other indicators of diversity where relevant.
Calculate gender and age percentages within each governance body.
Calculate gender and age percentages within each employee category.
Calculate other relevant diversity percentages using clearly defined denominators.
Document missing, unavailable or legally restricted data.
Check for double counting where individuals sit on more than one governance body.
Confirm that counts are not being presented instead of required percentages.
Reperform the calculations and verify the disclosure against GRI 405-1(a)–(b).

Demander les données

Request the disclosure evidence

Traduisez l’information en une question métier interne, puis adaptez-la au vocabulaire de votre organisation.

Please provide the GRI 405-1 data for [reporting period]. For each relevant governance body, include: body name; total membership; number and percentage by gender; number and percentage under 30, aged 30–50 and over 50; other relevant diversity indicators, where applicable; and the measurement date and source. For each employee category, include: employee-category name and level or function; total number of employees in that category; number and percentage by gender; number and percentage under 30, aged 30–50 and over 50; other relevant diversity indicators, where applicable; and the calculation source and any missing data. Please calculate percentages within each governance body or employee category, not as a share of the organization’s total workforce.

Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined GRI terms and the scope described above.

Meilleure demande

Please provide the GRI 405-1 data for [reporting period]. For each relevant governance body, include: body name; total membership; number and percentage by gender; number and percentage under 30, aged 30–50 and over 50; other relevant diversity indicators, where applicable; and the measurement date and source. For each employee category, include: employee-category name and level or function; total number of employees in that category; number and percentage by gender; number and percentage under 30, aged 30–50 and over 50; other relevant diversity indicators, where applicable; and the calculation source and any missing data. Please calculate percentages within each governance body or employee category, not as a share of the organization’s total workforce.

Rédigez votre information

Des notes qui transforment les données en information publiée

Modèles pédagogiques LRA — adaptez-les à votre organisation et vérifiez la source officielle avant validation.

Note méthodologique

Percentages for governance bodies are calculated using the total membership of each relevant body. Percentages for employees are calculated within each employee category. Age is classified as under 30, 30–50 or over 50 in accordance with GRI 405-1.

Note de contexte

Keep mandatory GRI Requirements, GRI recommendations and additional LRA preparation controls clearly distinguished. Apply a GRI 1 reason for omission where required information cannot be reported.

Centre de téléchargement

Outils et formulaires de préparation

Téléchargez les outils de préparation pour GRI 405-1 pendant 24 heures après confirmation gratuite de votre adresse e-mail. Les liens vers les rapports sources restent publics.

Gratuit · Accès par e-mail

Vérifier

Pour chaque affirmation, vérifiez les preuves

  • We identified the governance body or bodies using the GRI definition.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • We did not automatically include every board committee or exclude a qualifying management committee.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • For each governance body, the denominator is its total membership.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • For each governance body, we disclosed percentages by gender and the prescribed age groups.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • We disclosed other governance-body diversity indicators where relevant.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • We identified employee categories by level or function using the organization’s HR system.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • The employee population reconciles to the data used for GRI 2-7, subject to documented differences.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • For each employee category, the denominator is the total number of employees in that category.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • We did not report employee categories merely as percentages of the total workforce.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • For each employee category, we disclosed percentages by gender and the prescribed age groups.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • We disclosed other employee diversity indicators where relevant.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • We used under 30, 30–50 and over 50 rather than organization-specific age bands.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • The published percentages can be reproduced from the underlying numerators and denominators.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • Gender and age percentages reconcile within each governance body and employee category.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • Missing, unavailable or undisclosed data are handled consistently and transparently.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • Any legally restricted or confidential information is addressed through the applicable reason-for-omission requirements.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • Individuals serving on more than one governance body are not misleadingly double counted.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

  • Counts are not presented as a substitute for the required percentages.

    Risque The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check.

    Preuves à vérifier Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source.

Dossier de preuves à préparer

Lacunes fréquentes dans les rapports

  • Only headcounts are disclosed, with no percentages.
  • Governance-body percentages are limited to gender and omit the prescribed age groups.
  • Average board age is presented instead of age-group percentages.
  • Only the Board of Directors is included without assessing other formalized governance bodies.
  • Every board committee is included without determining whether it meets the governance-body definition.
  • A management committee meeting the GRI definition is omitted.
  • Multiple governance bodies are combined without explaining the denominator.
  • Individuals serving on several bodies are double counted.
  • Employee categories are reported as shares of total employees.
  • Gender and age percentages are not calculated within each employee category.
  • Employee categories are arbitrary labels that do not reflect level or function.
  • Only management categories are disclosed, while other employee categories are omitted.
  • Organization-specific age bands are used instead of under 30, 30–50 and over 50.
  • The employee population does not reconcile to GRI 2-7 data.
  • Workers who are not employees are included without a clear basis.
  • Employees with unavailable demographic data are silently excluded from the denominator.
  • Legal sex data are presented as gender data without explaining the basis.
  • Other indicators of diversity are omitted even though they are relevant and used in the organization’s monitoring and recording.
  • Additional diversity indicators are invented solely to populate the table.
  • The report describes diversity policies but omits the quantitative percentages.
  • A narrative statement on representation is presented as a substitute for the required breakdowns.
  • The disclosure cannot be reproduced from the underlying numerators and denominators.

Exemples

Ce que cela donne sur la page

Synthétiques, rédigés par LRA — ils ne proviennent ni d’un rapport d’entreprise ni du texte d’une norme.

Illustrative example 1

Illustrative synthetic example — Governance bodies
Governance body
Women
Men
Under 30
30–50
Over 50
Board of Directors
40%
60%
0%
40%
60%
Executive Committee
33.3%
66.7%
0%
66.7%
33.3%
Other indicators of diversity should be added where relevant.

Synthetic LRA illustration. Replace every figure and fact with the reporting organisation's evidence.

Illustrative example 2

Illustrative synthetic example — Employees
Employee category
Women
Men
Under 30
30–50
Over 50
Senior management
35%
65%
0%
55%
45%
Middle management
45%
55%
5%
70%
25%
Technical employees
30%
70%
35%
55%
10%
Administrative employees
65%
35%
40%
50%
10%
Production employees
20%
80%
30%
60%
10%

Synthetic LRA illustration. Replace every figure and fact with the reporting organisation's evidence.

Illustrative example 3

Each percentage is calculated within the employee category shown in the first column. The table does not show the share that each employee category represents within total employees.

Synthetic LRA illustration. Replace every figure and fact with the reporting organisation's evidence.

Rapports réels

How 3 companies report it

Exemples de pratiques de publication complètes et partielles. Ce sont des analyses fondées sur des preuves, non des modèles à recopier.

Rapports réels publiés

MOEVE, S.A.

Partial

Oil and Gas · Spain · 2025 · p.117 ↗

MOEVE, S.A.'s 2025 Consolidated Management Report provides detailed data on workforce composition by gender and age, including specific percentages for women and men across various categories on pages 117 and 121. The report also covers diversity markers and governance body composition, with relevant information found on pages 151, 157, and 168. However, there is no evidence regarding worker groups in the report.

Temenos AG

Partial

Software and Services · Switzerland · 2025 · p.83 ↗

Temenos AG's Sustainability Report 2025 provides detailed coverage of workforce diversity, including gender split with women representing 35% of the total headcount consistently from 2023 to 2025 and targets to increase this to over 35% by 2026 and 40% by 2030 (p.56). The report also includes age band distribution data (p.55) and ethnic group representation in the US at 46% (p.39). Governance diversity and structure are addressed on page 92, but there is no evidence found regarding worker groups in the report.

Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL

Partial

Electric Utilities / IPP / Energy Traders · Brazil · 2024 · p.16 ↗

Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL's 2024 Integrated Report provides detailed data on gender distribution, showing men constitute a majority across various categories, with percentages such as 86.0% and 94.1% reported on page 260, and workforce gender splits detailed on page 261. Age bands are also covered on page 260, indicating no employees under 30 years old, and other diversity initiatives, including a Diversity Committee and structured admission processes, are noted on page 259. However, the report does not provide specific information on worker groups, which remains unaddressed.
ChampMOEVE, S.A.Temenos AGCompanhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL
Gender splitNon trouvéNon trouvéNon trouvé
Age bandsNon trouvéNon trouvéNon trouvé
Other diversity markersNon trouvéNon trouvéNon trouvé
Governing groupNon trouvéNon trouvéNon trouvé
Governance shareNon trouvéNon trouvéNon trouvé
Worker groupsNon trouvéNon trouvéNon trouvé
Workforce mixNon trouvéNon trouvéNon trouvé

Carte complète des preuves avec citations et numéros de page →

✓ Assistant IA du Knowledge Hub · avec intervention humaine
Dr Ross Kurinko

Interrogez l’assistant IA du Knowledge Hub sur cette information

Obtenez des réponses pratiques adaptées à votre contexte de reporting.

Essayer Comment préparer GRI 405-1 ? Quelles données dois-je collecter ? Où voir un exemple issu d’un rapport réel ? Quelles erreurs éviter ?

Références au référentiel

Exigences GRI applicables et informations connexes

GRI

GRI 405-1

au sein de GRI 405 : Diversity and Equal Opportunity

Ouvrir la source officielle →

Connexes et exploration

Plus dans GRI 405 →Parcourir le catalogue complet →Rechercher dans toutes les informations →

Comment cette bibliothèque est construite 1 211 rapports publiés indexés 315 012 pages avec citations au niveau de la page 272 fiches publiées dans le catalogue actif
/fr/knowledge-hub/disclosure-cards/gri-405-1/