GRI 411: Rights of Indigenous Peoples·Disclosure GRI 411-1
Incidents of violations involving rights of Indigenous Peoples
Guida pratica per preparare questa informativa. Usa questa scheda per individuare le informazioni da predisporre, verificare le affermazioni e organizzare le evidenze a supporto. Per i requisiti esatti, fai sempre riferimento alla fonte ufficiale Global Reporting Initiative.
Status giuridico
GRI 411: Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2016 remains the applicable published GRI Topic Standard and is effective for reports or other materials published on or after 1 July 2018.
Passaporto pubblicato
Ultima revisione il 2026-08-03
Revisionato da
Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn
Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert
GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert
15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures
Canary Wharf, London
Materiale didattico LRA · Non emesso né approvato da Global Reporting Initiative
Standard
GRI 411: Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Disclosure GRI 411-1 · 2016
Ultima revisione
2026-08-03
Materiale didattico LRA · Non emesso né approvato da Global Reporting Initiative
Focus dell’informativa
This disclosure requires the organization to report the total number of identified incidents involving violations of the rights of indigenous peoples during the reporting period.
It also requires the status of the incidents and actions taken, with reference to:
incidents reviewed by the organization;
remediation plans being implemented;
remediation plans implemented, with results reviewed through routine internal management review processes; and
incidents no longer subject to action.
An incident can be a formal legal action or complaint or an instance of non-compliance identified through an established organizational procedure. The disclosure is therefore not limited to substantiated or finally determined violations.
When compiling the information, the organization should include incidents involving workers performing its activities and communities likely to be affected by existing or planned activities.
The information can be presented in aggregate. Confidential case-level details do not need to be disclosed publicly.
Policies, due diligence, consultation and FPIC processes belong primarily under Disclosure 3-3 and do not replace the quantitative and status information required by GRI 411-1.
Questo materiale didattico LRA supporta la preparazione dell’informativa. Per i requisiti esatti, fai sempre riferimento alla fonte ufficiale Global Reporting Initiative.
Prima di iniziare
Prima di iniziare
Una breve checklist prima di preparare questa informativa: spunta ogni voce man mano che la definisci.
Preparazione
Informazioni chiave da preparare
| Campo da preparare | Cosa rilevare | Suggerimento sull’evidenza | Responsabile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incident sources and population | Formal complaints, legal actions and identified non-compliance involving workers or affected communities. | Grievance registers, legal matters, project records, audits and monitoring systems. | Indigenous Relations / Community Relations / Legal |
| Total identified incidents | Total incidents identified during the reporting period. | Consolidated and de-duplicated incident register. | Sustainability Reporting / Human Rights |
| Incidents reviewed | Incidents reviewed through the organization’s formal process. | Investigation and review records. | Case owner / Legal |
| Remediation being implemented | Incidents with remediation plans in progress. | Remediation plans, owners and progress records. | Project / Community Relations |
| Remediation implemented and reviewed | Incidents with completed remediation whose results were reviewed through routine management processes. | Completion evidence and management-review records. | Management / Human Rights |
| No longer subject to action | Incidents requiring no further organizational action. | Closure records and closure rationale. | Case owner |
| Prior-period remediation | Older incidents still under action, reported separately from the current-period total where useful. | Prior-period register and remediation tracker. | Human Rights / Legal |
| Methodology and privacy | Incident definition, period rule, duplicate treatment, aggregation and reasons for omission. | Methodology note and legal or privacy review. | Sustainability Reporting / Legal |
Come prepararla
Richiedi i dati
Request the disclosure evidence
Traduci l’informativa in una domanda di business interna, poi adattala al linguaggio della tua organizzazione.
Please provide the incident records for [reporting period] relating to possible or identified violations of the rights of indigenous peoples. Include records from: community and worker grievance mechanisms; legal and regulatory matters; land-access, resettlement and cultural-heritage registers; project consultation and stakeholder-engagement systems; security incidents; audits and formal monitoring programmes; and other applicable formal procedures. For each anonymized incident, provide: incident ID; date registered or identified; source system; affected worker or community population; internal classification; right or issue involved; review status; remediation status; whether implemented remediation has been reviewed; whether the incident is no longer subject to action; and any linked duplicate record. Please also provide the reconciled current-period total.
Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined GRI terms and the scope described above.
Richiesta migliore
Please provide the incident records for [reporting period] relating to possible or identified violations of the rights of indigenous peoples. Include records from: community and worker grievance mechanisms; legal and regulatory matters; land-access, resettlement and cultural-heritage registers; project consultation and stakeholder-engagement systems; security incidents; audits and formal monitoring programmes; and other applicable formal procedures. For each anonymized incident, provide: incident ID; date registered or identified; source system; affected worker or community population; internal classification; right or issue involved; review status; remediation status; whether implemented remediation has been reviewed; whether the incident is no longer subject to action; and any linked duplicate record. Please also provide the reconciled current-period total.
Redigi la tua informativa
Note che trasformano i dati in un’informativa
Modelli formativi LRA: adattali alla tua organizzazione e verifica la fonte ufficiale prima dell’approvazione.
Nota metodologica
Incidents include formal legal actions, registered complaints and instances of non-compliance identified through established procedures. The compilation includes incidents involving workers performing the organization’s activities and communities likely to be affected by existing or planned activities.
Nota di contesto
Keep mandatory GRI Requirements, GRI recommendations and additional LRA preparation controls clearly distinguished. Apply a GRI 1 reason for omission where required information cannot be reported.
Centro download
Strumenti e moduli per la preparazione
Strumenti professionali di preparazione per GRI 411-1 — gratuiti con l’iscrizione a LRA Community. Registrati una volta (è gratis) e sblocchi tutti i download, insieme alla Biblioteca delle informative, ai modelli e all’assistente IA di LRA.
Preparazione all’assurance
Per ogni affermazione, verifica le evidenze
| Affermazione | Rischio | Evidenze da verificare |
|---|---|---|
| We applied the GRI definition of an incident. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| The incident population includes applicable formal complaints, legal actions and identified instances of non-compliance. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| We did not limit the total to substantiated or finally confirmed violations. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| We considered incidents involving workers performing the organization’s activities. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| We considered incidents involving communities likely to be affected by existing or planned activities. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| Relevant community, project, grievance, legal, security, audit and monitoring systems were reconciled. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| Duplicate records concerning the same incident were removed. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| The current-period total is separated from prior-period incidents with ongoing remediation. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| The published incident total reconciles to the consolidated register. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| The status and actions taken are mapped to the four references specified by GRI 411-1. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| We identified incidents reviewed by the organization. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| We identified remediation plans being implemented. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| We identified implemented remediation whose results were reviewed through routine management processes. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| We identified incidents no longer subject to action. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| Internal labels such as open, closed, negotiated and escalated were not used as substitutes without mapping. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| Zero incidents are reported explicitly where applicable. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| The incident count is presented as an exact whole number rather than an estimate or rounded figure. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| The disclosure does not reveal information that could create privacy, safety or cultural risks for affected peoples. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| Any unavailable required information is addressed through the applicable GRI reason-for-omission requirements. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
| The reporting-period and status cut-off rules are documented and consistently applied. | The published response does not support this human-reviewed assurance check. | Trace the statement to current approved records and the official IFRS source. |
Pacchetto di evidenze da preparare
Lacune ricorrenti nella rendicontazione
Esempi
Esempi illustrativi
Sintetici, scritti da LRA: non provengono dal report di un’azienda né dal testo di uno standard.
Illustrative synthetic example — Mining
During 2025, the organization identified three incidents involving the rights of indigenous peoples through its formal grievance and monitoring systems.
All three incidents were reviewed.
Remediation was being implemented for one incident.
Remediation had been implemented and its results reviewed for one incident.
One incident was no longer subject to action.
The information is reported in aggregate to protect the affected communities.
Synthetic LRA illustration. Replace every figure and fact with the reporting organisation's evidence.
Illustrative synthetic example — Utilities
Two formal incidents involving the rights of indigenous peoples were identified during the reporting period.
Both incidents were reviewed. A remediation plan was being implemented for one. Remediation for the other had been implemented and its results reviewed through the project’s routine management-review process.
Synthetic LRA illustration. Replace every figure and fact with the reporting organisation's evidence.
Illustrative synthetic example — Zero incidents
No incidents involving violations of the rights of indigenous peoples were identified during 2025. The four status and remediation references were therefore not applicable.
Synthetic LRA illustration. Replace every figure and fact with the reporting organisation's evidence.
Illustrative treatment — complaint not substantiated
A formally registered community complaint was included in the incident total even though the review did not substantiate the allegation. The incident was reported as reviewed and no longer subject to action.
Synthetic LRA illustration. Replace every figure and fact with the reporting organisation's evidence.
Report aziendali
Come le aziende rendicontano GRI 411-1 nella pratica
Esempi di prassi di rendicontazione completa e parziale. Sono analisi basate sulle evidenze, non modelli da copiare.
Chailease Holding Company Limited’s 2024 Sustainability Report is described on the current page as reporting no violations involving the rights of indigenous peoples.
A direct zero-incidents response addresses the quantitative requirement in GRI 411-1(a). Where no incidents exist, the four status and remediation references in GRI 411-1(b) are not applicable.
The card should therefore:
retain the zero-incidents result;
identify the exact page containing the direct answer;
remove the statement that outcomes or corrective measures are insufficient;
remove discrimination, forced-labor and general employee-incident information;
remove supplier social-assessment information; and
classify the disclosure as an adequate zero-incidents response, subject to confirming the cited page in the report.
A report with zero incidents is not required to invent corrective actions or remediation outcomes.
The current card itself states that the report records no violations but then incorrectly treats missing corrective-action detail and supplier assessment as gaps.
SQM’s 2024 Sustainability Report is described on the current page as stating that there were no violations involving the rights of indigenous peoples during the reporting period.
The card should:
retain the direct zero-incidents answer on page 362;
state that the four incident-status and remediation references are not applicable because the total is zero;
remove corruption and legal-action information from page 364;
remove child-labor and health-and-safety information;
remove the claim that those unrelated topics are insufficiently quantified; and
classify the report as an adequate zero-incidents disclosure for GRI 411-1.
Other human-rights or community-management disclosures can provide context but are not needed to complete a zero-incidents response under this disclosure.
The current card confirms the zero result but assesses unrelated disclosures as though they were part of GRI 411-1.
Zydus Wellness Limited’s Integrated Annual Report 2024–25 reports zero incidents involving the rights of indigenous peoples on report page 86.
The GRI content index on report page 99 directs users to page 86.
The card should:
correct the substantive page reference from page 52 to page 86;
state explicitly that the reported value is zero;
recognize that status and remediation information is not applicable where no incidents exist;
remove manufactured-capital and customer-health-and-safety information;
remove the absence of case outcomes or mitigation measures as a gap; and
classify the disclosure as an adequate zero-incidents response.
The surrounding Human Rights section provides policy and grievance-mechanism context, but this context is not a substitute for—and is not needed to supplement—the direct zero result.
Zydus reports: zero incident of violations involving rights of indigenous people on report page 86, while its GRI index maps 411-1 to that page.
Chiedi all’assistente IA di Study Studio di questa informativa
Ottieni risposte pratiche per il tuo contesto di rendicontazione. Le prime due risposte sono gratuite: iscriviti gratis a LRA Community per continuare senza limiti.
Riferimenti al framework
Requisiti GRI pertinenti e informative correlate
Riferimenti disponibili al framework e informative vicine utili alla preparazione di questo requisito.
GRI
GRI 411-1
all’interno di GRI 411: Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Correlati ed esplora
Altro in GRI 411 → Sfoglia il catalogo completo → Home della Biblioteca delle informative → Cerca in tutte le informative →
Approfondisci · GRI 411-1
Impara a preparare questa informativa dall’inizio alla fine
This guide covers the incident total and the four status and action references required by Disclosure 411-1.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.
Ottieni i tuoi strumenti per GRI 411-1 — gratis
I tuoi strumenti di preparazione sono gratuiti per i membri di LRA Community e per gli studenti. Registrati una volta (è gratis) e il tuo download parte subito — insieme alla Biblioteca delle informative, ai modelli e all’assistente IA di LRA.
Ci sei — il download sta per iniziare
Il file è in download. Anche il tuo Cabinet Community — con la Biblioteca delle informative, i modelli e l’assistente IA di LRA — è pronto.
Apri il tuo Cabinet →