Перейти к сути раскрытия

Библиотека раскрытийПрактическое руководство по каждому раскрытию в отчётности

GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts·Disclosure GRI 203-2

Significant indirect economic impacts

Практическое руководство по подготовке этого раскрытия. Используйте карточку, чтобы определить, какую информацию подготовить, проверить утверждения и организовать подтверждающие доказательства. За точными требованиями всегда обращайтесь к официальному источнику Global Reporting Initiative.

Правовой статус

GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts 2016 remains applicable at the date of this review. It is included in Phase 3 of GRI's Economic Impact project; no revised GRI 203 Standard is yet applicable.

Опубликованный паспорт

Последняя проверка 2026-08-01
RK Проверил Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert 15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures Canary Wharf, London Учебные материалы LRA · Не выпущено и не одобрено Global Reporting Initiative

Стандарт

GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts

Disclosure GRI 203-2 · 2016

Вступает в силу

2018-07-01

Официальный источник: Открыть ↗

Последняя проверка

2026-08-01

Учебные материалы LRA · Не выпущено и не одобрено Global Reporting Initiative

Суть раскрытия

Disclosure 203-2 requires an organization to report examples of its significant identified indirect economic impacts, including positive and negative impacts. An indirect economic impact is an additional economic consequence arising from the direct impact of the organization’s financial transactions and flows of money with stakeholders. It can be monetary or non-monetary and can affect productive capacity, stakeholder well-being and longer-term development prospects.

For each reported example, the organization explains why the impact is significant in the context of relevant external benchmarks and stakeholder priorities. External benchmarks can include national or international standards, protocols, policy agendas, official economic statistics and other authoritative reference points. Internal budget or expenditure comparisons can provide additional context but do not replace the required external context.

The disclosure should report the economic consequence, not only the organization’s activity or direct expenditure. For example, local procurement expenditure is a direct financial flow; related changes in supplier output, employment, income, skills or local tax receipts can be indirect economic impacts.

The organization should select examples through its process for identifying impacts and determining material topics. The selection should reflect significant positive and negative impacts across relevant activities and business relationships and should not be limited to flagship projects or positive success stories.

Это учебное руководство LRA помогает в подготовке раскрытия. За точными требованиями всегда обращайтесь к официальному источнику Global Reporting Initiative.

Прежде чем начать

Прежде чем начать

Короткий чек-лист перед подготовкой этого раскрытия — отмечайте пункты по мере их закрытия.

Подготовка

Ключевая информация для подготовки

Поле подготовки Что зафиксировать Подсказка по доказательствам Ответственный
Description of the indirect economic impact Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting description of the indirect economic impact. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Positive or negative Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting positive or negative. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Actual or potential Necessary contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting actual or potential. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Direct financial flow or activity causing the impact Necessary methodological information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting direct financial flow or activity causing the impact. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Additional indirect economic consequence Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting additional indirect economic consequence. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Stakeholders affected Required contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting stakeholders affected. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Economy or geographic area affected Required contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting economy or geographic area affected. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Value-chain location Necessary contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting value-chain location. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Time horizon Necessary contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting time horizon. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Monetary or non-monetary Necessary contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting monetary or non-monetary. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
External benchmark Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting external benchmark. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Stakeholder priority Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting stakeholder priority. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Source of stakeholder priority Required evidence. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting source of stakeholder priority. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Significance explanation Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting significance explanation. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Measurement or estimation method Required where quantitative data are reported. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting measurement or estimation method. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Attribution method Required where the organization claims causation. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting attribution method. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Assumptions and limitations Required where estimates are used. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting assumptions and limitations. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Negative consequences assessed Required methodological control. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting negative consequences assessed. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Evidence source Assurance control. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting evidence source. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
GRI 3 material-topic linkage Required contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting gri 3 material-topic linkage. Operations / Supply Chain / Sustainability Reporting
Reason for omission Required in GRI content index where an applicable requirement is omitted. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting reason for omission. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
+ Показать подпункты GRI 203-2 (рабочий чек-лист LRA)

Как это подготовить

Disclosure 203-2 requires an organization to report examples of its significant identified indirect economic impacts, including positive and negative impacts. An indirect economic impact is an additional economic consequence arising from the direct impact of the organization’s financial transactions and flows of money with stakeholders. It can be monetary or non-monetary and can affect productive capacity, stakeholder well-being and longer-term development prospects.
Collect and reconcile the records for: Description of the indirect economic impact; Positive or negative; Actual or potential; Direct financial flow or activity causing the impact; Additional indirect economic consequence; Stakeholders affected; Economy or geographic area affected; Value-chain location; Time horizon; Monetary or non-monetary; External benchmark; Stakeholder priority; Source of stakeholder priority; Significance explanation; Measurement or estimation method; Attribution method; Assumptions and limitations; Negative consequences assessed; Evidence source; GRI 3 material-topic linkage; Reason for omission.
Apply Disclosure 203-2 when the related topic is material and this disclosure is relevant to the organisation's impacts, or when an applicable GRI Sector Standard identifies it for reporting.
Draft the response using the defined terms shown in the disclosure focus; do not substitute broader internal labels.
Review the final wording against every requirement and the supporting governance or data records before sign-off.

Запросить данные

Request the disclosure evidence

Переведите раскрытие на язык внутреннего бизнес-вопроса, а затем адаптируйте его под терминологию вашей организации.

Provide the reporting-period records and reconciliations for Disclosure 203-2: Description of the indirect economic impact; Positive or negative; Actual or potential; Direct financial flow or activity causing the impact; Additional indirect economic consequence; Stakeholders affected; Economy or geographic area affected; Value-chain location; Time horizon; Monetary or non-monetary; External benchmark; Stakeholder priority; Source of stakeholder priority; Significance explanation; Measurement or estimation method; Attribution method; Assumptions and limitations; Negative consequences assessed; Evidence source; GRI 3 material-topic linkage; Reason for omission. Include scope, definitions, methods, assumptions, limitations, owners and approvals.

Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined GRI terms and the scope described above.

Более удачный запрос

Provide the reporting-period records and reconciliations for Disclosure 203-2: Description of the indirect economic impact; Positive or negative; Actual or potential; Direct financial flow or activity causing the impact; Additional indirect economic consequence; Stakeholders affected; Economy or geographic area affected; Value-chain location; Time horizon; Monetary or non-monetary; External benchmark; Stakeholder priority; Source of stakeholder priority; Significance explanation; Measurement or estimation method; Attribution method; Assumptions and limitations; Negative consequences assessed; Evidence source; GRI 3 material-topic linkage; Reason for omission. Include scope, definitions, methods, assumptions, limitations, owners and approvals.

Составьте раскрытие

Заметки, которые превращают данные в раскрытие

Учебные шаблоны LRA — адаптируйте их под вашу организацию и сверьтесь с официальным источником перед утверждением.

Примечание о методике

The organization should select examples through its process for identifying impacts and determining material topics. The selection should reflect significant positive and negative impacts across relevant activities and business relationships and should not be limited to flagship projects or positive success stories.

Примечание о контексте

Keep mandatory Requirements, GRI recommendations and additional LRA preparation controls clearly distinguished. Use a GRI 1 reason for omission where an applicable requirement cannot be reported.

Центр загрузок

Инструменты и формы для подготовки

Профессиональные инструменты подготовки для GRI 203-2 — бесплатно с членством в LRA Community. Зарегистрируйтесь один раз (это бесплатно), и откроются все загрузки, а вместе с ними Библиотека раскрытий, шаблоны и AI-ассистент LRA.

Бесплатно · Участникам сообщества

Готовность к заверению

Для каждого утверждения проверьте доказательства

Утверждение Риски Доказательства для проверки
Description of the indirect economic impact is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates description of the indirect economic impact.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting description of the indirect economic impact.
Positive or negative is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates positive or negative.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting positive or negative.
Actual or potential is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates actual or potential.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting actual or potential.
Direct financial flow or activity causing the impact is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates direct financial flow or activity causing the impact.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting direct financial flow or activity causing the impact.
Additional indirect economic consequence is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates additional indirect economic consequence.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting additional indirect economic consequence.
Stakeholders affected is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates stakeholders affected.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting stakeholders affected.
Economy or geographic area affected is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates economy or geographic area affected.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting economy or geographic area affected.
Value-chain location is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates value-chain location.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting value-chain location.
Time horizon is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates time horizon.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting time horizon.
Monetary or non-monetary is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates monetary or non-monetary.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting monetary or non-monetary.
External benchmark is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates external benchmark.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting external benchmark.
Stakeholder priority is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates stakeholder priority.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting stakeholder priority.
Source of stakeholder priority is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates source of stakeholder priority.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting source of stakeholder priority.
Significance explanation is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates significance explanation.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting significance explanation.
Measurement or estimation method is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates measurement or estimation method.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting measurement or estimation method.
Attribution method is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates attribution method.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting attribution method.
Assumptions and limitations is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates assumptions and limitations.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting assumptions and limitations.
Negative consequences assessed is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates negative consequences assessed.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting negative consequences assessed.
Evidence source is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates evidence source.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting evidence source.
GRI 3 material-topic linkage is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates gri 3 material-topic linkage.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting gri 3 material-topic linkage.
Reason for omission is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates reason for omission.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting reason for omission.

Пакет доказательств для подготовки

Типичные пробелы в отчётности

Reporting an activity or direct expenditure instead of its indirect economic consequence.
Using internal budget comparisons instead of external benchmarks and stakeholder priorities.
Using internal labels in place of the defined GRI terms.
Leaving a required preparation field unsupported by traceable evidence.
Treating GRI recommendations as mandatory requirements or mandatory requirements as optional.
Publishing estimates, exclusions or partial scope without methods, assumptions and the applicable reason for omission.
✓ AI-ассистент LRA · С участием человека
Dr Ross Kurinko

Спросите AI-ассистента Study Studio об этом раскрытии

Получайте практические ответы для вашего контекста отчётности. Первые два ответа бесплатны — вступите в LRA Community бесплатно, чтобы продолжить без ограничений.

Попробуйте Как подготовить GRI 203-2? Какие данные нужно собрать? Каких ошибок избегать?
2 бесплатных ответа

Ссылки на стандарты

Соответствующие требования GRI и смежные раскрытия

Доступные ссылки на стандарты и близкие раскрытия, полезные при подготовке этого требования.

GRI

GRI 203-2

в составе GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts

Открыть официальный источник →

Связанное и другое

Больше в GRI 203 → Открыть полный каталог → Главная Библиотеки раскрытий → Искать по всем раскрытиям →

Углубиться · GRI 203-2

Научитесь готовить это раскрытие от начала до конца

This guide covers one disclosure. The GRI Standards Certified Training — taken as a bundle with an ESRS course — walks the full workflow: datapoints, evidence, drafting and assurance, with exercises on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

Explore GRI training (ESRS bundle) →
Как построена эта библиотека 312 опубликованных отчётов проиндексировано 63 171 страниц с постраничными ссылками 272 карточек раскрытий, созданных практиками
/ru/knowledge-hub/disclosure-cards/gri-203-2/