GRI 205: Anti-corruption·Disclosure GRI 205-2
Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures
Guide pratique pour préparer cette information. Utilisez cette fiche pour identifier les données à préparer, vérifier les affirmations et organiser les preuves. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle Global Reporting Initiative.
Statut juridique
GRI 205: Anti-corruption 2016 remains applicable at the date of this review. A revised Corruption Standard has been published only as an exposure draft and is not yet an applicable requirement.
Passeport publié
Dernière révision le 2026-08-01
Révisé par
Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn
Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert
GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert
15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures
Canary Wharf, London
Support pédagogique LRA · Non publié ni approuvé par Global Reporting Initiative
Norme
GRI 205: Anti-corruption
Disclosure GRI 205-2 · 2016
Dernière révision
2026-08-01
Support pédagogique LRA · Non publié ni approuvé par Global Reporting Initiative
Objet de l’information
Disclosure 205-2 requires an organization to report the extent to which its anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to governance body members, employees and business partners, and the extent to which governance body members and employees have received anti-corruption training.
For governance body members, the organization reports the total number and percentage receiving communication and training, broken down by region. For employees, it reports communication and training counts and percentages by employee category and region. For business partners, it reports communication counts and percentages by business-partner type and region. It also describes communication provided to any other persons or organizations.
Governance body members should be excluded from employee-category figures. GRI recommends using information reported under Disclosure 405-1 to identify governance bodies, their members and employee categories, and recommends estimating the total number of business partners where necessary.
Communication should not be limited to formal briefings; it can include documented policy distribution, onboarding, contractual communication, portal notifications or other channels. Under the current GRI 205-2, training figures are required for governance body members and employees, but not for business partners.
The organization should define the regional taxonomy, reporting population, cut-off date, communication criterion and training criterion used. A global aggregate can be presented additionally, but it does not replace the required breakdowns.
Ce support pédagogique LRA aide à préparer l’information. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle Global Reporting Initiative.
Avant de commencer
Avant de commencer
Une courte liste de contrôle avant de préparer cette information — cochez chaque point une fois réglé.
Préparation
Informations clés à préparer
| Champ à préparer | Ce qu’il faut recueillir | Indice de preuve | Responsable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governance bodies identified | Recommended by GRI. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance bodies identified. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Governance body members by region | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance body members by region. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Governance communication count | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance communication count. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Governance communication percentage | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance communication percentage. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Governance training count | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance training count. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Governance training percentage | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance training percentage. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Employee population excluding governance body members | Recommended by GRI. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee population excluding governance body members. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Employee category | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee category. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Employee region | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee region. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Employee communication count | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee communication count. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Employee communication percentage | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee communication percentage. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Employee training count | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee training count. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Employee training percentage | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee training percentage. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Full business-partner population | Required denominator. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting full business-partner population. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Estimated total business partners | Recommended where necessary. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting estimated total business partners. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Business partner type | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting business partner type. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Business partner region | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting business partner region. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Business partner communication count | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting business partner communication count. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Business partner communication percentage | Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting business partner communication percentage. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Business partner training | Additional only under current GRI 205-2. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting business partner training. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Other persons or organizations informed | Required description where applicable. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting other persons or organizations informed. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Communication criterion | Required methodological information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting communication criterion. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Training criterion | Required methodological information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting training criterion. | People / Compliance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Reporting-period and cut-off basis | Required methodological information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting reporting-period and cut-off basis. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
| Regional taxonomy | Required methodological information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting regional taxonomy. | Tax / Finance / Sustainability Reporting |
| Reason for omission | Required in GRI content index where applicable. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting reason for omission. | Sustainability Reporting / data owner |
Comment le préparer
Demander les données
Request the disclosure evidence
Traduisez l’information en une question métier interne, puis adaptez-la au vocabulaire de votre organisation.
Provide the reporting-period records and reconciliations for Disclosure 205-2: Governance bodies identified; Governance body members by region; Governance communication count; Governance communication percentage; Governance training count; Governance training percentage; Employee population excluding governance body members; Employee category; Employee region; Employee communication count; Employee communication percentage; Employee training count; Employee training percentage; Full business-partner population; Estimated total business partners; Business partner type; Business partner region; Business partner communication count; Business partner communication percentage; Business partner training; Other persons or organizations informed; Communication criterion; Training criterion; Reporting-period and cut-off basis; Regional taxonomy; Reason for omission. Include scope, definitions, methods, assumptions, limitations, owners and approvals.
Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined GRI terms and the scope described above.
Meilleure demande
Provide the reporting-period records and reconciliations for Disclosure 205-2: Governance bodies identified; Governance body members by region; Governance communication count; Governance communication percentage; Governance training count; Governance training percentage; Employee population excluding governance body members; Employee category; Employee region; Employee communication count; Employee communication percentage; Employee training count; Employee training percentage; Full business-partner population; Estimated total business partners; Business partner type; Business partner region; Business partner communication count; Business partner communication percentage; Business partner training; Other persons or organizations informed; Communication criterion; Training criterion; Reporting-period and cut-off basis; Regional taxonomy; Reason for omission. Include scope, definitions, methods, assumptions, limitations, owners and approvals.
Rédigez votre information
Des notes qui transforment les données en information publiée
Modèles pédagogiques LRA — adaptez-les à votre organisation et vérifiez la source officielle avant validation.
Note méthodologique
The organization should define the regional taxonomy, reporting population, cut-off date, communication criterion and training criterion used. A global aggregate can be presented additionally, but it does not replace the required breakdowns.
Note de contexte
Keep mandatory Requirements, GRI recommendations and additional LRA preparation controls clearly distinguished. Use a GRI 1 reason for omission where an applicable requirement cannot be reported.
Centre de téléchargement
Outils et formulaires de préparation
Outils de préparation professionnels pour GRI 205-2 — gratuits avec l’adhésion à LRA Community. Inscrivez-vous une fois (c’est gratuit) et tous les téléchargements se débloquent, avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA.
Préparation à l’assurance
Pour chaque affirmation, vérifiez les preuves
| Affirmation | Risque | Preuves à vérifier |
|---|---|---|
| Governance bodies identified is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates governance bodies identified. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance bodies identified. |
| Governance body members by region is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates governance body members by region. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance body members by region. |
| Governance communication count is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates governance communication count. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance communication count. |
| Governance communication percentage is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates governance communication percentage. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance communication percentage. |
| Governance training count is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates governance training count. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance training count. |
| Governance training percentage is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates governance training percentage. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting governance training percentage. |
| Employee population excluding governance body members is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates employee population excluding governance body members. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee population excluding governance body members. |
| Employee category is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates employee category. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee category. |
| Employee region is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates employee region. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee region. |
| Employee communication count is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates employee communication count. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee communication count. |
| Employee communication percentage is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates employee communication percentage. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee communication percentage. |
| Employee training count is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates employee training count. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee training count. |
| Employee training percentage is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates employee training percentage. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting employee training percentage. |
| Full business-partner population is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates full business-partner population. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting full business-partner population. |
| Estimated total business partners is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates estimated total business partners. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting estimated total business partners. |
| Business partner type is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates business partner type. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting business partner type. |
| Business partner region is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates business partner region. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting business partner region. |
| Business partner communication count is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates business partner communication count. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting business partner communication count. |
| Business partner communication percentage is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates business partner communication percentage. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting business partner communication percentage. |
| Business partner training is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates business partner training. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting business partner training. |
| Other persons or organizations informed is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates other persons or organizations informed. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting other persons or organizations informed. |
| Communication criterion is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates communication criterion. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting communication criterion. |
| Training criterion is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates training criterion. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting training criterion. |
| Reporting-period and cut-off basis is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates reporting-period and cut-off basis. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting reporting-period and cut-off basis. |
| Regional taxonomy is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates regional taxonomy. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting regional taxonomy. |
| Reason for omission is reported accurately and completely. | The response omits, misclassifies or overstates reason for omission. | Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting reason for omission. |
Dossier de preuves à préparer
Lacunes fréquentes dans les rapports
Interrogez l’assistant IA de Study Studio sur cette information
Obtenez des réponses concrètes pour votre contexte de reporting. Les deux premières réponses sont gratuites — rejoignez gratuitement LRA Community pour continuer sans limite.
Références au référentiel
Exigences GRI applicables et informations connexes
Références disponibles du référentiel et informations voisines utiles à la préparation de cette exigence.
GRI
GRI 205-2
au sein de GRI 205 : Anti-corruption
Connexes et exploration
Plus dans GRI 205 → Parcourir le catalogue complet → Accueil de la Bibliothèque des informations → Rechercher dans toutes les informations →
Aller plus loin · GRI 205-2
Apprenez à préparer cette information de bout en bout
This guide covers one disclosure. The GRI Standards Certified Training — taken as a bundle with an ESRS course — walks the full workflow: datapoints, evidence, drafting and assurance, with exercises on your own data.
Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.
Obtenez vos outils GRI 205-2 — gratuitement
Vos outils de préparation sont gratuits pour les membres de LRA Community et les étudiants. Inscrivez-vous une fois (c’est gratuit) et votre téléchargement démarre aussitôt — avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA.
C’est fait — votre téléchargement démarre
Votre fichier est en cours de téléchargement. Votre Cabinet Community — avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA — est prêt lui aussi.
Ouvrir votre Cabinet →