Aller à l’essentiel de l’information

Bibliothèque des disclosuresGuide pratique pour chaque information à publier

GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts·Disclosure GRI 203-2

Significant indirect economic impacts

Guide pratique pour préparer cette information. Utilisez cette fiche pour identifier les données à préparer, vérifier les affirmations et organiser les preuves. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle Global Reporting Initiative.

Statut juridique

GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts 2016 remains applicable at the date of this review. It is included in Phase 3 of GRI's Economic Impact project; no revised GRI 203 Standard is yet applicable.

Passeport publié

Dernière révision le 2026-08-01
RK Révisé par Dr Ross KurinkoLinkedIn Strategic ESG Advisor · IFRS S1 & S2 / GRI / ESRS expert GRI Certified Global Trainer · PhD, University of Cambridge · ESG-AI expert 15+ years on FTSE 100 & Fortune Global 500 disclosures Canary Wharf, London Support pédagogique LRA · Non publié ni approuvé par Global Reporting Initiative

Norme

GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts

Disclosure GRI 203-2 · 2016

En vigueur

2018-07-01

Source officielle : Ouvrir ↗

Dernière révision

2026-08-01

Support pédagogique LRA · Non publié ni approuvé par Global Reporting Initiative

Objet de l’information

Disclosure 203-2 requires an organization to report examples of its significant identified indirect economic impacts, including positive and negative impacts. An indirect economic impact is an additional economic consequence arising from the direct impact of the organization’s financial transactions and flows of money with stakeholders. It can be monetary or non-monetary and can affect productive capacity, stakeholder well-being and longer-term development prospects.

For each reported example, the organization explains why the impact is significant in the context of relevant external benchmarks and stakeholder priorities. External benchmarks can include national or international standards, protocols, policy agendas, official economic statistics and other authoritative reference points. Internal budget or expenditure comparisons can provide additional context but do not replace the required external context.

The disclosure should report the economic consequence, not only the organization’s activity or direct expenditure. For example, local procurement expenditure is a direct financial flow; related changes in supplier output, employment, income, skills or local tax receipts can be indirect economic impacts.

The organization should select examples through its process for identifying impacts and determining material topics. The selection should reflect significant positive and negative impacts across relevant activities and business relationships and should not be limited to flagship projects or positive success stories.

Ce support pédagogique LRA aide à préparer l’information. Pour les exigences exactes, reportez-vous toujours à la source officielle Global Reporting Initiative.

Avant de commencer

Avant de commencer

Une courte liste de contrôle avant de préparer cette information — cochez chaque point une fois réglé.

Préparation

Informations clés à préparer

Champ à préparer Ce qu’il faut recueillir Indice de preuve Responsable
Description of the indirect economic impact Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting description of the indirect economic impact. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Positive or negative Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting positive or negative. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Actual or potential Necessary contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting actual or potential. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Direct financial flow or activity causing the impact Necessary methodological information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting direct financial flow or activity causing the impact. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Additional indirect economic consequence Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting additional indirect economic consequence. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Stakeholders affected Required contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting stakeholders affected. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Economy or geographic area affected Required contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting economy or geographic area affected. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Value-chain location Necessary contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting value-chain location. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Time horizon Necessary contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting time horizon. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Monetary or non-monetary Necessary contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting monetary or non-monetary. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
External benchmark Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting external benchmark. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Stakeholder priority Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting stakeholder priority. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Source of stakeholder priority Required evidence. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting source of stakeholder priority. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Significance explanation Required. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting significance explanation. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Measurement or estimation method Required where quantitative data are reported. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting measurement or estimation method. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Attribution method Required where the organization claims causation. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting attribution method. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Assumptions and limitations Required where estimates are used. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting assumptions and limitations. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Negative consequences assessed Required methodological control. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting negative consequences assessed. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
Evidence source Assurance control. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting evidence source. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
GRI 3 material-topic linkage Required contextual information. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting gri 3 material-topic linkage. Operations / Supply Chain / Sustainability Reporting
Reason for omission Required in GRI content index where an applicable requirement is omitted. Capture and reconcile this item using the scope, defined terms and calculation basis in the reviewed Disclosure focus. Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting reason for omission. Sustainability Reporting / data owner
+ Afficher les sous-éléments de GRI 203-2 (liste de travail LRA)

Comment le préparer

Disclosure 203-2 requires an organization to report examples of its significant identified indirect economic impacts, including positive and negative impacts. An indirect economic impact is an additional economic consequence arising from the direct impact of the organization’s financial transactions and flows of money with stakeholders. It can be monetary or non-monetary and can affect productive capacity, stakeholder well-being and longer-term development prospects.
Collect and reconcile the records for: Description of the indirect economic impact; Positive or negative; Actual or potential; Direct financial flow or activity causing the impact; Additional indirect economic consequence; Stakeholders affected; Economy or geographic area affected; Value-chain location; Time horizon; Monetary or non-monetary; External benchmark; Stakeholder priority; Source of stakeholder priority; Significance explanation; Measurement or estimation method; Attribution method; Assumptions and limitations; Negative consequences assessed; Evidence source; GRI 3 material-topic linkage; Reason for omission.
Apply Disclosure 203-2 when the related topic is material and this disclosure is relevant to the organisation's impacts, or when an applicable GRI Sector Standard identifies it for reporting.
Draft the response using the defined terms shown in the disclosure focus; do not substitute broader internal labels.
Review the final wording against every requirement and the supporting governance or data records before sign-off.

Demander les données

Request the disclosure evidence

Traduisez l’information en une question métier interne, puis adaptez-la au vocabulaire de votre organisation.

Provide the reporting-period records and reconciliations for Disclosure 203-2: Description of the indirect economic impact; Positive or negative; Actual or potential; Direct financial flow or activity causing the impact; Additional indirect economic consequence; Stakeholders affected; Economy or geographic area affected; Value-chain location; Time horizon; Monetary or non-monetary; External benchmark; Stakeholder priority; Source of stakeholder priority; Significance explanation; Measurement or estimation method; Attribution method; Assumptions and limitations; Negative consequences assessed; Evidence source; GRI 3 material-topic linkage; Reason for omission. Include scope, definitions, methods, assumptions, limitations, owners and approvals.

Use the organisation's own role and document names, but preserve the defined GRI terms and the scope described above.

Meilleure demande

Provide the reporting-period records and reconciliations for Disclosure 203-2: Description of the indirect economic impact; Positive or negative; Actual or potential; Direct financial flow or activity causing the impact; Additional indirect economic consequence; Stakeholders affected; Economy or geographic area affected; Value-chain location; Time horizon; Monetary or non-monetary; External benchmark; Stakeholder priority; Source of stakeholder priority; Significance explanation; Measurement or estimation method; Attribution method; Assumptions and limitations; Negative consequences assessed; Evidence source; GRI 3 material-topic linkage; Reason for omission. Include scope, definitions, methods, assumptions, limitations, owners and approvals.

Rédigez votre information

Des notes qui transforment les données en information publiée

Modèles pédagogiques LRA — adaptez-les à votre organisation et vérifiez la source officielle avant validation.

Note méthodologique

The organization should select examples through its process for identifying impacts and determining material topics. The selection should reflect significant positive and negative impacts across relevant activities and business relationships and should not be limited to flagship projects or positive success stories.

Note de contexte

Keep mandatory Requirements, GRI recommendations and additional LRA preparation controls clearly distinguished. Use a GRI 1 reason for omission where an applicable requirement cannot be reported.

Centre de téléchargement

Outils et formulaires de préparation

Outils de préparation professionnels pour GRI 203-2 — gratuits avec l’adhésion à LRA Community. Inscrivez-vous une fois (c’est gratuit) et tous les téléchargements se débloquent, avec la Bibliothèque des informations, les modèles et l’assistant IA LRA.

Gratuit · Membres de la Community

Préparation à l’assurance

Pour chaque affirmation, vérifiez les preuves

Affirmation Risque Preuves à vérifier
Description of the indirect economic impact is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates description of the indirect economic impact.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting description of the indirect economic impact.
Positive or negative is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates positive or negative.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting positive or negative.
Actual or potential is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates actual or potential.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting actual or potential.
Direct financial flow or activity causing the impact is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates direct financial flow or activity causing the impact.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting direct financial flow or activity causing the impact.
Additional indirect economic consequence is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates additional indirect economic consequence.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting additional indirect economic consequence.
Stakeholders affected is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates stakeholders affected.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting stakeholders affected.
Economy or geographic area affected is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates economy or geographic area affected.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting economy or geographic area affected.
Value-chain location is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates value-chain location.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting value-chain location.
Time horizon is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates time horizon.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting time horizon.
Monetary or non-monetary is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates monetary or non-monetary.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting monetary or non-monetary.
External benchmark is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates external benchmark.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting external benchmark.
Stakeholder priority is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates stakeholder priority.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting stakeholder priority.
Source of stakeholder priority is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates source of stakeholder priority.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting source of stakeholder priority.
Significance explanation is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates significance explanation.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting significance explanation.
Measurement or estimation method is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates measurement or estimation method.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting measurement or estimation method.
Attribution method is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates attribution method.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting attribution method.
Assumptions and limitations is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates assumptions and limitations.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting assumptions and limitations.
Negative consequences assessed is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates negative consequences assessed.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting negative consequences assessed.
Evidence source is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates evidence source.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting evidence source.
GRI 3 material-topic linkage is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates gri 3 material-topic linkage.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting gri 3 material-topic linkage.
Reason for omission is reported accurately and completely.The response omits, misclassifies or overstates reason for omission.Approved source records, calculation files, reconciliations and review evidence supporting reason for omission.

Dossier de preuves à préparer

Lacunes fréquentes dans les rapports

Reporting an activity or direct expenditure instead of its indirect economic consequence.
Using internal budget comparisons instead of external benchmarks and stakeholder priorities.
Using internal labels in place of the defined GRI terms.
Leaving a required preparation field unsupported by traceable evidence.
Treating GRI recommendations as mandatory requirements or mandatory requirements as optional.
Publishing estimates, exclusions or partial scope without methods, assumptions and the applicable reason for omission.
✓ Assistant IA LRA · Supervision humaine
Dr Ross Kurinko

Interrogez l’assistant IA de Study Studio sur cette information

Obtenez des réponses concrètes pour votre contexte de reporting. Les deux premières réponses sont gratuites — rejoignez gratuitement LRA Community pour continuer sans limite.

Essayez Comment préparer GRI 203-2 ? Quelles données dois-je collecter ? Quelles erreurs éviter ?
2 réponses gratuites

Références au référentiel

Exigences GRI applicables et informations connexes

Références disponibles du référentiel et informations voisines utiles à la préparation de cette exigence.

GRI

GRI 203-2

au sein de GRI 203 : Indirect Economic Impacts

Ouvrir la source officielle →

Connexes et exploration

Plus dans GRI 203 → Parcourir le catalogue complet → Accueil de la Bibliothèque des informations → Rechercher dans toutes les informations →

Aller plus loin · GRI 203-2

Apprenez à préparer cette information de bout en bout

This guide covers one disclosure. The GRI Standards Certified Training — taken as a bundle with an ESRS course — walks the full workflow: datapoints, evidence, drafting and assurance, with exercises on your own data.

Available as Guided Flex, Live Cohort, 1:1 Expert Mentorship or Corporate Programme.

Explore GRI training (ESRS bundle) →
Comment cette bibliothèque est construite 312 rapports publiés indexés 63 171 pages avec citations au niveau de la page 272 fiches disclosure conçues par des praticiens
/fr/knowledge-hub/disclosure-cards/gri-203-2/