This disclosure asks an organisation to explain how its strategy and business model are connected to sustainability matters, and how those matters are reflected across the value chain. In practice, it is about showing where sustainability is most relevant to the business, how it affects decision-making, and which parts of the organisation and value chain are considered in that assessment.
The practical focus is breadth and realism, not just a description of a few visible sites or initiatives. An organisation should think about coverage across its operations, products, services, suppliers and other upstream and downstream activities, and explain whether the picture it presents reflects the whole business or only selected areas.
This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official EFRAG source.
A quick mental checklist before you prepare this disclosure — tick each as you settle it.
Key datapoints to prepare
How to prepare it
Request the business model and value chain evidence from Strategy / Commercial
Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.
Use your own internal labels first, then map them to the reporting fields. For example, describe products, services, customer groups, operating segments, supply chain stages, and any restricted or sensitive lines in the language your teams already use.
Please provide the ESRS 2:SBM-1 information on products, value chain position, upstream and downstream overview, significant products and markets, changes in the period, sector classification, internal activities, revenue share, and fossil fuel / chemicals / controversial weapons / tobacco flags.
Why it fails: It uses framework language that many business owners will not recognise, so it is harder to answer quickly and accurately. It also mixes several different asks into one long sentence, which makes it easy to miss the practical evidence needed to support the narrative.
Please send the business description pack for [reporting period] for [entity / business unit]. We need your own names for the main products and services, where they sit in the chain, the key upstream and downstream stages, the most important customer groups and markets, what changed this period, and the basis for any activity or revenue stream you treat as significant. If any line of business needs separate handling because of policy, legal, or reputational sensitivity, please flag it and include the source files.
Notes that turn data into a disclosure
LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.
Start by explaining how the organisation defined its main business lines, which activities were treated as significant, how upstream and downstream parts of the business were identified, and on what basis any revenue share or significance judgement was made.
Explain what the figures mean in practice by linking the organisation’s products and services to its place in the value chain, the markets or customer groups they serve, and the business areas that matter most for sustainability strategy.
If there were changes in the period, describe what shifted in the product or service mix, which markets or activities were affected, and whether those changes altered the organisation’s sustainability focus or significance assessment.
Preparation tools & forms
Professional preparation tools for SBM-1 — free with an LRA Community membership. Register once (it's free) and every download unlocks, together with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.
For each claim, check the evidence
Evidence pack to prepare
Common reporting gaps
Mistakes to avoid when collecting the data
Where judgement is often needed
Illustrative examples
Synthetic, written by LRA — not from a company report, not text from any standard.
We describe a business that makes packaged food ingredients and finished products, with our own operations in Europe and North America, plus a supply base for agricultural inputs, packaging and logistics, and customers that include retailers, food manufacturers and foodservice groups. In the period, our main lines were bakery ingredients and chilled meals; these were the largest parts of revenue, and we note that the mix shifted toward higher-margin convenience products, which we treat as more relevant to our sustainability aims because they depend on lower-waste packaging and more traceable sourcing. - We classify ourselves in a food-processing sector grouping; the activities that matter most internally are procurement, manufacturing, cold-chain distribution and product development, and we regard them as significant because they account for 92% of revenue. - We do not operate in fossil fuels, chemicals or controversial weapons.
This example shows how a reporter can summarise what it makes, where it sits in the chain, which products and customers matter most, what changed during the year, why those lines are sustainability-relevant, how it classifies itself, which internal activities are most important, and whether it is linked to the three specified sensitive areas.
We are an industrial equipment business that designs, assembles and services energy-efficient pumps and control systems, with component sourcing from specialist suppliers and sales to utilities, process industries and infrastructure operators. Our most important lines were pump systems and digital monitoring services; together they made up most of the year’s turnover, and we highlight them because they support energy efficiency, asset life extension and lower maintenance waste. - We place ourselves in an industrial equipment sector grouping; the internal work we see as most significant is engineering, assembly, field service and software support, and we consider it significant because it generated 88% of revenue. - We do not operate in fossil fuels, chemicals or controversial weapons.
This example shows a different kind of reporter using the same disclosure to explain its products, chain position, key markets, year-on-year mix changes, sustainability links, sector grouping, major internal functions, and the three sensitive-area flags.
How companies report SBM-1 in practice
Real reports where this topic is disclosed. These are report practice, not exact disclosure templates to copy.

Scenarios to work through
A group sells packaged food through supermarkets and online subscriptions. During drafting, the team can describe the main offerings, but the supply chain map is split across procurement, logistics and sales, and no one has yet agreed which parts sit before the group and which sit after it.
A manufacturer has added a new product line in the year, which now accounts for 18% of turnover, while an older line still makes up 62%. The reporting team is unsure whether to mention only the largest line or also explain the newer line because it is growing quickly and is linked to the group’s sustainability plan.
A services group reports under a broad industry label, but its main activity is actually software implementation, with a smaller managed-support arm. The finance team wants to name only the broad sector label and leave out the internal activities because they think the sector code is enough.
A diversified group has a small chemicals unit, a larger consumer products arm, and no fossil fuel, weapons or tobacco operations. The drafting team is unsure whether they should still answer the industry-screening items and whether a zero answer needs any related turnover explanation.
Related framework references
How this disclosure maps across the major reporting frameworks.
Questions this page answers
Use the page’s plain-language explainer, then work through the preparation steps to gather the listed datapoints and build a draft. The page is designed to help you turn source information into a disclosure, not to replace your own judgement or internal review.
The page lists the datapoints to prepare, including offerings, value chain position, upstream and downstream activities, customer groups, period changes, sustainability link, industry classification, core internal activities, significance basis, the four product flags, and related revenue. Use that list as your collection checklist so you can see what is already available and what still needs to be sourced.
The page gives a practical preparation route and a set of datapoints, but it does not prescribe a formal methodology. In practice, use the page to align the scope of the disclosure with the business information you can evidence, then document how you treated any period changes, classifications, and revenue links.
The page is set up for practitioner use, so ownership should sit with the people who can evidence each datapoint and explain it clearly. A sensible approach is to assign each item in the datapoint list to the most relevant internal owner and keep the evidence pack under one coordinated review.
The page includes an evidence pack with five items and also gives six assurance claims to verify. Use those together to assemble a file that shows the claim, the risk if it is wrong, and the evidence supporting it, so a reviewer can trace the disclosure back to source material.
The page has a section on common reporting gaps and mistakes, which is there to help you spot weak points before sign-off. Use it as a pre-submission check against your draft, especially where the disclosure depends on classification, revenue linkage, or period changes.
The Download Centre includes a Prep & Assurance workbook in .xlsx format. Use it to organise the datapoints, track evidence, and move from source information to a draft disclosure in a structured way.
The Download Centre also provides a printable Library Card in .pdf format. It is there as a practical companion to the workbook, so you can keep the key points, checks, and drafting prompts to hand while preparing the disclosure.
The page includes a draft-output section with visualisation ideas, narrative starters, and a content-index line. Use those prompts to convert your collected data into a first draft, then check it against the evidence pack and the common gaps list.
Yes. It includes a 'From company reports' table that links to real published reports at the pages where the topic is disclosed, and it also shows synthetic illustrative examples. Use the real-report links for reference and the synthetic example to see how a disclosure can be structured.
Get your SBM-1 tools — free
Your preparation tools are free for LRA Community members and students. Register once (it's free) and your download starts right away — plus the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.
You're in — your download is starting
Your file is downloading now. Your Community Cabinet — with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant — is ready too.
Open your Cabinet →