Disclosure LibraryPractitioner guidance for every reporting disclosure
Home Disclosure Library GRI GRI 305 GRI 305-6
GRI 305: Emissions · 2016
Disclosure GRI 305-6

Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS)

Practical guidance for preparing this disclosure. Use this card to identify datapoints, verify claims and organise supporting evidence. For exact requirements, always refer to the official GRI source.

Dr Ross Kurinko, GRI Certified Trainer
Reviewed by Dr Ross Kurinko · GRI Certified Trainer LRA educational guidance · Not issued or endorsed by GRI
To prepare this disclosure
Disclosure focus

This disclosure asks an organisation to report how much ozone-depleting substance it releases to the atmosphere from its activities during the reporting period. In practice, the focus is on the organisation’s own emissions, expressed as a quantity, rather than on policies or intentions.

The practical question is whether the figure covers the organisation’s full operations or only selected sites, and whether the reporting boundary is applied consistently. If emissions occur in more than one part of the business, the organisation should make clear what is included so the reported number reflects the intended scope.

This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official GRI source.

Before you start

A quick mental checklist before you prepare this disclosure — tick each as you settle it.

Preparation

Key datapoints to prepare

Datapoint What to capture Evidence hint Owner
Gross ODS output The total amount of ozone-depleting substance made in the period before any deductions are taken off. Production logs, batch records, plant output reports, and period-end inventory or mass-balance workings. Operations / EHS
Destroyed ODS amount The quantity of ozone-depleting substance sent through approved destruction processes in the reporting period. Destruction certificates, contractor reports, waste transfer records, and treatment facility confirmations. EHS / Waste management
Feedstock ODS amount The amount of ozone-depleting substance used as an input material rather than released or sold as product. Process input records, material balance schedules, procurement and production records showing feedstock use. Operations / Production
Reused ODS flag Whether recycled or reused ozone-depleting substance has been left out of the reported amount, and the basis for that exclusion. Method note, inventory movement records, recycling logs, and any internal exclusion memo. EHS / Reporting
ODS production total The total ozone-depleting substance produced in the period, using the organisation’s defined production boundary. Manufacturing output reports, plant registers, and period production summaries. Operations / Production
ODS imports total The total ozone-depleting substance brought into the organisation or country in the reporting period, as defined for the report. Customs entries, receiving records, supplier invoices, and import logs. Supply chain / Trade compliance
ODS exports total The total ozone-depleting substance sent out of the organisation or country in the reporting period, as defined for the report. Export declarations, dispatch notes, shipping documents, and sales or transfer records. Supply chain / Trade compliance
ODS substances list The specific ozone-depleting substances that are included in the reported figures. Substance register, product specifications, SDS files, and the reporting scope note. EHS / Product stewardship
Factor source note The source used for the emission factor applied in the calculation, including the version or publication used. Calculation workbook, source document, methodology note, and any approved factor library extract. EHS / Reporting
Calculation method note A short description of how the ozone-depleting substance figure was worked out, including the steps and rules applied. Method statement, calculation workbook, assumptions log, and review sign-off. EHS / Reporting
+ Show GRI 305-6 sub-elements (LRA working checklist)

How to prepare it

1Set the reporting boundary first: confirm which operations, sites, and time period are in scope for the ozone-depleting substances figures, and keep that scope consistent across every figure and note you prepare.
2List the substances you are counting and define the business events that belong in each line item: what was produced, brought in, sent out, destroyed using approved methods, or used as feedstock. If you are excluding recycled or reused material, decide that up front and record the basis for that exclusion.
3Gather source records for each required number and statement. You will need evidence for production, imports, exports, destruction, feedstock use, the substances covered, the factor source used for conversion, and the calculation approach applied.
4Convert the activity data into the reported totals in the required ozone-depletion equivalent unit, and prepare the accompanying text on which substances were included, which factor source you relied on, and how the calculations were done.
5Document any exclusions, assumptions, or changes in method clearly, especially where recycled or reused material is left out. Make sure the explanation matches the figures and shows why the reported numbers are complete for the chosen scope.
6Check the draft against the official source before sign-off: confirm every required number and narrative item is present, the units and labels are correct, and the wording of your supporting notes still reflects the underlying records and method.
Request the data

Request the ODS activity data from EHS / Operations

Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.

What ODS-related quantities, exclusions, and calculation notes do we need for the reporting period, and what source evidence supports them?

Use your organisation’s own labels first, then map them to the reporting line. For example, ask for refrigerants, fire-suppression gases, process chemicals, customs/trade records, or environmental logs if those are the terms your teams already use. Keep the request in operational language and check the source material before sign-off.

Weak request

Please provide the GRI 305-6 data for ODS emissions, including production, imports, exports, destruction, feedstock use, exclusions, substances, emission factors, and methodology.

Why it fails: This uses framework language first, which can be hard for operational teams to recognise. It also bundles the ask in reporting terms rather than the records the owner actually holds, so the responder may not know which systems, substances, or evidence to pull. A better request starts from the team’s own operational labels and asks for the source records, calculation notes, and any exclusions in plain business language.

Better request

Please send the ODS figures your team holds for [reporting period] for [boundary / sites]: what was produced, brought in, sent out, destroyed, and used in process; whether any recycled or reused material was left out; which substances were included; how the numbers were converted; and the source records behind them. Use your normal site or inventory terms first, then add a short mapping note to the reporting line.

Formal email template
Subject: [Reporting period] ODS data request for [site / business unit]

Hi [name],

I’m pulling together the sustainability reporting pack for [reporting period] and need your help with the ODS-related activity data for [boundary / sites].

Please send a table covering:
- the substances your team tracks that fall within this topic
- quantities produced, imported, exported, destroyed, and used as feedstock, where applicable
- whether any recycled or reused material has been left out of the figures
- the calculation approach used, including the source for any conversion factors
- the source records or system extracts that support the numbers

Please use your team’s own terminology in the first instance, then add a short note showing how it maps to the reporting line. If anything is not available, please say so and explain the gap.

A possible LRA training template is attached below; adapt this to your organisation and check the official source before sign-off.

Thanks,
[preparer name]
Short Teams / Slack version
Hi [name] — could you send the ODS activity data for [reporting period] for [site / business unit]? Please include the quantities, any exclusions for recycled/reused material, the calculation method, and the source records. Use your team’s own terms first, then map them to the reporting line. Thanks.
Industry examples
Manufacturing

Context. A plant team tracks refrigerant losses, cylinder movements, and destruction certificates.

Adapted request. Please share the refrigerant and other ODS movement log for [reporting period] across [plant / site]. Include production, imports, exports, destruction, and any material used in process, plus the list of substances covered, the conversion method, and the certificates or system extracts behind the figures. Note whether any recycled or reused material was excluded.

Example response. The team returns a spreadsheet with columns for internal refrigerant name, movement type, quantity, converted amount, reporting unit, and evidence reference, plus scanned destruction certificates and a short note confirming that reused gas was excluded from the totals.

Chemicals / Process industry

Context. A process site records ODS-containing feedstock, trade movements, and destruction through compliance logs.

Adapted request. Please provide the ODS compliance extract for [reporting period] for [site / business unit]. We need the quantities produced, imported, exported, destroyed, and used as feedstock, the substances included, the calculation method, and the supporting trade or plant records. Please also confirm whether any recycled or reused material was left out.

Example response. The team sends a register showing each substance, movement category, mass, conversion note, and source document reference, together with customs entries, plant batch records, and a short methodology note explaining the factor source used for the conversion.

Draft your disclosure

Notes that turn data into a disclosure

LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.

Method note

State which ozone-depleting substances were included in the calculation, explain the basis used to turn the collected activity data into the reported figure, and name the source used for the emission factor or conversion factor.

Context note

Explain that the disclosure is intended to show the organisation’s ozone-depleting substance balance for the period, bringing together production, trade movements, destruction, feedstock use, and any excluded recycled or reused material.

Fluctuation statement

If the reported amount moved materially, link the change to the underlying drivers in the data set, such as higher or lower production, imports, exports, destruction, feedstock use, or a change in the substances included or calculation approach.

Content index entry
GRI 305-6 Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) — [location / page] / [notes]
Download Centre

Preparation tools & forms

Professional preparation tools for GRI 305-6 — free with an LRA Community membership. Register once (it's free) and every download unlocks, together with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.

Free · Community members
Assurance readiness

For each claim, check the evidence

ClaimRiskEvidence to check
I prepared the coverage figure from the records we held for the reporting period, using the same basis consistently across the disclosed operations.The assurer will probe whether the figure was built from complete source records, whether the period and boundary were applied consistently, and whether any sites or activities were left out without a documented reason.Data extracts used to build the figure; boundary and period notes; consolidation or inclusion/exclusion memo; source-system reports; reconciliation between the working file and the final published number.
I separated out the amount linked to destruction through approved treatment routes, and kept the working papers showing how that portion was identified.The assurer will check whether the classification into this category was justified, whether the treatment route was actually approved, and whether the same quantity appears elsewhere in the calculation.Process logs; destruction certificates or contractor statements; internal classification rules; calculation workbook; cross-check showing no double counting with other categories.
I isolated the quantity used as an input to another process, and retained the evidence showing why it was treated that way.The assurer will test whether the material really went into another process, whether the supporting documents are specific enough, and whether the amount was measured on a consistent basis.Purchase, transfer or process records; receiving notes; production or batch records; internal review notes; calculation file linking the quantity to the final disclosure.
I excluded material that had already been recovered for further use or recycling, and documented the basis for leaving it out of the figure.The assurer will look for whether the exclusion was applied correctly, whether the material was genuinely recovered rather than merely handled differently, and whether the exclusion was applied consistently across the dataset.Recycling or reuse records; supplier or contractor confirmations; exclusion criteria; exception log; reconciliation between gross and reported amounts.
I compiled the production total from operational records and kept the source files that support the number we published.The assurer will probe whether the production data is complete, whether the units and conversions are correct, and whether the total can be traced back to original records.Production logs; inventory or batch records; system exports; unit-conversion workings; management review sign-off; traceability from source data to final figure.
I built the import total from customs, procurement, or receiving records, and checked that the supporting evidence matched the period reported.The assurer will test whether all relevant inbound movements were captured, whether the period cut-off was applied properly, and whether the evidence supports the stated quantity.Import declarations; supplier invoices; goods-received notes; customs or logistics records; period-end cut-off review; reconciliation to the reported total.

Evidence pack to prepare

Common reporting gaps

Figures are stated without the supporting narrative, or narrative without figures.Scope is inconsistent between the text and the numbers.The reporting boundary is left undefined.Material changes since the previous period are not disclosed.Estimates and measured values are not distinguished.Source records for the figures are not identified.
Common gaps

Mistakes to avoid when collecting the data

Wrong data owner
The team asks a central sustainability contact instead of the operational person who holds the plant, trading, or inventory records for the ODS figures.
Using framework terms too early
People request data in reporting language rather than the business’s own terms, so the source team cannot map the ask to their records.
No clear boundary
The collection brief does not say which sites, activities, or legal entities are in scope, so different teams pull different populations.
Wrong period basis
The request does not pin down the exact reporting window or cut-off date, so some records are taken from the wrong month or year.
Mixed counting basis
One dataset is built from tonnes, another from converted tonnes of CFC-11e, and the two are merged without a consistent basis.
Source labels lost
Original file names, ledger codes, or system tags are stripped out during consolidation, making it hard to trace each number back to its source.
Separate populations merged
Production, imports, exports, destruction, and feedstock use are rolled into one total even though they need to stay distinct for collection.
Missing evidence trail
The pack contains numbers but not the supporting extracts, version history, or sign-off record needed to show where the data came from.
Exclusion not checked
The team forgets to confirm whether recycled or reused material should be left out, so the dataset may include items that should have been excluded.

Where judgement is often needed

Set the group boundary for bought or sold sites
If a site is added or leaves during the year, state whether its ODS figures are counted from the transfer date or for the full year, and explain the basis used.
Choose one substance list and stick to it
Where different countries or business units use different names or classifications, define the substances you have included, say how you mapped local labels to your reporting list, and note any exclusions.
Decide how to treat material at the edge of the reporting scope
For shared plants, joint ventures, leased equipment or outsourced operations, explain whether the ODS is counted in your figures and why that treatment was chosen.
Explain whether figures come from meters, records or estimates
If direct measurement is not available for all items, disclose which numbers are measured and which are estimated, plus the method used to fill gaps.
State the timing basis for imports, exports and production
Make clear whether you used shipment date, customs date, invoice date or another cut-off, and apply the same timing rule consistently across the year.
Show how you handled recycled or reused material
If you exclude recycled or reused ODS from the totals, say so clearly and describe the rule used to separate it from other material.
Be explicit about the conversion source
Name the factor set or calculation basis used to turn different substances into the common unit, and explain any change from prior periods.
Round in a way that does not distort the totals
If you round site-level or substance-level numbers, state the rounding rule and check that the rounded parts still reconcile to the reported total.
Aggregate where detail would expose sensitive operational data
If you combine small-country or small-site figures to avoid revealing sensitive information, explain the aggregation approach and keep the combined total traceable to source records.
Examples

Illustrative examples

Synthetic, written by LRA — not from a company report, not text from any standard.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — Industrial gases

*Synthetic illustration only.* We report our ozone-depleting substances using the same boundary as our production and trade records, and we explain the calculation basis we used. In this example, our mix covers CFC-11, CFC-12 and HCFC-22; we produced 120 tonnes before any deductions, imported 35 tonnes, exported 18 tonnes, used 22 tonnes as process input, and sent 14 tonnes to approved destruction, while 6 tonnes were excluded because they were recovered for recycling or reuse. Our emission factors came from a recognised industry protocol, and the quantities were derived from mass-balance records adjusted for the approved destruction route and the recycled/reused exclusion.

Illustrative only; figures are internally consistent and show how to describe the substances covered, the production and trade flows, the amount used as feedstock, the amount destroyed through approved methods, the recycled/reused exclusion, and the calculation basis with its emission-factor source.

Illustrative (synthetic) example — Refrigeration equipment manufacturing

*Synthetic illustration only.* We disclose the ozone-depleting substances in scope for our reporting period, covering HCFC-141b, HCFC-142b and CFC-113, and we set out the method used to calculate the figures. In this example, we made 80 tonnes before deductions, brought in 24 tonnes, shipped out 9 tonnes, used 16 tonnes as feedstock, and had 11 tonnes destroyed by an approved technology; 4 tonnes were left out because they were recovered for recycling or reuse. The emission factors were taken from a national technical guidance source, and the totals were built from purchase, sales and treatment records reconciled through a mass-balance approach.

Illustrative only; figures are internally consistent and show how to describe the substances covered, the production and trade flows, the amount used as feedstock, the amount destroyed through approved methods, the recycled/reused exclusion, and the calculation basis with its emission-factor source.

Company reports

How companies report GRI 305-6

Real reports where this topic is disclosed. These are report practice, not exact disclosure templates to copy.

Grifols, S.A.
Pharmaceuticals / Biotech / Life Sciences · Spain · 2024
Open report →
Grifols, S.A.'s 2024 Integrated and Sustainability Annual Report provides numeric data related to plasma fractionation processes and product traceability technologies on pages 257 and 241 respectively, including details on fibrinogen and the use of technologies to maintain supply chain traceability (p.257, p.241). The report also includes information on total water consumption measured in cubic meters per net revenue on page 238. However, several expected numeric values and narrative items related to other sustainability metrics are not found or remain unclear in the report.
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Semiconductors · Taiwan · 2024
Open report →
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.'s 2024 CSR Report provides specific data on air emissions control, including nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides, referenced on page 261. The report also details a financial investment of approximately USD 1.37 million in resource efficiency initiatives (p.143) and mentions efforts to improve energy utilisation through smart system controls (p.98), though no headline numeric value is provided there. However, several numeric values and narrative items related to sustainability disclosures are not found or remain unclear in the report.
Zydus Wellness Limited
Food Production — Agricultural · India · 2025
Open report →
Zydus Wellness Limited’s Integrated Annual Report 2024-25 provides specific numeric data on waste generation, reporting a total of 1,712 units with a waste intensity per rupee figure on page 141, and details on waste management practices including reuse, recycling, and safe disposal on page 128. The report also mentions production capacity expansion from 7 to 60 metric tons per day on page 86, indicating scalability related to sustainability efforts. However, some numeric values and narrative details related to waste or sustainability disclosures are missing or unclear, with no quotable evidence found for certain data points and methodology explanations.
✓ LRA AI Assistant · Human-in-the-loop
Dr Ross Kurinko
Ask Study Studio AI assistant about this disclosure
Get a practical answer for your reporting context. Your first answer is free — create a free account to continue the conversation.
TryHow do I prepare GRI 305-6?What data do I need to collect?Where can I see a real-report example?What mistakes should I avoid?
1 free answer
Check your understanding

Scenarios to work through

A facilities team finds 2.4 t CFC-11e of refrigerant losses from maintenance, and 0.6 t CFC-11e was captured and sent for approved destruction. The same year, 0.3 t CFC-11e was recovered and sent back into use within the site.

QHow should the preparer decide what to include in the ODS figures, and what should be left out?
Reveal model answer →

A chemical site handled three ozone-depleting substances during the year: 1.8 t CFC-11e produced on site, 0.9 t CFC-11e imported, and 0.4 t CFC-11e exported. The team is unsure whether to report only the net balance.

QWhat set of numbers should the preparer present for this item?
Reveal model answer →

The environmental manager has a list of refrigerants and solvents used in the year, but one of them is a recycled gas returned to the process after recovery. The draft note currently includes every substance in the total without explanation.

QWhat should the preparer check before finalising the disclosure?
Reveal model answer →

A reporting team has calculated 5.2 t CFC-11e of ODS produced before deductions, 1.1 t CFC-11e destroyed, and 0.7 t CFC-11e used as feedstock. They have the totals, but the working papers only say “industry standard factors” and “internal estimate method.”

QWhat additional information should the preparer make sure is disclosed alongside the numbers?
Reveal model answer →
Framework references

Related framework references

How this disclosure maps across the major reporting frameworks.

GRI
GRI 305-6
within GRI 305: Emissions
Open official source →
Primary
Related & explore
FAQ

Questions this page answers

How do I prepare GRI 305-6 emissions data for this disclosure page in practice?+
What data do I need to collect for GRI 305-6 on this page?+
How should I set the scope and calculation approach for the GRI 305-6 workbook?+
Who should own the GRI 305-6 data collection and sign-off?+
What evidence do I need to make GRI 305-6 assurance-ready?+
What are the common mistakes to avoid when drafting GRI 305-6 emissions disclosure?+
How do I use the GRI 305-6 Prep & Assurance workbook and printable Library Card?+
Can I use the synthetic example on the GRI 305-6 page to draft my own disclosure?+
How can I turn the GRI 305-6 data into a draft narrative and content index line?+
Can I reuse GRI 305-6 data for ESRS E1 (Climate Change)?+
More questions this page can help with