This disclosure asks an organisation to report how much ozone-depleting substance it releases to the atmosphere from its activities during the reporting period. In practice, the focus is on the organisation’s own emissions, expressed as a quantity, rather than on policies or intentions.
The practical question is whether the figure covers the organisation’s full operations or only selected sites, and whether the reporting boundary is applied consistently. If emissions occur in more than one part of the business, the organisation should make clear what is included so the reported number reflects the intended scope.
This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official GRI source.
A quick mental checklist before you prepare this disclosure — tick each as you settle it.
Key datapoints to prepare
How to prepare it
Request the ODS activity data from EHS / Operations
Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.
Use your organisation’s own labels first, then map them to the reporting line. For example, ask for refrigerants, fire-suppression gases, process chemicals, customs/trade records, or environmental logs if those are the terms your teams already use. Keep the request in operational language and check the source material before sign-off.
Please provide the GRI 305-6 data for ODS emissions, including production, imports, exports, destruction, feedstock use, exclusions, substances, emission factors, and methodology.
Why it fails: This uses framework language first, which can be hard for operational teams to recognise. It also bundles the ask in reporting terms rather than the records the owner actually holds, so the responder may not know which systems, substances, or evidence to pull. A better request starts from the team’s own operational labels and asks for the source records, calculation notes, and any exclusions in plain business language.
Please send the ODS figures your team holds for [reporting period] for [boundary / sites]: what was produced, brought in, sent out, destroyed, and used in process; whether any recycled or reused material was left out; which substances were included; how the numbers were converted; and the source records behind them. Use your normal site or inventory terms first, then add a short mapping note to the reporting line.
Notes that turn data into a disclosure
LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.
State which ozone-depleting substances were included in the calculation, explain the basis used to turn the collected activity data into the reported figure, and name the source used for the emission factor or conversion factor.
Explain that the disclosure is intended to show the organisation’s ozone-depleting substance balance for the period, bringing together production, trade movements, destruction, feedstock use, and any excluded recycled or reused material.
If the reported amount moved materially, link the change to the underlying drivers in the data set, such as higher or lower production, imports, exports, destruction, feedstock use, or a change in the substances included or calculation approach.
Preparation tools & forms
Professional preparation tools for GRI 305-6 — free with an LRA Community membership. Register once (it's free) and every download unlocks, together with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.
For each claim, check the evidence
Evidence pack to prepare
Common reporting gaps
Mistakes to avoid when collecting the data
Where judgement is often needed
Illustrative examples
Synthetic, written by LRA — not from a company report, not text from any standard.
*Synthetic illustration only.* We report our ozone-depleting substances using the same boundary as our production and trade records, and we explain the calculation basis we used. In this example, our mix covers CFC-11, CFC-12 and HCFC-22; we produced 120 tonnes before any deductions, imported 35 tonnes, exported 18 tonnes, used 22 tonnes as process input, and sent 14 tonnes to approved destruction, while 6 tonnes were excluded because they were recovered for recycling or reuse. Our emission factors came from a recognised industry protocol, and the quantities were derived from mass-balance records adjusted for the approved destruction route and the recycled/reused exclusion.
Illustrative only; figures are internally consistent and show how to describe the substances covered, the production and trade flows, the amount used as feedstock, the amount destroyed through approved methods, the recycled/reused exclusion, and the calculation basis with its emission-factor source.
*Synthetic illustration only.* We disclose the ozone-depleting substances in scope for our reporting period, covering HCFC-141b, HCFC-142b and CFC-113, and we set out the method used to calculate the figures. In this example, we made 80 tonnes before deductions, brought in 24 tonnes, shipped out 9 tonnes, used 16 tonnes as feedstock, and had 11 tonnes destroyed by an approved technology; 4 tonnes were left out because they were recovered for recycling or reuse. The emission factors were taken from a national technical guidance source, and the totals were built from purchase, sales and treatment records reconciled through a mass-balance approach.
Illustrative only; figures are internally consistent and show how to describe the substances covered, the production and trade flows, the amount used as feedstock, the amount destroyed through approved methods, the recycled/reused exclusion, and the calculation basis with its emission-factor source.
How companies report GRI 305-6
Real reports where this topic is disclosed. These are report practice, not exact disclosure templates to copy.

Scenarios to work through
A facilities team finds 2.4 t CFC-11e of refrigerant losses from maintenance, and 0.6 t CFC-11e was captured and sent for approved destruction. The same year, 0.3 t CFC-11e was recovered and sent back into use within the site.
A chemical site handled three ozone-depleting substances during the year: 1.8 t CFC-11e produced on site, 0.9 t CFC-11e imported, and 0.4 t CFC-11e exported. The team is unsure whether to report only the net balance.
The environmental manager has a list of refrigerants and solvents used in the year, but one of them is a recycled gas returned to the process after recovery. The draft note currently includes every substance in the total without explanation.
A reporting team has calculated 5.2 t CFC-11e of ODS produced before deductions, 1.1 t CFC-11e destroyed, and 0.7 t CFC-11e used as feedstock. They have the totals, but the working papers only say “industry standard factors” and “internal estimate method.”
Related framework references
How this disclosure maps across the major reporting frameworks.
Questions this page answers
Use the page’s step-by-step preparation section to work through the disclosure, then gather the listed datapoints and supporting notes before drafting. The page is designed to help you move from raw data to a disclosure-ready output, with an evidence pack and common gaps to check along the way.
The page lists the datapoints to prepare: gross ODS output, destroyed ODS amount, feedstock ODS amount, reused ODS flag, ODS production total, ODS imports total, ODS exports total, ODS substances list, factor source note, and calculation method note. Use that list as your collection checklist so you can build the disclosure and the evidence pack from the same source set.
The page tells you to capture a calculation method note and a factor source note, so the practical task is to document how the numbers were derived and what sources were used. Keep the scope aligned to the datapoints on the page and make sure the method is clear enough for review and assurance.
The page is aimed at sustainability/ESG managers, HR or data owners, and assurance reviewers, so ownership should sit with the people who can supply, explain, and evidence the figures. In practice, assign the datapoints and notes to named owners early so the evidence pack and draft can be checked before sign-off.
The page includes an evidence pack with five items and six assurance claims to verify, each framed around a claim, risk, and evidence check. Use those sections to assemble support for the figures, the method, and the source notes before the disclosure is reviewed.
The page has a section on common reporting gaps and mistakes, so it is meant to help you spot issues before you finalise the draft. A practical use is to compare your numbers, notes, and evidence against that list and correct any missing or inconsistent items early.
The Download Centre provides a Prep & Assurance workbook in .xlsx format and a printable Library Card in .pdf format. Use the workbook to organise the datapoints, method notes, and evidence, and use the Library Card as a quick reference while preparing the disclosure.
Yes, the page includes synthetic illustrative example disclosures, including a quantitative table, to show how the information can be presented. Treat it as a format guide only and replace it with your own internally consistent data and notes.
The page includes draft-output support with visualisation ideas, narrative starters, and a GRI content-index line. Use those prompts to turn the collected datapoints and method notes into a first draft, then check it against the evidence pack and the common gaps list.
The page says the closest ESRS correspondence is ESRS E1 (Climate Change), so the data may be reusable across the two reporting exercises. Use the page as a practical bridge, but do not assume the requirements are identical.
Get your GRI 305-6 tools — free
Your preparation tools are free for LRA Community members and students. Register once (it's free) and your download starts right away — plus the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.
You're in — your download is starting
Your file is downloading now. Your Community Cabinet — with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant — is ready too.
Open your Cabinet →