This disclosure asks an organisation to explain how it pays its suppliers and other business partners in practice. The focus is on whether payment terms are clear, consistently applied and managed responsibly, including how quickly invoices are settled and whether there are any patterns of late payment, disputed payments or other issues that could affect counterparties’ cash flow.
In practical terms, the reporting should cover the organisation’s real payment behaviour across the business, not just a few well-run sites or a single flagship operation. The useful question is whether payment practices are embedded across relevant operations and purchasing arrangements, and whether the organisation can describe any significant differences by geography, business unit or supplier type.
This LRA educational guidance supports disclosure preparation. For the exact requirements, always refer to the official EFRAG source.
A quick mental checklist before you prepare this disclosure — tick each as you settle it.
Key datapoints to prepare
How to prepare it
Request payment-practice data from Accounts Payable
Translate the disclosure into an internal business question — then adapt it to your organisation's own language.
Use your organisation’s own labels first, then map them to the reporting fields. For example, if you talk about suppliers, vendors, invoices, settlement runs, or small-business terms internally, keep that language in the request and only translate it afterwards for reporting.
Please provide the ESRS G1-6 payment practices metrics for the reporting period.
Why it fails: This uses framework language only, so the owner may not know which internal reports, definitions, or systems to pull from. It also leaves out the boundary, timing basis, category labels, and supporting evidence needed to check the figures.
Please pull the AP report for [reporting period] covering [entity / business unit] and send the usual supplier payment timing, any separate timing for smaller suppliers, the share of invoices paid within terms, and the number of late-payment cases. Include the source system, the definitions you use internally, and any exceptions or manual overrides, plus the supporting extract.
Notes that turn data into a disclosure
LRA training templates — adapt them to your organisation, and check the official source before sign-off.
We have used the payment terms applied in our contracts, including any separate arrangements for smaller suppliers, and measured punctuality using the share of invoices settled by the agreed date, with reported cases counted separately.
These figures show how quickly we ask suppliers to wait for payment, how often we meet those deadlines in practice, and how many payment-related issues were recorded during the period.
If the figures move from one period to the next, we will explain whether that reflects changes in contract terms, supplier mix, payment processes, or the number of reported cases.
Preparation tools & forms
Professional preparation tools for G1-6 — free with an LRA Community membership. Register once (it's free) and every download unlocks, together with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.
For each claim, check the evidence
Evidence pack to prepare
Common reporting gaps
Mistakes to avoid when collecting the data
Where judgement is often needed
Illustrative examples
Synthetic, written by LRA — not from a company report, not text from any standard.
: we report how our supplier invoices are handled, including the standard payment window we use, whether smaller suppliers receive different terms, the share settled within the agreed date, and the count of late-payment cases. This is an illustrative disclosure for practitioner review, not a real company report.
Shows how to present supplier-payment practices in plain language, with a clear split between standard terms, SME-specific terms, punctual settlement performance, and the number of late-payment cases.
: we summarise our supplier-payment practice by showing the usual time allowed for payment, whether we apply a separate arrangement for smaller businesses, the proportion paid on time, and how many late-settlement cases we recorded. This is an illustrative disclosure for practitioner review, not a real company report.
Shows a second way to disclose the same payment information, using a different sector and different figures while keeping the same four data points.
How companies report G1-6 in practice
Real reports where this topic is disclosed. These are report practice, not exact disclosure templates to copy.

Scenarios to work through
A group has one standard supplier contract for larger vendors, but its procurement team also uses a shorter payment schedule for small and medium suppliers. The finance team can pull the usual settlement period from the contract system, but the SME arrangement sits in a separate policy note.
At year-end, the accounts payable team has a dashboard showing that 87 out of 100 supplier invoices were settled by the agreed date. However, 12 of the late items were disputed invoices that were paused while the issue was resolved, and one was paid late because of a bank processing error.
A preparer is compiling the narrative and sees 14 late-payment incidents in the ledger. Eight relate to invoices from one supplier, three are from another, and the rest are spread across smaller vendors. The team is unsure whether to report the total count only or also break it down further.
The sustainability team has drafted a note saying the company pays suppliers within 45 days on average, but the finance system shows that the contractual terms are 30 days for most suppliers and 60 days for a subset of strategic partners. The draft also mentions that SMEs are on 30-day terms.
Related framework references
How this disclosure maps across the major reporting frameworks.
Questions this page answers
The page says to prepare four datapoints: standard payment period, small supplier terms, invoices paid on time, and late payment cases. Use the step-by-step preparation section to turn those into a draft and check the evidence pack before you finalise anything.
Use the page’s plain-language explainer and preparation steps to decide what sits inside the disclosure, then align the scope to the four listed datapoints. The page does not give a formal scoping rule, so you should document your own approach clearly in the workbook and evidence pack.
The page is designed for sustainability/ESG managers, HR or data owners, and assurance reviewers, so ownership should sit with the people who can source and explain the payment data. The workbook and evidence pack are there to help you assign responsibilities and keep the trail clear.
The page includes an evidence pack with five items and five assurance claims to verify, each framed around claim, risk, and evidence. Use those items to build a file that shows where the numbers came from and how you checked them.
The page lists common reporting gaps and mistakes, so it is useful for checking whether your draft is missing a datapoint, using unclear wording, or lacking support. Review that section before you turn the data into a final narrative.
The Download Centre includes a Prep & Assurance workbook in .xlsx format, which is meant to help you prepare the disclosure and organise assurance-ready evidence. Use it alongside the step-by-step preparation section and the evidence pack.
The page provides narrative starters in the draft-output section, so you can turn the collected data into a short written disclosure without starting from scratch. It also suggests visualisation ideas and a content-index line to help structure the draft.
Yes, but only as an illustrative example: the page says the example disclosures are synthetic. Use them to see how the data table and narrative might look, then replace everything with your own company data and evidence.
The page has a 'From company reports' table that links to real published reports at the pages where the topic is disclosed. Use it to see how others present the topic, but do not treat it as a formal mapping or a required format.
It gives you five assurance claims to verify, a five-item evidence pack, and a workbook to organise the preparation. Together these are meant to help you check the claim, identify the risk, and keep the evidence in one place.
Use the draft-output section: it includes visualisation ideas, narrative starters, and a content-index line. That lets you move from the four datapoints to a first draft without having to design the structure yourself.
Get your G1-6 tools — free
Your preparation tools are free for LRA Community members and students. Register once (it's free) and your download starts right away — plus the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant.
You're in — your download is starting
Your file is downloading now. Your Community Cabinet — with the Disclosure Library, templates and the LRA AI-assistant — is ready too.
Open your Cabinet →